Photosynthesis Thread

File: 1137-4771.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

Looks underexposed on here for some reason so I've bumped it up a tad.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-4482.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

Smallin Civil War Cavern.

I may actually make a separate set for caves, I've shot so many of them in Missouri while I was waiting to get this truck.

On the rock on the right are inscriptions carved from Osage indians 1000 years ago, to Civil War soldiers to a couple of hicks down the street proclaiming their love for one another. It's worth a stop if you are nearby.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2916588
First one looked better actually.

File: 1137-4705.jpg (601KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 1440x954px

Spherochromaticism be damned, this 85 1.8 Nikkor is pretty cool. It is almost completely distortion free. Really liking the Holy Trinity.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-4621.jpg (1MB, 1440x778px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x778px

In Berkeley on 80. Right after I shot this he caught a ride.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-4565.jpg (828KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

828KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-4891.jpg (1MB, 1066x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1066x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1472927610580.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

>>2916584
>>2916588

fixed that for you

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1440
Image Height	954
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:03 20:07:45
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1440
Image Height	954

File: Rockwell Celly.jpg (183KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1920x1080px

>>2916588

Ken Rockwell approved

>>2916584

is this thread just a personal blog?

get an instagram m9

File: 1137-4530.jpg (768KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2916588
Badly framed, looks like a smartphone picture.
>>2916591
It's shit, nothing to see here.
>>2916598
Could be OK, but it's fucking 80% black. Also lol bokeh, couldn(t you stop down?
>>2916601
Ultra shit framing and under-exposed. Atrocious.
>>2916607
Again, badly framed, under-exposed and too much sky.
>Never forget, muh dead soldiers fighting for the petrol I'm burning right now
Hilarious.
>>2916611
Badly composed again, but the exposure is ok. Could have been an ok picture there.
>>2916618
This is a bit interesting, but fucking learn to expose and stop down. Yet again the framing is terrible.

Well, at-least you're trying to post new pictures, but you don't seems to be able to progress in any way. You're a fucking meme, stick to swamp photography in medium format.

>>2916618
Hey Sugar,

Have you bought a MAGA hat yet?

File: IMG_1322.jpg (2MB, 3456x2304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3456x2304px

>>2916601
lol

Reminds me of these people.
They thought I was going to give them a ride since I rolled my window down despite me speeding up.
It's blurry because I was using a manual lens and they were closer than I expected.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Firmware Version	Firmware 1.0.3
Owner Name	unknown
Serial Number	0420209152
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:26 15:26:24
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/inf
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3456
Image Height	2304
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Av-Priority
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Continuous
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Cloudy
Exposure Compensation	2
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Camera Actuations	-1723531222
Color Matrix	0

Page 7? I think not.

File: 1137-5043.jpg (376KB, 1440x426px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1440x426px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2916584


OFFICIAL THREAD MUSIC CHANGE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCeVP9WuA6I
PHANTOM 309 DRIVIN MAFUCKA

Nice photos

>>2917811

uwot m8.

File: 1137-4924-2.jpg (774KB, 1440x600px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 1440x600px

>>2917811

are ya havin a giggle m8

>>2917809

kekkest of keks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=385ymk1PMm4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2917848
>sugar posts finally a decent shot

what the fuck.

correct the blue cast and you have a winner, you colorblind cuck.

Are you legit colorblind or do you just not understand how colors are supposed to work?

>>2917865
are you actually this retarded or do you not understand how a monitor works?

Your colors are fucking disgusting. You make Rockwell proud.

>>2917848

Too bad about the fake and gay crop.

>>2916621
>all this meaningless jargon used to try and make yourself seem more knowledgeable.

File: 1137-4924.jpg (956KB, 1440x861px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 1440x861px

>>2918286

Original crop

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2918285
>>2917885
>>2918005
>>2917865

damn i even turned the blue down a tad

Im doing all these on a ThinkPad Edge on the road guys lol they aren't known for their monitors

>>2917848
>are ya havin a giggle m8
no

*bumps unironically*

>>2916663
Lmao hipsters who choose to be homeless, I have seen them before it always amuses me

File: Untitled-1.jpg (201KB, 999x662px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 999x662px

>>2916598
I found the orange above the guy's head distracting.

File: 1137-4901.jpg (915KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2920314
Foreground is underexposed, bring up the shadows a bit more.

>>2920314

lol

Its official: Sugar can't learn. I remember in T2, they actually activated a switch that put the terminator in learning mode, is there something akin for good ole Sugar?

>>2920314
>going out of your way to not blow any highlights
>produce this turd

they arent rigid rules, you know?

>>2920321

Hey now I learned how to drive a full-size big rig lol give credit where it is due

File: 1137-4901.jpg (962KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

962KB, 1440x954px

>>2920315

done

>>2920325

Nigga those highlights are not blown even on my shitty screen fuck off with your cancerous fake C&C faggot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-4881.jpg (531KB, 1440x769px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1440x769px

here have some sleep-deprived happy rainbows fuckers.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2920329
A tad bit more.

>>2920329
>Sugar in charge of reading comprehension

its like trying to reason with a sea sponge.

keep on keeping, though.

File: 1470501851005.jpg (23KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 300x300px

>>2920329
>today I learned Sugar is also an illiterate cunt
>today was a good day

>>2920330
this would have been the only good one in the thread, but again you're unable to correctly expose. you really need to buy a book about exposure and read your manual...

>>2920489

Nah, it looks good. I mean, I hate sugar more than probably anyone here, but his exposure is fine.

CONGRATULATIONS SUGAR!
With this selection of photos you have overtaken isi in quality of photographs.
Your snaps are sharp and the processing works, if a little conde naste.

File: goddamn.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

>>2916584

Why would all your pics of a sunny and bright day be processed to look like there is something somber and heavy over the scene, dark ugly colors, an oversaturated mess of puke like tones with squashed highlights and oppresive shadows, an overall contrived scene. If that is how you experience a rather sunny day, im really worried. Are you depressed? Looks like an overcompensation a depressive would do.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:09 04:10:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1440
Image Height	954

File: 1471863961594.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>2920565

>>2920580
Not bait, these show better composition than sugars managed before, and his processing, whilst a bit tacky isn't fucking awful, like isi's.

>>2920583
(You)

File: 1137-5143.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2920872
It's genuinely awful. Even a phone picture would be better. Are you lifting full sliders the shadows in Lr after shooting in broad daylight?

File: 1137-5143.jpg (921KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

921KB, 1440x954px

>>2920988

No was just trying to bump the fill a tad more Florida shadows suck ass

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2921002
>Florida shadows suck ass

Its always someone or something elses fault, right?

Grow up, manchild.

>>2921005

You cannot disprove the well-known fact that Florida light is harsh this time of year, regardless of whether or not I suck balls at shooting in it

>>2921018
Thank god you can't be blamed because you're just a beginner with an entry level camera, and not a long-time tripfag with many undusted gears.

>>2920872
>>2921002
>bump the fill a tad more
That's why you lifted the shadows full force like some wannabe HDR freak?

>>2921035

I was doing my best isi impersonation.

>>2916611
The light in this is nice but you did nothing with it.

>>2916660
Sugar is a vegan cuck with no brain.
I'm sure he's #WithHer and probably prides himself of it.

>>2921047

They both suck.

I'm the most unvegan vegan you will probably ever meet. Pro-gun, anti-Feminist, Constitutionalist, you can actually eat a steak in front of me and I won't care. Nothing offends me. I'm actually a total dick in person. Think Q from Star Trek.

everything about these is bad, the processing, subject matter and composition are each somehow worse than the other. it's not normal for someone who's been doing this as long as you to have similar results to that of a complete beginner. seriously consider finding a new hobby, you're seriously wasting your time with this

>>2921054
>you can actually eat a steak in front of me and I won't care.

The fact that you think that's worth pointing out only proves what a sack of shit you are.
Q was funny and self aware. You're neither.

>>2921054
>I'm actually a total dick in person
As opposed to your Internet persona?

>>2921054

Just wondering: What's your reason for being vegan, if you even have one?

>>2921116
Because he's a fat, greasy cunt and thinks telling people he's vegan will magically help him lose weight and get laid.

He's as much a vegan as he is a "photographer", kek

>>2921420

Kek'd, because I pictured Sugar dropping his trip just to shit all over himself.

File: 1137-004.jpg (744KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 1200x798px

>>2921116
>>2921116

Animal rights. Also if you knew what was in your food you would never eat it. Our food is banned in a multitude of countries and you're all being poisoned through chemicals cleverly disguised as food. I'm not going to hijack my thread to get on a pedestal but it's a personal decision to not harm other living creatures and to try to live more clean.

I'm not judgemental though, I have meat-eating friends and we still hang out. Hell one of my friends had no idea I was vegan until we went out for grub. No one likes people who shit all over you for your personal beliefs and though I may troll the everloving shit out of some of you on this board it's all in fun because I know you fags can take it lol

>>2921428

Nigga please I don't have to drop my trip to shit all over myself lololol I say what I think with that trip on and if you don't like it then here's a quarter call someone who gives a fuck lol

have some Kodachrome for your trouble.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5001.jpg (1MB, 1440x1003px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1003px

Moar trains

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2922604
>Animal rights.

This guy lost it already.

>>2922621

You lost the game.

>>2922621

Not really. Basically just an extension of the right to life.

So many things I could say right now, but wrong board.

>>2922604
>but it's a personal decision to not harm other living creatures

a first step would be to stop posting your shitty pictures here then

>>2922626
What a trollman!

Are the premature balding, the shapeless body, the creepy presence, the extreme bad luck, and the total lack of talent a ruse too?

>>2922628

Wew lad.

>>2922604
>to not harm other living creatures
nigger
those creatures are just going to get slaughtered and fed to someone else

vegans are retarded

>chemicals cleverly disguised as food
are all vegans tinfoil hat men, too?

File: 1137-5213.jpg (822KB, 954x1440px) Image search: [Google]

822KB, 954x1440px

>>2922665
>>2922656
>>2922649

ad hominem

Iowa 80 Truckstop is titties though. even if you aren't a trucker, it's worth a stop just for the trucker museum. Lots of classics, they have two immaculate bullnose Kenworth cabovers from the 50's in the back.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5227.jpg (756KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

756KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5530.jpg (856KB, 954x1440px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 954x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2924166

Go away, fat diabeetus cuckold.

>>2920330
>2920330
fernley, nv?

>>2924185
>a romance quickly developed between us
fucking kek

>>2924166
Boring
>>2924175
Good

>>2920489
>>2920490

the exposure is correct here.

>>2924494

Thanks for quoting me and saying exactly what I said. Terrific contribution mate.

>>2924496
fuck off

>>2924496

This. My eyes literally popped out with such information overload.

Says the guy who bitched about a D7000

>>2922604
>meat-eating friends
they prefer to be called homosexuals

>>2916621
Sugar is a talentless hack but that doesn't mean you're not an unknowledgeable fuckwit.

File: 1137-5462.jpg (644KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

644KB, 1440x954px

>>2924344

Othello, WA

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5517.jpg (467KB, 1440x657px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1440x657px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5487.jpg (576KB, 1440x631px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 1440x631px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2924573
>Sugar confirmed pretty much eyeless

Have you tried vsco?

File: 20150819_133806.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>2924609

No I have the real thing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SPH-L710
Camera Software	L710VPUDNJ2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:08:19 13:38:06
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/2.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Brightness	-2.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.70 mm
Comment
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	ZDFI02

>>2924570
I can dig it.

>>2925055
You cheeky cunt. You know youre gonna stir up shit with that, don't you?

>>2916593
Put your trip back on isi. Not everybody likes their photos to look like they were taking through a dirty lens in the middle of the night.

>>2918900
Sugar. Why do you respond to posts like that? Seriously. Why? You know that there are trolls who just hate you.

>>2925055
Wait so all of these are film?

File: 1137-5706.jpg (662KB, 1440x674px) Image search: [Google]

662KB, 1440x674px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5268.jpg (1MB, 954x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 954x1440px

>>2925071

nope

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

you stupid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBW4BFN13aI

>>2928604
This is a terrible snapshit, Sugar. You know that.

Hell, that's the first time I've ever used the useless /p/ word "snapshit." It's literally the only word that can describe that.

>>2924570
This, however, it's pretty rad.

>>2924178
In all honesty, this is fairly well balanced.

>>2916663
>polaroidkidd.jpg

>>2924570
>>2924573
>>2924569
What lens you nig?

>>2929785

18-55 VR II

>>2929900
Wow, never thought a kit lens can have such good IQ.

>>2924178
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R5A0pg4oN8

>>2922604
>Our food is banned in a multitude of countries and you're all being poisoned through chemicals cleverly disguised as food. I'm not going to hijack my thread to get on a pedestal but it's a personal decision to not harm other living creatures and to try to live more clean.

Unless you're growing your own vegetables, you're being posted through the shit you buy too.

File: 1137-5548.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

>>2930608

It's pretty beastly.

>>2930894

kek

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

how about a good picture for a change, you fat faggot?

File: 1137-5806.jpg (943KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 1440x954px

>>2931676

no u

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-5606.jpg (713KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 1440x954px

>>2932611

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2932611
>>2932612
Awesome stuff as always, Shergar!

>>2932611
WB is too cool.

>>2932612
This is garbage and you know it.

Still love you, shug.

What type of route do you run?

>>2932615

Too obvious.

File: 1137-6414.jpg (801KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

801KB, 1440x954px

>>2933786

we're all over the place but 40 and 80 are the two big ones we usually run. Sometimes we dip down to 10 or up to 90, 80 is my favorite lots of cool shit to do on 80. Lots of cool truck stops, there's two Little Americas in Wyoming and Iowa 80 is always a blast there's a few pics from Iowa 80 ITT.

I finally got to stop at the Salt Flats now that I run under my own authority. There will be a lot of these and of Utah coming today. Had an absolute field day shooting all of this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6398.jpg (910KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

910KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2933977
>>2934400
>Sugar finally finds a boss composition and photo
>pollutes it with footprints and hamsoldiers
just

File: 1137-6422.jpg (866KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6382.jpg (917KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 1440x954px

>>2934403

I shot them without those people too. Fucking tourists, but I wanted context so I did them both

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6426.jpg (5MB, 4909x1559px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 4909x1559px

>>2934407

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2934410

>fake and gay panorama crop

File: 1137-6426-2.jpg (986KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 1440x954px

>>2934412

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2934412
>fake
>crop
What the fuck is that even supposed to mean? It's a crop. He cropped it. He really, actually, truthfully cropped it. It was larger, so then he cropped it. It's a real crop.

>>2934414
crooked horizon.
>>2934410
not bad at all.
>>2934407
ever so gently sloping horizon. also, this feels too tight. the left side is heavier than the right.
>>2934406
the emptiness on the right isn't balanced well.

overall, though, these are pretty rad. better than a lot of your stuff lately. not great, but much better. where is this?

File: 1474911569591.jpg (435KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1440x954px

>>2934403
>>2933977
I actually think the people in there work. I don't like that their heads are on the horizon line, but I think their presence there adds a nice sense of scale to the shot.

I think I would've ran a barrel gradient mask over the center of the shot and upped the contrast a tad bit. I know that shit gets lighter and softer in the distance, but the center here just feels a bit muddled. Here's a quick and dirty edit of what I mean.

>>2936208
You're autistic and get triggered by meme-words, anon.
I'm sorry.

>>2936242
Put your trip back on, isi.

File: 1137-6551.jpg (885KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

885KB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6530.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6440.jpg (410KB, 1440x367px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1440x367px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2936345
...you cheeky cunt. Did you actually tag that?

File: 1137-6511.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

>>2936359

One does not simply go to the Cadillac Ranch without tagging a car.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6494.jpg (1MB, 1066x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1066x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2936345
When I saw alph in the car behind I thought it was a nod to alphon. But then I saw the /p/ thing on the left. Ah well.

File: 1137-6612-2.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-6812.jpg (1MB, 1440x1170px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1170px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2920330
This is cool. But why is it called "photosynthesis thread"?

Sugar. Fuck the haters, this thread isn't bad. Props to you for taking anon shit for years and still posting regularly. I have seen you put up with more shit than anyone else here and you've still got your chin up. That's more than can be said about most.

File: rules.jpg.jpg (157KB, 680x794px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 680x794px

>>2938253

Rule 19. Always.

>>2938236
Used to work there. Pretty nice place.

>>2938241

>photosynthesis

Really? Can't make the connection? Come on, Anon...

>>2938233
You know, normally you go way the fuck overboard with your editing. I can't figure out why this is so damn flat and boring.

File: 1475424068555.jpg (580KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 1440x954px

>>2938233
Dammit, Sugar. Straighten your shit and fix your color casts.

>>2938253
I actually mostly agree with this.

>>2938253

You stupid faggot, don't paint sugar as some innocent victim. He has been, by far, one of the biggest shitposters on this board in the last five years. He and isi have more or less singlehandedly destroyed this place with low quality posts, verbal abuse, false expertise, and in sugar's case, ignorant racism.

I know every group needs a hapless schlemiel to act as the low watermark so we can all feel better about ourselves by feeling bad for them, but sugar ain't it.

>>2939016
>He and isi have more or less singlehandedly destroyed this place with low quality posts, verbal abuse, false expertise, and in sugar's case, ignorant racism.
You stupid faggot, don't paint isi as equivalent to Sugar. She has been, by far, dealt with the most irrational hatred the board has ever dealt out since the days of Alphon. Anons have more or less singlehandedly destroyed every thread she's made for years on end with low quality posts, verbal abuse, false expertise, sexism, and racism.

I know you're the main character of your own short story and must surely be the protagonist, though. Hapless schlemielizing faggot.

>>2939025

It amuses me that you can't see that she loves every ounce of attention she gets and goes out of her way to encourage it.

Pretty sexist of you to paint her as the victim. Poor girl can't stand up for herself, huh? There's no way that she would actually instigate the arguments, right? She's just a widdle baby gurl!

Anyway, who cares about isi (beside you, obviously)? This thread is about sugar.

>>2939025
>>2939016

Please, stop this. There is no need to be upset. Let us not turn /p/ into /fa/. Please release such posts in /pol/ or on social media, not /p/.

>>2916584
Ah, your photos are very nostalgic for me. I lived in the PNW for 3 1/2 years recently. I would travel back and visit my hometown Chicago on hitches, craigslist rides, and trains. I love that stretch of the Columbia River with all the turbines. I need to get on the road again soon; it's my favorite type of photography.

Also Sugar, if you stopped tripfagging your threads with bring less drama and your photos less hate towards them.

>>2939026
>Anyway, who cares about isi (beside you, obviously)? This thread is about sugar.
Well, you brought her up out of the blue, anon

>There's no way that she would actually instigate the arguments, right?
I've never seen her instigate it, no. I've seen her relish in it because of a "whatever happens" mentality, I guess.

>>2939025
>the most irrational hatred

You've got to be fucking kidding me.

Seriously. You can't honestly believe that insane level of bullshit.

Even she, personally, has openly bragged for years that she loves to troll this board. It's something she does for shits and giggles. You can love her or hate her. You can love her photos or hate them. But she's earned every bit of her hatred here.

>>2939100
>Even she, personally, has openly bragged for years that she loves to troll this board
Proof? And what does that even mean? Don't we *ALL* troll this board? What are you doing right now? Isn't this trolling and shitposting?

You've got to be fucking kidding ME. Seriously. You can't honestly believe that insane level of mental gymnastics.

>>2939102
>Proof?
All you had to do was hang around in the /p/ irc chat. It was her whole shtick. She'd put up a thread. Throw a few troll posts around. Then hang out in irc making fun of the replies. She'd show back up every once in a while to poke a stick in the ant hill.

>>2939112
I did hang out in the /p/ irc chat until it started dying, I never saw this behavior.

>Throw a few troll posts around.
What does that even mean? Why are you so vague?

>Then hang out in irc making fun of the replies
I do remember seeing her occasionally mock shitcrit. I don't know why this would trigger anyone other than a shitty critic.

What's your name on irc, anon? I'm Kevin.

>>2916612

wow much easier digestable now thx anon

>>2938315
Not really desu

>>2939195
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthesis

File: sugarpie.jpg (172KB, 859x580px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 859x580px

>>2939117
>I'm Kevin
Stop it! I'm Kevin!

>>2916584
Hey Sugar. You still sweet for me? You dirty little trucker.

I think I lived the American dream on my holidays. Thanks man. Isi is a great gal and all but a bit salty.

Here's a snap I took at that "rest stop".

>>2939486

Kek saved

Official Theme Music for Sugar Threads:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBN86y30Ufc

File: 1460315669413.gif (4MB, 347x244px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 347x244px

>>2939916

>"On The Road Again"
>Not "I've Been Everywhere" - Johnny Cash
>mfw I've been to like 95% of the places he rattles off in that song

>>2939955

derp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov4epAJRPMw

>>2939025
Just fuck off isi

>>2939971
>I posted it again!

>>2940059
See
>>2939971

>>2940070
See
>>2940059

File: 1137-6927.jpg (928KB, 1440x892px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 1440x892px

>>2940071
>>2940070
>>2940059
>>2939971

fuck off

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2940077
No u

>>2940077
>picture is actually mostly straight

Well damn, son. That's not too shabby. It's still not centered perfectly, but it's much better than your other symmetrical stuff to date. You're moving in the right direction.

He're a protip when you're editing shit like this: Look at the canvas size and calculate the exact middle Drop a guide line down. If you're off, fix it.

>>2916584
Good to see you walking and shooting again sugar. But your taste in music is shit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZn12XLmzxU

>>2916601

would you give this guy a ride?

Im my head im debating it. Im shelted af tho so leaning to kinda ya

>>2940304
>>2939957
>>2939916
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is0JEbFRNqI

...Opal, you hot little bitch.

>>2940380
>>2940304

Pls

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCQ0vDAbF7s

File: 1137-6800.jpg (950KB, 1440x1061px) Image search: [Google]

950KB, 1440x1061px

>>2940395

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPzHZ5_zlyg

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2940396
Here Sug, take a serious listen to this one for us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dbR2JZmlWo&ab_channel=TVFilthyFrank

>>2940398

Dude has more talent than every rapper on the radio since like 2004

Page 8?

I think not.

>>2939391
I know what it means, but what does it have to do with this thread?

File: IMG_20161009_110504.jpg (417KB, 1024x588px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1024x588px

I miss the watermark

>>2943503
You're looking for logic and reason in one of Sugar's decisions.
Save yourself the trouble, man.

>>2943956
https://youtu.be/WQeh132J7gE?t=12

File: 1137-7050.jpg (2MB, 954x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 954x1440px

Tokina 11-16 2.8 is titties.

If you are shooting DX and are using any other ultrawide I really don't know what you're doing with your life.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7011.jpg (678KB, 1440x1090px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 1440x1090px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2945425
C H R O M A B S

>>2945428

really? I thought I did a decent job of correcting them manually. I did notice even stopped down it has some magenta / yellow fringing in the extreme highlights. My Lightroom doesn't have a profile so I eyeballed it.

I still like it, very good DX lens glad I read the reviews.

>>2916584
Your first picture is my favorite. And yes slightly too dark, but not outrageous.

>>2945425
I went from the Sigma 10-20mm (first version) Which I still love.
to the 16-35 F4 VR (Full frame) And to be honest, the 10-20mm has a lot of character for an ultrawide. the barrel distortion is almost a positive thing in emphasizing scale / distance.

File: IMG_20161013_204505.jpg (188KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1080x720px

>>2916584
Constructive criticism please.
How could I have made this shot better.

>>2946160
The light is shitty. Don't shoot at this time of day. Everything is washed out and murky.

File: foto9004-1697972.jpg (130KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 900x617px

>>2946160
You live near Fort Payne? Try to catch it when it's foggy or there are lots of low-flying clouds.
Your issue here is that it's shot at mid-day in really bland light.

Fog and closer to sunrise or sunset is what you want. In the conditions you were in, a polarizer would be some help.

Pic related, was standing in exactly the same spot you are.

File: 20161013144905_IMG_4456.jpg (1MB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1280px

>>2946387
Got it thanks.
>>2946403
Good eye! No, I live in Tuscaloosa. I was just passing though on my way back from Tennessee and thought I'd take the scenic route. Would've loved to have gotten there in the morning, or even if it had been a little overcast. Unfortunately it's just been clear sky's for the past couple of weeks, which meant the falls were dried up too. Did manage to take a snapshit of these guys.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 750D
Photographer	DYLAN C
Lens Size	100.00 - 400.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.0
Lens Name	EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:13 14:49:05
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/22.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	330.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1280
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	Unknown
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	172
Color Matrix	135

File: 1137-7411.jpg (2MB, 954x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 954x1440px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7377.jpg (2MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7337.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7497.jpg (591KB, 1440x832px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 1440x832px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7485.jpg (635KB, 1440x664px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 1440x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1460872891930.png (2MB, 2837x3131px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2837x3131px

>>2950350
Fucking abysmal

>>2950203
This one actually has a pretty sweet composition to it. The balance is fucking nice. I don't know how, but I wish there was a was to differentiate between the rocks in the foreground which frame the shot and the shit in the back. Not bad, though.

>>2950204
Cool setting. No apparent thought to composition.

>>2950205
Same thing. No apparent thought to composition. Also, you've got some fucking weird posterization with the colors.

>>2950345
No.

>>2950350
For fuck's sake, JH, tone that shit down. I know the dark sky thing is your whole shtick, but this really is oversaturated to fuck and back.


Keep on truckin. Get some more cave shots if you get a chance. We don't see that sort of thing around here.

>>2950350
Are you hoping to get a job at the milk carton factory?

>be me
>be monday morning
>drinking coffee
>coffee's a little too bitter
>needs something
SUGAR UP

>>2950656

Yeah caves are cool. I'm mega pissed I missed the very last opening of Onondaga Caves by one day for the season and have to wait until April of next year. Meramec Caverns is fucking dope if you can get past all the nationalism and religious propaganda at the end. I've done most if not all the major tourist caves in Missouri at least along 44.......might take a swing at Florida Caverns on hometime in a couple weeks.

I will definitely say if you are in the Southern Missouri area do some of the caves. Fantastic Caverns is pretty cool. The Smallin Civil War Cavern is nice. Talking Rocks is mega-dope but fat people need not apply. There are crevasses I barely fit in to and there's a lot of climbing, it's a workout if you're carrying equipment.

All of these caves allow tripods but you have to keep up with the tour which can be challenging.

>>2952643

The other major challenge is keeping the lenses from fogging up, in Florida you have to equalize the temperature in the lens with outside by not running the A/C in the car before you shoot but with caves it's the opposite, I've found if I point the air conditioner into my bag I can circumvent fogging for an hour before the humidity takes over.

>>2952643
>if you can get past all the nationalism and religious propaganda at the end

Ya know, you get accused of being a whiny liberal vegan cunt. It's 3edgy5u statements like that which cause it.

I'll keep defending your threads, but bro you've got to tone that shit down. It doesn't make you look intellectual or mature. It makes you look like a 17-year-old spurglord who's trying as hard as he can to reject his parents and the way he was brought up.

Ya know how you handle things you don't like? Ignore them. Some people have pride in their country, and that's okay. Some people are religious, and that's okay. This isn't Saudi Arabia. No one's going to slice your head off if you don't abide by their religion.

>>2952675

I totally ignore that shit and love my damn country but I know 4chan is populated by sperglords who will lose their shit when they see the American flag. Its a fair warning.

Shit, while they were showing their little movie I walked off to the back part of the room and shot some more, still have to process those.

>>2952862
>I know 4chan is populated by sperglords who will lose their shit when they see the American flag

you know sometimes I really wonder what it's like living in your head

>>2952870

Been over on /pol/ lately? Lol

>select all commercial trucks

>>2952880
/pol/ exists in a reality separate from ours

>>2952882

Yeah but they sometimes leave their containment board and wander over here.

>>2952883
so thats how you ended up here

>>2952884

Shadddup lol

File: 1137-7551.jpg (735KB, 1440x727px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 1440x727px

snapshitting and I could care less

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>2954494
kys

>>2954496

no u

>>2954499
why would i i don't post snapshits

>>2954494
What were you delivering? Please tell me it was string beans to Utah.

>>2954684
Considering he delivers nothing but bad photos to /p/, I'm guessing it's a truckload of snapshits

File: 14590262_367437666930252_6723268868098210372_n.jpg (47KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 960x540px

>>2954684

meat to North Carolina

also scored all of this for 50 bucks. found a local camera shop on the road with a decent size boneyard. all brand new hoya filters, few tiffens and some other shit

>>2955028
>sugar
>delivering
>delicious, delicious
>meat

I love it.

>>2955818

It's part of the job lol

File: 1137-7600.jpg (676KB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 1440x954px

Some more additions to the unnamed set of people who keep us on the road (or get us off the road in this case I guess)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7573.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

>>2956334

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7576.jpg (1MB, 1440x1112px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1112px

>>2956336

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: 1137-7591.jpg (1MB, 1440x954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x954px

>>2956337

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>D7000
congrats on the move to digital bro its been a while

how do you like developing jpegs instead of asstia

File: 20161016_190609.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>2956334
When are you going to stop being a pussy and come make some real money?