Horizon and shit

>>2906559
If the composition works, then who cares if it's boring?

Look, if someone's only complaint about your shot is that you're using a "boring" composition, then they don't have anything to say about your composition.

the third has the most interesting composition

>but it's not the point of this thread
stupid. it depends entirely on the example. there is no general rule that fits all images

File: 1608191818.jpg (110KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 600x399px

>>2906564
Why the third?
The bottom of the pic, in theory, is completely useless. I know i can easly crop the photo, but when i'll be taking the next one, should i care of including the bottom even if on the bottom there's nothing intresting?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G7
Camera Software	SILKYPIX(R) Developer Studio 4.4 SE 4.4.3.3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:19 20:35:47
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	31.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4592
Image Height	3061
Rendering	Custom

>>2906571
I personally like water. Like the other poster said it doesn't really matter where you put the horizon but rather how you want to convey the story in your image. When I look at the water and the docks I think of travelling in northern Ontario relaxing by a nice quiet lake. I would have recomposed to remove the tree on the right side of the image though.

make the subject the focus point, if the sky is shit and boring then you dont need it in the photo so get more foreground

if the sky looks great and there is fuck all in the foreground then fuck the foreground

if the main focus is a bulding and the sky and foreground look shit then centre the building

etc etc etc

>>2906571
the water is more interesting than the blank white sky

File: 1608191919.jpg (88KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 600x399px

>>2906573
I thought the same thing for the three: fact was that it was huge and tall, and I had to cut the people on the boat and the duck.
You can see, btw, the tree in another pic i took later on, it is the highest.
In the first I was waiting for the duck and for the people.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G7
Camera Software	SILKYPIX(R) Developer Studio 4.4 SE 4.4.3.3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:19 20:54:01
Exposure Time	0.4 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	14.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4592
Image Height	3061
Rendering	Custom

>>2906559
>is the centered horizon boring if the composition looks good?

Yes.

Centered horizon only looks good if it's a deliberate part of your composition.
For example when doing a reflection.

>I don't fell i want to lose my space in useless sky

Negative space is often great to emphasize the rest of the picture.

>>2906585
> Negative space is often great to emphasize the rest of the picture
This is a good one, appreciatethat.jpg

>it's a "which of these three crops of the same photo have the best composition" episode

Wew

>>2906578
I like this way of thinking.
So basically focus on the subject and fuck whetever looks bad if compared to the rest.

>>2906588
>implying this happens often enough to warrant a reply of this nature
>implying this thread is worse than "I bought these cheap chinkshit lights, are they bad?" Or the asston of other, easily Googled questions

Fuck off shitlord.

>>2906596
exactly

all this keep the horizon centred and verticals straight etc is a load of balls

angles make photography interesting

and cropping out shit you dont need like a blank sky will enhance what is in the photo without half the picture being taken up by nothing

>>2906588
Nobody forces you to reply if you don't like.
You just keeping it bumping on top on this way.
So if you think that this is not interesting, please go back sharing your nudes on /b/, that are always appreciated.

>>2906597
>>2906610

lmao triggered right in the pussy