Thread replies: 321
Thread images: 113
Thread images: 113
This is the Film General Thread, aka FGT.
>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot Hanimex/Soligor/Vivitar/Sears/JC Penny/Revuenon
This is the place to post your film photos, without flushing them down the Recent Photo Toilet.
It's OK to ask about film gear in this thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 08:08:28 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
File: R0230020.jpg (156KB, 560x800px) Image search:
[Google]
156KB, 560x800px
>>2904798
I'm going to kick off the thread by asking one more time if anyone has used a Canon Pro 1 before, and if they have any advice before I dive in and start fucking shit up? Bought it last week, still haven't plugged it in. It is in situ though, and I bought my first small pack of paper yesterday. Ilford 'Galerie Prestige' 310GSM Smooth Pearl in A4.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:08:10 19:02:30 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 560 Image Height 800 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>
File: Wedding36.jpg (146KB, 1120x800px) Image search:
[Google]
146KB, 1120x800px
>>2904800
I'll probably be breaking it in by printing some cheesy wedding photos I took in the last few weeks.
Shot something like 20 rolls for one and 12 for the other. Only have a handful of 120 colour negs still to dev, but a buttload of scanning to get through.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 08:32:35 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1120 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
File: DSC_1914.jpg (1MB, 1250x848px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1250x848px
>>2904798
Let's see your stash, /fgt/'s
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 842 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 85 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4256 Image Height 2832 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:16 22:43:54 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Flash Flash No Flash Focal Length 85.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1250 Image Height 848 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2905010
>800Z
whats that like?
>>
>>2905010
New to film, is storing film in the freezer standard or a meme?
>>
Nikon fm10 vs canon ae-1 for someone's who's trying to move up from a regular p&s?
Price doesn't matter to me, my budget is 200$ and they both fit. Just wanna know if the extra 100 is worth it for the fm10 or if there are any other options
>>
>>2905012
I liked it in 220 format so I bought the last box on Amazon. Haven't tried any out yet. Everything else is eBay special.
>>
File: DSC_0107.jpg (271KB, 1200x900px) Image search:
[Google]
271KB, 1200x900px
>>2905016
Putting it in the fridge makes it last a very long time past the expiration date, it's a good idea to store it cold. If you freeze it then it supposedly lasts even longer, basically forever, but then it has to thaw before you can use it and it just seems a little unnecessary to me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Sony Camera Model D6503 Camera Software 17.1.2.A.0.314_9_f300 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:23 17:17:52 Exposure Time 1/32 sec F-Number f/2.0 ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 4.90 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 900 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2905017
I'm a nikon fag who has had the fm-10, don't buy it. It's plastic garbage. for 200 dollars you could easily get a better Nikon SLR. Idk anything about Canon FD cams, but the AE-1 is fine too.
>>
>>2905022
What other Nikon cameras would you recommend? I'm in no rush to purchase, so maybe I'd be willing to wait and save a few hundred more. What should I look for that's ~450 or less?
>>
>>2905026
I mean, what features are important to you? just start reading Ken Rockwell pages on Nikon cameras. If you want auto focus, get an F100. If you want manual, get an F3. Then slap on whatever cheap prime you want.
>>
File: IMG_20160817_100033.jpg (574KB, 1200x900px) Image search:
[Google]
574KB, 1200x900px
>>2905012
It's beautiful stuff. Expose at 640 because it can get quite grainy in the shadows at the slightest underexposure.
>>2905004
Woohoo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model F-04G Equipment Make FUJITSU Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:08:17 10:00:34 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/2.0 Subject Distance Range Unknown Focal Length 4.80 mm Lens Aperture f/2.0 Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 1536 Rendering Normal Scene Capture Type Standard White Balance Auto Image Width 2048 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Exposure Bias 0 EV Brightness 2.4 EV ISO Speed Rating 93 Exposure Time 1/40 sec
>>
File: IMG_2014.jpg (293KB, 586x800px) Image search:
[Google]
293KB, 586x800px
>>2904804
>>2904800
>everything went better than expected
I just plugged it in, installed everything I could find on the canon driver website, downloaded the ICC profile for my paper from Ilford, and went to town.
I think it's totally fucking insane how much menu diving, tab hunting and checkbox checking you have to do to get it to do what you want, but I guess these are the breaks.
Printing must just be waiting for its great white apple-shaped saviour.
All I wanted it to do, by the way, was not rescale the image, print at the DPI I saved in the file, use the Ilford ICC profile, and not arbitrarily gimp my A4 paper with inch wide margins when the machine's capable of borderless A3.
I'd imagine that anybody who knows how to resize a fucking jpeg themselves would want to do exactly the same thing literally every time they printed anything at all, but apparently not...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 16:59:03 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 27.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 586 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
File: KandaNightNain.jpg (86KB, 504x335px) Image search:
[Google]
86KB, 504x335px
>>2905101
I did a 35mm B&W wedding pic first up, using the canon raw converter plugin, Print Studio Pro, which I had to print twice because the first one upscaled itself, thanks to a hiding checkbox.
Then I did this colour 645 scan, which I decided would fit on the page at 600dpi. No joy from the Canon plugin, so I tried printing through GIMP.
Worked great, once I realised I had to tell it I was using a Canon paper to get small margins, then make it manage colour with the ICC profile.
>if how I'm doing this sounds pants-on-head retarded, please tell me, I am a total novice
Pic related is 100% crop of the scan on the left, which I sent to the printer as is, and the same area of the print itself (shot with one direct flash off to the side, the highlight at the top of the sign isn't blown out, it's just caught glare) on the right.
Not too bad, I reckon.
Still, a black and white wet print shits on this for sharpness and detail and tonality, seriously ignore internet shills who would say otherwise, I can't believe I took that bait so hard myself.
>>
File: 000001x.jpg (2MB, 1485x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1485x1000px
Hello, real beginner here (never been interested in photography nor film) but I found a Canon AT-1 at home about a month ago and I wanted to give it a try.
Dumping some pics from my first roll of film looking for critique or advice.
1/3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SLP800 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 14:51:06 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1485 Image Height 1000
>>
File: 000018 copia.jpg (1MB, 1485x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1485x1000px
>>2905201
2/3
lens is 50mm canon
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SLP800 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 14:50:56 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1485 Image Height 1000
>>
File: 000022 copia.jpg (2MB, 1485x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1485x1000px
>>2905203
3/3
also these have a bit of editing on it, if you want I can post some of the unprocessed ones
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SLP800 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 14:50:55 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1485 Image Height 1000
>>
First time posting here, and I figured this thread would be proper for my question. My uncle is a prof. looking to post some online lecture material, and has a room set up at his place where he can walk around and write/ gesture, with lighting just like a real lecture hall.
He's looking for a decent tracking camera, that can be mounted and follows his movements in realtime. I've done some research and pulled up a two names, which I'll post below, but I have a feeling these are just the ones that shill themselves hardest on search engines. Anyone have any other brands/ models they'd recommended if you've done this sort setup before?
SOLOSHOT: https://shop.soloshot.com/
iSmart: http://www.ismart-video.com/products/products/LTC_Series_IP_SDI_Lecturer_Tracking_Syst141.html
>>
Superia 400
>>
File: baari2.jpg (185KB, 1000x669px) Image search:
[Google]
185KB, 1000x669px
>>
File: baari3.jpg (217KB, 1000x706px) Image search:
[Google]
217KB, 1000x706px
>>
Anyone know of some cheaper ways to get it developed?
In my area right now (Halifax,Nova Scotia) they have to send away the film, which takes a week.. and it costs $15 per roll to get made into digital, excluding prints.
It has just become to pricey recently here, since all 1 hour photos shut down here.
>>
>>2905229
If you don't have a cheap lab near you, then likely no unless you start developing yourself.
>>
>>2905203
how did you pp this one?
>>
>>2905237
do you mean post-process?
IIRC it's just a colder temperature and higher contrast than the original
>>
>>2905241
looks nice hombre
>>
File: mintolia.png (4MB, 1872x1142px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 1872x1142px
Thought I'd share my recent finds. Picked up this Minolta TLR and just got around to cleaning everything; turned out beautifully. It was filthy, when I took out the viewfinder to the clean the mirror I found that a spider had been squatting in my camera for some time. I'm hoping to get a roll in it soon after I put in new light seals.
Got a minty Bessa R for a good price as well, it came with a Jupiter 8 lens. I've been told that that particular lens is pretty awesome for the price. I'll likely be looking for another lens as well; what are some good LTM lens I should keep an eye out for? Unless the glass is over a thousand, price isn't an issue.
>>
File: leitz doggo.png (4MB, 1817x1273px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 1817x1273px
>>2905305
Not film related, but thought I'd share anyway since Leitz (Leica) made cameras. Found this Leitz Trinovid dog for eight dollars. He's of German design and descent, and uses the Uppendahl prism system for his optics, which still blows some modern dogs' optics out of the water. He came out of the dog factory in '82, and somehow made his way to a ratty thrift store in north Georgia. No idea what that green thing by his feet is though.
>>
File: attack cat.jpg (404KB, 667x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
404KB, 667x1000px
Was taught to use the Jobo machine at my local photo lab and am now getting to dev my own stuff, for helping out in the shop.
Just wanted to share.
Pic related, my first self deved roll.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 18:28:59
>>
File: IMG_4332.jpg (420KB, 1081x800px) Image search:
[Google]
420KB, 1081x800px
>>2905317
Staunch looking puss.
>>2905305
Did you see the thread a few months back when some anon took his menelta TLR on a holiday in the US desert? Pretty comfy.
>>2905004
Only noobs on /p/, so not many stashes.
Pic related is about 12 months old. Most of the 35mm is gone now. Still have plenty of Velvia and Neopan, as well as all the tech-pan (don't know if I should hunt down some technidol on ebay, or just use Rodinal, or get some more Neofin Blau?). Bulk rolling my 35mm now, so still have a reel of HP5 and Retro80S in the fridge. Hopefully adding 100x220 Astia soon...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2015:12:09 13:50:35 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/9.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1081 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Custom Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>
File: Film2454_02.jpg (716KB, 1000x663px) Image search:
[Google]
716KB, 1000x663px
Stumbled upon a scanned roll of Porta 400 from two months ago or so which I never posted so here I go
1/6
Magnum photographer Chien Chi-Chang at a local book signing
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
File: Film2454_04.jpg (769KB, 1000x663px) Image search:
[Google]
769KB, 1000x663px
>>2905357
2/6
pretty chill guy, we drank some wine and talked about some of his newer projects. Towards the actual signing he was already pretty drunk and told everybody who took pictures not to post them on Facebook so his ex-wife and her lawyer don't see them
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
File: Film2454_08.jpg (632KB, 1000x663px) Image search:
[Google]
632KB, 1000x663px
>>2905360
3/6
quick attempt at a nguan copy. Will have to work a bit further on that
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
File: Film2454_09.jpg (687KB, 704x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
687KB, 704x1000px
>>2905362
fuck me I can't count, it's actually just 5
4/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
File: Film2454_22.jpg (910KB, 1000x694px) Image search:
[Google]
910KB, 1000x694px
>>2905363
5/5
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
Any of y'alls tried out some of that Maco TCS Eagle 640? Supposedly a C41 colour film for speed cameras, the kind they have on roadsides collecting fines for the revolving-door men.
Because I've got about 17m of it here and am wondering what the heck I ought to start testing it with. Got a 5-liter Digibase kit as well for dev, but no temperin' bucket yet...
>>
>>2905366
Also, have a picture of an upside-down budgerigar. Superia 200, Nikkor 105mm VR macro on a F5, self-developed, processing in Darktable.
>>
File: 30VHP503.jpg (647KB, 1456x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
647KB, 1456x1000px
>>2905387
That's an awful shot.
But it is worth mentioning what a treat it is to use modern high-grade lenses on film.
Micro-contrast isn't a meme, friendos.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 07:31:41 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1456 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2905394
When will you adopt a trip?
>>
>>2905394
Quite so: next to no light, bird's moving around like sixty, no depth of field to speak of. But the colours came out nicely, and the processing is fairly alright. As far as test rolls for them C41 chems goes, I was pleased.
And yeah, macro on Acros 100, say no more say no more.
>>
File: 30VHP509.jpg (235KB, 564x800px) Image search:
[Google]
235KB, 564x800px
>>2905397
>knowing you'd have to unfilter me so you could get to the FGT
It would almost be worth it. But no. Anonymous chinese glue-fetish newsgroup is for remaining anonymous.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 07:53:25 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 564 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2905410
Nah, you could leave it off when making a thread. No need to put that much extra effort into being a faggot.
>>
Colorplus 200 coming through because I'm poorfag.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.4.1 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 01:18:42 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 671
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.4.1 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 01:18:43 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 671
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.4.1 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 01:18:42 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 672
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.4.1 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 01:18:42 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 671
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.4.1 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 01:18:43 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 671
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Capture NX-D 1.4.1 W Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 01:18:44 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 671 Image Height 1000
>>
First real camera, first film camera. Can I live?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 18:27:02 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1742 Image Height 1124
>>
File: OlyMiniHP503.jpg (292KB, 1169x800px) Image search:
[Google]
292KB, 1169x800px
>>2905418
Care to enlighten me about what it is I do that rustles you so hard?
I post photos all the time, I share my knowledge openly, and I started the best recurring thread on the board right now.
And I'm not a fucking attention whoring tripfag.
As far as I can see I'm a model citizen in this shithole.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 08:27:28 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1169 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>
>>2905440
Tity is out of focus. Also resolution too large. 2/10
>>
>>2905448
>Take sharp photos,
How
>make better scans,
I tried, how
>don't post your gf's nudes on 4chan.
Aight
>resolution too large
There's such thing?
>>
Minus autismo, what is happening here with the red line and light thing? Too small of an f-stop?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SEIKO EPSON CORP. Camera Model WF-7620 Series Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 600 dpi Vertical Resolution 600 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3658 Image Height 7014
>>
>>2905459
light leak?
>>
File: 28413467994_64f157ce3c_o.jpg (539KB, 1000x645px) Image search:
[Google]
539KB, 1000x645px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1885 Image Height 1215 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 19:29:48 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 645
>>
>>2905460
Yep, that must be it.
>>
Even back in the day rabals rocked bad photo trends like the panomema bars
Then again they look like still frames from Rollercoaster
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1065 Image Height 1600 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2905601
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1600 Image Height 1145 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>
>>2905609
>>2905610
Fuji was fortunately too good for that.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1600 Image Height 1008 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_2024.jpg (189KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
189KB, 1200x800px
The FM3A I gloated about in the last thread.
It's pretty sensual.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 13:20:53 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/11.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 44.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 224 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2905611
But too bad I wasn't.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1600 Image Height 1068 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2905612
>cosina
no thanks.
>>
File: IMG_9801 - IMG_9804.jpg (182KB, 851x315px) Image search:
[Google]
182KB, 851x315px
>>2905613
>>2905611
>>2905609
>>2905601
>cuts out 50% of your image area for no reason
And nothing of value was lost.
Although, good on the FB cover pic for making panos great again.
>>
>>2905612
Fellow owner here. It's a sexy beast indeed.
>>
>>2905632
>not just owning an xpan/bronica 135w back dedicated to shooting your FB cover pic
Do you even photopleb?
>>
File: IMG_2027.jpg (117KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
117KB, 1200x800px
>>2905630
>dat palpable envy
And the 24mm I got with it for practically free.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:18 13:53:33 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/inf Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2905639
That's a really bad picture anon.
>>
File: Retro80S120001-7cover.jpg (537KB, 1702x630px) Image search:
[Google]
537KB, 1702x630px
>>2905638
Well that pic's a crop of 6x9 Velvia, so it's up there.
Still, can't afford an X-Pan, but don't want one either. Panos are t. pleb.
>and the TX1/2's are the ones to get anyway, it's a Fuji camera ffs
>>
>>2905639
i already have several pure-blooded nikon manual focus bodies, including an fe2 and fm2. no need for your filthy mudblood poser body.
also have a 24 2.8 ai-s. ;)
>>
File: EMRetro80S24.jpg (98KB, 549x800px) Image search:
[Google]
98KB, 549x800px
>>2905640
I decided freelensing the 50/1.2 @ 1.2 would deliver maximum trolling effect to my jelly friend >>2905630
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:08:14 20:24:58 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 549 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Daylight Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2905638
Those 135w backs are super hard to find.
>>
>>2905649
I have one with a broken frame counter that I'm looking to get rid of.
They are expensive though. Honestly not worth it for what they are.
>>
>>
>>2905632
At least photos on Facebook will last forever <3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 418 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: images.jpg (5KB, 600x193px) Image search:
[Google]
5KB, 600x193px
>Not shooting your panos 6x17 like Stuart Klipper
>>
File: images.jpg (3KB, 394x128px) Image search:
[Google]
3KB, 394x128px
>>2905653
Everything else works on it? What would you want for it? I don't have PayPal and can't set it up as I live in Japan. if you'd want to trade for some Fuji film or something Id be down!
One more Stuart Klipper shot.
>>
>>2905646
i don't get this meme
what did cosina have to do with fm3a?
http://www.nikon.com/about/feelnikon/recollections/r30_e/index.htm
In any case, get fucked, I only mount cosina voigtlander lenses on my nikon film body :333333333333
>>
>>2905645
>and the TX1/2's are the ones to get anyway, it's a Fuji camera ffs
The X-pan is literally the same. They're pretty good if you know you're there to shoot pano 135 4 laifu.
I'm fully aware I entered into the pano pleb meme fully and live with my decision. t-tho at least I don't crop.
>>2905662
I'm honestly not sure. I've toyed with selling it since I got my xpan. Everything else works. I was considering knocking like 1/5th of the price off it because of the shutter bug.
It's a minor annoyance for me but if you're a smart tog you won't notice it.
Sadly I'm not willing to trade it for film. My 2nd Freezer's full and my main fridge/freezer's also at limit.
I'm just fishing for what people would find acceptable for a fully functional back-frame counter. The thing that's put me off selling it for so long is how autistic most film photographers are.
I was in love with it before I got my xpan, but nowadays I find it getting used far less.
>>2905659
y-you lucky bar steward.
>>
File: 17597913680_cd2dc9e35f_b.jpg (56KB, 726x432px) Image search:
[Google]
56KB, 726x432px
>>2905666
Yeah I honestly wouldn't care. I could tell you wait frame each of my 4 current backs are one without looking. Fair enough about not needing film. Hopefully I find one in a store over here sometime soon. Lots of stores have Bronica gear but it's always ETRS stuff.
One thing I've always wondered, how do you know what exactly will be recorded on the film when looking at the viewfinder? Did the back come with a mask or do you just guesstimate?
Pic semi-related. When I fell for the 35mm through a 120 back meme.
>>
>>2905017
I'd get a Nikon fm2 it's a fantastic camera and its in your price range
>>
What's the cheapest way to get into medium format? No holga shit. Im thinking around $150-200 budget?
>>
>>2905671
>One thing I've always wondered, how do you know what exactly will be recorded on the film when looking at the viewfinder? Did the back come with a mask or do you just guesstimate?
It has it's own viewfinder which is pretty useless. I got a transparency mask that sits on the focusing scren instead. That worked better for me.
I tried that too but was unimpressed with the results. The 135w is the next step up but is still weight. The ultimate 135 pano setup is an xpan. No questions asked.
>>
File: CNV00001.jpg (646KB, 1818x1228px) Image search:
[Google]
646KB, 1818x1228px
Taken on a Canon TLb,
i cant remember which film though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Corporation Camera Model Frontier SP-3000 Camera Software FUJIFILM Corporation FEII software Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:08:17 09:59:43 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1818 Image Height 1228
>>
>>
>>2905345
I've heard that even if you store expired film in the freezer it gets fogged by radiation or some shit.
If this is true how fast will it happen?
>>
File: 1457993773347s.jpg (772KB, 2177x3000px) Image search:
[Google]
772KB, 2177x3000px
>>2904798
How are hassy lenses? A mate's trying to sell his 500-series and my only experience on film are P&S and minolta x700s.
>>
>>2905854
Bad.
>>
>>
File: observe.jpg (574KB, 1291x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
574KB, 1291x1500px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
>>2905311
heh
>>
Anyone know what the longest telephoto that I could fit into a Speed Graphic is?
From having a quick look, it seems there is good amounts of variation with flange distance despite same/similar focal lengths among lenses.
>>
>>2905909
You need to look for ~tele~ designs, not just long focal lengths. But the real answer is not very long.
I think there are a couple of Fuji and Nikon 300mms that are right on the cusp even for proper field cameras on standard bellows, you might be SOL with the Graflex.
>>
>>2904798
anyone got a good reccomendation for a flash for a film camera? ive been using a canon speedlite but its actually bigger than my camera so i wanted to get something smaller, ill just be using it for general day to day snapshits, id like something small (i was thinking about the fuji x20 flash but its too expensive)
>>
>>2905814
Well I don't think it's total garbage.
Film will degrade over time, irrespective of how its kept. It's the degree of the decay that changes, and at the end of the day only you can decide where the threshold sits for "unusable".
The BIGGEST factor influencing this though, is film speed. 400 speed colour film will almost certainly be trashed after 10 years expiry. You can still take pics with it, of course, but you'll want to shoot it at 100, and even then accept that a lomo-look is going to result.
I shot some 10 year expired Tri-X on the weekend, and the base fog on that is very substantial, especially when it's next to a roll of similar vintage T-Max 100 developed at the same time. Still usable, of course, but your grain and tonal range are compromised.
*I just "measured" the base fog by metering though the film base of both like they were ND filters: 1 stop for TMX, 2 stops for TXP*
>>
>>2906004
>don't tell us what the camera is, it doesn't matter
>>
>>2906022
whoops sorry, im shooting with an em and a canonet
>>
File: EMsandAISNikkors.jpg (275KB, 688x800px) Image search:
[Google]
275KB, 688x800px
>>2906040
Get an SB20. Pic related.
It's small, quite powerful, can bounce, has 3 settings for focal length, can be used in Auto thyristor mode or Manual, with an easy to use scale on the back, and when you upgrade your Nikon can also do TTL.
Mine was $20.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SIGMA Camera Model SIGMA DP1 Merrill Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Focal Length Range 19 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:01:27 10:20:40 Exposure Time 0.3 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 19.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 688 Image Height 800 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID 3030333132323837DB9FA85634334238 Resolution HI Exposure Mode A Metering Mode A Exposure 5/15467 Contrast -1.0 Shadow 1 Highlight -1.1 Saturation 0.9 Sharpness 1.0 Fill Light 1.0 Color Adjustment 12601/1296517459 Adjustment Mode 0.2752
>>
File: IMG_20160818_175013351.jpg (213KB, 1024x576px) Image search:
[Google]
213KB, 1024x576px
How'd I do? About $45 and change.
>>
How's Provia 400x? Thinking of grabbing a few pro packs of it in 120. It's about $6 more than pro packs of 100F. Is it good film?
>>
>>2906122
I hear that's the best T series model for being such a step up from the previous years release. Always makes me giggle thinking about a fully electric+plastic body with the FD lenses for the time period. As for the Tamron you could get some good very of far aways images with it. Start with a mediocre film first than work your way up.
>>
File: IMG_8606mini.jpg (151KB, 527x800px) Image search:
[Google]
151KB, 527x800px
>>2906149
It's amazing film.
Buy as much as they have to sell.
I wish I'd had a chance to try it in 120.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:03:15 11:29:23 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 527 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Flash Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2906073
seems a little large but ill check it out
>>
>>2906157
>>2906122
That's quite a lot considering those are Ameribux, the lenses belong in the trash, and using the T70 is like scrubbing your dick with AIDS-infected steel wool.
But if your ego will allow you to shoot in Program Auto, and you can find a real lense, and you can just grit your teeth and deal with the hateful noises it makes, it's a perfectly effective camera.
>>
>>2906020
I've used 10-year expired kodak gold with nary an issue, wasn't even cold-stored. Might depend on the film itself though, used a few rolls of 5-year superia that came out like a load of me old dog's dinner
>>
File: IMG_4337.jpg (607KB, 750x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
607KB, 750x1000px
>>2906159
If you want to go even smaller, the pentacks AF200T has a great range of manual controls on the back and is quite easy to use.
No zoom, no TTL, no bounce though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2014:02:24 07:59:22 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/2.8 ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Center-Weighted Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Digital Zoom Unknown Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 65408 Color Matrix 129
>>
>>2906158
It seems there's no limit to how much they have available. I'll grab 2 pro packs to start. Cheers!
>>
>>2906164
Tell me where.
>>
>>2906173
Amazon Japan. The one im looking at in particular has 11 pro packs prices at 3900¥/pack.
>>
>>2906160
I found a T50 at an antique shop with a corroded battery compartment being sold for $30. That's a terrific deal in my eyes compared to what he bought it at.
Aside from that however you probably could have picked up a qt RF with a faster aperture for that much. Just do the film thing and build up your FD lens collection and make the most of it.
>>
>>2906160
I've got a couple lenses already (2 Canon FD 50mm 1.4 and 1.8, Vivitar 28mm 2.8, Canon 135mm 2.5)
If that tamron is really that bad I'll return it.
>>
>MF camera
>$1000~AU or thereabouts
>rangefinder
go!
>>
>>2906177
The camera came with the lens that's on it already. I bought the tamron separately.
>>
>>2906204
Mamiya 6 for 6x6
Mamiya 7 for 6x7
>>
>>2906209
7 is good but quite literally double what I can pay.
I don't want to shoot square also.
>>
>>2906162
...and of you need tilt/swivel & TTL, you can check out the af-260.
It is of course bigger, but still fairly compact for a flash with those features. And can be had for a decent price.
>>
>>2906211
Damn, are they that much more in kangarooland? Ive seen them go for ~$900-$1000USD with the 80mm.
Any particular reason you want an RF?
>>
>>2906215
Even on eBay they're going for that much with a lens.. then there's shipping on top.
I just really hate hasselblad type box MF cameras to be honest.
Fuji 6x9 is nice but also expensive.
>>
>>2906216
What about a Plaubel? They are pretty common here in Japan and seems that ~100,000yen is a good base price.
>>
>>2906222
Shit just checked yen to aud. thats out of your range too.
>>
>>2906162
seems great, my camera doesnt have ttl and im shooting on a 50 so none of those issues concern me
thanks anon
>>
>>2906204
fuji ga645zi if you can deal with a non interchangeable lens, i dont know about the lens quality but fuji does make some god tier mf lenses so i have high hopes
>>
>>2906238
I generally shoot 35mm on 35mm and once I have a lens I kind of just adapt to the focal distance and dealwithit
Thinking maybe the GA645 or 645i for the 60mm (35mm on 35mm equivalent) though instead of the zi because I'm not a fan of zoom lenses and never shoot more outside of 35mm anyway.
>>
>>2906245
I'm not a fan of zooms either but in the case of the zi, it's so small and has such excellent IQ that the only downside I can think of is the slower lens. On the short side, it's f4.5 instead of f4 so not a big deal either
>>
>>2906251
surely the GA645 has slightly better IQ due to the fixed lens?
As I said though I tend to like 1 focal distance because I like to adapt to it and make the photos adapt to.
>>
>>
>>2904798
Hey guys, idk if this is the right thread for this, but what can you guys tell me about pinhole photography? Saw some cool pics and it looks dirt cheap to do, but I can't find any info on where to get the film, processing etc. Any info would be appreciated.
>>
>>2906288
is there any discernible reason to go for 6x7 over 6x4.5 other than the obvious bigger negs?
>>
>>2906291
Well having a choice of lenses, I guess.
I'm the massive gearfag OP, and I find the IQ from 645's to be worth the jump from 35mm and adequate for my needs.
BUT - I shoot a lot of verticals, and for that both the native orientation of RF 645's and the 3:4 aspect ratio are ideal.
And if you're mostly putting your work online, vertical resolution is what it's all about, so if you mostly shoot in a landscape orientation, you won't quite get that dank MF feel unless you go for 6x6 and up.
And finally, there ARE shitty 645 lenses. Or more correctly you're still going to enlarge enough sometimes to see the deficiencies in some 645 lenses.
Whereas 6x7 and up, pretty much everything is world-class if-your-photos-suck-its-not-the-camera tier.
>>
>>2906162
Does it cover 28mm? That size and functions are about perfect. No sync cable though, that's a shame, wouldn't work on my cold shoe'd cameras.
>>
Anybody knows what type of release cable I would need for a Yashica D?
>>
File: OldCamera_CableRelease.jpg (42KB, 500x302px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 500x302px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2006:02:02 12:48:54 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 500 Image Height 302 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: 7129787043_a88b3ed428_m.jpg (26KB, 240x240px) Image search:
[Google]
26KB, 240x240px
>>2906453
A regular cable release plus an adapter like pic related. I'm not sure what the official name would be, they're commonly called Leica Nipples. It's the same adapter used for several early Leicas and the Nikon F and F2 and probably some other cameras too.
>>
so my flatbed doesn't natively support 120 scanning. Can I still scan them on the scanner?
>>
>>2906463
No. the backlight is only 35mm wide.
>>
>>2905713
tlr cameras, mamiya 645 and bronica etr
>>
How to meter for slide film?
>>
>>2906477
Is it just me, or is this FGT getting massively shat in by basic bitch q&a's?
Use the fucking meter, is how you meter for slide film. Do what the fuck it says.
If your film is ISO 100, and the meter says you should expose for ISO 100 at f/2.8 for 1/125th of a second, then fucking do that.
If it so happens it says 1/250 but you're trying to take a picture of a wedding dress in a snowstorm, use 1/60.
If you're trying to take a picture of a negro in a mine shaft, use 1/500. It's that simple.
>>
>>2906477
the way you meter for negative film
Just keep in mind that underexposure is easier to fix than overexposure (the reverse from negative film)
>>
>>2906477
Most slide has fuck-all for dynamic range. You have zones III thru VII. Try to preserve highlights in non-emitted light as far as possible; emission sources can go straight to zone XX for all I care.
In terms of scenes, you'll be looking for low contrast and vivid colours.
>>
>>2905719
>>Own viewfinder
>Wait, so you can use a WLF with it? Fug that! I guess it'd be easy to make your own mask though.
I fugged up. I was sleepy at the time.
It has it's own focusing screen, you can use the WLF with it.
You can also buy the generic hassy masks online for a few euros and use them instead (which is what I use anyway)
>>
>>2904798
is there anyway to get different color tints when developing color film?
or can one only do that kinda stuff in post editing
>>
>>2906516
>If it so happens it says 1/250 but you're trying to take a picture of a wedding dress in a snowstorm, use 1/60.
If you're trying to take a picture of a negro in a mine shaft, use 1/500. It's that simple
Actually, it's the other way around. And metering isn't as easy as you say it is. For instance, you never addressed the difference between reflective and incident metering. If he's using his camera's meter, he should know what type of meter it has and how to use it. If metering is so simple why did Alex Burke dedicate a whole blog post to it? should've just linked him to the post, it's well written, comprehensive and without the shitty condescending attitude.
http://www.alexburkephoto.com/blog/2016/3/28/metering-and-exposing-color-film
>>
File: CNV00002.jpg (348KB, 960x640px) Image search:
[Google]
348KB, 960x640px
Some recent snapshits with the (surprisingly nice) Poundland film, Agfa Vista 200.
1/4
>>
File: CNV00007.jpg (296KB, 960x640px) Image search:
[Google]
296KB, 960x640px
Missed focus on this one but I was shooting at f/1.8.
2/4
>>
File: CNV00014.jpg (264KB, 960x640px) Image search:
[Google]
264KB, 960x640px
Do the bricks look weird or is it just me?
3/4
>>
Last one. C&C welcome.
4/4
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 960 Image Height 640 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_20160424_223014674.jpg (2MB, 5344x3006px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 5344x3006px
>>2906290
You can use any film you like as long as your body holds it right I think. Cheap and fun to do. Some great free designs online like these.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5344 Image Height 3006
>>
File: IMG_20160819_231612.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x2448px
>>2905004
(im poor)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Exif Software Version 1.0.2.0 Camera Model GT-I9300 Equipment Make SAMSUNG Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Width 3264 Image Created 2016:08:19 23:16:12 Image Height 2448 Unique Image ID ZDFI02 Exposure Time 1/17 sec ISO Speed Rating 800 F-Number f/2.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority Lens Aperture f/2.6 Brightness -2 EV Color Space Information sRGB Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Exposure Bias 0 EV Image Height 2448 Image Width 3264 Focal Length 3.70 mm Flash No Flash
>>
>>2905612
>that modern Nikon font
my dick is hard anon. Is it engraved and filled with paint? Don't give the wrong answer.
>>
>>2906618
>Actually, it's the other way around
Welp, in the trash you go.
When you take a meter reading off a white scene, and you intend to render it as white in the final image, you add two stops.
Inverse for something you want to render as black (but not as much, because it's nice to have a little detail in there).
Alex's blog post reiterates constantly that metering is simple, and not a dark art at all.
The most helpful hint I've had re: metering was that "18% Grey" typically corresponds to the luminance of grass. So if your scene is complex and you have no idea what your meter is picking up on (and you don't have an actual meter, to take an incident reading), point it at the damned ground and lock your exposure there.
>>
>>2906598
Use slide film and cross process it.
The OP pic is just a B&W film scan I tinted green in GIMP so it would stand out in the catalogue.
>>
>>2906680
Of course it is, bae. As is the nameplate and serial no. Took it for its first spin last night drunkenly walking home. We'll see how well the TTL flash works. The film wind is like silk.
>focusing a 24mm in the dark is just as hard as ever though
>>
>>2906631
I really wish people would stop calling it that. It's not very nice to refer to cheap FF or Kodak emulsions as near expired ebay shit I bought for just over a quid.
>>
>>2906763
>focusing a 24mm in the dark is just as hard as ever though
Here's a protip:
Step 1: Assessing the situation
>Can you see your arm?
>Yes
Good, Proceed to step 2.
>No
All hope is lost. Just set it to f2.8 1/15 and hope for the bleedin' best.
Step 2: Rangefinding and scouting
>hold out your arm in front of you.
>Is the subject farther than your arm?
>Yes
Move lens focusing ring to the right.
>no
hmmmm
>can you safely elbow your target?
>Yes
Move it about the middle to left
>No
move it all the way to the fucking left
Step 3: calculating required 24mm eqv depth of field and available light
>do you have a flash?
>Yes
Set flash to mid/low power, set aperture to f8/11. Blast that mother.
>No
All hope is lost. Revert back to step 1 and answer no.
>>
File: 63230006.jpg (752KB, 1039x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
752KB, 1039x1024px
Just got my photo uploads from the lab and an entire roll had this happen.
Has anybody ever had this happen to them. It kind of made me laugh when I saw it but I'm kind of upset that a whole roll is pretty much fucked.
I'm guessing this edge ripped off when I was putting the roll in and stuck on the film?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.40.003 (150911) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1039 Image Height 1024
>>
>>2906631
love the vista 200, shot exclusively with it for 6 months
>>
File: cervesa.jpg (5MB, 3870x5552px) Image search:
[Google]
5MB, 3870x5552px
>>2906828
the fuck? that is bizzare. is this 120? it kind of looks like the tape that a new roll has on it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
>>2906828
Something has definitely scratched/wiped the emulsion off. No way to really know when it happened tho.
Lab should probably check their processor too.
>>
>>2906828
>The mark follows the mountain perfectly
Happy accidents, anon
>>
File: 63230003.jpg (895KB, 1039x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
895KB, 1039x1024px
>>2906830
>>2906832
no it looks like the part of the roll you tear off got in there somehow. I really have no idea how this happened, I feel like I would have noticed it come off when I was putting the roll in. Maybe it happened when I was winding to the first shot?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software EZ Controller 6.40.003 (150911) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1039 Image Height 1024
>>
>>2906838
Ah, that's the little paper tab that you tear open to start the roll. Either it somehow got carried along in your camera, or the lab fucked it up. did you get the negatives back too? I find it highly unlikely that this would somehow get stuck between the film and shutter.
>>
>>2906838
yeah thats what i meant, the tape that holds the fresh roll against the spool. that's definitely what it is, i totally recognize the kodak one lol.
i have also forgotten to take it off more than once but it never got wedged against the film plane. it just ended up on the inside of the take-up spool.
>>
I have a friend who lives in Tokorozawa, Saitama in Japan. She is willing to buy films for me there and have it shipped to my location since where I am, there are no more films. The shipping fees of Amazon and Ebay are outrageous so it isn't an option.
So I would like to ask if anyone here is living in Japan who knows where she can buy films in Tokorozawa? Or are films only available in Tokyo? I haven't been to Japan so I have no idea.
Thanks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 300 Image Height 300 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: selfportrait.jpg (759KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
759KB, 1000x1000px
Any interest in an experimental and alternative process spinoff thread?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:08:19 22:52:03 Color Space Information sRGB
>>
>>2906842
yeah i've had that happen as well, never seen this before though. seems bizarre
>>2906839
how likely is it to get carried along? i don't think i've heard of this happening before. negs coming in a few days, i just got these from the web uploads that the lab does when they're done processing. should i contact the lab and ask what they think or would that just be wasting their time?
>>
>>2906073
>Nikon EM
Why.jpg
>have two of them
Allofmywhy.jpg
>>
>>2906849
>>2906849
The closest Yodobashi camera or Litanies camera will surely have them. Yodobashi will probably have a better selection depending on what you're looking for. Otherwise you could always order what you want off Amazon.jp and have it sent to her address in Japan. Shipping is often super cheap or even free.
>>
File: EMTriX03.jpg (220KB, 1174x800px) Image search:
[Google]
220KB, 1174x800px
>>2906870
>small
>light
>cheap
>dat black Guigaro style on fleek
>dat perfect nikon long exposure in auto mode with m.Up on the self timer
The real question is why DON'T you have 2, my child?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1174 Image Height 800
>>
>>2906871
Auto correct. That should say Yodobashi Camera or Kitamura camera.
>>
>>2906298
thanks for the information
I do actually shoot mostly in portrait which sounds like a good thing with the ga645.
from what I hear about lenses though the GA645 lenses are pretty great.. only problem is I've searched online for some shots taken with a ga645 and there's only a handful that are interesting and obviously medium format.. but I suppose lots of people don't know what they're doing.
>>
>>2906871
I tried Yodobashi camera and amazon.jp but I can't order online from them because I can't checkout the items becauseit is using Google translate. Does yodobashi have an English site?
>>
>>2906873
>no manual exposure
>can't have long exposures, and overexposed photos
>plasticky
>not as durable as the Nikon FM or FE
>made for women
>>
>>2906815
Stop calling it what?
You buy Agfa Vista from Poundland in the UK. They've even started selling it wholesale online.
>>
File: 12063847_1124711457547196_4982997249287172193_n.jpg (122KB, 539x800px) Image search:
[Google]
122KB, 539x800px
>>2906942
And yet both of my plasticky, not as durable women's cameras give me sharp, perfectly exposed rolls of slide film 35 years later...
>also I forgot; THE best winding action of any 35mm camera
>>
>>2906956
Nikon FE is the best SLR I've ever owned.
>>
>>2906855
nice
>>
>>2906956
How can you overexposed a photo on the Nikon EM like long exposure if it doesn't have manual exposure?
Does it have exposure compensation?
>>
>>2905020
>If you freeze it then it supposedly lasts even longer, basically forever,
Not forever. It will still fog over time due to background radiation.
>tfw when no one has kept a frozen, lead lined storage room of all emulsions since photography began
Why even shoot?
>>
>>2906160
>using the T70 is like scrubbing your dick with AIDS-infected steel wool.
>But if your ego will allow you to shoot in Program Auto...
I think you're thinking of the T50. The T70 had shutter priority and full manual. Also had a partial meter (11%) for taking readings. Not quite as good as a real spot meter, but better than just relying on center weighted all the time.
>>
>>2906631
seems like a nice film, can you develop it with c41?
>>
File: F1000013.jpg (268KB, 1100x733px) Image search:
[Google]
268KB, 1100x733px
Took some photos.
S-Shit on me ?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:23 14:47:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3360 Image Height 2240
>>
File: F1010002.jpg (321KB, 1100x733px) Image search:
[Google]
321KB, 1100x733px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:07 15:31:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3360 Image Height 2240
>>
File: F1010028.jpg (324KB, 1100x733px) Image search:
[Google]
324KB, 1100x733px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:07 15:32:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3360 Image Height 2240
>>
File: F1010011.jpg (382KB, 1100x733px) Image search:
[Google]
382KB, 1100x733px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:07 15:31:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3360 Image Height 2240
>>
File: F1010029.jpg (266KB, 1100x733px) Image search:
[Google]
266KB, 1100x733px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:03:23 14:49:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3360 Image Height 2240
>>
File: F1000008.jpg (337KB, 1200x799px) Image search:
[Google]
337KB, 1200x799px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-3000 Camera Software FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. FE FDi Service Software / FRONTIER355/375-3.0-0E-522 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:07 15:30:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3360 Image Height 2240
>>
>>2907016
Yep it's C41. Apparently it's rebranded Fujicolor 200. If you're in the UK a few Poundland stores have a decent amount of stock left.
If not you can order it online.
>>
>>2907020
Reminds me of the artwork for DJ Metatron
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 600 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2906990
I meant the T70.
"Having Manual" doesn't make a camera nice to use.
You need to peer through the viewfinder and see if a number is flashing or not to meter? And make sure you're holding that button down the whole time, or the viewfinder "display" will go away. Then look again on top of the cam to see what shutter speed it's on. Then there's no exposure comp. It's a fucking debacle. If you have to use that camera, the program is far and away the least painful.
The 3 options, for tele, normal and wide, are even better than most modern cams, as you can basically make the cam bias towards preferencing shutter speed or preferencing DOF.
>>
>>2907043
It's sold in all Kruidvat (major Dutch drug store chain) stores for years. I'm guessing it's still made nowadays or their stock must have been huge. Also, most expiry dates are >2017
>>
>>2907139
All the ones I've bought are either 2018/19.
>>
File: Film6041_08.jpg (714KB, 1000x993px) Image search:
[Google]
714KB, 1000x993px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
>>2906949
You post on 4chan. At work, at family functions, on your fucking tombstone we'll make sure to call you that fucking 4chan guy. We all know where we'll find you.
>>
>>2906940
I have no problem ordering off Amazon.jp in English? If all else fails can't you just tell your friend what to order for you?
>>
>>
>>2906855
Looks cool, I'm interested. It could probably just stay in this thread though.
>>
>>2907166
Amazon.jp is fine in translation but the Yodobasi and Kitamura camera, I can't translate it properly via Google translate.
>>
>>2906291
IMO not when you're shooting a SLR - a 645 neg is already big enough. 6×6 or 6×7 is better when you're shooting a rangefinder, because 645 negs are oriented vertically on the film roll and all 645 rangefinders shoot portrait orientation in normal position.
>>
>>2906291
6x7 is about 4x as big as 35mm
6x4.5 is maybe a bit bigger than 2 35mm frames stuck together end to end.
to me, 645 isn't worth it. 6x6 / 6x7 is the way to go.
>>
>>2907206
Which country do you hail from? I want to make sure I never send my non-existant children there for basic numeracy lessons.
>>
File: formats[1].gif (3KB, 255x170px) Image search:
[Google]
![formats[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/tBl43pu.gif "formats[1]")
3KB, 255x170px
>>2907220
:^)
>>
>>2907206
6x7 is typically counted as being about twice as big as 35mm, in film area. Even the focal length and dof calculations are done with a factor of two. 645 isn't much bigger than one 35mm, but it's enough of a difference. Basically 645 is the best of both worlds, with relatively small camera bodies, fast lenses(for medium format) and easily superior IQ compared to 35mm, with good dof control. If anon is looking for a camera system that is similar in use and design to 35mm cams, then 645 is a good start, but it won't compare to bigger neg cameras, obviously.
>>
Just got my first color rolls back from my Mamiya C33. Don't ever want to shoot 35mm again after seeing these
>>
I've been out of photography for 2 years to due a lack of interest. I want to get back in now. Is Ektar 100, Portra 160 and Velvia 50 still available in 4x5?
>>
>>2907230
You could have googled this.
>>
>>2907232
Yes, and I got inconclusive results so fuck you.
>>
>>2907233
http://www.adorama.com/kkp1604510.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/679020-USA/Kodak_1587484_4_x_5_Ektar.html
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Fujifilm-reversal-film-Fujichrome-Velvia-50-4x5-4x5-color-20-sheets-From-Japan-/262467380153?_trksid=p2141725.m3641.l6368
30 seconds of google you fuck. You're welcome.
>>
>>2907230
>>2907233
No. Due to lack of interest all three emulsions were pulled.
If only you had continued to google their names or look at any reputable distributor you'd have seen that they were still available.
How the fuck do you get inconclusive results on a search? You shoot 4x5, how can you be this fucking dense?
When I finally got into Neopan/Acros earlier this year, I did a search for muh emulsions, looked. Goodbye Neopan 400 ez pz. Also not for sale in any reputable store.
>>
File: laukku.jpg (287KB, 800x600px) Image search:
[Google]
287KB, 800x600px
I should sell this to some Nikon fanboi.
>>
>>2907246
reminder to list is as BILLINGHAM RARE when you do :^)
>>
>>2907245
4x5 is mostly shot by old farts who don't know how to use the Internet
>>
File: Japan203.jpg (573KB, 1202x800px) Image search:
[Google]
573KB, 1202x800px
>>2907226
>>2907226
Your 35mm must have sucked donkey dick m8.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:01:19 10:56:34 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1202 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Custom Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
>>
So I finally got everything together and last night developed my three first rolls, today I did three more. Everything seems to be going pretty good. Still need to figure out scanning, I have a macro lens and extension rings, and can use gf's old school light table but I guess I need to figure out how to block out ambient light, how to hold the film on the table etc.
Also I just realized I'm gonna need negative sleeves or everything is going to be a huge mess really soon. Where to buy those cheapest (in Europe)? Or do I just suck up and pay the postage fees at Macodirect and buy from there? I guess I could buy some film too while I'm at it but I don't really need it right now.
>>
Nikon AIs 20mm 2.8 in mint condition for $100, should I cop?
>>
File: IMG_0006 (Medium).jpg (87KB, 508x768px) Image search:
[Google]
87KB, 508x768px
Until work starts up again I can't really afford a new set of chems so I've been playing with the idea of double exposure in scanner instead of developing the rolls I shot recently. I'm taking random negs just to test and see if it works anything like a real, in camera double exposure.
So far it seems like it only works if you pair an extremely contrasty neg with very few mid tones, and a regular neg. Setting the scanner from the default exposure (100%) to 200 made a big difference. Pic related, you can just sort of see a skyline of buildings upside down coming in from the left. I wasn't expecting anything workable but it seems like it might be worth playing with, it might work better with proper analog printing.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model CanoScan 5600F Camera Software MP Navigator EX 2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1200 dpi Vertical Resolution 1200 dpi Image Created 2016:08:20 23:21:43 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1164 Image Height 1759 White Balance Auto
>>
>>2907337
I think he's mad because his local Poundland sold out of film.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1536 Image Height 2048 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2907362
>have 150+ rolls in fridge
>mad
Nah, it just comes down to dubbing it something that it's not. It's just a a budget C-41 film. Call it what it is. Agfa vista 200.
>>
>>2907366
B-but I did call it that...
>Poundland film, Agfa Vista 200.
>>
>>2907371
aye laddie, but ye led it off wi a fukken unforgetable intro a a >poundland film
That's where the issue is. Drop the poondland title and we're golden.
>>
>>
>>2907185
No English sites that I'm aware of. They carry pretty much any Fuji elmusion made though. Your friend would have to go to the store herself as im not aware of any online ordering you an do via Yodobashi and kitamura. if you're curious about them carrying a particular film feel free to ask me and I can let you know.
>>2907226
Welcome to the 6x6 club!
>>2907346
Are chems like, <$30?
Dropped off 5 rolls of 120 Provia, 1 roll of 120 Ektar, 1 roll of 120 Portra 400, and 2 rolls of 220 800z. Get them back in 6 days. Pumped to see the results and how well I did judging exposure on the Provia stuff.
>>
>>2907572
What was the bill for all that then?
>>
>>2907602
E6 = 630¥/roll
120 c41 = 580¥/roll
220 c41 = 1300¥/roll
Total of 6910¥ with is about $70 in freedom units.
220 is a bit of a ripoff so I won't be shooting anymore of that unless I need to.
>>
>>2907414
What's your issue with poundland you snobby cunt?
>>
>>2907717
He's probably from London.
>>
>>2907612
Are those standard prices in Japan? That's actually pretty cheap compared to where I'm from, though I'm not really surprised.
To any of you HC110 developers, have you got any special recipes? I've just went with massive dev chart temperatures and times and dilution B and probably will until I see a reason not to, but I have some rolls I know have't got very special shots I could try experimenting with.
>>
>>2907206
well then, I dislike square frames so a 6x7 rangefinder then? around/under $1000AU.
>>2907224
>>2907222
6x4.5 still looks plenty big to be honest but I'll still take recommendations. Basically I want the option of being able to blow these up for prints.. but I guess then that quality comes down to whoever is printing it because it won't be me.
>>
File: article-2164786-0F6A372800000578-894_638x409.jpg (67KB, 638x409px) Image search:
[Google]
67KB, 638x409px
So what's the consensus on PoundLAND film? I know it's cheap but the results look good for some thing from the land of pounds
>>
>>2907757
Have you actually read any of this thread?
It's good. Rebranded Fujicolor 200.
>>
>>2907572
Yeah something like that. ID-11 is £6.99 for a litre, I've seen D76 for £9.99 for 3.8 litres (seems too good to be true almost), plus a litre of fixer which online is something like 10 or 15 quid. For reference £10 is about 13 US dollars.
I have the money, it's more that there are more appropriate things to spend it on right now. When work kicks off in September I'll be able to get back in.
>>
>>2907746
Yeah, pretty standard. Lots of photo "labs" around that aren't really labs, but places that do enlargements and photo album type stuff. Many of them will send your film tons Fuji developer for around those prices give or take 100¥. When I lived in Kyoto I went to a major Yodobashi camera and paid those same prices.
I'm going to be taking advantage of the cheap E6 processing for the rest of my time here. C41 is actually a tad more expensive here than what I used to pay in Canada.
>>
>>2907752
6×4.5 is plenty even for mural size prints. Especially if you shoot Arcos or some other extremely fine grained film. Don't forget that size and weight are also factors.
>>
what scanner does /p/ use for 120 scans?
>>
>>2907855
I'm using a Epson Perfection V550
>>
>>2907292
good afternoon mr rockwell
>>
>>2907855
V600
>>
File: 000011870002.jpg (316KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
316KB, 1000x667px
last month I was in São Paulo fucking around
took a couple of snapshots. I'll post 3 of them
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3089 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:21 12:45:34 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>
File: 000011870008.jpg (252KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
252KB, 1000x667px
film is some 135 ISO 400 Kodak
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3089 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:21 12:45:45 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>
File: 000011870016.jpg (359KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
359KB, 1000x667px
I like this one
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model EZ Controller Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3089 Image Height 2048 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:08:21 12:45:19 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667
>>
File: IMG_0586_2.jpg (720KB, 1920x1471px) Image search:
[Google]
720KB, 1920x1471px
Provia 100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Photographer Johan Robertsson Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:09:11 01:39:38 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 111.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1920 Image Height 1471 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: IMG_5901.jpg (761KB, 1200x801px) Image search:
[Google]
761KB, 1200x801px
135 Portra 800
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Photographer Johan Robertsson Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:10:02 23:58:26 Exposure Time 1/90 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 801 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: 26026145410_2010a9f0ab_c.jpg (528KB, 800x800px) Image search:
[Google]
528KB, 800x800px
Bronica SQA - 80MM
Portra 400
1/3
>>
File: IMG_0491.jpg (455KB, 1254x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
455KB, 1254x1024px
120 ilford 100 delta pro
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Photographer Johan Robertsson Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:10:23 23:01:50 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 111.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1254 Image Height 1024 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: 24214047851_c53417369d_c.jpg (390KB, 543x800px) Image search:
[Google]
390KB, 543x800px
Contax T2
Portra 400 (I think, maybe Superia 400)
2/3
>>
File: IMG_03292.jpg (442KB, 842x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
442KB, 842x1024px
120 Provia 100
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
>>
File: 24948943955_4ee8be66bc_c.jpg (446KB, 539x800px) Image search:
[Google]
446KB, 539x800px
Contax G1 - 45mm
Portra 400
3/3
>>
File: IMG_0722.jpg (571KB, 836x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
571KB, 836x1024px
120 Portra 160
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Photographer Johan Robertsson Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2014:10:30 21:40:57 Exposure Time 1/90 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 111.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 836 Image Height 1024 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2907921
boy are those are some nice colors tad cool though
>>
File: svolvaer074.jpg (317KB, 800x638px) Image search:
[Google]
317KB, 800x638px
Think this is T-max 100 6x7
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2013-05-22T18:40:42+02:00 Image Width 800 Image Height 638
>>
>>2907909
jesus what the fuck did you do to the colours
delete this
>>
>>2907922
Yeah the probably are a little over sharp. I pulled them from my flickr, which I've been told sharpens them or something.
>>
File: Film194.jpg (854KB, 987x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
854KB, 987x1000px
>>2907963
depends on what you want to do. If you want to make large prints, you probably need to DSLR scan but for general purposes (social media, /p/, flickr etc.) I quite like the results. Here's a B&W shot I scanned today
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
>>
>>2907947
Yeah the probably are a little over sharp. I pulled them from my flickr, which I've been told sharpens them or something.
>>
>>2907982
Do you have any tips, or a technique you follow? Have a V600, but have yet to get decent results from it. I usually just pay an extra $5 when developing film so medium res scans. Thinking of selling the scanner, but might keep it unless I want to make higher res scans if I decide to make some prints down the road.
>>
>>2907923
It's in the shade obviously. Main light source being the blue sky.
>>
>>2907937
seems i forgot to convert color profile to sRGB, although if you care about color accuracy you would be using Firefox with color management enabled and using the color management extension coupled with your monitors color profile for accurate colors. (it's the only browser that supports correct color management)
>>
>>2907993
No. It looks like absolute shit.
>>
Alright, so since this seems to be DSLR scanning central as well, I'm gonna ask a couple of questions as my last post didn't really get noticed.
I've got a camera, a macro lens, extension rings, a tripod and an old school light(ing?) table. Also a retina screen iPad if that's better. And of course, about 10 rolls of both medium format and 35mm I want to scan, and I'm about to develop more. Do I still need to get something for good results? Diffusion material, something to lay on top/under the film? Also is having ambient light in the room with this kind of setup going to cause me any trouble?
>>
Is there a black and white film that looks good without pushing?
>>
>>2907909
I actually really like this snapshit... I like the way the colors reflect from the road and the composition is fine I think
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DX_encoding
I can't believe I didn't think of this before. You just scrape off or add to change the ISO that automatic exposure film cameras read.
Huh. Cool.
>>
tl;dr
can get any sort of kodak film (colour negative) I want for free, already have plenty of ektar, what should I go for?
Thinking portra 400 but maybe 160 or something else entirely.
>>
I am developing some of my digital photos at one studio with chemicals;
For mate toning of the picture, besides the paper Matte paper, which chemicals could give me better yellow tones? and which ones could give me better blue tones? There's something like this actually or I'm just hallucinating?
>>
>>2908121
It's better with a diffused flash rather than using an iPad etc. Get a sheet of opal acrylic and shoot a flashgun at 1/128 through that. Your camera should be at around f8 1/125 and the lowest ISO. Shoot RAW obviously.
>>2908192
T Max.
>>2908204
Stop commenting on your own photos.
>>2908221
Yep neat trick, I use it quite a bit when I'm shooting my Mju II.
>>2908331
Portra 400 is one of my favourite 135 films of all time. Do you work in a camera store?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 540 Image Height 493 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
I only have a kit lens - is it enough for dslr scanning?
>>
>>2908390
You might be able to get usable results if it can focus really close but a macro lens is what you need
>>
>>2908331
Portra 400 and just overexpose it if you want to go lower on the ISO, it's great even at 100. From what I've seen, I don't really like the skin tones (for white people) with Ektar. Portra is a lot better in that regard and also very versatile.
>>2908369
No flash I'm afraid.
>>2908221
You can also tape over if you want to go slower. I use both all the time with my only DX reading cameras like Mju I and II.
>>
>>2908369
>>2908400
OK getting some Portra 400 in 35mm, and Portra 160 in 120mm, see how we go.
Agree with Ektar though, too orange/pink for skin tones, great for architectural stuff though.
I run a semi photography based magazine with my partner and Kodak is offering us some film to review so thought I'd ask.
>>
>>2908400
>suggests buying Portra 400 and shooting it at 400 is too fast
>completely ignores the fact Portra 160 exists
I seriously don't understand this blanket "over-expose print film by multiple stops" meme at all...
>>
>>2908390
You can use extension tubes and it works perfectly fine.
>>
>>2908449
thanks
>>
>>2905004
all i have is
1 x undeveloped superia 400
1 x agfa vista 400 (still in my nikon fg)
1 x tri x (still in my trip 35)
1 x unopened roll of tri x
Not sure if I want to keep using tri x in my trip 35 and colour in my Nikon or just shoot the tri x as soon as i finish the roll of agfa.
>>
>>2904800
my photography teacher in highschool bought one for us to use. there was only 5 people in the class and I was the only one who ever used it.
I only ever printed black and white stuff on some ilford galerie fine art paper but I really really liked the results.
I can probably take some pics of the prints if anybody wants.
>>
>>2905464
nice, but lacking a good subject.
>>
Is an x-ray film protector worth it for $15?
Does x-ray scanners really exposeds the films especially those x-ray scanners at airports?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 320 Image Height 236 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2908491
never had a problem and taken through plenty of different rolls of 35mm film, albeit, through european scanners.. I've heard american ones are a little more intrusive.
>>
>>2908470
please do
>>
>>2908409
I understand you don't get it. I've shot a load of Portra 160, but I prefer Portra 400 even if I shoot it at 100. Subjective stuff, you know. For speed I'd rather go straight to Portra 800, I like the 400 most at least a little overexposed.
>>
>>2908491
>Is an x-ray film protector worth it for $15?
I remember reading somewhere that those scanners are really useless. I never had film ruined by scanners (even 1600 ISO), but I usually just ask them to hand check it so it doesn't have to go through the scanner. On around 15 flights, I only had my film go through a scanner once. Just make sure that you arrive there early so you don't have to rush through security and keep your film on top of your carry on luggage, ideally in a ziplock bag or something
>>
>>2908504
>I remember reading somewhere that those scanners are really useless
*protectors
>>
>>2908338
a bump...
>>
Has anyone calibrated a non split prism screen on a Hasselblad 500c before?
I have a loupe, a screwdriver and a church steeple I can see out my window as an infinity point, do I need anything else?
>>
>>2908522
Try posting on a forum in your native language, Pedro.
>>
>>2908614
he's asking which chemicals give the better yellow or blue colors. The english is not perfect, far from it, but you can understand what is he asking for...
>>
>>2908621
>builds wall
>>
>>2908621
>he's asking which chemicals give the better yellow or blue colors
yeah I know what he said
that doesn't mean it makes any sense
>>
>>2908748
Never heard of color temperature?
>>
>>2905016
its never been a meme, its pretty much for people who stockpile though
>>
>>2908753
How would choice of developer have an effect on that?
>>
>>2904798
>Vivitar
i guess it's official
[spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fz50hqWrHUY[/spoiler]
>>
>>2906988
someone should create a massive lead lined freezer room that stores thousands of rolls of every available film to be opened when they stop producing film
>>
>>2908777
I'm surprised the thread got this old before it triggered someone!
Unless its one of those bizarre old series one primes, it belongs in the trash m80.
>>
>>2908753
Color temperature is determined during the printing phase, not the film development phase.
>>
File: 1444681655002.jpg (16KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 300x300px
>developing several rolls of film at 3 am, very sleepy
>I could've been shooting digital if I wasn't such a fucking hipster
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe ImageReady Image-Specific Properties:
>>
>>2907986
sorry for the late reply. I feel like it works a lot lot better for MF than for 35mm. You can of course scan 35mm but the results are meh (don't have pictures on this PC right now, will post some examples when I get home).
As far as the scanning process goes, I usually just load the film, wipe down the scanning section with a microfibre cloth, use condensed air on the emulsion site and flip it over quickly (so the dust coming from the air doesn't settle on that side), put the film down, use compressed air on the other side of the film and that's it.
As for the scanning, I use professional mode 16bit greyscale (for B&W) or 48bit color (for color negatives), 2400 dpi, do a preview scan, adjust the highlights/shadows/blacks if necessary, check dust removal to medium (high for 35mm) and scan+export as .tiff files.
>>
>>2909085
iktf bro.
I only ever process at nights too because I hate using a changing bag in the summer.
>>
>>2907986
>>2909086
I own a V550 which is pretty much the same. I'd get rid of my flatbed entirely if it wasn't for my xpan/bronica. As much as I hate to admit it. You're better off DSLR scanning/using a dedicated option like a plustek/pakon etc for standard 135 negs.
The biggest thing you need to do to get good scans is to understand the limitations of the scanner. The best advice I'd give for scanning 135 on it is to not exceed the optical DPI when scanning and to downscale when possible. Although the scanner states it's 6400 DPI, it's really a bit closer to 1600 DPI in terms of resolving power. I personally scan at 3200 DPI and downscale to 1600 in PS.
I usually don't use the auto exposure results from the scanner/it's crops. Instead I select the frames manually. I usually scan with dust removal/ICE etc all turned off and adjust in photoshop. Alex has an amazing guide he wrote on his site that should help you get the best colour out of your scanner. http://www.alexburkephoto.com/blog/2013/06/02/scanning-and-editing-color-negative-film
>>
>>2908827
nah not triggered
it's v2000 a clon of cosina ct-1super, pentax K and 1/2000 shutter, imo it's pretty good but what do i know, it's my first film slr
>>
File: Olympus-XA2.jpg (50KB, 500x351px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 500x351px
any XA2 users?
>>
File: XAfront.jpg (498KB, 1000x750px) Image search:
[Google]
498KB, 1000x750px
>>2909139
>XA2
No but OG XA user here
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 Windows Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 29 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2016-08-23T13:40:03+02:00 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 32 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 5.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.15 mm Image Width 1000 Image Height 750 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual
>>
>>2909085
this is why I am still alive
>>
>>2909175
Is there a manual for cleaning them? I love mine, but last couple times I used it, the light leaks were pretty bad.
>>
>>2907937
what's wrong with the colours?
>>
File: IMG_20160825_183901.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x2448px
I'm a newfag. I have rodinal, how do I read this table so I can develop properly
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model GT-I9300 Camera Software MOB30Z Equipment Make samsung Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:08:25 18:39:01 Image Width 3264 Image Height 2448 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/2.7 Exposure Program Aperture Priority Focal Length 3.70 mm Lens Aperture f/2.6 White Balance Auto Image Width 3264 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Exposure Mode Auto Comment User comments Image Height 2448 Flash No Flash Exposure Bias 4832 EV Brightness 0 EV Scene Capture Type Standard ISO Speed Rating 107 Exposure Time 1/30 sec
>>
>>2910602
Rotate it 90 degrees clockwise for a start friend :)
EI refers to the speed you metered the film at.
The development times are all given for chemicals at 20 degrees C.
Pick your developer, which in your case is Rodinal R09, and pick which dilution you'll be using. Either 1 part rodinal to 25 parts water, or 1 part rodinal to 50 parts water.
Go along in that row until you find what speed you metered at, so if you metered at 400, in a 1:25 dilution your development time is six minutes (with a proper agitation routine).
So to read the table pick your developer and dilution, then read across to find the appropriate development time for the speed you metered at.
Good luck!
There's also a new fim thread over here: >>2908966
Then at the bottom it says to fix for 2 to 5 minutes.
>>
>>2910681
thank you!! (btw I posted the pic from my phone and it auto rotated like that...)
>>
>>2910693
No problem!
That looks like Ilford Pan 400? It doesn't have a fact sheet but if you read the one for Ilford HP5 it's not too far off. Then read the tech sheet for Ilford powder devs. The specifics won't be relevant but they explain everything like how to measure your chemicals, how to agitate, how to develop, it makes it all very simple. Much better than most blog articles.
I've shot seven rolls of it, I like it! Pushed it to 800 twice. Decent emulsion, I hope you get some good photos out of it!
>>
File: Nikon FA Gold.jpg (41KB, 590x425px) Image search:
[Google]
41KB, 590x425px
Fags, I've been shooting with an F3 for a while now and want something similar but smaller. Looking at the FE or the FA... what do you recommend?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2012:01:14 19:06:32
Thread posts: 321
Thread images: 113
Thread images: 113