Reminder: /p/ are not your peers.
They are a merely a collection of uneducated dilettantes who, for the best part, have no idea about art theory.
Most have never even attended a University lecture on a related subject, never mind actually cultivated years of hands on experience.
Their understanding of Photography, and by extension of art, come from popular media. They see hyped imagery on the internet, they see so-called "shocking" imagery on television. They stand, their minds fogged and blinkered, in art galleries, passing comments on artists they know little about.
Do not think that you can find worthwhile critique with these people. They can only see the surface of your intentions and compare it with the surface of another's. They have no greater understanding of your work - as they do not seek it. They sit in front of screens flicking through images which either stimulate their immediate interest, or are cast aside as inadequate. These people would cast aside a Van Gogh for being too creative, a Van Eyke for being too religious, or an Araki for being too pornographic.
Be creative, allow no ones shallow sniping to remove your vigour. Photography is a medium which has no best purpose - you must find its purpose.
Should I get the Fuji XT1 or the Sony A7ii?
>>2895228
Do your research.
(I would go Sony)
>>2895229
>I would go Sony
cucked.
the only good answer is: discard digital, go film. ur a pleb.
>>2895235
>the only good answer is: discard digital, go film.
Literally proving op right
>>2895219
Araki does not belong in the same universe as Van Gogh and Van Eyke, let alone the same sentence.
>>2895236
OP namedropped Van Meme, hes a tool.
>>2895235
>go film
1976 called, they want their meme back, faggot.