SFX 200 Exposure

File: image.png (4MB, 2208x1242px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2208x1242px

Here's one I digitally rebalanced. They're supposed to be very dark due to the nature of the film.
This is my ideal exposure.
How much should I adjust exposure?

File: image.png (2MB, 2208x1242px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2208x1242px

A few more for reference

File: image.png (2MB, 2208x1242px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2208x1242px

>>2889842
These are all after being digitally remastered. All of the scans are overexposed like the first picture posted.

>>2889837
this is negative film? you mean underexposed?
your highlights look normal but the shadows are empty

did you make sure to compensate for the red filter? that's going to reduce the amount of light reaching the film by quite a bit

I think you mean underexposed, by a lot. You do know that you're supposed to compensate several stops for using a red filter plus a polarizer, right?

sfx is not sensitive enough to IR to use a 25A filter if youre looking for a pronounced IR effect. you need something like a hoya R72.

>>2889839
By how many stops you digitally adjusted it? That's your answer.

>>2889837
You put a red filter on ir film? Holy fuck anon, top keks.

Just to go over this, you used film that's only sensitive towards and off the end of the red end of the spectrum, and you put on a filter that makes everything red. And then you come in here surprised at the lack of contrast.

And let me guess, you didn't dial in +4 to account for the filters, and didn't consider repricoscity