Birthday Party in dark Restaurant

>>2889680
>1/80 sec
>f/5.6
>ISO800
I think your birthday test went wrong.

>>2889680
>shooting f5.6 in the incredibly low light
>genuinely being this retarded

File: 2016-07-24 Birthday Test_1.jpg (125KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1000x667px

>>2889681
Yeah I know like I said I have others which arent as bad - but they play pit area I messed up like this, are there any tricks.

Here I tried noise removal and filling light and bumping up the contrast and exposure.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	AfterShot 2.4.0.119
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:25 14:25:09
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: D700-1469449229551.jpg (710KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 1000x667px

>>2889680
yeah, youre fucked

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:25 22:28:43
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2889683
I couldn't think of anything else.
Have you shot raw or jpeg?

>>2889687
Raw

But looking through the others I see I messed up further when I took them to the bright area I bumped up the shutter speed and then because you cant meter it properly in any case I kept the faster shutter speed for the second time in the play pit.

I think I'll have 20 usable ones (before going to PP) but there are a lot of shots with the kids in the play area which are basically unusable.

>>2889691
shooting RAW is the best thing you could have done because now you can bump exposure and open up shadows in lightroom.
If you want to put a few of the raw files on dropbox, I'd be glad to work on one or two for you. I'm sure some other anons might also be willing to try to help you salvage them.

File: aa.jpg (131KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1000x667px

>>2889680
Badoobie Poopooshits

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:25 18:41:09
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>2889680
Did you have a long zoom lens on that couldn't open wider? Anyways you should've raised iso
Yeah if you shot raw, they'll be usable

why didnt you just use a fucking flash

>>2889680
It baffles me how is this even possible on a fucking 70D. Cameras nowadays make technically decent photos instead of you. Even DSLR you can literally just point and shoot. Why didn't you just leave it on full auto if you have no idea what you are doing? The main problem isn't the darkness (ISO 3200 is usable on 70D, there is pop up flash, and your zoom lens has a point where the aperture can be wider then 5.6).

Its very obvious from the EXIF data that you are exceptionally clueless. How did you even decide to use manual mode?

This thread made me a feel bit sad ):

>>2890270
>amateur asking for help because he knows he fucked up
>better tell him he fucked up

>>2890271

I'm a broke Eastern European, so drastically misusing expensive(for my standards) toys just bothers me more.

Also, he didn't just fuck up. If he used auto, or a less presumptuous camera i would have not reacted the same way.

File: art.jpg (126KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1000x667px

This image is art.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016-07-26T08:53:03-04:00
Flash	No Flash Function
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

>>2890221
Thank you for asking the right questions.