I went to Paris, here's some photatos

File: Paris-45.jpg (2MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3648px

>>2884319

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:15 20:56:56
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Niggas In Paris.jpg (1MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5472x3648px

>>2884320

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:15 20:58:29
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	79.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Paris-29.jpg (2MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3648px

>>2884322
Which one of you was this?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:15 20:54:13
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	113.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Paris-4.jpg (1MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5472x3648px

>>2884324

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:15 20:49:58
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2884319
snapshit.
>>2884320
18mm, framing is still too tight. What the hell? Also not using the color of the flag???
>>2884322
Even worse snapshit. How do you press the shutter, think this gonna be an ok picture, the UPLOAD IT HERE???
whatawasteofa7dmk2.cr2

>or we can talk about Fuji and Sony like every other thread.
Yea, good idea there.

File: Paris-61.jpg (2MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3648px

>>2884326

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:15 20:59:11
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Paris-32.jpg (2MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3648px

>>2884328

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:15 20:54:44
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	45.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2884324
Underexposed, still a snapshit.
>>2884326
Dat chromab, with Canon's best lens on a crop sensor. Your best picture so far. Also details are blown like it's high ISO but
>ISO 100
What a joke of a camera.

>>2884327
I mean these are all snapshits from walking round the city, don't see how I can direct 5 people all independently posing in front of a photogenic background...

>>2884328
>>2884329
How can you be that bad? I don't want list every things that upset me about those.

>>2884319

Paris fag here. All you did was taking some tourist snapshit.

There are plenty of beautiful places to shoot in Paris (and outside) and you just missed anon. Le Louvre, l'arc de Triomphe, do you even visit ?

>>2884334
You could compose something atleast ok, especially in the world most photographed place. But fuck no, even wit a pro camera with a 100% accurate viewfinder, you chimp around and those are the results. Read a book about composition please.

>>2884335
>I don't want list every things that upset me about those.

Not him, but could you do so anyway please?

File: 2014-11-7-3744-Ektar100-00.jpg (242KB, 1500x992px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1500x992px

>abs out the ass
>fine detail is murdered
>everything's slightly shaky for some reason
>everything's underexposed by at least a stop
>they're all snapshits

just
kill
yourself

you couldn't even manage to take a whole picture of the arc, the most basic of tourist's snapshits

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	692
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:16 13:13:13
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Focal Length	5.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Should have gone to Nice

File: IMG_6629 (1).jpg (460KB, 2592x1728px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 2592x1728px

Really loving all the CC in this thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	Photos 1.5
Photographer	MK
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Image Created	2016:07:12 20:04:37
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2592
Image Height	1728
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2884344
Well, then...
>>2884328
>crooked horizon
>bird looks like dust on sensor, clone tool
>sculpture is cut
>lamplight is cut
>the building isn't interesting with this hedgerow
>the Eiffel tower is cut, another object missing its lower part
>angle of view is meh for the building
>chrome abs out the ass

>>2884329
>crushed blacks in daylight (I don't remember the Champ Elysée being THAT dark)
>not enough emphasis on the people taking pictures (yet again, wrong cropping/angle of view)
>the "zara home" sign is distracting and should be blurred/crop
>ISO 100
>you couldn't take a decent picture there, but you roll with it, instead of finding a decent point of view
>about that point of view, there's so many people's back
>with an apsc, you could had focused on the planes

>>2884383
It's shit.
>1/200
>f/2.8
why not
>1/30
>f/7.1 ?

>Exposure Program Manual
Another victim of this meme.

>>2884389
It's not like I was shooting sports or anything.
And yes, >>2884383 isn't really that great.

>>2884334
whats the point of posting them in the first place then? if you're just going to come back with "uhh they're quick snapshits" you might as well wait until you have something to post with some actual effort applied.

>>2884319
dude, wtf?! you missed a nice shot here by not showing their shot from a different perspective.

>>2884347
clean your negatives you lazy fuck.

It hurts my anus that someone like you has a camera like this.

I really need to mug one of you guys, just so that there is justice in the world.

>>2884320
It is too tight but I like the b/w not knowing it was the flag. Could have worked with it a little more to get something more whether it was b/w or color.

>>2884319
If the narrative includes the "photographer" at frame right - put him in the frame. I thought it was about the black dude on the bench.

>>2884322
Everything not good other than guy is in focus.

>>2884324
You saw something interesting - stuck it in the middle and went "click" - not enough.

>>2884326
Tbis is better. Wish we could see the apex of that roof, though. Horizon may be off a bit?

>>2884328
No

>>2884329
You got the moment - but the whole exposure can't be so dark. I don't know how to fix this one - but you did get the moment. The photo is too much about ZARA HOME

>>2884347
pErSpecTiVe is not helpful here

>>2884383
The sky is doing nothing but hurting. You have a choice... shoot this underexposed and try to bring shadow detail back, or frame the sky out of the photo when shooting.

>>2884490
>Canon
>Shadow detail
of course, I can get 12 stops with ML, but I guess I didn't do it for whatever reason.