Disposable camera shots from the early 2000s will become the

They already were like two or three years ago. Get with it.

>>2878933
No because drugstores charge 12$ usd for them and most photographers just use an olympus xa or some shit with film in it
I've known lomography enthusiasts that have used expired disposable cameras for years
The only trend in terms of photography i can see happening in vaporwave is mid-early 2000s digital compact photography which *gasp* people are already doing "ironically"

>>2878992
Those old shitty point and shoots give the worst pictures imaginable.

The only worse cameras are ones on flip phones.

Every smartphone these days takes far better pictures than those point and shoots. They have like a $0 value.

>>2878933
>will become the next vaporwave aesthetic.
>the next vaporwave aesthetic
>vaporwave aesthetic
>vaporwave
>aesthetic
wtf are you trying to say?
speak American

>>2879036
t. butthurt digipleb

>dat full frame sensor
>dat dynamic range
>dat ease of use, rugged durability

Like four years ago I went on a trip across Europe with a couple of friends and we took 8 or so disposables with us, broke one and lost one but just snapped away and didn't really care

When we got back we got them put on a CD for us and the pics obviously weren't great but there was some really cool ones and some good ones of us with friends we had met etc

Highly recommend

>>2879036
>Every smartphone these days takes far better pictures than those point and shoots. They have like a $0 value.
Yet most of those point and shoots don't hover around the 28mm fixed eqv.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (601KB, 1000x702px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 1000x702px

A shot i took way back in 2003 with a disposable

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1347
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Created	2015:03:11 21:02:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	702

File: IMG_20150307_0004.jpg (764KB, 1000x706px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1000x706px

>>2879287
another

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1355
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Created	2015:03:13 16:57:34
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	706

>>2879287
>>2879289
nice snapshits bro.

>>2879287
So scratch, much retro, wow. It's actually a nice shot with all that aberration though. It would be profoundly boring without it.

>>2878933
People were doing that in the late 2000s and earlier. The next thing would probably be taking even noisier photos

File: 3098659985_76b845a12d_o.jpg (987KB, 1280x880px) Image search: [Google]

987KB, 1280x880px

New York 2005

File: 4883937648_8c4cab1c03_o.jpg (772KB, 1100x777px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 1100x777px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	15300
Image Height	21059
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2010:08:12 00:56:14
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1100
Image Height	777

File: xa.jpg (1MB, 1899x1099px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1899x1099px

>>2880510
Almost thought I saw that on flickr from the thumbnail when looking at olympus xa picture examples

good shit btw

File: 4883332753_b98d12721c_o.jpg (1021KB, 1090x777px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 1090x777px

people are pretty much using disposables when they go in for Lomography bullshit anyway.

People will more likely look back at old instagram photos and say "why did they keep on applying shitty filters to everything?"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Created	2010:08:11 23:57:02
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1090
Image Height	777

>>2880508
>>2880437

Dude....

>>2880517
beautiful

>>2880511
>cutting the top corner of the van off

do you even compose

>>2880537
do you even read posts