foto up: salty sailor edition

File: FOTO5776.jpg (263KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5519.jpg (248KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 617x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5518.jpg (140KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5477.jpg (148KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5442.jpg (250KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5440.jpg (280KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5439.jpg (291KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 617x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5576.jpg (203KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5616.jpg (252KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5601.jpg (271KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 617x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5611.jpg (247KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5610.jpg (272KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5595.jpg (216KB, 618x900px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 618x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5755.jpg (242KB, 900x615px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 900x615px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2872474
I wish you got this without the wake in frame :(

File: FOTO5633.jpg (392KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 900x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5806.jpg (268KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 900x617px

>>2872492
Visual illiteracy everywhere.
Try blurring your eyes then looking at forms :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5816.jpg (191KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5800.jpg (218KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5756.jpg (253KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5730.jpg (247KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 617x900px

:^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5830.jpg (307KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5833.jpg (337KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5835.jpg (328KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5836.jpg (192KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2872471
>>2872473
White balance is way too different between these first two shots.

Oh, who the fuck am I kidding. You don't give a fuck. You're just here for shits and giggles.

File: FOTO5831.jpg (240KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 617x900px

:^))

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5397.jpg (155KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 900x617px

>>2872505
Because we rode into cloud coverage and stormy weather.
>he thinks wb is objective yet can't into stormy temperatures
Heeeee, luv u /p/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2872498
>>2872506
Look at me! Look at me!

File: FOTO5396.jpg (191KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 617x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5874comb.jpg (153KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 900x617px

>>2872508
Sorry for triggering

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5854.jpg (259KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO5857comb.jpg (283KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: me and you jamie - let's do this.png (540KB, 676x508px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 676x508px

>>2872507
I love how defensive and aggressive you are. It turns me on.

The white balance is different. That's all I said. I don't care why it's different, and, quite frankly, it doesn't matter. But you sure showed me!

Wanna fuck? I'll drive down to Alabamastan, buy us a six pack of champagne and a funnel, and we can go at it.

>>2872513
The white balance was actually a set metric for most of the day.
Wb shift not so much.

Everything in this thread is SOOC btw. :^)

>>2872515
You're sending mixed signals. Is that a no or yes on the champagne love fest?

>>2872494
Get fucked you disgusting cunt
>yes, I'm salty

>>2872525
>assuming isi isn't the janitor for /p/
:^)

>>2872525
My memory card had about 60 tho :^)
Reported yourself.

>>2872527
...is it that you don't like champagne? I was just trying to be romantic. I'm fine with beer or whatever. Heck, I'm fine with coke or water.

>>2872525
Get the fuck off her blog. Nobody asked for your opinion.

You're good, but none of them stand out. I'm sure if you took another couple trips you'd get a good shot.

>>2872478
close to being really good

>>2872513
>The white balance is different!
>It's different because of the weather conditions
>Haha I don't care if it's different!! Lol wanna fuck?

And people say isi is the one shitting up the board. Right.

>>2872498
Is that a fooking leica?

>>2872567
Yes

>>2872557
i'm new to /p/ so i don't know this isi but i've been on 4chan for a long time and...

there have been so many shitty, self-cenetered, ego-maniacal trips that many anons hate trips on principle. So by simply having a trip you're inviting a world of assumptions and hatred.

I use the anonymize option because I found myself making the aforementioned assumptions about trips. IMO if you don't use the anonymizer and complain about trips, you only have yourself to blame.

>>2872572
People that hate trips are not native to blue boards.
It outs your origins erry time.

>>2872574
>People that hate trips are not native to blue boards
What makes you think that?

You know I actually quite like these shots, I'd be proud of them, and I'm sure a lot of people would be too. But why are you so aggressive?

>>2872578
I'm not particularly aggressive.
Cheeky maybe.

>>2872577
It's a well known historical fact.

>>2872579
>It's a well known historical fact.
Well i'm from /fa/ originally and it has (had) terrible trips

Isi is your uncle also your brother?

>>2872570
respect on taking leica intoa boat. What leica is that?
Also I must say, I liked these pictures more than the hippy camp pictures.

>>2872581
I only have sisters so he'd have to be one of those

10/10 thread because anon and the rest of /p/ will get their jiminies rustled trying to out-shitpost each other.

couldn't you please have contained your pictures to the other thread you already have up? it's nowhere near reaching bump limit.

>not calling this thread the salty seaman edition

Missed opportunity

>>2872597
Foto Tho is capped. My music thread might still be up. Different purpose.

>>2872601
Sweetie, why are you ignoring my advances? If you're going to reject me, just pull that band aid off and get it over with. Don't string me along like this.

>>2872601
my bad, I didn't realize there was a purpose to your threads

>>2872621
There is no purpose to these threads. Only chaos.

>>2872574
all fucking tripfags must fucking hang

the best blue boards are the ones with the least trips

>>2872626
You think pretty highly of /p/ then

>>2872630
no this one is pretty bad

I would tell you which ones are better but i am afraid you would just go shit them up

Thsee colors are on point
Leica Q?

>>2872590
Why don't you go out and shoot some pic- oh wait :^)

>>2872656
nah, it's a Fuji X-Pro2.

>>2872574
clearly never been to /fa/

>>2872674
People with self confidence don't use /fa/ so you're probably 100% correct.
It's a self-improvement board for autistic cucks for fuck's sake.

>>2872662

put your trip back on slut

>>2872675
clearly never been to /fa/

>>2872496
Hdr tone map bullshit reeee

>>2872688
>implying I am actually isi

Stay classy, shug.

File: me and you jm.gif (480KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 480x360px

Alright, Issles, I'm not hearing a yes or no from you, so Imma just grab my keys and start driving in the direction of Alabama. When I get there, you better be down to party.

These are wonderful, OP. How do you get those tones?

>>2872503
pls see how it's done by a real photographer >>>
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=equator+gian+paolo+barbieri&safe=off&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz9ajqtc7NAhXJFpQKHTPiB_IQ_AUICCgB&biw=1600&bih=789

These are shite

Whoever shitposts to the bump limit wins a cookie

File: Untitled155.jpg (616KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 900x600px

>>2872969
Ok

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:30 01:30:57
Exposure Time	1/850 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	6.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: Untitled154.jpg (525KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 900x600px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:30 01:25:11
Exposure Time	1/450 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	6.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Unknown
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: Untitled153.jpg (726KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 900x600px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:30 01:24:38
Exposure Time	1/210 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Brightness	4.4 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Cool White Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Unknown
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>2872471
>>2872473
they are different and only concern me cause in the second one there is nothing to show that it is stormy, if I could see the storm or something put it into context it probably would be fine

>>2872792
What did he mean by this?

Why is there so much banding? I thought fuji was good at colour

>>2873063
Compression to 3mp by WiFi import

>>2872986
Like WTF is going up in this photo, it's like there's gridmarks of ugly noise all over it. I can't imagine the inbuilt jpeg engine is THIS terrible.

Sure your xpro 2 isn't just a hunk of broken shite?

I asked you in a different thread and you never answered

Were you the person on /p/ that was using contax G glass on their x-pro1 or was it someone else

pls respond

>>2872986
>When I see this landscape, I think iso 800, 1/850, f 5.6
>no
>>2872987
>>2872988


Here are the reasons Isi hides her Exif, she can't work out how to adjust iso or aperture.

>>2873114
Brush marks from photoshop touch, I merged two different film Sims

>>2873116
Oh darling you just don't understand more advanced exposure than base iso. I shoot 800 for Dr settings.

>>2873115
Not me

>>2873126
>I shoot 800 for Dr settings
Why not shoot at base, underexpose, then push 2 stops in post, or is "muh isoless sensor" not your meme tactic to getting awful photos any more.

ur pretty, OP :^)

>>2873133
Maybe you should read up on what Dr 800 does.

>>2873163
>shooting at iso 800 so you can use a meme jpg profile

You've hit a new low

>>2873176
Still didn't read up on it did you?

Wait these are unironically jpegs?
Rofl

>>2873180
Yep, I've got a good grasp on it, I'm not sure you do sweetcheeks ;)

Also, doesn't stop it being a meme jpg profile.

Teach me your pp. Nah I probably can't get this out of my pictures with my 60D.

>>2873210
She doesn't PP, these photos are SOOC using Fuji 800DR settings most of the time

>>2873214
I do clone things out and shit like that often. But yeah, I'm not doing any color correction or demosaicing in post. I set custom WBs based on intent and generally have the camera set up for fast jpeg control. I shoot raws for an archive and in case I want to tweak it in-camera.

For anyone curious I gave the camera set up so that left arrow is custom settings with a variety of contrast settings (+4/+4 shadows and highlights through -2/-2), down for wb, right for film simulation.

Are you still using photoninja for these?

>>2873214
>>2873239
Damn that's great... I will be honest, this would make taking pics with a digital camera way more fun for me.

Yeah lame, but sometimes I spend so much time on the pp and even then I'm not very happy.

>>2873256
It's skill less trash letting the camera do all the work and thinking for you

>>2873289
This is the opposite of polishing turds.

>>2873322
Yeah they're raw unpolished turds
Mods delete this thread

Nice holiday snapshits isi. Love you, you are great

>>2873289
>It's skill less trash letting the camera do all the work and thinking for you
Wow, so much asinine. Does the A7 have a luddite mode then?

>>2873484

Yeah, it's called "On".

Ok, now I knew isi work. solid snapshits of a holiday, I think...

as the anon there, >>2872478
where you almost perfect capture in this set. My fav one too

>>2873485
> "On".
And then the battery runs out, right?

>>2872478
>>2872485
these two are good

>>2873556
2 out of 85, not bad odds really.

>>2873607

Look at the file names, 5874 - 5397 = 477 photos minimum.

Dat less than half a percent hit rate.

>>2873645
>they did the math
>they did the depressing math

>>2873651
>not accounting for: swapping between memory cards, shooting bursts, gifs
amateur hour math

>>2873645
>Look at the file names, 5874 - 5397 = 477 photos minimum.
Is your life so wretched and devoid of meaning that you even think about this?

>>2873697
You just sound butthurt that he figured it out.

ITT: retards who argue over uninteresting bullshit

Why can't you faggots simply enjoy the images posted on this board?
>Hurr, she took a quadrillion images and only posts two mediocre ones

Who cares? At least she's out taking pictures - instead of sitting in the basement - like you do.
Jesus fuck, get a life.

>>2873783
Someone has a crush on isi

>>2873796
Moopco, he stalks every thread she makes

>>2873809
I thought he was dead in India somewhere

>>2873811
corpses take better pictures than that

>>2873796
Totally. I wanna smoke some bud with her.

File: bonsecour1.gif (969KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

969KB, 600x400px

>>2873653
>gifs
u know how i do

File: FOTO6025.jpg (390KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 617x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6024.jpg (311KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6039.jpg (288KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6037.jpg (284KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 617x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6038.jpg (293KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2873917
neat

File: Untitled157.jpg (612KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 600x900px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	38 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:01 18:36:37
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	-1/50 EV
Exposure Bias	1.7 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>2873921
I LIKE IT

>>2873645
Thank you for the correction anon. These are truly sad times.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (323KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 900x617px

>>2873918
Dis would be neato without the county highway sign.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:02 13:17:24
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	617

>>2874184
Outside of the greater context of my body of work I'd agree.

>>2874275
What are your snapshits conveying?

>>2874303
that she can't take photos

>>2874303
A time and place. I'm interested in themes of rephotography.

>>2874329
A time and place is what all holiday snapshitters are conveying.

>>2874374
Jamiewilliams.22slides.com
Find the themes yourself then you edged out ragamuffin

>>2874475
Is the theme that tree stump in the water taken from 84 different angles? Or the colour purple? Hard to decide

>>2874770
You're too young and edgy to understand the point of rephotography and changing landscapes. :^)

>>2874784
Kek, I'm older than you sweetheart. I simply think that 99% of your photos are snapshits, 0.5% are the same thing over and over, and 0.5% are decent.

>>2874843
> ITT: isi getting rekt again

>>2874843
>Kek, I'm older than you sweetheart.
Riiiiggghhht! That's why you are bickering on the internet like a 12-year-old

>>2874784
The point of rephotography is to show change with time.

Gonna let you in on a hint, the ocean looks pretty fucking similar year to year, especially if you shoot it at the same time of day.

Your photos are bad, your approach is bad and your attitude is bad.

>>2875051

>Your photos are bad, your approach is bad and your attitude is bad.

/thread

/isi

>>2875051
Welcome to /p/, meet isi. She's just lonely.

>>2875053
His reply to you and I is going to be so uncomprehending, you will be triggered. Just you watch.

>>2875055
Yes he is.

>getting this defensive when you get critiqued.
Been here this long still acting like a newfag.

>>2875037
Haha nice try whiteknight. Where did I bicker exactly? I simply stated my opinion. Pretty sure that's allowed here.

>>2875051
Beaches change with the tide which isn't the same day to day
Do you go outside?

>>2875308
Day to day? That change can't be seen with eyes lad, you won't see a stack corrode away to a smaller stack in one day. You won't see the sand formation change in one day. That's like saying photograph the moon everyday because it is moving away. That's a ridiculous excuse to photograph the beach, these photos aren't even of the beach either so your reasoning is pretty irrelevant.

>>2875479
I'm going to go out on a limb and say you can't seperate the photos on my site into sets mentally without me doing it for you, and therefore cannot really tell what is rural rephotography, and what are colorful beach landscapes.

You can have multiple competing motives, interests, and desires. You do not have to be a cardboard artist that only does one thing.

http://m3.22slides.com/jamiewilliams/fuji5877v1-1659474.jpg
http://m3.22slides.com/jamiewilliams/foto1961-1580721.jpg
http://m3.22slides.com/jamiewilliams/foto3177-1658629.jpg

Rephotography is, however, a pretty fundamental element to polishing landscape photography. Photography isn't just a means of bragging about going to new places, nu-male.

>>2875479
Oh ironically though, those stumps are on a quicksand tidal beach that routinely sucks down trees and driftwood and regurgiates them back up, they are not solidly rooted for the most part, except closer to shore

So if you have a fine eye for detail, that beach is indeed ever-shifting. There's even a shipwreck in it that occasionally resurfaces.

I should point out that the lack of wonder you feel in your own personal surroundings (forgive me if I'm reading too much into it :^)) is most likely due to you *not* revisiting it often enough to notice whats really there.

So many photographers that love being photographers more than they love practicing photographer never learn to see the forest because there are so many stupid trees in the way. Stupid stumps!

>>2875521
>>2875524

Alright, which white knight faggot gave isi a SERIOUS ART book for her birthday?

Where you from?

>>2873906
>>2873917
Cool.
>>2874184
Without is better indeed.

I haven't been on /p/ that much lately, but why the hate?

>>2875521
>>2875524
More irrelevant nonsense related to the argument anon and anon and I were having. Keep quite and learn to take critiques btw fucking tripfags and their ignorance.

>>2875525
> implying she knows art
tripdropping again I see, PC didn't change

>>2875526
>Where you from?
Alabama. The boat stuff is the Gulf of Mexico.

>>2875529
>tripdropping again I see, PC didn't change

i also made the A7 luddite crack.

>>2874329
>I'm interested in themes of rephotography.
lately I've been taking hundreds of photos of this one mountain with the exact same framing in different light. It might be photomania

File: FOTO6684.jpg (272KB, 617x900px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 617x900px

we out hea, we snapshittin

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6685.jpg (401KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6744.jpg (389KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>tfw isi is a redneck

File: FOTO6795.jpg (379KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6785.jpg (462KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 900x617px

>>2877155
I'd say I vary from that stereotype in many key areas.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2877156
great expression, too bad you chopped down the treetops ms bunyan

File: FOTO6807_crop.jpg (203KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2877161
pretty much objectively underexposed

>>2877160
I'll most likely crop them out completely desu, I wanted a closer shot of him but was limited by fence, desire to survive, and fear of lightning. Might just shoop the gaps in the treetops to add more sky though, I kinda like the falloff towards the sky.

Tomorrow morning is likely to be foggy, so I might go past this area again.

>>2877164
>he believes in objective exposure
I think you'd probably like it more if I'd shot it at -2 shadows as opposed to 0, but no, this is not underexposed by any sense of the word, certainly not objectively so. Stormy days are not sunny ones.

>>2877168
>desire to survive
pshaw
fog might be cool but personally I'd like to see as much texture as I can possibly get with this guy

>>2877172
I will say though that I wish I'd frame a few degrees to the right on that shot and kept the area of the shot confined between the two fenceposts. I'd also prefer to have caught the horse in the background a few seconds later, but I was worried more about losing the subjects interest

>>2877172
look at the cow in the background, its white fur is too dark
all the highlights of your photo are a stop or too down, it doesn't look low key it just looks veiled
but thats an opinion I guess

>>2877174
In an ideal world Id like to frame him pretty tightly around the horns, because holy shit man, that was about 4-5 feet of horn-span, but it's mostly a matter of getting him to come close enough to the fence without fearing the stability of said fence, haha

>>2877176
>it looks veiled
Now anon understands the concept of cloud coverage, today we have made progress in the /p/ classroom.

>low key
that word doesnt mean what you think it means, and doesn't relate to this photograph or its intent in even the slightest manner.

>>2877175
the second fencepost doesn't bother me at all desu, the tree at the top right maybe a tiny bit
I dunno if I even have an opinion about this but you could always crop horse #2 out and settle for cownterpoint

>>2877179
>that word doesn't mean what you think it means
nonsense, look at the histogram. the mean luminosity value is lower than neutral gray. low and high key don't just apply to studio lighting.

>>2877182
Ah, your message is hidden. You must have tried to misuse a buzzword! That's horrible! I hope you'll try your luck again!

>>2877184
you're only hurting yourself if you get so defensive every time somebody accuses you of making a mistake

if it's artistic choice on your part to underexpose your horse photos that's fine, but it would be easier if you just said that. personally when I see a cow in cloudy weather, my mind does not underexpose the white part of the cow, I see it as white.

>>2877220
It's not a matter of being defensive. I mean, you're being equally defensive *of* your opinion.

It is simply that you are categorically wrong and are attempting to *seem* as though you have relevant commentary. A common tactic, to be fair. Many don't even realize they do it.

You need to develop a better understanding of what photography is about if you think exposure is objective, that a cow should be a particular value. You are failing to take a photo in for its entirety, instead focusing a mock-analytical eye at it to fulfill what you think you're supposed to be doing (and what you think critique is, lol)

That last response of mine wasn't defensiveness. It was dismissal. Your hanging chad is in.

>>2877230
do you realize that I made a technical critique and your response to that technical critique was to immediately insult me and imply I didn't know anything about technique? You might think your jokey condescension effectively masks your profound insecurity; you'd be wrong

>>2877234
I do realize that you might think that's what happened here.
Notice there's an objective (your word) difference between the way I responded to you, and the way I responded to >>2877160

You ain't as insightful as you think you be.
Exposure ain't so objective either.

See >>2872476 for the absolute subjectivity of exposure.

You choose your wording, I'll choose mine in like.

>>2877156
>>2877161
These are great. Like, really. Do you have any more from that set?

>>2877240
Just another of the horse from another angle (not as good, promise) that I didnt post because I shot it with a different film sim and didn't feel like reloading the file on my SD card (or opening a raw converter, lolol)

Probably going back out that way tomorrow weather depending, who knows though

>>2877164
Yeah, nah it's not.

>>2877235
that other photo is pretty much objectively underexposed too
and for the record? that insightful comment you felt like replying to? that was me

>>2877247
Sorry to hear about your bipolar disorder. :^)

>>2877156
This is shit

File: nothing sordid, jamie, i assure you.jpg (81KB, 1920x976px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1920x976px

>>2877252
Maybe I've been going about this all wrong. Maybe you're not into a simple champagne/funnel love fest. Maybe you like things a little more kinky. It'll be nothing sordid, I assure you, but I can add a little more excitement to my offer if you'd like. So what about it? I can make things kinky:
>me and you
>a couple of holgas or dynas
>some nasty ass ISO 3200 B&W film
>maybe we do a few body shots of rodinal
>scan and add some white borders just to fuck with /p/

Just think about it.

>>2873917

p good famalam

trees and startrails when

>>2877561
Shut up you inbred mongrel

I don't get it. Why does OP tripdrop to bump himself and defend his photos from crits? It's pretty obvious OP, I'm new to /p/ but I've been on other blue boards for a decade and it's easy to point out samefags. Also feels like you give the photo meaning after you take them, that's just ridiculous.

>>2877739
Your own behavior is far more obvious.

>>2877745
I don't understand.

>>2877751
Noone does anon. Isi threads are most confusing. I do like that large horned animal though

>>2877245
It'd definitely be worth it! I would totally appreciate a few more pictures of animals paired with that unique coloring/filter/film simulation.

File: FOTO6867.jpg (430KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 900x617px

>>2877826
Took a different road today, stumbled on these cute little shits instead

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6869.jpg (371KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO6874.jpg (328KB, 900x617px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 900x617px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2877935
I, too, want to be Gursky :^\

File: Untitled158.jpg (755KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

755KB, 900x600px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:09 01:39:57
Exposure Time	20 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Brightness	-9.8 EV
Exposure Bias	-2.7 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	High
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: Untitled159.jpg (669KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 900x600px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:09 01:40:56
Exposure Time	1/58 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Lens Aperture	f/4.9
Brightness	1.9 EV
Exposure Bias	2.3 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: Untitled160.jpg (422KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 900x600px

Forgot my trip obv, on mobile

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	38 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:09 01:49:25
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	-4.9 EV
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>2879545
>>2879539
>>2879538
>no white border
>shit images
why even bother posting, white borders are the only thing you have going for your photos being half decently composed.

>>2879613
Yous your (here).

>>2879539
if you're gonna take this photo, compose it. get your camera on a tripod, stop it down so your foreground's in focus (and get your focus right), change perspective so the trees don't go above the cave edge, wait for the correct light so your sky isn't blown out. don't be so lazy.
>>2879545
I kinda like this.

>>2879746
Didn't have my tripod with me. Locations water level varies tremendously.
Landscape photography is a waiting game, you're still well off making proofs of concept to polish later.

>>2879746
>stop it down so your foreground's in focus (and get your focus right), change perspective so the trees don't go above the cave edge
Oh to all of this though;
It's a view underneath a tree trunk not a cave
There is no stopping down to get that deep of focus. Focus is also irrelevant on the foreground framed trunk. The trees cannot be moved in relation to the waterline without destroying the position of the central most stump.

Just because you can think of things you'd prefer in a photo doesn't make it realistic critique. A reminder.

>>2879755
Sounds like you got some of that salt water into your system. I'm not asking you to take my opinions as gospel truth, I'm giving them to you so you may have an honest lens into how other people perceive your photographs.

>Focus is also irrelevant on the foreground framed trunk.
the out-of-focus chromab'd tree penis would disagree with you
>There is no stopping down to get that deep of focus.
then focus stack. photography is a creative art. lazy, sloppy photography is boring narcissism
>destroying the position of the central most stump
that's not what's most important to the gestalt of this picture, the central stump is not isolated clearly enough for that

>>2879805
Let me rephrase...there's no perspective with a 24mm equivalent lens underneath a leg of a dead cypress to frame the tops of dead pines

Your critique makes deep assumptions that cannot be fulfilled by reality and placatory advice for the sake of something to say.

The saddest part of it all is that you truly think you're providing unique or revelatory insights rather than noting the form factor of convenience.

You did mistake a tree for a cave. From my perspective that's points earned towards an abstracted element.

>>2879815
>Your critique makes deep assumptions that cannot be fulfilled by reality
nobody gives a shit if your landscape photo accurately represents reality, or that you picked a poor vantage point. photography is imagemaking, if you can't make a good image in a certain place then move somewhere else.
"It's the best I could do" is a lame excuse, and you know it.

>>2879828
Straight over your head.
Let me repeat in simple English:
The composition you desire is not actually possible. It is fueled by your imagination as to the scale of multiple layered objects.

You think the photo could be better executed. So do I. But the fixes you suggest heavily rely on assumptions that are not accurate to the scene.

Can you even guess the height of this view?

I'm sorry you cannot handle a rigorous critique of the relevancy of your own.

>>2879831
let me rephrase, in case you honestly didn't understand what I said:
If that's the best composition you could get from that place, it's not a keeper.

but you yourself said this was a "proof of concept", why are you willing to fight to the death for it?

>>2879834
Did I call it a real keeper? You're the one reaching here...

I dislike bad presumptive critique. I'm not defending the photo. I'm offending your ability to explain why you dislike it.

If you can't quantify I don't expect you to qualify either.

>>2879834
Read the thread, and think for yourself, is OP overly defensive and delusional about his photos?

>>2879853
On the contrary, I'm just not delusional about the quality of input to be had from the average board demographic these days. I do understand well the delusion of the last year's crop of newfags and the remarkable desire the board over to speak just to speak.

>>2879844
>If you can't quantify I don't expect you to qualify either.
you want me to give your photograph a number? I've stated some very clear compositional problems with your photograph. You've as much as agreed with me that you posted a lazy, sloppy landsnap here, but you somehow believe the problem is the quality of my critique?

You know what would really shut up guys like me and dramatically improve board quality? Posting some interesting, original photographs. I mean do you really think nobody else on this board but you likes good photography? You think I come to this thread and take the time to think about your photographs just so I can shit all over you?

>>2879880
I think you think your thinking is more relevant than it ever was

I agreed that it lacks polish and remarked that your critique is inaccurate and implausible.

You are upset that I do not agree with your advice despite my objective knowledge of its impossibilty

A short word for you is autistic.

>>2879722
what are you even talking about?

>>2879881
>I agreed that it lacks polish and remarked that your critique is inaccurate and implausible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_distortion
>You are upset
>I think you think your thinking is more relevant than it ever was
>A short word for you is autistic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
>despite my objective knowledge of its impossibility
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(making_excuses)

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, but you probably shouldn't be posting here with a tripcode if you're so psychologically vulnerable

File: Untitled162.jpg (841KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 900x600px

>>2879894
You should probably put yours back on.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe® Photoshop® Touch
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	38 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:09 16:28:36
Exposure Time	1/1100 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1776
Image Height	1184
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	High
Flash Mode	Off
Focus Mode	Manual
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

>>2879895
> anon made me sad
> he must be tripdropping
I bet you think I'm that anon too, shame you isi, shame on you.

>>2879895
I'm serious. You're clearly not helping yourself the way you're posting here, you're just toughening your defense mechanisms and your narcissistic delusions. That road just leads to you becoming old, bitter, and sad.
On the other hand, maybe posting here with such a personal vulnerability as a tripcode indicates a desire to open yourself up to the world. If you you don't want to stop, push yourself to actually go through with it. Be willing to own up to your mistakes. Grow from them. Do something beautiful.

>>2879899
I don't differentiate the unwashed masses.

>>2879904
You accidentally admit the motivations of your own anonymity here innit

I'm just here to post photos.

>>2879907
I never said I wanted to open myself up to the world, and I never said I was beautiful

>>2879905
> implying you don't care
oh you care. You just accused me of tripdropping, you think I'm a unique person =^) you care enough to differentiate my personality from others.

>>2879916
Nah that phrase describes a great deal of casual posters. I meant it with no personal qualification.