Shit on my snapshits, I wanna get better

you sure like buildings.

>>2859508
>>2859512
these are keepers, specially the one with reflections because it adds more than 'just building'. It's a very neat optical illusion.

>>2859509
this one is clean but a bit boring. At least the sky is clean so you knew that it would compliment well with the clean facets of the building.

>>2859513
Definite no on this one. You missed focus on this one and it all looks very blurry which isn't a nice thing for such a complex building. Even if it was in focus there is nothing interesting. It's a matter of not a good subject plus poor composition.

>>2859510
I like the colors on this one but it's a little bit bland for me. I do like how crisp the water is and the subject is alright. I think a different perspective would have been better but that's a tough call because this probably was the best perspective you could get on it.

>>2859512
wow this one is just great, the reflection, the symmetry, the minimal colours!
I really like the one in the OP too, great job man

>>2859512
After watching for 3mins I don't get how many towers (+reflections) there are

>>2859508
deez nuts

>>2859508
Where's the cheese?

File: IMG_8209.jpg (3MB, 5133x3422px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5133x3422px

Don't really wanna hijack the thread but also don't want to start another for the same thing, only started taking photos a few weeks ago, shit on mine so I get better too.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:10 12:18:24
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/20.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/19.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_7807.jpg (4MB, 5133x3422px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5133x3422px

>>2860518

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:25 16:28:32
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Landscape Mode
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_7987.jpg (5MB, 4732x3155px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 4732x3155px

>>2860520

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:25 16:21:56
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Landscape Mode
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/9.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	32.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2860518
>>2860520
>>2860521

Should had lurked more, I just found a proper thread for this.

>>2859508
>>2859509
>>2859512
>>2859513

I live near chicago OP, and all of these photos would have been better if you didn't single out every building. Most major cities are packed with buildings, and though you could have focused on one building in particular, the multitude of buildings are what, in my opinion, give cities the specific feel that they have.
Though these photos look nice from an architectural standpoint, I feel as if you lost that aspect.

>>2860518
>>2860520
>>2860521

Your photos have something that many here on /p/ dont have in my opinion - they feel complete.
Too many nice pictures I see seem as if they are lacking something, yours do not.

One thing I could say though is that in the first shot, the photo seems a bit dark. The people on the ground come out nicely in this way, but the sky and buildings would look much nicer if they were just a tad brighter.
The other two photos are quite nice.