Who Remembers 4:3 Aspect Ratio?

>>2854802
i bet you weren't even born yet when they phase out 4:3.

Considering my camera shoots in a 4:3 ratio, I'd hope to god that I can remember it.

>>2854802
>Who Remembers 4:3 Aspect Ratio?

- all cellphone shooters
- almost all compact camera shooters
- all micro43 shooters
- all 645 film shooters
- almost all digital medium format shooters

derp

Wasn't Grand Budapest in 4:3?

I think it worked out pretty well

>tfw 90% of TV here is still analog 4:3

>>2855014

>645 film shooters

wut

>>2855047

Math must be another of life's many difficulties foisted upon you.

File: JPY160NS024 - JPY160NS027mini.jpg (227KB, 1121x800px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1121x800px

>>2855047
What do you mean wut?
Tell us what the lowest common whole denominators of 6 and 4.5 are, sugar?

>>2855047
645 is 4:3, Sugar dear.

>>2854802
I remember very clearly that it was shit.

>>2855050
>>2855052
>>2855072

And yet we still love him

I miss 4:3 monitors. They made so much more sense for 90% of the shit you do on a computer, since web pages, text documents, and the like are usually vertically arranged and you end up with miles of dead space on the sides with a 16:9 display. They were nice for working on vertical photos, too.

I think I prefer 3:2 for photos, though.

>Not even that glorious 256:240 aspect ratio of the NES

>>2855018
Parts were.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fijHLmqQxM4

>>2855072
>>2855052

I've shot 6x7 exclusively for the last 3 years and forgot lol

>>2855505
>I've shot 6x7 exclusively for the last 3 years

getta load of this guy.

>>2855505
Sugar plz