What do you think about this edit? [EXIF data available. Click

>>2841294
There's something awesome, impressive, unique, and exciting happening, but it's blurry in exchange for us being able to focus directly on a totally mundane hooded head with no face.

The edit is flat and bland, but who fucking cares.

File: Incendio.jpg (4MB, 3254x1527px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3254x1527px

>>2841297
And this one?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot Pro1
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:15 12:29:06
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/3.2
Lens Aperture	f/3.2
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.19 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3254
Image Height	1527
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2841299
this one is better, seems like screenshot of the movie (the aspect ratio supports this), it gives the idea that the green-hoodie-man burned down a forest

>>2841294
>>2841299
nice idea but the execution is poor, place the figure closer to the flames. Do research of this kind of thing and find something you like and do what they do.

>>2841297
>implying forest fires are awesome, impressive, unique, and exciting
>implying they dont happen every single summer and all look identical

>>2841294
is this from the Nvidia 1080 benchmarks?

>>2841294
I think you should be focusing on the event rather than your friends boring head. Also, crop the people on the hill out.