Thread replies: 313
Thread images: 102
Thread images: 102
File: 11-11-41-ZURBEAUTY.jpg (182KB, 1024x941px) Image search:
[Google]
182KB, 1024x941px
>FUJIFILM
I have a FF Nikon setup, I am interested in getting an XT-1 or Xpro2.
Show me your best images showing Fuji color and lens quality.
Please tell mr what body and what lens each image is shot with, thanks.
>FUJI THREAD
>>
I would show you my stuff, but I'm ashamed of my photos and I wouldn't want to turn you off of Fuji.
>>
File: _DSF4344.jpg (413KB, 1750x1167px) Image search:
[Google]
413KB, 1750x1167px
>>2832758
What's the judgement on reposts?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
>>2832777
Show me what you got, I am primarily interested in images before they are processed to death (showing what the camera can do) as well as the quality of fuji lenses.
Thanks.
>>
>>2832802
Most of the recent photos on my tumblr are with the X-Pro2
http://deadseries.tumblr.com
>>
>>2832758
I've got a few really nice ones, with the XE-1, XT1, and X-pro1. This one's The XT1 and the 35/2.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1234 Image Height 824 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:21 18:00:02 Exposure Time 1/2000 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 8.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1127 Image Height 752 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard
>>
File: _DSF5419-2.jpg (965KB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
965KB, 1000x1500px
>>2832802
Why would unprocessed photos help you with anything? Will you be posting a lot of those?
Unprocessed photos look like shit regardless of what camera you take them with.
If you want sterile test conditions, you should consider an a6300!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: DSCF7541.jpg (701KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
701KB, 1000x667px
>>2832807
XE-1, 18-55 2.8-4.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 40 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:11:02 11:15:28 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 0.9 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 26.50 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: Lake Ella_2.jpg (174KB, 1089x726px) Image search:
[Google]
174KB, 1089x726px
>>2832809
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Photo Ninja 1.2.5 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:23 14:29:36 Exposure Time 1/210 sec F-Number f/1.4 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.4 Brightness 4.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Image Width 1089 Image Height 726 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard
>>
File: DSCF0121_v1.jpg (618KB, 1250x847px) Image search:
[Google]
618KB, 1250x847px
>>2832810
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4952 Image Height 3288 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:24 17:01:48 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 8.5 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1250 Image Height 847 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard
>>
File: DSCF0165_v1.jpg (428KB, 1200x1807px) Image search:
[Google]
428KB, 1200x1807px
>>2832811
Obviously these aren't masterpieces, but I think they well illustrate what the sensor is capable of.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3288 Image Height 4952 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:04:24 16:33:00 Exposure Time 1/2200 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 9.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1200 Image Height 1807 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard
>>
My own pictures are (still) shite.
But this militarypilot anon makes awesome images, check this archived thread:
http://fgts.jp/p/thread/2730894/#2730894
Don't think he's posted anything in a while. Some real gems there and shows what the x-t1 is capable of doing.
>>
I have a few bits and pieces. Most should have EXIF.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 210 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5809 Image Height 3873 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:06 22:20:20 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 2000 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness -1/50 EV Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 140.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832818
Is this the 50-140mm lens?
Buy me one, bro.
>>
>>2832818
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 13:57:19 Exposure Time 3.2 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness -2.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832821
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 13:57:20 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness -2.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832823
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 210 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4159 Image Height 2773 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:04:06 22:20:19 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 5.1 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 140.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832824
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:19 22:51:59 Exposure Time 1/8000 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 9.9 EV Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832826
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 21 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 14:07:49 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 5.6 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 14.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832831
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 14:07:48 Exposure Time 1/6 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -5.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832832
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 13:57:18 Exposure Time 1/1800 sec F-Number f/1.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.6 Brightness 7.3 EV Exposure Bias 1 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832834
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 84 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 13:57:21 Exposure Time 1/70 sec F-Number f/1.2 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/1.2 Brightness -5.4 EV Exposure Bias -1.3 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 56.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832835
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 62 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 14:22:26 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 8.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 41.40 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832839
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 14:22:28 Exposure Time 1.9 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness -0.4 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832841
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2048 Image Height 1365 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 14:07:49 Exposure Time 8 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness -4.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>
File: _DSF5453.jpg (526KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
526KB, 1500x1000px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
>>2832832
I think this is a fantastic image.
Wonderfully framed and composed shot, it's just a pity about the fireworks. Presumably unstaged.
What I want to know is, say if you were taking it again, would it be possible to get clearer fireworks with any special combination of settings on the 100T? Under "ideal conditions" sorta deal.
I mean, could you have increased the shutter speed and cranked up the iso in order to freeze the light burst or would that have made the rest of the image untenable due to noise or whatever?
Or was this just the tradeoff for getting the image in the first place?
Thanks, still learning.
>>
File: _DSF4607.jpg (1MB, 1750x1167px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1750x1167px
>>2832850
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
>>2832843
i really want the X-Pro 2, how is it with low-light, high ISO? im thinking along the lines of 1600 and up
>>
>>2832758
just get a suny fool frame.
>>
File: _DSF4686.jpg (2MB, 1167x1750px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1167x1750px
>>2832852
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
>>2832851
Short answer is, if you knew the fireworks were coming - I didn't - then supporting the camera on a tripod or even a bag or jacket, etc, on a bench or a seat and releasing it with a remote or timer would yield a sharper image.
That was a bit of a grab shot without any notice.
>>
>>2832835
birds are the best subjects
>>
>>2832857
I figured as much that it was taken at chance.
Just wanted to know if it was possible at all (with that camera).
Thanks.
>>
>>2832853
Broadly comparable to the XT-1 and other cameras with that sensor - I would say probably half a stop better in noise performance. But of course that's on a higher resolution sensor - 24 vs 16 - so if you downscaled it to 16MP you'd probably get another stop or so of noise performance back as well.
Noise is pretty subjective; I was always happy to use my X Pro 1 up to 3200, and same with X100S/T and XT-1; I'm pretty happy using my X Pro 2 at 6400.
To give you some idea, >>2832835 is shot at ISO 6400 at f/1.2 - so it was fairly dark. I'll give you a 100% crop with NR turned off in Adobe Camera Raw - and remember that with X-camera files, ACR/Bridge is not the best at fine detail; you can get better detail and noise performance with Photo Ninja, Iridient Developer, and others.
Also worthy of note is that some additional wizardry going on with noise and the Across film sim:
http://fujifilm-x.com/en/x-stories/the-newest-film-simulation-acros/
>>
>>2832866
And now here's the 100% crop image because I'm retarded.
>>
File: _DSF6423.jpg (1MB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x1500px
>>2832855
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: _DSF6454-2.jpg (867KB, 833x1250px) Image search:
[Google]
867KB, 833x1250px
>>2832873
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>
>>2832864
Where X100 series does help in this instance is that a viewfinder gives you a third point of contact which is good for stability; the OVF means you can watch what's happening outside the frame to give you the best chance to time it right, there's no mirror to slap and add to motion and the electronic shutter reduces motion again.
Faster shutter would mean freezing the firework and reducing the size of the light trails. But yeah, resting the camera in some way or having a stabilised camera or body is the best way to fix that blur.
>>
File: _DSF5119.jpg (970KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
970KB, 1500x1000px
>>2832875
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:10 11:17:38 Exposure Time 1/1700 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 7.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: _DSF5116.jpg (948KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
948KB, 1500x1000px
>>2832882
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
>>2832820
Yep, it is. Save up for it - it's wonderful.
>>
File: _DSF4819.jpg (586KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
586KB, 1500x1000px
>>2832883
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:10 11:22:49 Exposure Time 1/3000 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 10.4 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832883
I love a bit of beaver
>>
File: _DSF9006-Edit.jpg (1MB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x1500px
>>2832884
Agreed
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 136 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:24 00:16:07 Exposure Time 1/1250 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 6.6 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 90.60 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832878
Thanks.
Noted for next new year.
>>
File: _DSF9440.jpg (922KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
922KB, 1500x1000px
>>2832888
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 210 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:23 17:07:21 Exposure Time 1/3200 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 9.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 140.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832852
one of the best I've ever seen in /p/
>>
>>2832893
lol wut
>>
>>2832895
Photo Ninja, Lightroom, and Photoshop.
>>
File: _DSF1420.jpg (542KB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
542KB, 1000x1500px
>>2832892
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
>>2832898
No rove for c1 or iridient?
>>
>>2832894
u herd me fgt
>>
File: _DSF5455.jpg (1MB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x1500px
>>2832902
I'm on Windows, so no Iridient, and C1 isn't enough of an improvement over lightroom for me to make the transition. If I didn't have PS, the layers and stuff would be great, but I DO have PS, so it's not a big win there.
Photo Ninja is the only program with enough of a jump in detail and image control over the awesome flow of lightroom to seem worth it to me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Capture One 8 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:08 17:36:18 Image Created 2015:11:08 17:36:18 Exposure Time 1/420 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/4.9 Brightness 7.8 EV Exposure Bias 0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 68.70 mm Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: _DSF5193.jpg (547KB, 1500x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
547KB, 1500x1000px
>>2832907
But the detail you can get from PN is... surprising.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Capture One 8 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:08 16:48:05 Image Created 2015:11:08 16:48:05 Exposure Time 1/850 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 8.8 EV Exposure Bias 1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: _DSF5192.jpg (815KB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
815KB, 1000x1500px
>>2832909
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Capture One 8 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2015:11:08 16:47:00 Image Created 2015:11:08 16:47:00 Exposure Time 1/550 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 7.6 EV Exposure Bias 1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 106.00 mm Image Width 1000 Image Height 1500 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: _DSF1444.jpg (316KB, 500x750px) Image search:
[Google]
316KB, 500x750px
>>2832912
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
>>2832905
do you just not click on any photos when you're here?
>>
File: _DSF8952.jpg (853KB, 1500x703px) Image search:
[Google]
853KB, 1500x703px
>>2832914
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 45 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:26 17:56:06 Exposure Time 1/1100 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 9.3 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.20 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832915
I do, and that one was one of the best
>>
File: _DSF4792.jpg (708KB, 1750x1167px) Image search:
[Google]
708KB, 1750x1167px
>>2832916
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi Vertical Resolution 200 dpi
>>
File: _DSF4381.jpg (577KB, 1167x1750px) Image search:
[Google]
577KB, 1167x1750px
>>2832918
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi Vertical Resolution 200 dpi
>>
File: _DSF4478.jpg (947KB, 1167x1750px) Image search:
[Google]
947KB, 1167x1750px
>>2832919
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
>>2832810
I have no fucking excuse for it, given I have way too many lenses that cover 50mm equiv- but I fucking want a 35mm f/2
>>
File: _DSF4723.jpg (1MB, 1750x1167px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1750x1167px
>>2832920
>>2832921
You don't need much of an excuse. It's a great size, great image quality, it's weather sealed, it focuses well. It's a really nice lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
Fujifriend's favourite film sim?
>>
File: _DSF4890.jpg (649KB, 1750x1167px) Image search:
[Google]
649KB, 1750x1167px
>>2832924
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
>>
File: _DSF8822.jpg (994KB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
994KB, 1000x1500px
>>2832925
For portraits, chrome. For everything else, Acros + R
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 54 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:23 17:03:38 Exposure Time 1/680 sec F-Number f/3.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/3.6 Brightness 7.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.80 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
Whats the dynamic range like on the fujis? Is it a huge reduction compared to a FF Nikon
>>
File: _DSF9566-2.jpg (898KB, 1250x833px) Image search:
[Google]
898KB, 1250x833px
>>2832929
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>
File: _DSF8919.jpg (798KB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
798KB, 1000x1500px
>>2832935
I've never compared it to a FF Nikon, but it's never let me down. Especially with the high DR modes.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 83 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:03:23 17:04:53 Exposure Time 1/3000 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 10.9 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832935
My X100s keeps up insanely well with my D800 as far as dynamic range is concerned. I think it might even have some more room in the highlights to be honest. I've been meaning to do a side-by-side for my own curiosity.
>>
>>2832937
obviously you should post more
>>
File: _DSF5618.jpg (689KB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
689KB, 1000x1500px
>>2832941
I used to post all the time. Less so now.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
>>2832946
hey gervin, what's up? long time no see!
>>
File: _DSF5576.jpg (1MB, 1500x1129px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1500x1129px
>>2832948
Fuck I wish. Not him though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:02:11 23:29:27 Exposure Time 1/1100 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 4.8 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 1129 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832868
Fucking resize, fgt
>>
Anyone either have or been tempted by the Mitakon 35mm 0.95?
For shits and giggles?
The updated model is about 20% smaller and 200g lighter.
I have no need for it, just think it might be a fun lens to fuck around with.
>>
>>2832959
I considered it, but not for very long. It's not great wide open, so it'll just be a gimmick lens, and without autofocus, it's too much hassle for me. If it were $50, maybe, but it's not a serious tool in my bag, so I'll bypass it.
>>
>>2832959
I was tempted until I found out it was APS-C. Wideangle with lots of background blur would be a unique gimmick that I'd try but it's basically a 50mm 1.4.
The 50mm 1.1 on the other hand is tempting. Or if I had the money, the 0.95s
>>
File: TONE1799.jpg (325KB, 1080x720px) Image search:
[Google]
325KB, 1080x720px
walking home from a party with my x100t in my pocket, got this tonight
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 00:12:09 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 1250 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 1.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: TONE0300.jpg (386KB, 1080x675px) Image search:
[Google]
386KB, 1080x675px
>>2832992
other random stuff
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:06 04:41:38 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 3200 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -3.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF0008.jpg (457KB, 1080x864px) Image search:
[Google]
457KB, 1080x864px
>>2832995
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:28:54 Exposure Time 1/150 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 5.3 EV Exposure Bias 1.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF0189.jpg (321KB, 1080x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
321KB, 1080x1080px
>>2832996
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 83 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:32:53 Exposure Time 1/140 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 4.6 EV Exposure Bias -1.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF9803.jpg (290KB, 720x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
290KB, 720x1080px
>>2832997
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:31:24 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 5.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF9988.jpg (327KB, 964x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
327KB, 964x1080px
>>2832998
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 51 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:29:00 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness -0.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 34.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF0372.jpg (419KB, 1080x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
419KB, 1080x1080px
>>2833000
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 84 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:28:41 Exposure Time 1/3000 sec F-Number f/1.2 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.2 Brightness 6.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 56.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF2771.jpg (237KB, 1080x632px) Image search:
[Google]
237KB, 1080x632px
>>2833002
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:30:24 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 9.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF0038.jpg (438KB, 1080x720px) Image search:
[Google]
438KB, 1080x720px
>>2833003
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:30:17 Exposure Time 1/70 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 5.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF2870.jpg (236KB, 1080x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
236KB, 1080x1080px
>>2833005
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:29:36 Exposure Time 3 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Brightness -3.2 EV Exposure Bias -2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: TONE4915.jpg (552KB, 1080x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
552KB, 1080x1080px
>>2833007
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:41:57 Exposure Time 1/120 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 6.8 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: DSCF3980.jpg (212KB, 699x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
212KB, 699x1080px
>>2833009
that wraps up my dump
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 02:43:25 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Brightness -1.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2832802
Oh geez Rick, it's time to get schwifty again! I-I-I don't know if I can do it Rick!
>>
File: untitled-1-6.jpg (427KB, 853x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
427KB, 853x1280px
I'll post a few I'm happy with.
I normally shoot 5Diii for work and XT1/X100S for play.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:10:45 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 0.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-9.jpg (391KB, 1280x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
391KB, 1280x1024px
>>2833151
I don't do much in post, I stick to the Fuji profiles and just add a bit of punch to them.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:13:41 Exposure Time 2.5 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Brightness 3.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-10.jpg (384KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
384KB, 1280x853px
>>2833152
For my use I don't need anymore dynamic range I tend to try to keep it under 800 and expose for the highlights, I don't mind pushing the shadows to 3200 (2 stops)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:14:00 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 2.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-11.jpg (703KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
703KB, 1280x853px
>>2833154
I find the sensor very capable, I plan on skipping the XT2 AND XPRO 2 and waiting for their 3rd gen.
Focus peaking makes using old lenses really easy, this was taken on my Pentax 50mm 1.7 at F2 I've always enjoyed the rendition of this lens.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:14:28 Exposure Time 1/4000 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 3.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-12.jpg (414KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
414KB, 1280x853px
>>2833158
Focus on the XT1 is almost on level with my 5Diii apart from very fast moving subjects.
Classic chrome (this image is using it) is really nice and being able to use it as a profile in Lightroom gives me a great base to work from.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:19:59 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 3.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
Please post some classic chrome emulation.
btw. I'm buying fuji xpro2 later this year.
>>
File: Screen Shot 2016-05-07 at 00.41.17.png (1MB, 1342x440px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1342x440px
>>2833162
having an ISOless sensor is great for getting more dynamic range and is a very different shooting experience compared to my Canon where I have no room for error in camera.
I tend to shoot everything a stop or two under.
>>
File: untitled-1-5.jpg (376KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
376KB, 1280x853px
>>2833165
Since getting my first fuji I've not stop traveling with it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:09:06 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 3/50 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-7.jpg (525KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
525KB, 1280x853px
>>2833166
Great micro contrast on most of their lenses, I've not used one that's not sharp wide open ether.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:12:03 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 640 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 6.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2833166
How fucking god-tier is Fuji for travel? I can't imagine packing my Canon gear for a holiday again. I always think I should sack up and just take an X100T, and always cave in and go for multiple lenses, but even so the bang for buck ratio with weight is hilarious.
>>
>>2833167
used xe2 or x-pro1 what would you buy?
>>
File: untitled-1-13.jpg (467KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
467KB, 1280x720px
>>2833167
Something I'm doing that I did not see coming was using classic chrome more and more for architecture.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:29:52 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 1.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
Is it worth it to get an X-pro2 or should I just get the 1
>>
>>2833170
XE-2. I love my X Pro 1 and I couldn't imagine not having the OVF, but it's in some ways the X-series prototype, and it's aged a lot now. I used it again while my XT-1 was getting repaired and I was waiting on my XP2, and it really shows its age. The XE-2 just got a FW update that puts it up with the XT-1 and XT-10 with autofocus.
>>
File: untitled-1-14.jpg (614KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
614KB, 1280x853px
>>2833171
I love the muted but punchy colours from chrome.
>>2833168
I shelved my 5Diii for everything other than paid jobs I spend 3 years traveling only with an x100s and I always thought I would want more lenses but it simply was not the case, I think just using one lens made me a better artist constantly having to think about how to get that shot that would be super easy with a zoom, panning, going places I should not.. all great haha. then I got a used XT1 for £400 and a 12mm f2 + 35mm 1.4 next is a 56 1.2 I'm going to use the 5Diii for my studio work when I'm not renting a phase plus anytime I'm shooting fast events other than that I'm going full fuji.
>>2833170
I kinda have the same problem, I want a backup body to my XT1 as I'm going to start doing paid work with it. I would say get the XE2 as it got more updates is faster in day to day and focuses faster.
>>2833173 If it's your only camera treat yourself to the XPRO2 if not get a used XPRO 1 for like £200 on ebay bro they are great. If you can get the XE2.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:29:57 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 0.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>
>>2833179
Travel cam, street stuff, probably gonna be my main camera for everything. AF speed is my biggest concern, along with usability with manual lenses.
>>
File: Screen Shot 2016-05-07 at 15.40.45.png (774KB, 480x1219px) Image search:
[Google]
774KB, 480x1219px
>>2833177
I got myself a phablet and a OTG cable to put images from my camera to the phone.
I've had my Instagram around a year and the set up of mirrorless + a phone makes me feel so free to travel and shoot and share and not feel tired down to a computer.
I keep my "Fuji backpack" packed at all times and when I feel like it I will go and shoot for a few hours.
>>
>>2833180
Then you want the 2.
The screen is dramatically better for MF, and the AF is FUCK faster.
I'd get an XPro1 as a fun "I don't want to shoot film" film camera on the side of my main camera and my backup. Some people can use it as a prime (isi for instance) but for most people, no.
>>
>>2833177
>I shelved my 5Diii for everything other than paid jobs I spend 3 years traveling only with an x100s and I always thought I would want more lenses but it simply was not the case
Yeah my 5D2s only come out for paid work; I've travelled a lot and kinda go through phases. Last trip I'd just gotten the 16-55 and 50-140 combo and knew it was silly to take the weight of them overseas but did it anyway; the trip before that I had an X Pro 1 w/ 14/35/56mm and barely used it, mostly using an X100S. Now I'm looking in my bag packed for a few weeks away and I'm back to primes again - and will no doubt end up thinking I should have just gone with an X100 lol.
I was still sticking to Canon for off-camera flash; I've had problems with my PWs working on my X Pro 2 but just got a Yongnuo knock-off of the Canon wireless transmitter and so far it's been hilariously reliable. If I can satisfy myself that it's not going to go down, I think I might seriously buy another as a spare and use my 600EXs on my Fuji gear and fuck the Canon stuff off.
>>
File: untitled-1-15.jpg (329KB, 856x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
329KB, 856x1280px
Another thing I've noticed is shooting with smaller camera, you blend in more and are able to capture what's going on like a fly on the wall.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:43:53 Exposure Time 1/180 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 1.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2833173
I would say get the XE-2. It has better AF, better EVF, and better manual focus aids. The XE series is very easy to use and very small and light. If you have a littler extra I would say to get the XT1 though.
Personally my eyes get strained easily when looking at the EVF's, so the Xpro works very well for me, but the XT Is a great camera honestly, it really is the prime realization of what the first gen of Xtrans can do.
>>
File: untitled-1-21.jpg (524KB, 960x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
524KB, 960x1280px
>>2833185
The leaf shutter of the X100S is a god send for shooting in silence and being abel to use flash at crazy sync speeds.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:47:22 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 2500 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -0.4 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-17.jpg (317KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
317KB, 1280x853px
>>2833188
This guy had no idea I took a photo thanks to the leaf shutter, I was half a foot away from him.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:46:19 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness -0.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-19.jpg (336KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
336KB, 1280x853px
>>2833190
Another stealth shot.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:46:43 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 1.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-16.jpg (414KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
414KB, 1280x853px
>>2833191
Being able to focus peak makes using old lenses super easy, this was taken on my PK 100-300 5.6.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 113 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:44:33 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 0.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 75.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: untitled-1-20.jpg (421KB, 853x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
421KB, 853x1280px
>>2833193
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 15:47:00 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 4.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 33.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2833190
Even better than that, Electronic shutter mode on an X-T1 or XPro2. Literally no sound at all. If there's no major motion in the shot, rolling shutter doesn't touch you.
>>
File: untitled-1-22.jpg (450KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
450KB, 1280x720px
>>2833194
Side note the x100s can do Macro somewhat well.
>>2833195
Ahh I know I have it but I just don't like using it haha purist fag inside me compels me to use the x100s for stealth haha.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100S Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 16:06:53 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness -0.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2833168
Be sure to take one of those instax printers if you are hunkering for some backpacker puss-puss.
I guarantee it.
>>
>>2833254
Sounds hairy and smelly...
>>
File: DSCF1070.jpg (250KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
250KB, 1000x667px
Random shot I took testing my X-A2 with the kit lens. Not sure why I like it so much.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-A2 Camera Software Digital Camera X-A2 Ver1.20 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 14:25:14 Exposure Time 1/480 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Brightness 5.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 16.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4896 Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown Sharpness Normal White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Focus Mode Manual Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Aperture Prior AE Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
>>
>>2833369
that's disorienting as fuck
I like it
>>
>>2833369
It looks blurry. Is it blurry? What's going on.
>>
>>2832808
>Unprocessed photos look like shit
Translated to
>I have no experience with Fuji in the past 6 years
Set your Fuji camera up correctly, frame correctly, expose correctly and congratulations - you just eliminated post processing from your workflow.
>>
>>2833399
Fuji jpegs are processed.
>>
File: 2016-03-26 04.51.06 1.jpg (4MB, 2663x3994px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 2663x3994px
Some x100 pics incoming
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model X100T Camera Software VSCO Android Version Equipment Make FUJIFILM Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:03:27 03:45:28 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/8.0 Subject Distance Range Unknown Focal Length 23.00 mm Lens Aperture f/8.0 Light Source Unknown Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Program Aperture Priority Sharpness Hard White Balance Auto Image Width 4896 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Exposure Bias 0 EV Brightness 8.1 EV ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Time 1/450 sec Sharpness Unknown White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Aperture Prior AE Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
>>
File: 2016-04-03 07.52.59 3.jpg (4MB, 4701x3134px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 4701x3134px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model X100T Camera Software VSCO Android Version Equipment Make FUJIFILM Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:04:04 01:26:41 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/4.0 Subject Distance Range Unknown Focal Length 23.00 mm Lens Aperture f/4.0 Light Source Unknown Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Program Normal Program Sharpness Hard White Balance Auto Image Width 4896 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Exposure Bias 0 EV Brightness 5.7 EV ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Time 1/150 sec Sharpness Unknown White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Program AE Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
>>
File: 2016-04-03 07.53.29 3.jpg (4MB, 4435x2957px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 4435x2957px
>>2833445
Sorry for filesize. I'm on the phone
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model X100T Camera Software VSCO Android Version Equipment Make FUJIFILM Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Maker Note Version 0130 Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:04:04 00:46:23 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/8.0 Subject Distance Range Unknown Focal Length 23.00 mm Lens Aperture f/8.0 Light Source Unknown Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Program Normal Program Sharpness Hard White Balance Auto Image Width 4896 Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Exposure Bias 0 EV Brightness 8.3 EV ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Time 1/900 sec Sharpness Unknown White Balance Auto Chroma Saturation Normal Flash Mode Off Macro Mode Off Focus Mode Auto Slow Synchro Mode Off Picture Mode Program AE Continuous/Bracketing Mode Off Blur Status OK Focus Status OK Auto Exposure Status OK
>>
>>2833414
fuji raws are also processed
>>
What's everyone's favorite wide for Fuji? I only have the 35mm f1.4 for now but 50mm equivalent is just not my bae for daily shooting.
>>
>>2833457
depends on how wide you mean. Take your pick, 14,16,18,23. I have the 23 1.4 and love it. The 35mm frame line is great if you you want something just a bit wider.
>>
File: _DSF8333_v1.jpg (709KB, 824x1234px) Image search:
[Google]
709KB, 824x1234px
>>2832866
>Photo Ninja
Just downloaded and tried it out. Holy shit it's so much easier than photoshop. I'd have to do so much fiddling with the image in order to get it to look nice but the colors look great from the get go with Photoninja
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X100T Camera Software Photo Ninja 1.2.5 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:07 23:27:30 Exposure Time 1/240 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 8.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 23.00 mm Image Width 824 Image Height 1234 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>
>>2833438
wow what kind of PP are you doing?
>>
>>2833457
16mm
>>
>>2833165
I just got my x100t and I'm having trouble understanding how to expose with ISOless sensors. Should I leave the exposure dial to -2 all the time? Or only when in places with a high contrast of light?
>>
>>2833254
I already have one. It has seen shit lol.
>>
File: 0003758d-1d0f-4046-b878-ce3ccd1cc1b4.jpg (437KB, 1280x854px) Image search:
[Google]
437KB, 1280x854px
>>2833445
I just leave it set to auto iso. I made two presets, one goes to iso800 and one to 3200. If your images look great up to iso 6400, why would you bother with setting the iso manually? I shoot in aperture priority and adjust the exposure compensation if needed. I don't shoot raw anymore. I just transfer the jpegs to my phone and edit via vsco. Perfect travel setup. The only thing that bothers me is the battery life of both, the xe2 i used to own and the x100t i now use. I've got enough batteries, but seeing them drain so fast still makes me nervous.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:05 01:37:10 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 2000 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -1.6 EV Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: c45b8337-b0d4-4965-88fe-ee5e87167581.jpg (413KB, 1280x1920px) Image search:
[Google]
413KB, 1280x1920px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:05 01:35:50 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness 1.4 EV Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2833465
the VSCO kind
>>
>>2833482
the thumbnail looks fine but the second i loaded it it became this mushy soft focus mess. the fuck is wrong with that lens?
>>
File: dbaddecf-f539-4eb1-bb66-141db3ee28ff.jpg (251KB, 1280x854px) Image search:
[Google]
251KB, 1280x854px
These were raws, processed with lightroom 5, using vsco film. I mostly used the slidefilm presets.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:05 01:36:35 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 2500 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -3.2 EV Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2833481
>I don't shoot raw anymore
>uses vsco nonstop
>>
File: 615fdda6-9343-450a-a3c9-ee02f7656d25.jpg (1MB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x1500px
>>2833485
Shot wide open in thick fog, I guess. ;)
The 18mm is pretty good though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:06:21 21:02:49 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Brightness 3.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: 1137-400026.jpg (896KB, 811x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
896KB, 811x1000px
Glorious Fuji Provia 100f
Only good Fuji anything is film.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:06:08 13:28:30
>>
File: 10895c1a-0ec4-4fe0-ac90-758a96e6ba03.jpg (261KB, 1280x854px) Image search:
[Google]
261KB, 1280x854px
>>2833487
What are you implying?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:05 01:37:29 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness -5.8 EV Exposure Bias 1.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
OP here,
Thanks for the replies so far everyone.
Just curious, can someone post some images taken with the film simulations without being post processed afterwards?
I understand that post processing can make an image look better but I am still not sure how the XT1 will compare to my Nikon SOOC (also curious about a non film simulation profile, does it just have a standard setting?)
Bonus point for images taken in a city/of buildings etc as its what I will primarily be shooting.
Thanks /p/
>>
>>2833493
That you're fuckin up.
>>
File: c6b0f889-839b-4132-aa6d-3c39551f78e6.jpg (207KB, 1280x853px) Image search:
[Google]
207KB, 1280x853px
>>
>>2833481
Awesome picture, makes me feel like I am there.
>>
>>2833495
I'll see what I can do when I'm in front my PC later, if nobody else does.
Fuji's "standard" setting is the Provia film sim
>>
>>2833457
I like the Samyang 12mm for landscapes and the 18mm f2 for street.
>>
>>2833457
I default to the 16-55 as a do-all lens that takes the work out of thinking about what lenses I want to pack; the 14mm is not super expensive but is rather good; the 23mm is beautiful, but I use my X100T way more than I use that lens. Still haven't tried the 16mm f/1.4, which is something I was waiting on for ages, but it's received uniformly great reviews
>>
>>2833369
I had the X-A1 when it first came out. I did not care for it at all.
How is the X-A2?
>>
>>2833463
35 equivalent and wider. I should mention that I also have a GR, so 28 equivalent is covered.
>>2833469
Looks pretty tempting, but how does it balance with the X-T10? I'll probably upgrade to the Xpro2 some time after the X-T2 comes out, but I'm digging the compactness of the X-T10 for now. Got any pics with the 16?
>>2833517
Thanks! I wonder how the 18 compares to the GR. I do like that focal length...
>>2833529
I really need to grab that kit lens too. I've never really been a zoom guy but it seems like a very useful lens and often pretty cheap used too.
>>
>>2833569
>I really need to grab that kit lens too
That'd be the 18-55 I guess? I was referring to the 16-55 f/2.8
>>
>>2833500
Thanks, Id appreciate it.
>>
>>2833546
Really good as babby's first real camera I guess, I'm still learning my way around it. AFAIK it's exactly the same as the X A1 but adding a 180° screen for selfies.
>>
>>2833165
those colors look fucking terrible mate
>>
>>2833457
the xc 16-50 used as a 16 prime.
>>
>>2833574
Oh damn, yeah. Shows how little I've looked into the zoom offerings.
>>
>>2833823
Exactly what I'm doing. Is there really a need for something else besides specialty stuff like fisheye and the like?
>>
>>2833473
Assuming this is in the context of shooting raw, you'd be best served by ETTR - Fujis are extremely good at recovering highlights, though it's a quality not many seem to take advantage of.
Step one is set up the camera to produce extremely flat jpegs (I.e. ProNeg Hi sim with -1 highlights and -1 shadows) - this will give you a histogram display you can rely on to provide recoverable highlights when the far right bar is just clipping (or just about to clip if you want to play it extra safe) - this means +EC as often as not.
Consistently under exposing shots is definitely not the way to go.
>>
Do Fuji have a flash option? best off camera setup??
>>
>>2833856
There's a few ways you can go:
- Fuji have a few (frankly shitty) TTL flashes available, with no way to trigger them off camera. There's talk of a wifi flash coming this year but it's been delayed.
>Third party speedlights and:
- Optically trigger Nikon SBs, or various cheap Yongnuos, etc. XT-1 doesn't have a pop up flash but has a little clip on fixed unit that triggers quite reliably; it also works on the XP2. The lower models have some kind of built in.
- PocketWizards - though there's an incompatibility issue with Mini TT1s and the XP2
- Cheap radio triggers, or other reputable triggers from Cactus, et al
- Roboshoot makes TTL triggers for Fuji that will support TTL on Nikon speedlites.
- For Canon users, I have a few 600EX-RTs- I'm triggering their native radio receivers in manual but with output control with the Yongnuo YN-E3-RT. Quite reliable so far, takes AAs, not super big.
>Or of course:
- PC sync on some bodies or hotshoe sync cables
>>
Low budget here.
What's your thoughts on the XE 1?
>>
why should I choose fuji XT-1 or Xpro-2 instead of Nikon D610 or D750?
I want to replace my D90. Convince me to not buy a D610 as upgrade.
>>
>>2832826
This is honestly a fucking beautiful shot, nicely done man
>>
>>2833881
For what ?
>>
>>2833862
Nice sensor, nice lenses, slow camera with a crappy viewfinder.
Not sure what type of photographer you are but chances are good you'll be at least a bit frustrated.
>>
>>2833889
I own a Pentax MX and I want to try digital photography.
I shoot mostly in the streets and few portraits. I need something small and not too heavy, like my slr. And also something that gives decent results in low-light shots.
I don't want to spend a lot of money in my first DSLR.
The Fuji X-E1 seems a good choice, but I want more opinions.
>>
>>2833894
You're not going to get good low light performance on ANY Fuji body, the difference between crop and full frame is crazy for low light shots.
>>
>>2833894
If you're coming from film, you will probably not mind most of the limitations. The sensor will do well in low light, but the viewfinder won't. Autofocus will also leave you wanting, but again, coming from a manual SLR you'll be okay.
>>
>>2833895
That's not even a little bit true...?
Hell, the XPro2 is on par with the A7II in low light, even after being "corrected" for its ISO rating disparity.
Fuji's 16mp sensor does excellently even at 6400
>>
>>
>>2833888
landscape, street, portrait. Sometimes still life.
>>
>>2833921
Well weight to IQ ratio is a major reason. The full frame sensors give you a bit more DR and high ISO but at the cost of being bricks that when coupled with 3-4 lenses simply is not fun to walk around with.
Landscapes the DR is fine I've never had a problem exposing for the sky and bringing everything else out in post always looks clean just stick to 200 and you can push the shadows to 3200 and they will still be clean.
>>
>>2833906
>I understand the viewfinder kinda sucks, but it's not really a big deal, is it?
It very much can be, since you're relying on that viewfinder to see your scene. In low light, it will be choppy and laggy, and won't show much fine detail to allow for correct focusing. There are focusing aids that will help, but still, it won't be a party.
Most of the negative stigma about Fuji cameras comes from the Gen1 bodies. They were slow, clunky, inaccurate, and somewhat difficult to use. People liked them anyways because of the styling, and the lenses, but really, they didn't compete with the rest of the market. Much of that has been fixed today, but not much has been done to improve the oldest bodies. Cameras like the X-E2 have gotten major upgrades and improvements because the hardware inside could handle being pushed further, but the oldest stuff like the XPro1 and X-E1 didn't have the meat inside to allow for upgrades in any major area.
still very usable in many situations, and if you aren't used to high performance, you may not mind, but in terms of the viewfinder, if you're coning from a bright big full frame SLR viewfinder, you will almost certainly be unhappy with the experience of using an X-E1 in low light.
It won't affect the image quality, but it may severely affect your shooting experience.
I'd suggest buying one from someplace with a return policy to be sure that if you DO hate it, you can get your money back. The image quality will be great, but you may not be able to deal with the rest.
>>
>>2833923
Thanks for your reply.
Would it be wiser to put more money in my purchase and get the EX2?
>>
>>2833927
If you can swing it financially, yeah. There is a dramatic difference in user experience between the two.
>>
>>
I'm more familiar with fixed focal, and thus never used a zoom.
How is the zoom kit with the EX2?
>>
>>2832843
Those are some decent photos btw.
>>
>>2833888
An X-T1 will treat you very nicely for your stated uses. Small, quick, great viewfinder, great image quality, great lenses, great overall experience. Not as heavy or intimidating, not as inconvenient .
I love my Fuji over what I used to shoot with Canon for portraits. I haven't done any digging into why this is the case, but I find that for skin (and portraits in general) I very much prefer the way that detail is rendered on the Fuji. On Canon, there is lots of detail, but it's all really poppy crunchy detail that you find yourself spending a lot of time trying to soften to get a portrait of anything OTHER than the detail, if you know what I mean.
On my Fuji stuff, all of that detail is still there, and the files are very sharp and clean, but the detail isn't nearly as obtrusive. Things look much more smooth. And then if you want to, you can go in later and crunch things up.
It may just be the lenses used, not having as much micro contrast? Maybe it's something to do with the way the files are interpreted by photoninja/lightroom, etc. (To be clear, I'm not talking about Adobe's issues with fine detail, that's a different matter)
If I was going to shoot nothing but portraits, I'd grab a Fuji literally every time.
>>
>>2833935
The kit zoom on Fuji is (to my knowledge) the best kit lens available on any system. great build quality, great AF, great image quality.
On its own, it sells for $700 new. It's not a "starter lens" it's a genuinely great lens.
>>
Posted a similar question in the gear thread a few days ago but didn't really get an answer.
I'm thinking of upgrading from an X-E1 to an X-E2 because I hate the X-E1's slow write speeds. I use manual lenses 99% of the time and it sometimes takes irritatingly long after just a single shot before I can use focus magnification again. I am already using a fast SD card btw.
How much better is the X-E2's write speed? Ideally I'd like to be able to use the magnification nearly instantly after taking a shot. Can some with an X-E2 please test this?
(And I know focus peaking keeps working while the card is writing, but it's far too inaccurate for me. In fact I think I can eyeball the focus better when it's off.)
>>
Help me decide /p/.
I'm going on a 6 month trip to europe/asia, and I'm not planning on taking my entry DSLR.
I'm torn between the X100T (drawbacks are no WR and possible succesor soon) and paying double for an X-Pro 2 and either the 35mm f2 WR or the soon to come 23mm f2 WR. The Xpro leaves me with a great camera for when I come back home to work with, but it's almost double the price with a lens.
An X200 announcement soon would be great, but until then, what sould I go for?
>>
>>2833986
If money is no object, then obviously the xpro2 if that's what you want.
If the purchase of either camera would eat significantly and detrimentally into your travel expenses, then don't buy either.
Get something cheaper that you can stomach the loss of if it gets stolen/broken (to where are you travelling specifically?)
A GR (if you can stomach the DUST) - they're cheaper now, or X70 if you want something in the fuji ecosystem.
Is the only reason you want to buy either is because you don't want to lug your dslr around for this half year trip? Or were you planning on buying one or the other anyway?
I live in Thailand, and am in constant anxiety about mold eating my shit up. My house is made out of humidity and dust, with two construction sites on either side, a river on one end and on the last side, bugs (lots).
35/f2WR lives on the xt1 when it leaves its dry cabinet, unless I know I'm going to be indoors and aircon'd all day, out of the dust and humid heat.
In and out of air conditioned hotel rooms fogs shit up something nasty, unless you place a cam inside a ziplock and allow it to acclimatise over 20mins every time.
It'll be summer, after all, and at least in Thailand the Rainy Season of Suck.
On theft: shit gets stolen, even if you're a savvy traveller. Come to the crappier parts of the world with flashy gear and you're asking for it.
Lucky that all this fuji stuff is mostly quite small. X100 is kinda eye-catching though (if you go for the silver one). A clever thief might even mistake it for a leica, at least temporarily.
Remember to factor into final cost: some spare batteries; any filters you may need; lens pens or whatever; ziplocks and silica gel sachets.
Maybe even a 3rd party charger that allows usb charging so you can charge on the go with an external powerbank.
Every little bit adds up, and I don't know how strapped you are for cash.
>>
>>2834011
Oh, but one thing I strongly recommend you do bring, if you do fuji in the end, is the instax printer for shits and giggles. Great fun and a good way to make the acquaintance of fellow travellers/inquisitive locals.
Unless of course this is not a leisure trip.
>>
holy fuck i just found out AE-L will autofocus when i'm in MF.
what the fuck fuji i fucking love you
>>
>>2834088
Unfortunately it's not a perfect replacement for back button focus. It won't use zone focus points, and usually seems slower and less sure than regular focusing (in my testing)
>>
>>2834093
Yeah, but it's a nice little touch for nailing critical focus when you're shooting 100$$$ street.
>>
>>2833986
As mentioned previously, if money is no object, the X-Pro2, definitely.
Keep in mind that the X-Pro2 DOES NOT come with a lens. There is no kit you can buy.
I would recommend the 18mm f2 or the 23mm f2 lens.
The 24mm is also an option. The only reason I recommend the 18 or the 23 over the 35 is because they both put you wide and closer to 35mm than the 35mm lens would which is going to put you at 56mm.
>>
File: _DSF8810_v1_.jpg (2MB, 1958x1508px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1958x1508px
If you're into fine detail, and are hoping to use a Fuji, the software choice you make to deal with your raw conversion is very important. Adobe is improving, but still at the bottom of the pack in terms of fine detail (if that's your thing)
This is an XPro2 - 50-140 @ 55mm - f/4
Converted with Photo Ninja
No processing or sharpening other than removing the noise reduction.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 83 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1008 Image Height 1508 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:05:08 15:39:27 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 6.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1958 Image Height 1508 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2834117
You mean RAW to JPEG?
What's up with Adobe being shitty at it?
>>
>>2834118
In my case, I use PN for Raw (RAF) to lossless TIFF, then import the TIFF into lightroom and process as normal.
The color filter (and other settins) is unique on a Fuji, and requires a different algorithm to translate. Adobe's isn't great at it. Others are better.
There's only speculation on why Adobe struggles. Some say they sacrifice accuracy for speed, others say it's just because they don't care since Fuji's market share is so small, others still say that they do it on purpose, to keep other manufacturers from getting uppity and making other unique architectures that would make their lives harder.
>>
>>2833957
XE2/XT1 next to me, let's me go right into focus on both straight after the shot no delay at all.
>>
>>2833986
You should get a near mint used X100s. 90% of the x100T without the price.
>>
>>2834118
it's all down to camera profiling which lightroom and photoshop do extraordinarily well. the need for a third-party developer is a myth that's perpetuated too often
>>
I am honestly struggling to decide between a Fuji or SONY setup.
I am primarily interested in the Fuji because I am in a unique position to get some equipment at cost price AND for the Fuji philosophy of continuous improvement as well as the build quality and care (like being all metal, made in Japan emphasis on lens quality and image quality etc)
BUT I am still tempted by 1. The FF sensors in the Sony cameras, as well as the third party lens options like the Voigtlander 10mm prime which is just insane and not even something I could get from Nikon or Canon.
Has anyone else been in this situation and what made you choose one over the other?
>>
File: PNvsLR.jpg (963KB, 1855x989px) Image search:
[Google]
963KB, 1855x989px
>>2834446
incorrect
PN on the left, fully updated LR CC on the right
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 950 Image Height 1089 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 144 dpi Vertical Resolution 144 dpi Image Created 2016:05:08 23:13:11 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1855 Image Height 989
>>
File: PNvsLR2.jpg (2MB, 2299x996px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2299x996px
>>2834452
There's also sharpening...
Again, PN on the left, LR CC on the right.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1203 Image Height 996 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 144 dpi Vertical Resolution 144 dpi Image Created 2016:05:08 23:22:05 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2299 Image Height 996
>>
File: _DSF8855.jpg (2MB, 1015x1687px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1015x1687px
>>2834457
>Lightroom... ...extraordinarily well
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>
>>
>>2834468
>That's a lot of gain in sharpness for just the raw conversion in PN.
That's because PN does a good job of translating the data where LR doesn't.
You don't have to do anything other than export to TIFF in PN if you don't want, but I usually go in and remove all noise reduction (unless the shot really needs it. PN does a good job of noise reduction in my experience)
I also add some contrast, fix white balance, and otherwise "equalize" the exposure to get a good starting point, and then do all of the real editing in LR and PS. I find Adobe products a LOT easier to use for getting the looks I like, but PN can give you a much cleaner and sharper starting point.
Sometimes, I don't bother, because detail doesn't really do much for an image, but if there's one in particular that DOES need it, there's a lot more to be had.
>>
>>2834088
I really like that feature. I've also noticed that it seems to AF more accurately when doing it that way, as opposed to using the shutter release in AF-S, at least on my OG X100.
>>
>>2834478
Thanks, I was really curious because I don't want to cut out LR from my workflow entirely but I'm getting a Fuji soon & the raw processing--like you said--does matter.
>>
>>2834483
You can cut out LR, but for me, it's invaluable. I do probably 80% of my editing there. It makes it great for doing color, tone, contrast, and style edits.
Unfortunately, I haven't found a way yet to get the benefits of PN, while still being able to use the camera calibration simulation stuff that is so great in LR. Hoping to find a way.
>>
>>2834118
>What's up with Adobe being shitty at it?
Iridient Developer, made by one guy in his fucking basement achieves better with fuji raws than adobe.
>>
>>2834446
Wrong, as others have said and that other anon has proven (likely more than once if it's the same guy with the bw headshots from previous threads).
Well known issue. Simple google search will bring it up.
LR is convenient as a photomanager and people just have gotten used to it, but for fuji it's not optimal.
It's also the source of much bitching from many sides (usually the sony forum on dprev) about mushy, lack of details, foliage probs on fuji.
ONLY if you use LR.
>>
File: 160509_060648_COLLAGE-1.jpg (425KB, 1304x1628px) Image search:
[Google]
425KB, 1304x1628px
My Fuji set up I run a popular Instagram so I'm out almost daily.
XT1 + 35 f1.4 + 12 f2.0
X100s
XE20 flash with two yangnuo wireless triggers and a pack of jels. 5 foot compact tripod umbrella and floor mat for ground level shots. Plus cleaning kit and ND filters like 6KG including 500ml water. Sometimes I'll strip out the bottom row and put the 55-200 in.
>>
>>2834531
What's your popular instagram?
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-05-09-06-23-05.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1440x2560px
>>2834532
Just got a Gopro clone (Yicamera) going to start doing shooting vlogs with it on my camera and might start doing reviews too.
>>
>>2833852
wow that's very interesting about the histogram, I'll try it out. Thanks!
>>
>>2833852
when would be a good time to under expose? I'm using my x100t to take photos for my sister's prom. Location will be outdoors with lots of trees and natural light. Would I need to underexpose in a situation like this and expose correctly for the highlights? Is this what you meant by using the histogram, underexposing until the highlights dont clip anymore?
>>
>>2834482
pretty sure this is because it uses a larger focus box in this mode than in af-s
>>
>>2834575
GL - I should add that histograms do not represent signal captured in a linear form; that final bar on the right represents an exponentially greater amount of data than the far left bar (if that makes sense).
>>2834577
In that kind of scenario (huge DR, constantly changing lighting) I would use either a 2 stop soft grad filter (awkward but effective if you're comfortable working that way, and you need something like the Lee system so you can position the filter properly for the scene) or fill flash (built in is fine unless you're using the TCL/WCL which will block it) at -2/3 if about 4/5 paces away or -1/3 if further (like when going for full body) just to even out the exposure a bit. With either of those methods you can play it safe with EC and underexpose by -1 or more. Use both and you'll have almost perfect exposures SOOC, but don't sweat the whole grad filter thing, was just throwing it in for completeness.
Fill flash is awesome in full daylight combined with the built in ND filter as you can shoot f2.8 for subject separation (I've found this aperture on APSC at 23mm is pretty much perfect for upper body shots as your subject is still entirely within the focal plane so edges are nice and sharp). Also for maximum separation try and get the light coming in from the side/upper left or right. Added bonus will be no squinting faces.
Finally don't forget to direct the hell out of these people, use EVF for setup and OVF to nail fleeting expressions and do a practice run if you can in similar conditions just to get a feel for how the flash changes things.
Hope that all makes sense - best of luck.
>>
>>2834607
Thank you for the help! I plan on doing some sort of a practice run with the -1 exposure before so I don't royally fuck something up. Too much work for a mother's day gift... but you have to do what you have to do
>>
File: questionings.png (43KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 500x500px
>>2833482
>>2833486
>>2833493
Where is this place/what city?
>>
>>2833881
Wish i had money for upgrading my D90 to X-Pro2. Btw what lens setup do you have?
>>
File: f7248c2d-44ba-4cbf-93f8-c6f5d1a7c05a.jpg (203KB, 1280x854px) Image search:
[Google]
203KB, 1280x854px
>>2834857
Thats in Como, Italy. My girlfriend and I went on a short vacation to milano and made a daytrip to Como and both of us found como to be much more interesting and comfy than milano.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:05 01:34:52 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Brightness 4.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
Anyone here use an X70?
>>
>>2833881
Size and weight, and the color and contrast that come out of Fuji's sensors.
I currently have a D610, which I downsized to from a D3S when I switched from sports photography to being an in-house photog for a company, and it's a good camera, but I've never liked the images that come out of it as much as the ones from the D3S. I recently got an X100, and photos come straight into Lightroom looking the way my D610 photos do after 10 minutes of tweaking and filtering. That might not be a big deal for casual photography, but if you do any kind of volume it's huge and saves hours of time and energy.
Even with a small FF camera like the D610, my kit is still a pain to lug around, too. I love the idea of having the same capabilities in something half the size and weight, and am seriously considering selling my Nikon gear and buying an XT2 setup when it comes out.
>>
Any of you actually use Silkypix?
Either the freebie Fuji gives out or the proper full, paid version?
I've never come across anyone (fuji) that actually uses that over LR/C1/RT/PN/ID et.al.
I mean, I've played with the giveaway one, but is the paid version just so unappealing?
Who is buying that shit?
>>
>>2835169
Honestly I don't see the point unless you REALLY want the 21mm adapter lens you can get with it, awesome minimal landscape and architecture set up. Other than that I think it makes sense to just bite the bullet on an x100/s/t or if you care tons about size the Sony RX100 the x70 without a EFV kinda sucks.
>>
>>2834882
Italian here, there's literally nothing for a tourist in Milano. It's a working city more than a tourism city. Torino is much more interesting.
>>
>>2835438
>italy
>work
haha
funny one there.
>>
So far I have an XT1 with a 35 1.4, 12mm 2.0. I want to get a standard zoom next the 16-55 is 2.8 is far to big and frankly my Tamrom 24-70 2.8 IS shits all over it. So I'm left with the 18-55 or the 16-50 anyone here used both? I'm thinking the 16 being a 24 is more useful than the 1/3 I lose vs the 2.8-4. Optically they are pretty close so it comes down to 24mm vs 2.8-4.0 and it being £100 cheaper.
>>
>>2835441
16-50 if you want a 16.
it's the only thing the lens good at.
>>
>>2835442
I've read it's very sharp wide open and renders really nicely do you not agree breh??
>>
>>2835442
That's not true at all. It's a great lens all around. Optically on par with the XF lenses, great autofocus, etc.
>>
>>2835263
I tried it when first getting disappointed with the rendering in Lightroom, but found it totally unusable. It was the version that came with the camera though, so I have no idea how a more robust version might act. Mine didn't even have sliders. In stead, it had drop down menus. There would be a segment called "shadows" and there was a dropdown that would give me an option for "Darker - Dark - Medium - Light - LIghter" and that's it. Like, really guys?
>>
>>2835441
>the 16-55 is 2.8 is far to big and frankly my Tamrom 24-70 2.8 IS shits all over it.
wut
I haven't used the Tamron, but the 16-55 is excellent. In what aspects does your Tamron beat it out? If I remember correctly, the Tamron is softer and less corrected than the Canon 24-70 mk1 which was only "pretty good" and the only reason you'd buy it is for the IS.
>>
>>2835169
>>2835437
>Other than that I think it makes sense to just bite the bullet on an x100/s/t or if you care tons about size the Sony RX100 the x70 without a EFV kinda sucks.
Right.
It's not as versatile as a rx100 sony (m3 and up) or even say a canon g7x or whatever the new one is called.
No stabilisation for video, and on that of course
>fuji
>video
in the first place.
The GR has a better 18mm lens, capable of being waaay more discrete (though of course dust issues).
The X70 seems to be for those that already have a full fuji interchangeable lens system, and want a pocketable, no frills no hassle cam with a familiar layout and feel in terms of colours and files. Maybe something taken for day trips on holidays where the risk of theft of your main fuji system is too great. Or out on dinners and nights out where a larger cam wouldn't be appropriate.
Really kinda niche, as anyone looking or a small travel cam would be better served with something like the rx100 or g7x or even an lx100. And if you needed something like the GR or Nikon A you would already have it.
Doesn't even have a built in ND filter so you've either got to fumble about with the cumbersome filter attachment or risk rolling shutter or other probs with the electronic shutter. If it had at least this staple for modern pocketable p&s then it would be able to stand amongst the competition.
As it stands I just don't get it. Personally don't see the appeal.
>>
>>2835458
You remember wrong the Tarmon is neck and neck with the Canon mark ii.
It has IS and the Fuji does not. I already have a work set up with Canon I'm just looking for small little lenses and the 24-70 has less features and does not offer anything new vs my Tamron so I'd rather get a small kit lens and maybe 2 more primes. Perhaps "shits all over it" is an over statement though.
>>
>>2835478
>At the 70mm end of the zoom range, the Canon performs well across the frame, even wide open at f/2.8, while the Tamron is significantly softer around the borders. The Tamron’s borders remain softer than the Canon until stopped down to about f/11, but they’re pretty good by about f/8, and for most purposes, are perfectly usable even at f/5.6.
http://www.lightandmatter.org/2013/equipment-reviews/lens-comparison-canon-ef-24-70-f2-8l-ii-vs-tamron-24-70-f2-8-vc/
>In the center of the frame Canon's lens was always slightly sharper and at 24mm the edges were significantly sharper than Tamron's.
>When we compared the optics to Canon's 24-70mm (version 1) we got some interesting results. Throughout the whole zoom range the Tamron had serious vignetting issues at 2.8. At F4 and above vignetting was no longer an issue.
https://fstoppers.com/gear/review-tamron-24-70mm-28-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm-5701
>>
>>2835486
And then you have the Fuji 16-55
>The Fuji XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR is optically superb. As shot on Fuji's cameras which compensate for everything, it's as perfect as I can measure.
>It's ultrasharp and has no falloff or distortion at any setting, and is also made extremely well.
>>
>>2835488
And for something a little less Rockwellian:
Fujifilm's XF 16-55mm f2.8 becomes the best quality general-purpose zoom for the X-mount system. It's hardly a controversial statement given the specification (not to mention the size and cost), but always reassuring to confirm it in practical tests.
In my optical tests with a distant subject, I found the XF 16-55mm delivered very good sharpness in the middle of the frame at all focal lengths even using the maximum f2.8 aperture. There's some softness in the very extreme corners, most visibly at 16mm and a little less so at 55mm, but move into the frame even just a little and it improves greatly. If you are shooting highly detailed scenes and can close the aperture to f5.6 or f8, the degree of detail and sharpness becomes very impressive.
The peak performance in my tests was around the 35mm (roughly 50mm equivalent) focal length where the results were sharp even in the extreme corners at f2.8. The weakest point was at 16mm where the corners were softest compared to other focal lengths and some coloured fringing was also visible. Luckily the fringing was easy to correct in RAW files, and again once the aperture was closed to f5.6 there was a high degree of detail across the entire frame.
>http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Fujifilm_Fujinon_XF_16-55mm_f2-8_R_WR/verdict.shtml
Also, has weather sealing.
Summary: You'll never notice the difference between the Tamron and the Fuji in a final photograph, regardless of display size.
>>
>>2835494
I'd also like to add the Tamron has basic weather sealing.
Thanks for all the info but it's a bit wasted on me I'm trying to decide between two super budget lenses haha.
I think I'm going to go with the 16-50 it's only 200g and 3.5 is plenty fast for walking around. I'm more worried about sharpness stopped down I'll be using it in the studio from time to time at 50 f8 when I CBA to drag Canon gear around
>>
>>2835498
The 16-50 is great. It won't let you down.
The sharpness is very good, especially stopped down.
With Fuji files, you'll get a MUCH more dramatic jump in sharpness from picking the right processing program and learning to use it correctly than you will from jumping from a $200 lens to a $2000 lens.
>>
>>2835498
The 16-50 is just as good as the 18-55. Ive owned both and stuck with the 16-50 for the wide end. Because of the barrel distortion, it's uncorrected fov is actually much wider than 24mm equiv. It's more like a 21mm on the wide end if you leave the barrel distortion, 24mm with Fiji correction profile.
The focusing is also faster in the 16-50 II than the 18-55 in my experience.
>>
>>2835503
Fantastic, exactly what I wanted to hear, thanks anon! What sorts of speeds can you.
>>2835502
I've been using capture one for Fuji and Lightroom for my Canon rig I know there are a few that are a tad better but I like the capture one workflow.
What do you guys think of the OIS? What sorts of speeds can you hand-hold at 16mm?
>>
>>2835502
What do you suggest? I don't have a Mac so no irridient. Photo ninja??
>>
>>2834452
Holy shit. That's the difference between "Wow this is a great lens!" and "Holy fuck I paid way too much why the fuck did I fall for the meme and get into this system this camera sucks"
You'd think Fuji would do everything they could to fix it. Or at leas tell people... Like a little info card with every camera body.
>>
>>2835550
For many people, the ability to pixel peep at 100% isn't as important as the lightroom interface, the ability to use camera profiles correctly, nice preset to speed up editing, etc.
A good color and contrast workflow will do a LOT more to benefit your final image than a bit more detail at 100%.
As of right now, there's no way to get your detail out of Photo Ninja and still get LR's camera profiles that emulate Fuji's film simulations.
After contacting PN support (Which is to say, Jim) to ask about a way, I got the following response:
>At some point I'd like to reverse engineer the Fuji looks (e.g. Velvia, Sensia), but I haven't gotten around to it yet. In the meantime, if you experiment with the Color Enhancement filter (and maybe the tone controls) a bit I'll bet you can get pretty close. It has quite a bit of ability to push/pull/nudge colors in different wedges of the color hue wheel. (If you have access to a Color Checker chart, you can shoot it with different color settings, then adjust the Color Enhancement & tone sliders until it matches the JPEG preview.)
So essentially, you get one or the other. And in most situations, one matters much more than the other as far as final image success is concerned.
>>
>>2834877
i have:
afd 50mm 1.8
afd 20mm 2.8
afd 80mm 1.8
afs 35mm dx
kit 18-55
if I'll take the fuji, I'll miss my 20 and 35 so much. I love them.
>>
I have like 2 days left before I can trade my X-Pro2 back in to the shop for a refund.
I'm thinking of downgrading to an X100T. Talk me out of it, or talk me into it.
Just help me decide what to do! I'm mainly interested in street photography.
>>
>>2835616
We're going to need a lot more information than that to even reply to you intelligently, let alone advise you. Why not pretend we don't live in your brain, and that we have no idea why you're returning your XPro2, what features you want, what type of street photos you take, etc.
>>
>>2835619
Umm...I guess I don't like having all these lenses. The 100T might be more easily concealable.
>what type of street photos you take
I like candid type photos.
I also like that the 100T is 35mm equiv. The closest I have right now with the X-Pro2 is an 18mm lens which puts me at 28mm. The 23mm lens by Fuji is $1000.
>>
>>2835620
So why not sell "all these lenses" and use the money to buy the 23mm (or the cheaper smaller one that's coming down the pipeline) or even just the kit lens (which is only one lens, and yet covers a whole bunch of focal lengths, including 35mm!!!)
"Candid type photos" is useless as a statement when trying to get gear advice. Preferred angle of view, general distance from you to your subject, whether you shoot portraits, scenes, architecture, etc. is somewhat useful. A link to the photos you post would be best.
>>
>>2832888
Apart from the brick face and granny tits she looks old.
>>
>>2835565
True to Fuji colors is supposed to be what the pro Silky pix is all about.
Perhaps its only redeeming feature; fuji and silky being tight as all fuck or some shit.
>>
File: 7e61f811-2f1e-4f62-9fd7-424784f4c42f.jpg (491KB, 853x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
491KB, 853x1280px
>>2835616
X100T is awesome. No more wondering if you have the right lens. If 35mm equivalent is your favourite focal length, then get one.
>>
>>2835620
>I like candid type photos.
Maybe you can use the XF 27mm prime lens. It really small so it makes most Fujis look like and old point and shoot and people will think you're just playing around with it instead of shooting if you're not composing through the viewfinder.
>>
>>2835620
The 23mm doesn't make sense to me either, you can get an X100T for the same price. Some people maybe need the extra speed but I don't. I'm waiting for the 23mm f2 though; I like 35mm equivalent and I'll probably sell my 35mm f1.4 and buy that then.
I'd stick with the Xpro2 at least until a new X100F(?) comes out. They're fun cameras to use but I prefer the GR for compactness and stealth (and 28mm).
As someone who also shoots street mostly, I like how with my X-T10 people more often look at the camera when I shoot it vs when I shoot the GR. Gives your shots a different vibe.
>>
>>2835616
is this your first camera ever?
>>
>>2835863
the 23mm 1.4 is way, way way nicer wide open than the x100t is even stopped down
protip: theres one on ebay right now for ridiculously cheap
>>
>>2835620
Dunno where you live, but in the US the 23mm is $700 when there's a rebate going on, and it's pretty likely that there will be another one in a few months. There's also a rumor that a 23 f/2 is coming soon, which should be around the X100 lens's size and I doubt it'll cost more than $500.
>>
>>2835616
trade it for a6300
>>
>>2835616
get the 23mm 1.4 for x-pro2. Voila. You now have a faster, more advanced and powerfull x100.
>>
>>
>>2835620
Get an adapter and use some other lens.
>>
>>2834452
just so yo know, you're my favourite fujifag :3
>>
I want to upgrade from my x20 to an X-E2 sometime soon and buy an adapter to use FD lenses with an adapter. I'm just scared I'll never be able to focus it with whatever focus aids it has. The X20 has some wacky choice of focus when I use autofocus and maybe I just have to get used to it but I was never able to use focus peaking or whatever the outlines are that are supposed to show focus are called. Should I just get an slr? I'm used to bronica.
>>
>>2835613
Yeah, Nikon's 35 is really great in terms of iq/price. 20/2.8 looks like my 24/2.8 but with a bigger filter thread, not sure what have you find in it. Btw fuji have 18/2 which is light, compact and quite fast.
>>
>>2837176
Yea his shit is really good. He's probably my favorite on this board, also, but then he also uses the most expensive Fuji gear, too.
>>
>>2837125
Sure
Shot on XPro2 - 18-55 @ 55mm - f/4 - ISO 200 - 1/320 (Aperture Priority)
I start in color correction and set white balance manually to taste (I don't worry about accuracy so much as what I think looks good, and I'm usually a bit warm and a very very tiny bit magenta)
I brought the exposure down a little bit since I tend to shoot for the high side of the histogram (Hold over from my time with Canon)
So I have illumination at -7, exposure offset at .24, and highlights at -.30
Contrast at 5, detail at 4
I haven't learned to work the color enhancement panel yet, so I don't touch it, even though a lot of the time, I have some wonky vibrant HDR looking colors going on.
Skip B&W
In noise ninja, if the shot is under about ISO 800, I just drag all NR to 0 (like I did with that image)
Detail:
Strength 81
Radius .65
Masking 100
Then export as a tiff, and get cracking in LR.
>>
File: _DSF4594.jpg (515KB, 1750x1167px) Image search:
[Google]
515KB, 1750x1167px
>>2837176
Aww, thanks man! I try to keep from being annoying, and if I do make bold statements about the system, I try to back them up with photos, to minimize the obnoxiousness.
>>2837365
That means a lot, thank you.
I DO use the top of the line Fuji stuff, so yeah, take it with a grain of salt. The XPro2 and 50-140 certainly don't come cheap, but damn are they nice to use.
I don't imagine I would be as happy with the experience using an X-E1 and the cheaper lenses. But I haven't touched them, so who knows!
I don't have the 16-50 f/2.8, since I really love the 18-55 enough to feel like it wouldn't be worth it for me. So I'm not using ALL of the most ridiculous stuff...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 150 dpi Vertical Resolution 150 dpi
>>
What's going to be a better kit?
> Fujifilm x-t10 + Fujinon 23mm f/1.4
> Sony a6000 + Sigma 35mm 1.4 hsm art
>>
>>2837218
Aren't you afraid of that crop factor fucking your shit up?
I had this idea a loooong time ago, but they I learned about crop factors - and how it works on a APS-C sensor. It made me sad.
>>
>>2837390
Better for what?
>>2837393
Speed boosters can do a LOT for crop factor issues, as well as depth of field sacrifice. I don't think I would ever adapt an SLR lens without one, these days. Though it's not cheap to do well.
The concept of a crop shouldn't bother you at all. Every lens you've ever used is "cropped". Use lenses based on their field of view on your camera, without worrying about the other stuff.
>>
File: Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 18.44.02.png (334KB, 768x536px) Image search:
[Google]
334KB, 768x536px
>>2837390
Ergonomics, sensor IQ and weight all fall in favour of the XT10 set up.
The Sigma is much bigger and I doubt it's better, 100% not if you factor in IQ to size ratio.
Image related, could not find the 35mm 1.4 but the 30mm is even smaller and it looks stupid on the a6000
>>
>>2837390
Sony if you want to take videos. If you're just doing photography, all hail glory to Fuji.
>>
>>2837385
I have the X-Pro2, the 18mm f2, the 35mm f1.4, and the 55-200mm f3.5-48.
The lenses I all bought used. My photos are still shit, though, since I suck at composition and finding good subject matter.
>>
>>2837218
The new E2s is pretty fuckin good and the kit lens that comes with it is amazing. It's a great kit for $999.
>>
>>2837431
Hey man, my favorite photography quote I've ever heard:
If you want to take more interesting photos, become a more interesting person.
My favorite photos are always portraits, because I love beautiful photos of beautiful people, but my second favorite is always some awesome thing happening in some awesome place. People cliff diving, or cracks through crystal clear ice on a lake in Siberia somewhere, etc.
You have to go where the photos are. You have to be near the activities you want to shoot. Photos aren't just waiting in a line at your bedroom door, asking to put themselves together to be shot from your bed or your desk.
My favorite photos I've taken personally are always on road trips, or on vacation at the equator, or at a concert. When I'm just fucking around at home, or just testing light, or seeing if my lenses are sharp, the results are always disappointing.
>>
>>2837454
>My favorite photos are always portraits, because I love beautiful photos of beautiful people, but my second favorite is always some awesome thing happening in some awesome place. People cliff diving, or cracks through crystal clear ice on a lake in Siberia somewhere, etc.
That's called low-hanging fruit. It's easy to be impressed by it, it's so sweet.
But it's tourism basically.
>>
>>2837457
Works for me.
I'm certainly not saying that they're the best photos, merely the photos that I personally enjoy. I don't come to photography for any deep artistic expression, and find that I don't like most modern-art concepts, like "purposefully empty" photos, or other things you have to work hard to enjoy. I just like looking at pretty things, and neat things, and awesome things. For me, the stuff I like is all in the shallow end of the pool.
I recognize the quality of deeper more "artsy" work, but don't enjoy the experience much.
>>
File: _DSF8810_v2.jpg (5MB, 4032x6032px) Image search:
[Google]
5MB, 4032x6032px
>>2837382
>>2834117
Here's a full res of the photo, edited. I wouldn't call it presentation ready, since I would go in and do a lot of detail removal, and skin work with frequency separation, but if all we're talking about is what you can pull out of an RAF file with a PhotoNinja - Lightroom - Photoshop workflow, this is a pretty good shot.
Had to export it at 8/12 quality from PS, so excuse any banding you might find.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 83 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4032 Image Height 6032 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2016:05:12 14:49:26 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 6.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 4032 Image Height 6032 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2837462
>that scar on the chest
story?
>>
>>2837497
She had cancer as a teenager, and that's where they put her portacath for administering chemo drugs.
>>
>>2837499
>and she's dating the fujifag cancer now
rofl what a death wish
>>
>>2837501
le edge
>>
>>2837393
Nah I'm just afraid I won't be able to use the manual focus and I'll never be able to actually get anything in focus since it's not a through the lens optical finder.
>>
>>2837701
Manual focus is objectively easier with an EVF with focus aids like glowing edges and simulated spit image.
>>
>>2833007
Holy fuck m8 I loved it! Congratulations!!
>>
>>2837462
is that a mannequin
>>
>>2833007
very nice shot.
how did you get the fire to not look like a blurry smooth line?
>>
File: 1k-May 11_ 2016-9.jpg (222KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
222KB, 1000x667px
>>2837701
The focusing aids are pretty good. Unless you're shooting a longer lens with a thin depth of field wide open, you're not going to have any issues. The only lens I've ever had issues with was the Canon FD 85mm 1.8 in low light, but that lens has CA out the ass wide open anyway.
If it isn't something absolutely time critical you can always easily zoom in to check focus.
Pic related, Manually focused from a voigt 35 1.4 in low-ish light.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro2 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 18 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:11 14:16:58 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -4.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2837793
no, just a regular man turned woman
>>
>>2832893
>crushed blacks
>obstructive foreground doesn't add anything
>no point of focus
>uninteresting
but I mean, we're talking about /p/ here
>>
>>2837385
Hopefully you can make it to X Photographers some day anon. God speed!
>>
>>2837385
I remember you were shooting the X-T1? Are you gonna switch back to X-T2 or you'll keep the Xpro2?
>>
how's the blackout time on the XT1?
>>
>>2837823
Is
>crushed blacks
a meme here? I mean seriously how is photography supposed to be an art form if people are going to pretend that 100% clear IQ is mandatory instead of a very obvious artistic option?
>>
>>2838670
what is a blackout time?
>>
>>2838970
The time where the screen goes black as the photo is taken.
>>2838670
Sorry anon I'm visiting my mom for the night and all I have is my XPro2, but when I get home, I'll record the viewfinder of the XT1 for you as a photo is taken so you can see.
I found it to be great for single shot, and burst low, but in burst high with a fast moving subject, you may find yourself wishing for less blackout.
It's not BAD by any means, but it's there.
>>
>>2837815
Unkind.
>>2837983
Doubtful. I don't shoot full time, and I'm not too interested in the other requirements. One of the other XBros around here is supposedly on his way though, and we're all very excited for him!
>>2837985
I've thought about it, actually. I doubt it though. The X-T1 and the XPro2 are nice together. I think it would be nice to have, but not nice enough to justify the hassle and expense. When I need a nice big viewfinder, or a lot of battery, I have my X-T1. When I need the focus nipple or the resolution or the form factor, I have the XPro2.
Truly, for what I shoot, the resolution is nice to jerk off about, but doesn't actually do anything beneficial for my shots.
Acros is nice, but I never shoot straight to JPEG anyway, so again, not really worth it.
But I do see that the battery grip for the X-T2 is supposed to have a second AF adjuster nipple, which is something I really miss from the X-T1...
But no, I'll talk myself out of it. It would just be gear faggotry to do it.
>>
>>2832892
how did you focus this? i thought fujis were too slow for this type of shot
>>
>>2839131
Given that the XT2 will have the focus nipple and sensor from the XPro2, which one would you buy as a Fuji neophyte?
I'll be using it mostly for general documentary photography, automotive events including the occasional trackday, and cosplay. (photoshoots and not walkaround hall shots) I'm switching over from FF Nikon and my main lenses will be the 23 1.4 and the 50-140 2.8, plus some UWA or other and maybe a portrait tele down the line.
I'm leaning toward the XT2 as it stands, especially because I wear glasses and the bigger EVF seems like it's worth losing the hybrid finder.
Also, any opinion on the XT kit lens? I don't do a ton of wide-angle shooting and was thinking maybe it makes more sense to get the kit and just use the kit lens as my wide.
>>
>>2832758
is the 23mm 1.4 too big for a walk around lens?
what pancake will best complement it for just walking around and taking creepshots
>>
>>2839480
Its a choice of 2 - 18mm or 27mm.
My creep-fu is weak but wouldn't a telephoto be better for that particular pastime?
>>
>>2839453
>i thought fujis were too slow for this type of shot
Well that's easy. It's untrue. I took about 200 photos of those guys (High speed burst mode over about an hour) and literally every single photo was in focus.
Anyone saying that Fuji AF isn't capable is either talking about the older bodies where it WAS bad, or is coming from another system and hasn't gotten a feel for how to set up and use the Fuji AF system. There are a lot of settings and tweaks involved in optimizing it for what you're doing, and knowing where to hold the focus point is important.
>>2839477
I was going to tell you it was all about taste and feel until I got to the part about glasses. Get the X-T2. I have perfect vision so no glasses, and the eye relief on the XPro2 is straight up annoying, even for me. I can't imagine trying to use the viewfinder with glasses.
>Also, any opinion on the XT kit lens?
It's excellent. the only compromise you make with it is maximum aperture. Otherwise, it's a totally viable lens. fast AF, good build, great image quality, good feel.
Thread posts: 313
Thread images: 102
Thread images: 102