What did you buy this week /p?

>>2801135
>not a7r ii + mc11

Peak design capture clip pro and Lowepro ProTactic 350 AW backpack

Nice little combo for lightweight day hikes with a decent tripod strap system

>>2801135
who cares

>>2801135
I got a B+W 82mm uv filter for the 90mm Angulon MC.

File: 1001121_563658717142975_3520392957589834578_n.jpg (43KB, 593x664px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 593x664px

Bought an a6300. Literally don't know the first thing about photography.

>>2801196
We assumed the second sentence after reading the first sentence. You didn't need to type it.

SMC takumar 28mm f3.5 and a YN560 III + RF603 II bundle thingie. Haven't arrived yet cause of like 2-3 weeks delivery

File: DSCN0688-ryan-in-pool.jpg (167KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1000x750px

Mamiya RZ67 PRO II kit - 3 backs, 65, 110, and 150 lenses. Waist level and prism finders.

Gonna take it to a garden next week with some Velvia and see what the Rockwell slide hype is all about.

>>2801135
>he actually bought the meme lens.

You could have just gotten a 24 f/1.4 and cropped it to 35mm f/2 equivalent when needed.

>>2801135
Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5

Domke f2 and a sekonic l-308s light meter.

Last week I bought a 15-30 Tamron, f2. 8... Hadn't used it until last night though.

>>2801175
Rip off
Ebay same stuff for 30 euro.
Peak design even tried to sue the company for copy right shit...
But failed hard because the other company was actually first making these clips .
Hehehe

>>2801238
Which is the other company?

>>2801218

Why not the 10-18?

>>2801264
The only real advantage of the 10-18 is it's like 70% of the performance for much cheaper. The 10-22mm is pretty much a much better lens in every other significant way.

File: dwaynethedeadhead.jpg (225KB, 1200x813px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1200x813px

>>2801135

Mailed in some C-41 to dwaynes, does that count?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	375 dpi
Vertical Resolution	375 dpi
Image Created	2016-01-05T20:09:18-05:00
Image Width	1200
Image Height	813

>>2801265

How is it better? Most reviews and comparisons I read rated the 10-18 as sharper at least.

Camera bag and a set of macro, cpl and nd filters to get started with them.

Macro are just for the fun, nd filters are the ones I was really interested in. Cpl, meh, it came with it so what the hell. Maybe it'll come handy to avoid glass reflections at zoos or shooting the inside of stores from the window.

The bag ssimply was a must have to carry everyday stuff and the camera.

Next month will come the tele lens. 55-200 vr because poorfag.

What is a decent macro lens for an a6300? I am thinking of this: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-SEL90M28G-Standard-Prime-Mirrorless-Cameras/dp/B00U29GNEG/

>>2801269
It counts to me. The only photography expense I have is processing costs.

>>2801214
How much?

Peak designs strap.

Nothing because I'm still a poor uni student. But I have a job interview next week so I may be splurging on a new 70-200mm 2.8 and 150-450mm 4.5-5.6 for my K-3 if I get the job.

File: voigtlander_75_1.jpg (34KB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 800x640px

hopefully here Mon/Tue

I bought a 200mm 2.8 L II used from a friend. Can't wait to use it next week.

>>2801214
damn i cant wait for summer, pic is comfy

>>2801269
how much people here use dwanes? what are the advantages?

i mean other than the fact theyre the last people who could process a discontinued film why would someone want to get their film developed by dwanes rather than their local lab or doing it themselves?

Film. A national park permit. Fuel for road trips.

>>2801361
Not Murrican, so can't speak from direct experience, but I'd imagine that their position as an established mail-in pro lab in a populous country probably gives some assurances as to the quality of their service.
That could come down to the speed of turnaround, the likelihood that they have best practice procedures in place for handling and organising orders, the likelihood that their processing is going to be on the highest quality equipment, with name brand chemicals, and the strictest QC and consistency of results.

If you were a pro still shooting film, I think clients would expect you to justify using anyone else.

>>2801135
canon 7, bessa r, industar 22, and $25 worth of the cheapest 35mm films i could find on amazon
i got an ipad mini as a gift, does that count?
>>2801214
nice haul
>>2801395
pics?

>>2801135

>bought sigma meme lenses WITH filters

topkek, what a waste of money

>>2801361
It's like going to the Kaaba, it needs to be done once in your life if you are a film photographer.

You should really see if they can do a cross process of Kodachrome 64 to b&w.

>>2801238
Seed alright for the price. Ive got plenty of extra cash for fun stuff like this. The clip is built well and took a beating today when i fell down a small cliff face. Tumbled and rolled on my camera (6d with a 16-35Lii) and it stayed tight on my backpack strap. No complaints and comfy to wear. Bought at my local camera store where everything is overpriced anyways. I didnt want to wait for shipping for it or a knockoff. Money well spent in my opinion

File: pepelaugh.jpg (60KB, 500x495px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x495px

>>2801197

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	633

>>2801407
>ipad mini
Unless you got the new ipad pro you got an outdated piece of trash.

>>2801395
What national park in aus makes you fucking pay?

>>2801432
Heaps, in SA. Applied for and was granted a blanket permit. I can basically go anywhere in South Australia, excluding the Woomera restricted zone and certain Aboriginal communities.

>>2801433
In SA you guys have the nuclear test fields and underground community/ex facilities its pretty fucking great need a good car though.

>>2801135
>What did you buy this week /p?
Bread
Eggs
Tuna
Aubergine
Courgettes
Tomatos
Limes
Olive Oil
Cheese
Coffee

>>2801438
Beer
Bourbon
Beer
Pizza and chips
Beer
Bourbon paella
Bourbon
Nandos
And two roles of 120 velvia.

File: 62f977411ba626c1132c7f5bce7794a8.jpg (75KB, 531x550px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 531x550px

Going also to try IR shots with it.

>>2801439
>And two roles of 120 velvia.
faggot

>>2801438
What do you do with courgettes? I've never really found a use for them where I wouldn't have preferred a different vegetable.

>>2801438
>Aubergine
>Courgettes
Had to look that shit up. British people have some weird name for stuff. If I went to england and asked for eggplant would people know what I mean?

>>2801453
People would know you're a dirty foreign yank and snicker behind your fat arse.

I bet you would ask where the 'soda' and 'potayta cheeps' are.

>>2801451
I think most people mix them into salads.

I sometimes do that but more often add them to the mush I take into work to microwave along with the aubergine and .... oh I forgot to mention peppers. I bought peppers as well. And I just bought apples, bananas and pears since that last post.

/ck/ would no doubt be appalled

>>2801135
A bunch of original Cokin filters, and I learned I don't need to modify my camera for IR so I bought an IR filter.
I don't need new cameras and gear to make photos.

>>2801492
>buys a bunch of gear
>I don't need new gear to make photos
...m8

>>2801442
>zoom lens
>IR photography
Be sure to check it first on Flickr or on some forums, most zoom lens have hotspot problems in the IR band.

Two rolls of 35mm film

>>2801494
It's a filter set worth $50 or less, not a whole camera body and L lenses.
And to add I bought the filter set because I actually needed a filter set for long exposure.
Twat.

>>2801483
But would they know what an eggplant is?

>>2801497
So you DO need new gear to make photos.

>>2801497
So you're a poorfag gearfag.

Gear is gear. Doesn't matter if you're wanking over $4 goodwill compacts, $4000 flagship bodies, pieces of colored glass, bags, cleaning swabs or whatever. Being cheap doesn't magically make it not gear nor does it make you any less of a gearfag, just a gearfag who feels superior to other gearfags because you buy cheap shit instead of because you buy expensive shit.

>>2801500
Some would, others would be intrigued and try burying and egg in the ground to see if it will grow

>>2801490
>often add them to the mush I take into work to microwave
>microwave

disgusting pleb

File: 81kB6jsvGEL._SL1500_.jpg (186KB, 962x1500px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 962x1500px

These. And they are TERRIBLE.

They've actually ruined lenspens.

>>2801490
In salads? That's interesting. I find the taste to be too 'green' for me. Cucumbers are a nicer alternative for salad but of course they should never be cooked. Guess I'll just avoid zucchini for now

>>2801540
Pan fried zucchini on either olive oil or sesame oil is awesome, put a bit of black pepper on it and some pumpkin seed oil if you have any.

>>2801543
>zucchini
Didn't he play for Juventus about 10 years ago?

That recipe would work well with courgettes though

File: Screenshot_20160326-115046~3.jpg (214KB, 1196x1195px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1196x1195px

>>2801312
About $1k shipped for errythang

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:03:26 11:53:22
Image Height	1195
Image Width	1196

>>2801590
Load of shite

bought a sigma dp2 merrill, every shitty thing a person has ever said about this camera is true

sigma software is shit, camera takes 20 seconds to save a photo, iso above 100 is terrible, has a particular ability to capture the color 'puke yellow'

b-but at least it's really sharp, right guys?

I bought a Minolta AF 75-300 f/4.5-5.6 and a Zenit EM with a 50mm f/1.8 and a 35mm f/2.8

Looks like /p/ bought a lot of nice new gear this week!
I'm sure that means we'll be seeing some photos soon, yes?

>>2801631
What are we, lovers? Fuck off

>>2801631
well memed, my friend :^)

File: 20160326_112128.jpg (888KB, 1073x1430px) Image search: [Google]

888KB, 1073x1430px

€250
R8

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-N900W8
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:03:26 11:20:48
Flash	No Flash
ISO Speed Rating	250
F-Number	f/2.2
Focal Length	4.13 mm
Exposure Bias	0 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Time	1/15 sec

>>2801500
IF THEYRE HEATHENS

FUCK YOU CPATCHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAS

>>2801674
>NEX-6
>not an a6000
It's shit m8

>>2801674
you can get a nex 7 for that much ;-;

My F100 has been sitting unused for like 2 years after I sold off my last AF Nikon glass. Convince me not to get a 50mm f/1.8G or maybe a 28mm f/1.8G. I've owned both lenses before and liked both a lot. I'll probably start selling my Leica gear and going full Nikon.

>>2801431
why would i want a tablet bigger than my laptop?
the 9 inch has much more appeal

>>2801728
>convince me to buy one of two lenses I've already owned
What?

>>2801590
Seems like a fair price. I hope you got the good version of the 65mm.

File: 12472836_10208988391850800_8581197136840062897_n.jpg (92KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 960x960px

Just bought a Zeiss Planar 50mm f2. I was gonna get a summicron but I got a better deal on this.

>>2801766
>the 9 inch has much more appeal
The new pro is 9.7 inches lol.

>>2801779
so jelly

>>2801779
my bentax is f1.4
haha cuck.

>>2801354
Great lens. What are you going to shoot with it?

>>2801803
Shoot?

>>2801778
I'm new to Mamiya - which one is good and what's the diff?

File: 1440553833439.jpg (112KB, 1400x1060px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1400x1060px

>>2801592
Thanks cock!

>>2801981
There is a floating system version. I don't have an RZ67, I just want one but don't like certain aspects of it. The floating element one should perform better across different distances. Their probably both fine though.

>>2801804
Shooooooooooot.

I bought an X Pro 2

>>2801779
pig disgusting

>>2801715
Its actually pretty great, m8
Except for the kit lens desu

>>2801717
Not really

>>2802088
yeah, if he's not going to mount it on a patrician Ikon, what's the point

>>2801135
Red Weapon 6k
Couple of Zeiss Ultraprimes.

File: 1280144017202.gif (1MB, 193x135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 193x135px

>>2802123
>Except for the kit lens desu
Please find me a better kit with the same range and size
>inb4 samsung
Samsung doesn't count

File: rdf.jpg (22KB, 800x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 800x300px

initiate hipster faggot mode

File: 1k-March 28_ 2016.jpg (429KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1000x1000px

This.
Going to pad out the lenses with a 40/50 and a 150 next week. Maybe a prism finder too.
After filing a 135 back for the Mamiya, I don't think I can justify the price of the 135w just for ease of use though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	84 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:03:27 14:31:06
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/6.4
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/6.4
Brightness	4.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	56.00 mm
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMG_4094.jpg (4MB, 2293x3440px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2293x3440px

>>2801495
I checked flickr, there was some images with Tokina in infrared.
Just tested it, works great.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Photographer	unknown
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:03:27 16:28:24
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	1.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Olympus 35 RC.jpg (55KB, 450x341px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 450x341px

Bought this qt for $60, a little high, but definitely worth it, going to develop the pics today.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot A50
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 7.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	90 dpi
Vertical Resolution	90 dpi
Image Created	2004:09:17 09:45:46
Shutter Speed	1/60 sec
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.15 m
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.31 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	450
Image Height	341

>>2801135
Yooo let me know how that 24-35 is. I've been missing the gap between 24 and 50 for ages but I don't know what to pull the trigger on

>>2802272
YESS


BLESS THE BRONICA MASTER RACE! BEST CAMERA EVERERREREREER

>>2801766
10 inches then? Doesn't matter to me, still smaller than my laptop and isn't 12 inch fuckhuge

about to order a 50 1.2 canon.

i bought a 5d mark iii when it first came out, but it's still sitting in the box, might take it out this week .

>>2801135
85mm 1.8

Should arrive this week. Pretty excited. I rented both this one and the 1.4 (nikon) for a day to compare. Expected the 1.4 to be better, and it was marginally so, but not triple the price better.

A6000 lens turbo and canon fd 50 1.4. Trying to get some astro panoramas on a budget.

>>2801794
>pentax
>calling a leica user a cuck

lel

>>2801532
I just bought one yesterday. Do yours also have a bunch of greyish powder on the pen-tip? I assumed it was some sort of fluid but it took me using my old lens pen to get all the fucking grey dust off. I bought on last year of the same line and it didn't have this shit on it.

File: 35f28OM.jpg (18KB, 274x307px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 274x307px

Bought an OM-Zuiko 35mm 2.8 to match my 21mm and my 50mm when i work on films. Love the 50 and 21 (the 21, especially, is one of my favorite lenses) so, I imagine the 35 is also swell. Haven't tested it out yet. Told the owner of the shop I was a fan of OM mount stuff and he tossed in a 2x Converter for free. Not bad. Messed around with it today. Not great results, but it's a fun toy.

>>2801794
so fucking ignorant lol

picked up an a7s ii, rokinon 35 and 85mm T1.5, Benro monopod, pelican 1510. a6000 is relegated to b-roll.

>>2801446
LOL

>>2802839
Yes, same issue.

It's their new "invisible carbon"... Which is now more visible than ever. Idiots.

File: 852-728x462.jpg (41KB, 728x462px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 728x462px

Just bought one of these.

>>2802842
films as in movies? why do you use zuikos? way to small and impossible to use w follow focus in my experience

>>2802287
You don't like any of the 28mm or 35mm?

>>2802287
Well everything I'm going to say is subjective but just consider what youll be mainly shooting. I picked the 24-35mm, despite the 11mm difference, because I enjoy shooting with my X100T at f2 - enough to sacrifice shooting up to 70mm. 24 for those big wide shots, 35 in case a person is involved. I dont believe 24mm is good enough for someones profile, even with crop; and I didn't want to carry two lenses - so I opted out of those primes. If I really wanted a nice portrait shots I would just use the 50mm or 85mm prime; on the other end if I really wanted nice events shots I would buy the 24mm.

Read up on Shotkit for some insight on why some photographer prefer a certain focal length on their niche.

File: $$$.jpg (261KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 2000x2000px

Should be here any day now

>inb4 angry comments seething with jealousy

File: maxresdefault.jpg (49KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1280x720px

>>2802957
What sort of faggot doesn't have a built in spirit level on their camera?

And if's for a tripod- that's even worse

File: what have I done.png (78KB, 1023x628px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1023x628px

>>2802957
jelly as fuck desu. shame my camera doesn't have a hotshoe/coldshoe.

>>2802994
dude free toffifee AND riesen?

>>2802959
What sort of faggot doesn't realize that not everyone shoots digital?

>>2802994
Is that for a single roll of film or am I missing something...

>>2803002
I reckon it's $100 worth of film. a roll of those is about $3

>>2803002
100 rolls. £1 each or for murricans. $1.41 each.
and some "free" sweets :3c

>>2803001
Poorfags shooting film

File: 1437760612342.gif (2MB, 278x213px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 278x213px

>>2803001
>mfw someone shoots film near me

>>2803053
>using a gif to represent how much dick you choke on
It's okay anon, we all know you're a faggot

>>2803012
That's a bloody bargain m8.

>>2802902
No I'm just not sure what I want. I already have a 14-24 and a 50 but sometimes the 24 is too wide and the 50 is too long. Stepping forward or back isn't always an option either. I have heard great things about the 28 1.8 optically but am a bit concerned with the build quality.

>>2802912
Yeah I thought it would make a nice walk around lens. And a great compromise between zooming flexibility and optical quality. If I had that and pocketed a small 50 I would be in good shape probably; but I wasn't sure how the 24-35 faired in reviews yet.

I bought a roll of Cinestill 800T last week.

A nikkor AF 24mm 2.8 and thinking about a Nikkor AF 28-85mm 3.5-4.5

Nooby here, spent spring break fucking around with a friends camera, realized I love taking photos. Bought a nikon d3300 starter bundle for slightly over 500, should be here tomorrow, I'm pretty hype

>>2803247
Good luck, have fun. Get a cheap Cokin filter set from china to start with long exposure.
Also read Understanding Exposure by Bryan Peterson first.

>>2803247
You've started all wrong, Nikon are dog turd. You'll only realise when you're too far in, and spent too much on shitty Nikon optics to turn around and choose again.

>>2803247
buy a pentax k1000 in any condition and go from there

I bought some bubble teas.

Tasted delicious. Very rich and sweetened only slightly.

>>2803253
Somehow I think it'll be alright in the end. I only plan to get into it as a hobby and my career path is gonna set me up with a decent income, if I really did make a mistake I'm sure switching won't be so godawful.

>>2803250
Thank you bro, I'll def check out that book. The bundle I got comes with these

http://www.adorama.com/PRO52KIT.html?utm_source=EMW&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=AdoramaOrderConfirmation&hotlink=t&svfor=5m

I'm assuming I can learn with them just as well?

>>2803256
Seriously tho, Nikon have made zero good optics in over 15 years. Even Tamron are groundbreaking compared to Nikon.

Not too late, cancel that order.

>>2803261
Can any other anons weigh in on this? When I was researching beginner cameras 5+ sites said that nikon d3300 was a great choice.

I really don't plan on going pro, it can't be that bad can it? If it is what would you recommend around the 500 dollar range instead?

>>2803270
That guy is a fucking idiot. Seriously. That camera and Nikon's lenses will serve you just fine.

>>2803273
I thought so, thank you for the input

>>2803256
The UV filter is garbage. The most usable is the circular polarizer, the ND2 might work in some lower lighting settings, but to make a dramatic sky with blurred clouds or smooth water surface you will need at least ND6 with around 2 minutes of exposure.

>>2803279
Depending on your usage there is only one other serious contender with the Pentax K-50, but its strengths come out when you want to use it a lot outdoors in not so ideal weather or worse.
For generic shooting everything the D3300 will serve you well.

>>2802994
Where did you buy this!?

>>2803448
Poundland sell C41, 135x24 for £1 in the UK. I only popped online because my local store was out of stock, but they started selling online last year. If it's out of stock, just check back every few days.
Also: Beware of drama over "discontinuing" AGFA, someone spreads the rumour after talking to someone in store every few months.

File: v3[1].jpg (12KB, 400x263px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 400x263px

>>2802994
>200/24
>24

>>2803456
Great, thanks! Bummer they don't ship to the rest of Europe though...

File: yaf.jpg (19KB, 435x397px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 435x397px

>>2803253

>>2801174
fucking trash

File: lowepro_lp36869_fastpack_250_aw_ii_1119686~01.jpg (215KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1024x1024px

Lowepro Fastpack BP 250 AW II

Ordered last Friday, arrived today. I really needed a good, real camera bag. Been using a small lunchbox sized bag which was fine for a body and two lens but I've got more gear and I hike and travel way more often so this bag seemed like this perfect fit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>2802889
nice

>>2803287
Yeah I honestly would rather have a well rounded generic camera to start out. I don't really know what I want my niche to be so I'm really just gonna be getting snap shits of everything and anything I can.

>>2803270

D3300 are nice, but with a little more you could afford a D5200 and it would be nicer, tho

D3300 + 35mm dx + 50mm G and you will be fine and will be taking better pictures than those guys who don't even know what optics is.

>>2803189
You don't have to worry about anything 24mm or wider, you're covered. You'll be better off with a 24-70mm. If you have a good reason not to go for that then you really should find something between 24mm and 50mm. Leave the 12-24mm for all your wide shots, usually with a tripod. You need something to go along with your 50mm and a 28mm might be just the thing. You could get a 35mm if you want to stick with just one lens instead of the 28mm and 50mm. Try out all your options before you buy.

File: Nikon-Nikkor-50-AF-S-18-G-D700.jpg (51KB, 648x431px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 648x431px

I just bought pic related, same lens too. Did I do good?

I'm tired of having different camera systems, I'm going all F mount and that's it.

>>2803689
Couldn't do better.

About go get a Fuji XT1 with the 12mm F2.0, 35mm F1.4 and 18mm pancake F2.0

Will be my pleasure camera for travel etc going to keep my 5Diii for work.

>>2803689

nice. D700 is one of the best cameras ever made!

>>2802898
Yeah, as in movies. I like their look. I shoot mostly in black and white, but i do like their color quite a bit. People say they 'lack character.' I think that can;t be further frolm the truth. The images are plainly stated but the detail and contrast is nice, especially for the price. I started out using the 21mm just because its one of the first lenses I got and I have gotten really accustom to it. The zuiko's are part of how I get my 'look' so to speak and, for cinema, its better to have a set that goes together than a random selection of different lenses at random focal lengths.

As for follow focus, I have had the opposite experience. It works just fine for me. Most of my shots are stable tripod shots anyway. Its not the gear, necessarily, but what you make of it. I would love to have a number of other prime lenses to pick from but, for now, the G.Zuikos seemed to be my best bet and I've come to really like them. I use them for mostly documentary but they work nicely for narrative films too. They have this kind of 'art-filmy' look about them I like. A lot of filmmakers have come into their own by creatively using whatever was at their disposal at the time. One day, I'll be using a set of some crazy expensive lenses, but, for now, I'm perfectly happy with the Zuikos.

Just tested out the 35 today alongside the 50 and 21 and they all match up pretty well. Gonna start a documentary project in the next few days so I'm anxious to bust them out.

>>2803689

As an ex Nikon photographer I can confirm that this is sexy as fuck.

>>2803692
If you don't need the 18mm to be a pancake it may be cheaper and better for you to by the 18-55 f2.8-4.
Optically it's better than the 18mm which is probably the worst XF lens produced so far.
f2-f2.8 isn't that huge when you consider the IS that you gain.

>>2803751
I was thinking that and had a look at the prices the cheapest I could find the 18-55 was £230 used or the 18mm new for 230. I just read today, they are working on a 23mm RW I think I will hold off on the mid range and just get the wide and the 35 for now.
Thanks for the advise doe anon!

>>2803689

BEAST MODE

>>2803270

I just bought a D5300 kit for $500.

File: 1000px-9550.jpg (176KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 667x1000px

sold my ef-s 24mm 2.8 for 100 yuros (got it for 100 quid a while back)
sold my EF 28-80 USM for 60 yuros (got it for 20 quid a while back)

i guess i'll get a 24-105 or something like that next, after I move back to the UK, or I'll maybe upgrade my glorious indestructible 40D to a 60D or a 7D

or maybe a tamron 17-50 f2.8 non VC, they say that one is great

actually I would upgrade to the 7D straight away but all the batteries and the grip and all that shit :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

just bought my 2nd blackrapid strap and will be teathering it too with strong as fuck accessary code like so:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-R5CvP87m4

feelsincredibleman, don't ever really have to worry about dropping ever again

File: BR_Shot-HERO_001-620x350.jpg (34KB, 620x350px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 620x350px

>>2803925
dis 1

File: time.jpg (10KB, 183x45px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 183x45px

>>2801322
:'(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Sean
Image-Specific Properties:

Nice i love my d5100

>>2803918
Why? The iso on the 7D is not much better than the 40D and the dynamic range on both is shit.

A real upgrade would be full frame or nikon/fuji/sony APSC.

Canon sensor tec is stale as fuck and I've saying that as someone with a 50D 7DII and 5Diii

>>2803918
>7D
pls don't, cropped sensors canon are shit, pick a 5D Mk II or even an old 5D.

I was going to upgrade from my old 1D Mk II to a 7D. Has it really aged that badly?

>>2804215
IMO, the only old canon that's still worth it is a 5D MK II, but I guess the price is closer to a 6D, depends where you live.

>>2804220
Well I already have a 6D and wanted something with a crop sensor and good burst to use as my tele body when shooting press stuff. The 1D works well but weighs a tonne and the high ISO performance is non existent

>>2804211
what if some people just prefer crop cause they are lighter, have a tighter FOV, can use crop lenses and make full frame lenses not vignette like a motherfucker?

>>2804222
Oh... so if you just take photos in daylight with the tele, 7D will do just fine.

>>2804193
>>2804211
Really? I wanted to try my friends 7D but every time I had the chance I was drunk so I preferred not to put anything expensive on my hands that wasn't mine.

To be honest I do not have the slightest issue with my 40D. If anything, the fact that I can't really go past ISO 400 withouth preparing my mind to do some PS magic to remove the noise (or just VSCO the shit out of the photos because noise anyway lmao).
Also 10.1MP is not a lot to play with but I can live with that since I never print, all I do is digital.

Most of what I do is either studio stuff (fashion/portraits/products) or architectural/real estate so I was a little hesitant to change to FF.
It sounds stupid not wanting to go FF doing what I do, but if I want to keep doing all of that after switching I would have to sell my 40D, all my EF-S glass: My EF-S 55-250, my EF-S 10-18 and my 50 1.8, and buy their full frame equivalents (70-200 f4, 17-40 I guess, and 85 1.2) which are much more expensive.

If I ever start making money with this then yeah, I will probs get a 5D3 or even a 5Ds and get some EF L glass but as a hobby right now I think my setup works just fine, again, my only complaints are 40D's high ISO performance and that I only have 10MP with it.

I though about selling my beloved 40D and getting a 50D so that I can keep both my EF-S glass and all my 40D batteries and grip since they work with the 50D too, and that way I would get 15MP and a slight improvement on high ISO.

I don't know. At the moment I'm just happpy I sold that shitty 28-80 for more than what I got it for.

>>2804264
just buy a 650D

>>2804266
>650D
I can't stand DSLR cameras without top LCD, I use it all the time.
Also I guess the viewfinder is ultra tiny. The one in the 40D feels tiny already compared to my old EOS film cameras. And I have very big hands and tiny cameras don't feel very good on my hands.

>>2804271
the 5d2/3 has a tiny viewfinder compared to my AE1 but that never detered anyone from shooting good pictures

Looking at the top lcd takes about the same time as looking at the lcd and you can buy a 20 dollar battery grip if it is too small

considering your needs getting a newer sensor 3 digit rebel which supports for your ef-s glass just seemed a better idea than buying another 50D which is 2 whooping generations behind

>>2804281
Fuck it I think I'm good with gear for now.

I'll keep the 40D and just wait until I have an actual issue with it. Again the resolution is not the end of the world and I don't do much high ISO stuff anyway...

Getting another camera would be GAS at this moment I think, and we all hate gearfaggotry don't we?

File: 61iZsJI11SL._SL1001_[1].jpg (81KB, 1001x1001px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1001x1001px

>>2801135
This shit.

It's aight.

>>2804293
nah upgrading from a 9 year old digital camera can barely be called GAS desu

>>2804309
Does he come with all the gear and accessories?

File: theoffice_michaelscott_crying.gif (496KB, 435x248px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 435x248px

>>2804556
>mfw just realized it's 9 years old

File: mainScreen-Shot-2014-09-14-at-2.35.48-PM.jpg (124KB, 960x765px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 960x765px

Should be coming on Friday

>>2804556
It is if you don't need to upgrade for any reason. If a camera suits your needs, keep it until it breaks.

>>2804649
sorry

File: image.jpg (64KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1024x683px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	683
Scene Capture Type	Standard

I bought a pentacon 29 2.8 for $50.

Did I get ripped off?

>>2804730
is??

>>2804818
You will die in 10 days.

>>2804831
Soligor 35mm 3.5 I think

>>2801490
I just did a courgette, tomato and fetta tart tonight, twas noice.
What about courgette and potatoe fritters?

>>2801508
By this logic, everyone is a gearfag. So calling anyone a gearfag carries absolutely zero significance.

Thanks for making gearfag a useless term, gearfag.

File: s-l1600.jpg (34KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1280x850px

Didn't want to leave Budapest without at least something from the local shops. Should help with 2/45 Rokkor's crappy minimum focus range at least.

>>2802041
actually first valid post, congrats.

I got a x100t as a birthday present from my wife and its exactly what i needed, not more not less. once i have some spare cash lying around i will buy the x pro 2 as well...

>>2804884
Everybody wanks over gear?

I assumed that some people actually just used it.

Nothing as of yet, though I did see an Om-4t out a few days ago and may swipe it if the seller can come down on the price. Either that or a Maxxus to fit 2-3 lenses that have been serving me no purpose.

Bought 4 packs of Fuji fp100c while it was still at a reasonable price.

Pentax k30 + kit lens, mint condition. On its way as we speak. What am I in for?

File: image.jpg (178KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 750x1334px

Bought it today at a best buy, open box deal, for $420. I took it out of the box and it literally looks brand spanking new. No cosmetic flaws at all and no internal hiccups so far. Happy af senpai. I'll check the shutter count when i get home, i'm at school right now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	1334

>>2804998
Some serious photography with a weather sealed body and non sealed lens. If you want a 50-200 WR kit telezoom just let me know, I sell ot for cheap.

>>2804818
I have one. If an ass had an ass, that would be that lens.

>>2804937

From what the anon was saying in their previous posts, anyone who buys any kind of gear, for any reason, is a gearfag.

Doesn't matter if we actually use it or not.

>>2805094
No, that's not even close to what anon was saying.

Go read it again. Anon says "wanking over".

Sandectomy your vag and read before you go full retard next time.

>>2805015

>I have one. If an ass had an ass, that would be that lens.

wait why?

>>2805010
Lucky just got the body for 380, best buy had na open box for 440 which would be a deal on the kit lens but I rather put it directly towards the 16mm or the 20mm if I can scrounge up the cash

>>2805010
>buys brand new camera
>it literally looks brand spanking new
Holy shit batman, that's awesome.
Should we have a gay snowballing orgy to celebrate?

File: nikon-d3300-camera-review-5.jpg (51KB, 720x479px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x479px

I just started getting into photography did i fuck up /p/?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D80
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	1094
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	157 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2014:10:17 14:05:34
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/22.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.79 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Auto, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Comment	http://Radojuva.com.ua
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	720
Image Height	479
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2805828
Nah you did good m8, now go out and take pics

File: 1k-April 01_ 2016.jpg (425KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1000x667px

My fridge was looking a little empty desu. I was down to one box of Portra 400, 3 rolls of HP5, 1 roll of tri-x and two rolls of tri-x.
This should keep me stocked for a little while :3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:01 12:36:26
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	0.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2801135
A GoPro

nothing because i am poor :(

>>2805931
>open here
#rekt

>>2806003
My stupid friend did that. I'm also triggered by it.

File: R0010097.jpg (266KB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1500x994px

>>2803689
Well look what came in the mail today. It's a bit bigger and heavier than the F100 unfortunately, but it feels just as solid and I can't wait to try it out as soon as the battery charges up.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4928
Image Height	3264
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:01 13:04:12
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	0.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	994
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_9067.jpg (203KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1200x800px

Arrived today.

>>2806183
I don't know why but I can't stand HP5, it always looks like shit to me when I try it. I always get big clumpy nasty grain.

Satin Ilford paper is great though, good choice. I didn't know they made sheets smaller than 8x10, where did you find that?

File: EMHP5Xmas51.jpg (182KB, 532x800px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 532x800px

>>2806192
Use T-Max Dev, anon.
Also, it comes as a liquid concentrate so you mix it at room temp, you get 16 or so rolls out of a litre of 1:4 solution, and it keeps for as long as you should ever need it to.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:30 07:54:45
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	532
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Partial
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

Anyone here decent with fomapan? I've used it before but recently switched to Delta and... well... Delta does what it's told. Foma seems incredibly inconsistent and temperamental.

It's sheet film. Mostly Foma 100. I shoot it at 50ISO, expose for shadows, agitate in deep tanks for 15s per minute and add an extra minute to whatever the appropriate time:temp reading is. Normally they're at least ok, but is there a better developer? Better technique to use?

On another note, is this ADOX 20 stuff as ridiculously high quality as they claim? The whole "mega-megapickels" schtick they're claiming?

>>2806294
I use HC-110 and it's so convenient that I don't feel like trying anything else. Isn't HP5 traditional grain anyway, why would it require T-Max developer? I even do Fuji Acros in HC-110 despite it being T-grain and it turns out fine, HP5 is the only film that hasn't behaved properly.

what a shitty consumer whore thread.

>>2806295
I developed fomapan 100 for the first time yesterday and used 25% xtol for 10 minutes as per the massive dev chart and they came out seriously underdeveloped

>>2806300
sounds about right. I only know so much but as a general rule
- the ISO is half what is on the box
- it needs aggressive agitation (I practically shake the stuff in dev tanks)
- it needs longer development
i think the MDC takes its pointers from the official dev times and FOMA are lying bastards

fwiw my usual setup is stock ID-11. If the dev time is 7min I push it to 8-8:30 and agitate for an extra 5s per minute. They usually come out a lot denser then, but the downside is the lovely midtones foma has can sometimes get lost.

don't have any scans of the stuff on my laptop but it's worth finding out "your method" and then sticking with it. it can be good film

File: AE1TriX034.jpg (81KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 533x800px

>>2806296
Tmax Dev doesn't really have much to do with the films of the same name, it's pretty strange.
Although I have souped some TMY in it, and it was fine.
The flipside is that I really don't like its results with finer grained films.
Makes Retro 80s look like garbage. But I use it with Tri-X and HP5 quite happily.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.6
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.8
Serial Number	1132529712
Lens Name	EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2015:06:27 09:53:18
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/11.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	533
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Center-Weighted
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Timed
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Self-Timer Length	10 sec
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Daylight
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

File: image.jpg (66KB, 679x390px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 679x390px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	679
Image Height	390
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2806432
>vomits internally

>>2806432
>>2806435
The M5 really is one of the ugliest cameras ever made.

>>2806192
>>Satin Ilford paper is great though, good choice. I didn't know they made sheets smaller than 8x10, where did you find that?
Some completely random e-shop that does not even specialize in photography, but they had the cheapest bulk HP5 and also a large selection of Ilford photographic paper.

>>2801182

OP... and me.

Thanks for asking.

File: 54656.jpg (51KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x540px

My first non-disposable/iphone camera! Next week I'm going out to the mountains to take pictures.

>>2804649
You fucked up bad

File: Olympus_OM-D_E-M5.jpg (258KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1024x768px

An Olympus OM-D E-M5 with a Panasonic 25mm, should be getting it around Thursday.
I'll probably get an adapter next week to use some of my Dad's old OM lenses.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	SLT-A77V
Camera Software	Aperture 3.2.3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:05:07 15:49:31
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	768
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
GPS Status	Measurement Interoperability
Geodetic Survey Data	WGS-84
GPS Differential Correction	No Correction

>>2807437

Have fun. You have a nice little camera there.

>>2804649

Ouch...

>>2804690
>>2807453
>>2807441

what's so bad about the 7Dii ? am i missing something?

>>2807461
new version should be coming sooner to compete against nikon d500..... Tough you know you can still use it and take great pictures with it anyway

File: IMGP8896.jpg (468KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1000x665px

Got bored, bought this for $15 Canucklestan bucks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:03 17:38:43
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	665
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2802889

now way

File: 12936485_1008680715885837_2470082070064501814_n.jpg (84KB, 559x960px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 559x960px

got myself an A7 on the Craigslist

did i do good /p/

>>2807594
no

>>2807597

how do i fix the errors of my ways

>>2807594
It's a nice catch, anon. Don't listen to that fool.
You're gonna love the 14+ stops of dynamic range for sure. Now go out and take some pictures!

>>2807601
By buying a second one.

>>2801135
A bunch of shit I'm going to flip for 50% profit next week.

>>2807601
you overpaid

>>2807634

...but i got it for $500

>>2807637
You underpaid, give the seller the extra money that you owe him.

picked up a nex c3 for a small everyday carry. Can anyone recommend a good prime for it?

File: s-l1600.jpg (176KB, 833x1192px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 833x1192px

Had a good morning and won a bucket list camera on ebay.

>>2807444
Nice, how much did it cost you ?

Bought my first mirorless, the Fuji xa1

File: 4423459832_e84a4e022e_o.jpg (184KB, 1150x1280px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1150x1280px

In b4 customs rips me a new asshole because it's coming from Moscow. But it's going to look comically cute on my huge boxy Praktica.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH
Camera Model	CaplioG3 modelS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2010:03:06 22:17:05
Exposure Time	1/48 sec
F-Number	f/3.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	154
Lens Aperture	f/3.7
Brightness	3.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.70 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1284
Image Height	1428
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>2807857
YOU GOOFED

>>2807792
£360

>>2807444

that is one sexy looking camera. Too bad about the sensor though, I've been warned to stay away from micro 4/3. Is it any good? Can you post samples?

>>2807857
very good camera. select your lenses wisely, dat shit mad expensive

File: aesthetic_zyzz[1].jpg (61KB, 580x923px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 580x923px

>>2807872
What is the appeal of ИHДУCTAP lenses? I see them a lot on here. Are they actually decent, or do people just like the commie aesthetic?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	580
Image Height	923

File: 16197183852_0e5d06228b_b.jpg (353KB, 819x1024px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 819x1024px

>>2807916
Don't have it yet, you could look at https://www.flickr.com/cameras/olympus/e-m5/ and https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=portraits&camera=olympus%2Fe-m5&media=photos though.

>>2807927
cheap and they're usually pretty small.

File: IMG_20160405_123947.jpg (102KB, 750x982px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 750x982px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Nexus 4
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2448
Image Height	3264
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:05 12:48:16
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/2.7
ISO Speed Rating	1200
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.60 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	982
White Balance	Auto

>>2807929
Neat. Though some of those photos have really softened details at iso 1600. Where'd you buy your unit?

>>2808417
nice, how much did it set you back?

Just orderred a used d7100 with 18-140vr and a bag for 700us$
How did i do lads?

>>2808574
eBay; the woman selling it listed it as an "EM-5" and was around £80 cheaper than other sellers.

File: thegame.jpg (158KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1366x768px

One of the last pieces in the puzzle of my dream 35mm system that I have been lusting after for years.

Soon.

File: Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 22.40.43.png (303KB, 820x800px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 820x800px

fantastic

>>2808980
Don't drop it.

>>2809031
Thats good advice in most cases

Hopefully my Sigma DP2 Merrill arrives tomorrow

Got it for 350 € new, so even though it has its quirks it's an amazing price.

>>2809621
Very cool. What do you plan to use it for?

>>2809008
how is it?

I desperately want a focus tab for my soviet lenses after using my uncle's m-mounts for a while it just feels so good