My urbex set

File: 25642124810_b71645f6b7_c.jpg (246KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 800x530px

2/15

File: 25642905460_7557fb62a7_z.jpg (143KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 424x640px

3/15

File: 25642941260_f5a8529eee_z.jpg (123KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 424x640px

4/15

File: 25642985610_8b228701a8_z.jpg (151KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 424x640px

5/15

File: 25673626740_15f344257b_z.jpg (139KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 424x640px

6/15

File: 25822881562_6144111696_z.jpg (123KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 424x640px

7/15

File: 25879049691_f1a4bc135d_z.jpg (106KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 424x640px

8/15

File: 25917074956_acf9d3ea64_c.jpg (156KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 800x530px

9/15

File: 25917638036_9fd897117f_z.jpg (119KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 424x640px

10/15

File: 25943196625_bef3ca1095_z.jpg (138KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 424x640px

11/15

File: 25948783246_180470cb9b_z.jpg (151KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 424x640px

12/15

File: 25974964515_072d944115_z.jpg (160KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 424x640px

13/15

File: 25643119910_dd51581996_z.jpg (80KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 424x640px

14/15

File: 25315020023_68a6c371da_z.jpg (102KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 424x640px

15/15

File: wall.jpg (286KB, 424x640px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 424x640px

>>2799191

hello OP. this one in particular looks pretty dope. i dig the editing too, even if the start is a little lazy, it getts better soon after. its an interesting set. cant feel the 2.8, the DOF is pretty large in most shots (must be a sensor size thing), which sometimes hurts the view, as it makes things flat, i cant sense the space, specially with the not so good lighting.

also im not so sure about the color work, might be the harsh light, but i feel its bordering b&w, without being b&w.. so id boost the colors, or, go b&w. like here, you have >>2799194
and >>2799196, both very rich tonally and different on close inspection, but in the thumbnail look pretty similar, you compose with colors in mind, but it doesnt show in the final output. could benefit with some highlights darkening.

pic related has some toning and color boosting, also general darkening, i think it gives better view of the space.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:03:22 21:28:22
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	424
Image Height	640

>>2799208
Thanks for the reply. I was trying to be conscious of over processing the images. They looked a little too gritty when I was darkening the shadows. A few of them could use retouching for sure.