Thoughts About: Smena 8m

It's the cheapest eastern european camera. Body is plastic, but it has a better lens then other toy cameras. If you lightproof it with some tape it will produce pretty normal results. I doubt you want that, so better get holga instead.

File: 74TT0000.jpg (1021KB, 2000x1365px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 2000x1365px

>>2787840
It's not the cheapest, that title goes to Shkolnik/Student, which is the actual Soviet Holga equivalent (except older and worse). But it's hard to find those outside exUSSR.

Smena 8m's lens is actually amazing for a simple triplet.

File: Clipboard02sasdasd.jpg (1024KB, 1542x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1024KB, 1542x1200px

>>2787813

Like I said in >>2784399 and >>2784479 , there's a staggering discrepancy between Smena's lomo toy camera status and the actual quality of images it renders. The small shutter and aperture speed range forces you to choose your film iso according to expected shooting conditions, the all-manual nature and shitty viewfinder requires some getting used to, but its tiny size and portability make up for it. If you're inventive and like to improvise the effective range of applications for a Smena 8M increases greatly.

This was a Bulb shot in an unlit corridoor, I pressed the Smena against the opposite wall to keep it steady. None of my means of digitisation (flatbed, DSLR) can record the lens/film's actual IQ and resolving power. On a fucking shitty plastic Smena. Think about that.

File: cropped-sem-titulo-1-copia.jpg (40KB, 940x198px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 940x198px

Interesting, great statements and in depth review. Although I am already aware of the pros and cons of it, my goal towards it is to used it kind of like a lomo/pro camera. I already have a Holga GTLR, Yashica MG-1, and a ton of toy camera that I already tested. However, I am so intrigued to the Smena 8m by it's distinctive images that comes out of it. I am open to suggestion towards other Smena cameras if there are some that think they better type. Go right ahead it.

>>2788184
smena symbol has a coupled film advance/shutter mechanism so no double exposures and a release lever that doesn't let you use a shutter release cable, which means a virtually useless B mode.
All models before 8 don't have film rewind so yeah, takeup casette and all that faff. Older models may have an actual gallilean viewfinder instead of the horrid solid piece of acryllic all newer ones do.

The main thing though is: all have the same T-43 triplet, so they should render stuff identically. 8M is smaller and lighter than 8, it basically boils down to the looks and aesthetics. I can recomend the 8M having used it. Like, as a full-fledged fixed focal general everyday carry. Only stuff the 40mm won't do is distant objects, go figure. Though with its IQ you can crop the shit out of a frame, in a pinch, and still get good results.

>>2788218
Thank you very much, after reading your statement and information. I decide to order the Smena 8m. Went it arrives, I will do a follow up thread of me testing it out. /p/ is beast.

>>2788218
>you can crop the shit out of a frame, in a pinch, and still get good results

Given that the finder on the 8M shows like 2/3 of the actual frame (and very approximately at that), you'll have to crop every time you want semi-precise framing.

>>2788218
>all have the same T-43 triplet

8M might have more modern coatings than the earlier ones. I don't remember the lens on 8 being as rainbow-shiny as the lens on my 8M.

I've bought three of them and never paid more than £5 for one. I may have put a roll through one of them at some point

>>2788328
Why would you buy 3 of the same camera, especially if you don't even use them?