Interesting photographers / works

File: d548b326489023.56355f5280f9c[1].jpg (1MB, 1400x1120px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1400x1120px

>2783608
See this photo for example

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	16 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015-05-18T16:43:41-04:00
Exposure Time	170 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-6.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Image Width	1400
Image Height	1120
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2783608

its not interesting. its a gimmick he did like 3 times, then never ever again. its just an experiment in his creative workflow.

come up with your own stuff, faggot.

File: 1376823659966.jpg (186KB, 1000x649px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1000x649px

>>2783618
wew lad

>>2783608
>look at the image 3 times before realising there is a naked women on the floor
the foreground is really distracting in this photo

>>2783608
Benoit P for anyone interested. Dude has an odd personality, but goddamn can he create some cool images.

>>2783618
>its not interesting. its a gimmick

Gimmicks are usually quite interesting m8.

>>2783635
Fuck. I just noticed it too

File: charlie hamilton james.jpg (156KB, 1280x828px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1280x828px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014-09-08T19:40:08-07:00
Image Width	1280
Image Height	828

File: sand.jpg (205KB, 1280x828px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1280x828px

>>2783642
I kind of wish he'd made more of an effort to make the waves look like sand dunes, could have made for a even more surreal image, maybe he didn't want to edit it too much though

File: 864x486.jpg (50KB, 864x486px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 864x486px

>>2783642
>>2783643
Fuck I'm jealous. I tried to do some underwater photography in Egypt, but to actually go deep underwater I had to take off my glasses. I couldn't see shit except blurry colours.

>>2783608
What the fuck. I thought this was like a behind the scenes style photo to show his lighting setup on the model.

Now that I know it's the actual photograph, it just looks like a bunch of random shit placed together which make no sense.

>>2783643
>>2783642
Really cool, but my assburgers can't get over the fact that there's splotches of chromatic noise in a black and white photo...
I assume that's not in the original

File: -otter on log with house.jpg (466KB, 800x431px)

466KB, 800x431px

>>2783642

a long exposure with a flash trap for when/if an otter shows itself.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	800
Image Height	431

File: fictions.jpg (394KB, 990x990px)

394KB, 990x990px

Fictions by Filip Dujardin is a cool series

since when did creative literally come to mean meme snapshit gimmick

>>2783637

i meant, there are a ton of stuff more interesting to research about photos than how does one simulate a floating light. its a special fx, a neat one, but just that, its surface level interesting.

Benoit P. gets pretty deep. Just read some of his stuff about his projects.

Fishing line would work.