What does /p/ think of this tool? Any experience?

Looks completely unsuitable for DSLR / MILC scanning, and pretty much any dedicated film scanner or flatbed worth using has its own tray.

I bought one because my university's scanners didn't have masks. It's a bit fiddley to use, but it works.

>>2764354
I've heard great things about the 120 version of this and I plan to get one for dslr scanning. But for 35mm, this:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/907200-REG/pacific_image_649899001691_film_holder_for_pf7200u_pf7200_pf120.html

It works perfectly. Unless you are a hipster faggot that wants sprocket holes.

>>2764742
dslr scanning?

File: 4.jpg (378KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 450x600px

>>2765047

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	450
Image Height	600

>>2767285
>reflections
>paper texture
>fucked up backlight
Maximum nigger tier.
An iPad and a fucking toilet paper tube would already improve that.

>>2767491
lol the gear in that pic is probably more than ur rent fuccboi

>>2767495
is this the ultimate gearfag post?

>>2767495
well, considering that I own my apartment, that is indeed the case