[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Low-pass filter on Canon 5DS R in insect photography?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 3

File: 2014-11-04-13.jpg (1MB, 1722x1221px) Image search: [Google]
2014-11-04-13.jpg
1MB, 1722x1221px
This is may be regarded as a gear thread, although I see it as slightly more technical in nature: I've been using a canon 5D mk3 w/ MP-E 65mm in my setup and was wondering about trying the S or S-R, however I can't establish whether moire will be an issue as I couldn't find anyone on the other forums whose used either for insects. Does anyone have experience with the S-R?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3744
Image Height5616
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:08 09:10:39
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1722
Image Height1221
>>
>>2763102
Can you rent?
>>
>>2763106
unfortunately not where I live
>>
File: 20150516_4537.jpg (307KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]
20150516_4537.jpg
307KB, 600x900px
>>2763102
I'm using a 5Dii and the mp-e 65mm. I've been looking at this as well and have been considering renting a 5Dsr to see if there is a serious issue with moire. If I recall correctly the fellows over at lensrentals (the kings of gear nerds) seem to think it won't be an issue. The real question is what does the MP-e resolve detail at. Yes you will end up with larger files to print from but with only marginally better detail if mpe doesnt resolve detail to that resolution. I suspect that it doesn't but this is just a gut feeling after having used the lens for so long. I also may be talking a bit out of my ass. Gearfagging isn't a specialty for me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh)
PhotographerReagan Davis Pufall
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:05:16 16:16:16
Exposure Time1/40 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length65.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width600
Image Height900
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2763129
I hadn't actually considered the resolving power of the lens - I mostly use the images in A4 pdf's, so this would indeed seem pointless; I was just hoping the extra resolution could somewhat extend the magnification range of the lens when cropping.

On an unrelated note - have you considered using a stacking rail?
>>
>>2763148
Focus stacking isn't particularly useful for mantises. They're fairly active with most species being quite obsessed with jumping on the lens or furiously wiggling their antennae or maxilla after each flash.

If greater magnification is your goal you could simply stack on extension tubes. Apparently the 1.4 teleconverter isn't horrendous on this and 'works' despite what canon says. I have a bellows laying around that I've been meaning stick on it for giggles but it isn't an auto bellows so to have a usable dof I would have preset the lens to a smaller aperture and go blind trying to see anything in the viewfinder.
>>
>>2763161
lol sorry, I've gotten so used to shooting dead things I forget that most people shoot living specimens. Thankyou, I'll look into the teleconverter option.
>>
>>2763161
>live view
>iso set to H
>strong flashlight
>>
File: 1454545421691.png (107KB, 540x521px) Image search: [Google]
1454545421691.png
107KB, 540x521px
>>2763233
f96 before putting on the bellows
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.