photography portfolio for film school

I'll post more if I get a response. I have different variants of this landscape I shot that are also up for consideration.

damn

what a troll

>5-8 submissions of portraits
>must be horizontally composed

TOPKEK nice fucking film school

"Welcome to art school make sure your art looks like these arts"

File: 1449518699174.jpg (66KB, 800x790px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 800x790px

>>2749306

>>2749669
it's almost like videos are typically done horizontally

>>2749306
This one is not good, Op. This one could be better if you photographed something, instead of only a 'scenery'.

Post more, especially the portraits.

>>2749678
kek

>>2749935
I'm pretty sure a landscape is supposed to be scenery.

Anyone here have anything serious to add?

>>2749306
you're kidding right?

>>2749971
Why do you think I'm kidding?

>>2749306
uh... I don't know what I'm looking at.

But I really can't give you advice. Art schools love weird shit like this. Modern photography is all about weird shit like this these days. Right now only photojournalists are doing the real stuff.

So I personally think it's a bad photo, but the experts might love your photo, so who knows?

>>2750052
do you have any reasoning behind your words?
I feel like I'm talking to a 12 year old

>>2750060
Basically my point is I don't think /p/ will give you the right advice. A lot of what /p/ hates, people actually in professional photography love.

holy shit i thought you shot this on an iphone, but nope you took this with a 6d.
i appreciate that you're trying to do something other than a typical landscape, but the execution was very poor and personally i'm not a fan of the way the photo is composed.
please take the time to learn how to use your equipment properly.

>>2750353
why is the execution very poor, and what about the composition did you not like?

>>2749306
This photo is poorly exposed both too dark & blown. You're edging up to ambiance, but the exposure just kills it.

>>2750975
I have more exposed version of this, but I actually prefer the way the windows jump out from total darkness. I didn't know how to get the trash from getting blown without getting even darker to the point where the windows wouldn't even be visible. Perhaps if I knew how to use HDR it would have been possible. I haven't cropped the photo yet, and expect I'll be taking out a big portion of the top.

File: pop.jpg (59KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x333px

>>2750998
The windows don't pop out at all.

10 sec in photoshop

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:22 16:38:48
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	500
Image Height	333

>>2751000
I meant to say I like how they're suspended in the darkness, they're like faint candle light. I haven't touched the photo at all in photoshop yet.

I'll post the more exposed versions in a few hours.

Is the jagginess in that image a result of what you did to get more light, or is it just because it's super low res?

>>2749306
just dump all of them in low resolution

>>2751010
the jaggieness comes from your terrible exposure.