Wanted to ask your opinion about which lense I should buy. I

>>2740814
post in the gear thread cunt.
>but seriously, extra range + IS every time, I've taken sharp handheld photos at 105mm and 1/4sec with that thing

>>2740817
Tought about buyin 24-105mm, but at canon store the guy recommended 24-75mm lense, the price is bigger tho

>>2740847
>the price is bigger tho
yeah, wonder why he recommended it hey...
You stupid cunt.
Delete this thread.

>>2740814
If you're going to buy a 24-105 f/4, buy the Sigma.
The Canon only makes economic sense as a kit lens.

Personally I would get a 24-70 and just crop if I needed 105.
70mm at f/2.8 with a 1.5x crop becomes 105mm at f/4.2

>2016
>Canon
I mean come on!!!

>>2740906

You're assuming he has a Canon body when he could have a Sony.

>>2740919
And you're assuming >>2740906 knows his ass from a hole in the ground

>>2740814
24-105 if video

24-70 for stills

File: RageFace.png (19KB, 300x309px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x309px

>>2740814
>lense


>>2740847
>lense


FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

>>2741223
Usually people who know jack shit about cameras spell it like that

>>2741214
>24-70 for video and stills
IS is for no-budget shitty looking handheld videos that no one will ever see. Get a rig and some solid sticks, you'll never need IS.

Well what do you need it for?

>>2741223
Is this lense for Cannon camera?

>>2740814
I think you shouldn't use anything. Take the picture raw. Literally.

>>2741337
Yes

>>2741273
It's true, I know jack shit about them
Op btw here

>>2741306
Just additional lense to learn with, try aswell for taking videos with slider

>>2740906
whats better

>>2741474
Get a fast prime. 35mm f2 will do you nicely, or get the 50mm f1.4 if you have fool frame. Learning with zooms makes you lazy. Plus if you have a crop body an "all purpose" lens that only goes as wide as 40mm is pretty dumb

>>2741497
May I know what do you mostly use everyday, lens and dslr?

>>2741521
I use micro four thirds but I only ever carry around a 35mm equivalent on the front of my camera and stick a 90mm equivalent in my pocket. I don't really like 50mm as a focal length, I prefer it a bit wider, but I still think it's the best way to get started.

If I know I'm going to need them (shooting wildlife etc) I bring a 135mm f2.8 and a macro. I have other lenses too that I very rarely use.

>>2742043
Thanks

>>2740814
I own both, the pictures look about the same
I'd take the 24-70 for the wider aperture but if you don't consider that very valuable def go for the 24-105
if you want a new lens to try something different and you don't have a prime def get the sigma 1.4/35mm or the 1.4/50mm

Best to get a cheap lens and put a red ring on it so thatway people think your pro

OP, if you want a 24-70 2.8 go for a Tamron.

>>2742116
No worries man. My first lens was actually a manual focus 50mm f1.4. It's a good way to learn and the lens will be cheap. If you aren't comfortable with a prime get some zooms, if you aren't comfortable at that focal length work out why not and do what you can to change it. I actually agree with the Russians and Pentax, 43mm and 58mm feel far more natural than 50, but both are close enough not to make an obscene amount of difference

>>2740865

Why the Sigma?

>>2742661
$$$

>>2740865
I can see that you don't know anything about i have seenphotographing. Most stupid answear

File: received_1017043545008925.jpg (17KB, 424x362px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 424x362px

>>2747318
The enlighten us, if you donknow yourself m8