just copped one of these for 35mm film scanning did i goof?

inb4 dslr scanner butthole

>>2723354
Yeah, a little bit. You can't come close to getting all the detail out of film with a consumer level flatbed, and with 35mm, you sort of want as much detail as you can get, but you'll be okay if you don't expect magic.

You should have gotten a PlusTec 8100 for 35mm, but oh well.

>>2723368

word. thanks dawg

File: imacon comparoe.jpg (1MB, 2387x2927px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2387x2927px

>>2723359
being inb4 does not make your scans any better.

>>2723390

u saying i goofed?

>>2723401
When you use phrases like "copped" and "goofed", it just makes me want to punch you in your face with a hammer until it looks like mince, rather than help you.
Look at any of the other film scanning threads currently active, you fucking retard.

>>2723410
holy fuck chill LOL

>>2723410

lol hommie i realize you prob got some presonal issues goin on but treyna call out some random dude on an anonymous image board aint halpin nothin

if you have a dslr, you could do much better buying a macro lens + slide duplicator. consumer flatbeds are not good for scanning anything smaller than 6x6.

File: we twitter nao.png (6KB, 877x148px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 877x148px

hidden thread, downvote, sage

>>2723410
retard gtfo /p/ we don't need your cancer around here