Any criticisms on some photography? 1/7

File: 25cent.png (3MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2000x1333px

2/7

File: Carolina Trucking.png (3MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2000x1333px

3/7

File: Greg.png (3MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2000x1333px

4/7

File: tree.png (4MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2000x1333px

5/7

File: Skycontrast.png (311KB, 1280x276px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1280x276px

6/7

File: lightwheel.png (2MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1333px

7/7

We all go through this phase when we're experimenting with style... but unfortunately, all of your photos are flat out snapshots.

There isn't any emotion or any sort of story to tell in any single particular frame and together they are just a jumbled mess.

Keep shooting, you have the basics down, now you need to work on implementing into something a little more... focused.

>>2697200

Nice lighting and contrast, and love the detail of the goat. Also who gives a fuck about a picture of a goat sitting in a cage.

>>2697202

Also good, but why?

>>2697203

I like this one, but the blacks are almost too crushing. No detail from those shadows at all.

>>2697206

Who gives a fuuuuuuuck. Also not fully in focus.

>>2697207

Apparently that tree's leaves are made out of laser beams.

>>2697208

No.

>>2697210

Word.


Think about WHY you're pointing your camera at something. Why would someone want to look at what you're showing them? You have some nice talent, and the colors and fine detail in your pics are awesome, I'm just missing the point of why I should look at them.

>>2697200
>.png
Never, ever save a photograph in png again. It's entirely the wrong format. Use 80-90% quality jpg.

I have them as jpgs, had to compress them to upload them