Senior Portraits

File: _DSC3236.jpg (925KB, 741x1000px) Image search: [Google]

925KB, 741x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 12:08:33
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	741
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3276.jpg (761KB, 698x1000px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 698x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	147 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 12:08:22
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	98.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	698
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3312.jpg (1MB, 729x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 729x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 12:08:08
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	729
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2691038
Can't say I'm a fan of the blown out sky in this one.
Couldn't that be avoided easily since you're lighting the subject manually anyway?

File: _DSC3333.jpg (971KB, 760x1000px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 760x1000px

with my soft as shit 50mm, the chromabs on this one was unavoidable

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 12:07:57
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	760
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3386.jpg (886KB, 699x1000px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 699x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	138 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 12:07:36
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	92.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	699
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: _DSC3431.jpg (747KB, 719x1000px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 719x1000px

last one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	232 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 12:07:15
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	155.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	719
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Captuare.jpg (57KB, 965x526px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 965x526px

>>2691047
actually i really tried to get it down enough to not be noticeable, but everything i tried i couldn't avoid the dreaded haloing of HDR

this one was the only picture that the sky gave me trouble in too

pic related is all this will give me, like you said i should have underexposed since i was using a manual light

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	Trevor
Image-Specific Properties:

>>2691052
i dont get it

>>2691056
It's a meme you dip

File: 10446091_405121382977870_2459318913776861199_o.jpg (27KB, 984x691px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 984x691px

>>2691060
android is SCHIT

I'd say they're too saturated?

>>2691081
Agree with this anon

>>2691040
>>2691041
these

File: Untitled-1.jpg (157KB, 632x1000px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 632x1000px

>>2691038
Sky might be a bit blown out.

I'd say this is the only good one >>2691040

The others seem boring or have too many distractions like trees and horizons going through his head

>>2691040
>>2691041
>>2691045

These are actually nice, a little too saturated for my taste and for some odd reason the guy looks like he's copy/pasted sorta. Chill out with the saturation (unless in print it's going to take out the saturation) and you got some nice images for your senior portrait.

>>2691050

Except this one because he looks so copy pasted and it's just so weird and awk and I just don't get it.

For some reason part of my post went missing. But OP, if you understand what why chromatic aberration happens you'll know where to look. Also, the OP pic is blown out to oblivion and it makes me feel bad because it would've been a nice picture otherwise.

>>2691038yeah the sky is blown out in this one. But you know that by now.

Were you using reflectors? He looks slightly illuminated in some but not fully, suggesting you weren't using flash or external light sources to illuminate him further, because your biggest problem to me is that your subject is consistently darker than your background. This is resulting in problematic shadows across his face.

>>2691038
Why don't you replace the sky?

File: replace the sky.jpg (69KB, 613x380px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 613x380px

>>2691220

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	613
Image Height	380

>>2691200
i used a Saber Strip light

>>2691248

Right, that explains why one half of his face is always brighter than the other.

Composition and posing aren't bad, but you want to work on your lighting.

Sometimes one half of his face is brighter, causing odd looking shadows to form on the other side. Sometimes his whole face and body are just underexposed in general.

If you want to do portraits you must have serious control and understanding of lighting.

>>2691243

i lol'd

>>2691038
>>2691040
>>2691041
>>2691045

why do americans do this? whats the point of "senior photos"? its so cringey

File: WHATSUPLADIES.jpg (40KB, 383x462px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 383x462px

>>2691309

They say it's for posterity, a document of a young person entering adulthood for the rest of their lives.

I secretly think it's so you can look back at yourself in ten years and double over in pain.

>>2691309

While I agree with you I didn't really question it since it's OP's task.

But man... what even is the point?

>>2691309
I think it's a marketing ruse designed to justify neckbeards like OP taking cheesecake shots of cheerleaders, by first taking a few of her leaning against a tractor in mormonwear to send to grandma.

But yes, like so many American 'cultural' institutions, it is cringey, and creepy, and has stacks of stylised daddy's little girl semi-sexualisation attached to it.

>>2691328
>now wet your lips a little and look up into the camera, stacey. daddy's going to have this picture in his mind every time he fucks mommy for the rest of his life, it's gotta be a good one!

>>2691038 (OP)
Sky might be a bit blown out.

Fu.....mu-muh....sides...omfgtheyaregone..killing me /p

>>2691142
agreed

>>2691038
AE and contrast btfo! Too much light in the sky, use a graduated ND filter here. for portraits consider getting a lightweight foldable reflector to move some light in on the subject. focus and clarity are perfect, but you might want a longer lens or move closer to cut out some background. DOF is nice, I like the amount of detail in the setting.

tl:dr breddy gud bru, keep practicing

File: better.jpg (309KB, 628x1049px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 628x1049px

this tbh

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:24 23:55:48
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	628
Image Height	1049

>>2691344

Missed that you are shooting 50mm thats no good bru.

That guy must feel a bit uncomfortable with you grinding on him out by the farm and innawoods. choose a longer lens, even a zoom would help, but at a loss of prime lens clarity and speed

>>2691355
75mm for full frame equilvalent

>>2691355
the fuck? Why would 50mm not be good for this?

>>2691167
>>>2691041
>>>2691045
>These are actually nice
Don't you see the bright green bush beside his head or some tree extending the guy?

>>2691159
thanks.
lmao.
i laffed real good.
thanks.

File: 1445569350040.jpg (112KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 800x800px

Thanks a ton guys, so obviously i should look for better glass, or a real good 85mm.

then look out for obvious things like blown out skies and posing positions

>>2691038
>>2691041
>>2691041
>>2691045
>>2691049
bruh. do you even light source? your subjects face and body is not well lit enough in these

>>2691040
only good one.

>>2691159
fucking kek

>>2691471

I said nice, not masterpieces.

>>2691619
No, you don't need better 'glass'. You can buy a better camera when you learn to use the light around you to compose your shot. Raise your aperture a bit and use something a bit more sane than f/1.7. If you really want to spend money, buy a bounce board. I found one on amazon for $17.

Oh, and tell that kid to get a real haircut, his head looks like it needs to be circumcised.

>>2691619
It's not the glass, your gear is fine. You need to get better at lighting and directing your subject. If you're properly lighting a scene - no matter if it's achieved via reflectors, natural light, strobes, ect - you'll be doing less editing which makes the images look tacky & unappealingly saturated.

Don't worry about blown highlights in portraits, unless the highlight is the persons skin. A blown out sky can look more natural and soft if taken at the right hour & wide-open.

Have you subject move around more, interact with the environment.

>>2691619
>so obviously i should look for better glass, or a real good 85mm.
What? Why? your gear is perfectly adequate for this type of shoot... better equipment will improve your results exactly zero percent. You need practice, and creativity. Skill, and technique. Not "better glass"

>>2691159
I'm expecting to see this in future /p/ humor threads

quick question on etiquette, is it generally considered ok to post photos you took for someone else in a place like this? or post anywhere else? What if they paid you for them?

I've seen reddit threads like "was a photographer at a wedding and I snapped this lucky shot, thought you guys might like it". And I always think, "hey! that photo belongs to the people who paid you to do the shoot" or something like that.

Am I unreasonable? how does /p/hoto approach these situations and how do you guys feel personally about those type of things?

>>2691852
>And I always think, "hey! that photo belongs to the people who paid you to do the shoot"

Rarely is that actually the case. 90% of the time, the photographer retains all rights to an image. That should be the end goal, at the very least, or else they wouldn't have much of a portfolio to show anyone.

One big exception is commercial work, especially of a time-sensitive nature. The client then retains rights to the image, and the photographer is contractually restricted to certain usage.

The other big exception is when you publish an image (as in, use it in a commercial publication with wide release, or use it for commercial purposes, such as advertisement). In that case, you need to use a model release. You can't just snap a photo of someone on the street and use it to advertise Dr. Pepper without their consent.

In terms of etiquette for non-published images? That's up to the photographer. It's a polite thing to ask someone if they mind if your photo ends up on 4chan, but it's not a requirement.

>>2691891
ah, thank you very much for your reply

>>2691619
>>2691619
>Thanks a ton guys, so obviously i should look for better glass,
It's great how people just imagine what they want to hear...

>>2691038
As a note on the side...... That is one good looking farm boy.

>>2691430
>>>2691355
>the fuck? Why would 50mm not be good for this?

50mm works fine but 85 would be better, for three reasons

make some distance between shooter and subject

Narrower perspective makes body shot appear slimmer

Less background

File: 1445710459686.jpg (532KB, 632x1000px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 632x1000px

Took about 30 secs in photoshop to add a much needed sky. Yeah I know the color is off but you get the idea.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Photographer	Trevor Fulton
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	930
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	632
Image Height	1000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:25 19:29:13
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	632
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2691975
He's got a D7000. His 50mm will act literally like an 85mm lens, FOV wise. An 85mm lens will act like a 130mm which is pretty much optimum for head shot, or top-half shots.

>>2691309

only white people do this

>>2692123
this

Only whites fall for this shit.

>>2691048
>>2691045
>>2691041
>>2691040
>>2691038

Poses are stale, things crossing through his head. Most of them are lit nicely though. Some are lit (or photoshoped) almost too nicely and feel as if hes not part of the back round anymore. Overall though, not half bad shots.

>>2692014
>>>2691975
>He's got a D7000. His 50mm will act literally like an 85mm lens, FOV wise. An 85mm lens will act like a 130mm which is pretty much optimum for head shot, or top-half shots.


Sounds about right

I shoot 85 full body and 100 for head shots on film.

I still use a zoom for digital, mostly all snapshits

>>2691041
Nice Pullover where Do You bought it?

>>2692123
>>2692370
>confirmed for from the middle of nowhere where there aren't any minorities

>>2691309
What do you mean what is the pont?
Are you dense?
If a persons child is moving to a new stage in their life sometimes they want photos to remember it by.
Why would you assume only Americans do this.
I think you're just a cynical twat

>>2691983
If you cannot get something reasonable OOC, you are doing it wrong sonyboy

>>2696256
>Why would you assume only Americans do this.
Because only Americans do this?

>>2697033
Wow, your envy is so real in this post we can feel it. Apparently you have some deeply rooted emotional trauma. This thread is about photography. If you want feels go somewhere else. Thank you and have a wonderful night.

>>2697030

Are you fucking retarded? The exif in every single picture in this thread says D7000.

File: retard alert.gif (393KB, 493x342px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 493x342px

>>2697030

>>2695026
Wrong again anon.

Grew up in the suburbs and am now at a uni with 30+ people.

File: twitter1.jpg (376KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1000x1500px

Here are a couple I just took tonight. Opinions?

1/2

File: twitter3.jpg (585KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 1000x1500px

>>2697216

2/2

>>2697030
That's entirely dependent on the variances of the light sources.

>>2697216

nice shot but i think color works better here because of my team colors murrica

>>2697218
I like this one. the first one reminds me too much of pic related. then again, I couldn't take a shot that nice, so don't listen to me. I'm a scrub

File: guyhihvbsodjvnlokdmvloks dv.jpg (137KB, 1035x1035px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1035x1035px

>>2697508
forgot pic

>>2691038
Does he haz downs?

>>2697515
Yeah, but he doesn't let it get him down.

>>2697471
>>2697508
thnx. you're saying the b/w one looks too... "pregnant"? I can see it

>>2691038

This shit is ripe for future /p/ humor threads

File: a2b56ac1d8868df2bc3b6fa2a5b6783ef57788004f60cba3fffaa7c5871fb882_1.jpg (123KB, 800x645px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 800x645px

>>2697515
>>2697552
>>2697787