/out/doors wear

Lots of pockets(can't have too many)
Sturdy, no tight fit just a bit baggy.
As for looks I like earth like colours, hazel brown and olive green I like.
Keep it comfy though, I have pants with lots of pockets but with zippers in awkward spots where they sting in your legs when kneel down.

Manufactured here in the States, in my case (or wherever you're from) with excellent quality control and customer service.
Durable as shit. Heavy tech fabrics, quality metal hardware, designed from the bottom up to be serviced and repaired.
Classic, low-profile appearance. No flashy colors or branding.
Anything more would be activity-specific: for hiking, keep in mind the way pieces will layer and handle moisture, temperature, etc...
I wear a merino base, a beautiful heavy wool sweater and a technical shell. Most folks would probably prefer some kind of fleece/down mid. If you design shell layers, spend extra time perfecting the underarms for ventilation and mobility. Got any sketches you can share?

Materials may be the most important factor.

Warm insulating layers for winter.

Moisture wicking breathable fabrics for summer.

No fabric that absorbs and holds water (other than wool).

Function over style, but if you want to sell clothes, they have to look good as well. Some spregs will buy new clothing that looks milsurp, but 99% of the population wants style with their clothing.

A goth ninja style water repellent poncho that fits into a pocket and doesn't fucking deafen me with rustling would be great. I don't care if it doesn't breathe. Easy to fold easy to unfold easy to wear, rain? Wind? Hail? Surprise snow in the mountains? Just break out the poncho and give 0 fucks.

Be very specific about what the clothes are for. I've seen so many otherwise semi-skilled people buy the wrong clothes for the activity that they had in mind. I made some mistakes myself over the years too. So IMO be clear about what your clothes are designed to be good for and include a simple no-bullshit description on that peice of clothing so that also the rookies will know.

>>984009
Not OP, but can I trouble you for an example?