Internal or External Frame pack

File: 1478181648791.jpg (60KB, 761x563px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 761x563px

>>892885
bumpski

>>892901
/out/ is a slow board, you don't need to bump.

File: mlt-9127_1.jpg (45KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 550x550px

>7lbs
You're better off getting a surplus ilbe pack at that weight and price. stay away from amazon chinkshit in general. You'll get a battle tested pack capable of carrying 100+ pounds plus modular rifle carrying. its way more versatile in general, I've carried an ar with the stock protected in the side pouch, it actually has a sleeve that runs along the side to carry a longgun but unless im bushwhacking I usually just use the compression straps on the side to secure it. Overall extremely comfy, if you're willing to take a few pounds in weight its 100% worth it.

>>892943
Also, just downright bombproof and since you're probably hunting(?) The camo can't hurt. I've packed a quartered deer out with it relatively comfortably.

>>892943
marine here

I really cant find any real complaints with this bag. I did grueling shit in it but it would be a great pick imo for fun hiking with funs. Maybe I'll swing by my old base and see if theyre cheap there.

>>892943

The frame will let me load up things like firewood, since I don't have a sled. But from what I'm seeing the external frame one has greater capacity. I do miss having MOLLE, though

>>892943
I was never pleased with the gen 2 ILBEs. Tactical Tailor has some great reworked milsurp packs that are much better

>>892885
External