Trousers for innawoods?

>>832024
God damn I hate you /k/ crossovers who always assume that they can make due with their TATICOOL molle pack and wear nothing but multimeme
There's a damn difference between /out/ and going to war

Look at fjallraven. Sturdy and good looking.

>>832024
Jeans

>>832034
That's why I'm asking..
>>832040
>not reading the post
I'm not wearing jeans if theres a chance it can get soaked.

running shorts

File: DSC_0619.jpg (899KB, 1400x884px) Image search: [Google]

899KB, 1400x884px

Why do newfag /k/ posters always announce their special club when asking a generic question on another board?

BOA Galaxy shorts or LASC Sixties

File: DSC_0377.jpg (578KB, 800x651px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 800x651px

>>832058
A few more good options from a part of my wardrobe. Kooga rugby shorts are nice for thick brush or climbing as they are fairly tough

>>832058
Did it because I'm not familiar with the particular quirks of another board, and in case I ask something that is taboo, etc. From what I can tell /k/ isn't very welcomed here.
>>832035
Thanks, will look into. I see kids on campus wearing fjallraven all the time, but never guessed it was an outdoor brand.

>>832024
dddd

>>832064
Of course "they" are welcome, there is massive overlap/crossover between the boards. Just don't be that annoying guy that announces his special team affiliation. I don't understand why /k/ of all boards breeds people that do this, probably because most of the board are just /r9k/ers that feel at home on /k/ because they have a milsurp field jacket and an airsoft gun.

>>832024
Arc'Teryx pants are pretty fucking good. Expensive, but well worth the money IMO

I have a pair of their rock climbing pants and they're the comfiest things I've worn on my lower body ever. They also tend to be really lightweight and packable, which is very important on long treks/hikes

File: F90647-284-633_0.jpg (138KB, 522x1239px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 522x1239px

>>832024

File: F83253-633_0.jpg (138KB, 522x1346px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 522x1346px

>>832091
Both are good, the one above feels more comfy than this one but gaiters are nice to have. Both have zippers vertically on each side for ventilation which is nice, above ones are less durable but more breathable in the green material (non-G1000).

These are bulletproof no complaints other than it has buttons instead of a zipper. The ones above I have 2 different pairs of the G1000/poly mix and the only issue so far has been the crotch stitching after having for 2-3 years.

If you can get them at half or less than MSRP they are worth it; at retail price not at all.

>>832091
>>832102
They look nice but are expensive and over engineered, link for those who need it: http://www.fjallraven.com/lappland-hybrid-trousers-w

http://store.tripleaughtdesign.com/Recon-RS-Pant


Does anyone ever go /out/ in crye gear? I was looking at their pants in either Ranger green or black and they look pretty good.

Hoping for some help
I'm in need of some pants that are
1. Pants , work mandates it
2 look relitivley normal, ( once again can't look like too much of a clown at work )
3 dry quickly /wick
4 are light /not warm

I'm often getting soaked and need so.wthing that will dry out faster than typical jeans or other cotton work pants

>>832276
Durribility and cheapness are also factors
Ideally $30 per pair or cheaper if possible and they should hold up when /out/ and about

>>832024
I suggest you have a look in stores that sell outdoor pants. Just browse that shit. There's a ton of options, and many of them will work just fine. You have to decide this yourself, after considering your climate, budget, other needs.

>>832034
I think that's a little unfair, because soldiers spend a lot of time outdoors and milsurp for example works pretty good for civilians as well.

>>832035
It's pricey though, you don't have to spend that much to get pants.

>>832040
>Literal sponge pants

>>832058
>Unused Coghlans ferro/mag
>Douchebag college track star shorts
>Snakeskin wallet
>Teeny tiny lantern on key ring
>Autism phone
What hath god wrought

>>832060
>Nice for thick brush as they are fairly tough
>Inseam approx. 8 inches
Well I'm glad your legs are so amply protected

Uncle Sam supplied me with way too many sets of ACUs so I those pants when I go out.

I don't wear the tops tho cause I aint a faggot

>>832324
Thank you for your cervix

>>832328
If you need any other organs lemme know

File: product_image_114_5_18_14_6_57.jpg (813KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 1000x1000px

>>832024
If you don't mind camo, British combat pants are cheap and comfy.

File: 69050404_flexiwork-work-pirate-trousers-holster-pockets_blackblack-0404.jpg (95KB, 792x1411px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 792x1411px

waiting for them to arrive, hyped

File: DSCF2615-2.jpg (449KB, 2000x1600px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 2000x1600px

Condor Stealth Operator Pants

Ignore the shitty name, they're good mid price poly cotton trousers with some good features - trouser legs are hemmed to allow a draw cord, double thickness where it matters like on the knees and edge of pocket where you clip your torch/knife, inner pockets inside the thigh pockets, and thick and often belt loops. The D rings that come on them are junk, however.

Some OC:

>>832333
Hes from /k/ what do you think (but good choice tho)

File: image.png (2MB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1242x2208px

>>832024
>Arborwear (original) tree climbers
Not a huge fan of the tech ones, but that's just because they're so light.
If you're out hunting, going through brush, trail work, etc then I would say pic related, OP. If backpacking, then probably not seeing as how heavy they are. But I'm /Philstaff/ so I get them for $35 and I absolutely love them.

File: 1468926267071.jpg (27KB, 560x524px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 560x524px

>>832375
>Condor
i don't get the hate for Condor on /k/. I have the condor fleecejacket (Outdoor Alpha Mikro or whatever the name is) for years and wore it at work. it's still going strong.
ridiculous names though

>>832375
Any info on that sheath/clip setup?

File: 1468867869240.jpg (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

Hi Martin

>>832034
REI gearqueer detected

>>832024
fjallraven

>>832102
I love the look and features of these, but the price is ridiculous for a pair of trousers. As you say, half price and I wouldn't hesitate.

>>832033
FPBP

>>832035
>Sturdy and good looking
Obscenely heavy and makes you look like a faggot hipster.

>>832091
I have these and they're the perfect blend between comfortable and tough. When both vents on the side are open they're even good for a 30+ °C day. Pockets are well thought out with a small mesh inside to keep smaller things from falling around also when they're fully packed they're not in the way when hiking. Climbed with them and had no problems either. Good allround pants if you can afford them.

>>832499
Bergans make quite similar pants for half the price. For half the price you might not get the exact same quality (as a general rule you get what you pay for), but Bergans still make quality products in my experience.

>>832516
wrong and no

File: IMG_1634.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>832058
mah nigga

soffes related.

>>832443
Custom kydex for my BRK Imp.

File: 1ckLCVNdNYU-350x400.jpg (20KB, 350x400px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x400px

>>832024
Just go full Gorka. You can get a full suit for $50+ online.

>>832060

>my sides

i don't know how anyone on here is offering suggestions without more info.


OP- are we talking insulated/cold weather? heavy rain? long hike? ripguarded? /out/ specific?

>>832863
Is that carry pack the one from hill people gear? If so, bueno?

>>833091
Was wondering how long before one of you gorka fags showed up shilling your slavshit

>>834355
Oi faggot, commie gear is fucking awesome and cheap

>>832034
STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE

>>832060
Do you wear anything your nuts don't hang out of?

>>833091
>>834355
so i'm new to this board but not new to being innawoods. what's the problem with a gorka suit? never owned one but it seems pretty legit from what i can tell. don't get me wrong, commies can eat a bag of dicks, but give credit where it's due

>>832085
>climbing pants
Which ones? They have eleven dif climbing pants.

File: IMG_2456.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

prAna

Try some on; you'll know what I mean.

>>832041
I wear jeans. a spare one for rain and a short one for hot/dry weather.


Yeah, i don't really care how heavy my backpack is.

File: e0025cd3175b587a882fd7a923d0ec058cc07129b9c998d730ab69169587be2e.jpg (115KB, 625x625px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 625x625px

>>834592
>what's the problem with a gorka suit?
it looks goofy

All these expensive pants are the same as $20 cargo pants from walmart. You retards are paying for the brand name

>>835054
yeah, nah

>>834592
It's literally baggy cotton canvas (with polycotton reinforcements). I don't know what they made it for, but extended outdoors in wet conditions was clearly not it.

>>834596
Pemberton and I recently bought a pair of texada pants

I like the pemberton more, they're lighter

>>835064
A lot of military gear is or used to be cotton, just look at milsurp, it's just a little old fashioned maybe now that soldiers have gore tex and fancy new fabrics. But people have used cotton as outer layer and made it just fine, it was pretty much the standard a few decades ago. Impregnate it and it's a bit more water resistant. Use rain gear when the rain is really bad, and have wool as inner layer when it's cold.

I use my snowboarding pants.

>>832024
Swedish M90 combat pants are pretty good.

>>832278
At that price just go buy something from Walmart. Youll have to probably triple your budget if you want sorta good stuff.

File: c44cb7cf62de945dd71a5497e4d67363.jpg (28KB, 462x362px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 462x362px

>>834248
HillPeopleGear Runner's Kit Bag.

Yeah. Very bueno.

>>832034
I spent 2 weeks innawoods in full PPE, my rifle, lots of ammo and lots of MREs. Shit was pretty chill and nice.
Have fun with your REI ultralight bullshit anon

>>832058
Maybe they like watching faggots like you squirm and cringe before giving into an involuntary gear thread.

>>832058
>lol

>>832024
I usually go in my BSA trousers. They are Zip-away so I can use them in the summer as shorts and winter as trousers. Lots of pocket space, very well made. However they are expensive.

http://www.scoutstuff.org/bsa/uniforms-insignia/mens/pants/centennial-canvas-convertible-pants-classic-canvas.html#.V69EpPkrKUk

>>832067
>/k/ as a whole cannot stand airsoft

File: 18250_CYS_FR.jpg (21KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 495x495px

I got a couple pairs of Duluth pants after seeing them on /out/ a few months ago

They seem solid and I like the reinforced canvas parts.I thought the "gusseted crotch" was a gimmick but you can actually squat/climb/sprawl easily without feeling like you might rip the ass out

Thinking of getting them tapered at the knee so that they are more snug on my boots b/c they have big fatboy pipes at the end and I feel like dirt/rocks get up into my socks/shoes easier than with slimmer jeans

http://www.duluthtrading.com/store/mens/mens-pants/18250.aspx?processor=content

>>832060

replace that fucking carpet, jesus that's fucking gross.

>>832390
i have a pair of those, i hate them, they have no pro over owning just a pair of dickies, the tech ones look neat because they're lighter. plus the arbor wear have an awful fit super baggy worse than dickies.

>>835064
its made for the mountains and supposed to be mainly be used as a windbreaker

File: fjallraven.jpg (163KB, 661x1000px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 661x1000px

>>832024
fjallraven ftw

File: fjallraven Vidda Pro Trousers Regular.jpg (102KB, 522x1205px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 522x1205px

>>834592
>so i'm new to this board but not new to being innawoods. what's the problem with a gorka suit?
It looks goofy and takes a long time to dry. Other then that's its fine, i got one. Lots of swing room for your dick, put some wax on it to make it water resistant and you're good.

I also got these when they where on sale. The price is a bit steep but they are solid well thought out pants and they look good enough (imo) to be worn for every day use where jeans would be ok to wear.

>>839045
>Flyer for tactical penis deploymen
>2 side pockets
>3 cargo pockets
>1 multi tool pocket
>Hatchet pocket
>hook to keep pants secured to boots
>adjustable elastic strap to keep snow and crap out of boots
>reinforced knees and ass
>doesn't rip
>resistant against embers that burns hole
>not to warm, not to cold
>dries quickly
What's not to like?

>>839058
>what's not to like

The price if you live in australia

>>839076
>The price if you live in australia
How much is it?

>>839077
Anywhere from high 200-400 including postage. Between exchange rate and shipping we get screwed hard

OP you need to try some joggers by modern amusement.
Reasons why:
look like a badass
contours to your leg so that it does not get caught as easily on things around you (perfect for rock climbing in cooler weather)
the contours give you complete range of motion with extra space if it were possible for you to stretch that far
fast drying
very durable
cuffed at the bottom (joggers, duh) so you can easy pull them over or put them under boots.

Just pack more than one set of clothing for fuck sake. Don't forget to bathe.

>>832165
I'm on the fence about them.

I got them assuming they would be higher quality, and I wanted both the build in knee pads (plus the velcro behind the knee to cinch it in, pure sex) and the velcro cuff, plus the tacticool memeness wasn't out of the question either.

Very comfy, not the lightest /out/ pants you could use, but my knees are rekt so always having a protective cup (in conjunction with thin neoprene knee pads) is paramount to me not keeling over if I kneel on a pebble. My one complaint is the durability wasn't what I thought it was. By the third 5ish mile hike I did in them a 2" length of stitching on the butt blew out, and I had numerous rips and holes in the butt material too (not good considering I only ever stopped to sit on large smooth granite boulders).

I believe they raised the price on them since I got them, I definitely wouldn't have got them for the price they are now.

7/10 bretty good m8 but I assume I would be just as happy with emerson airshit knockoffs since it seems I would have to do the same amount of restitching and patching regardless, but for half the cost.

File: dog.jpg (97KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 640x640px

>>832024
Neeeeeeeeeeed that coat? What kind is it, pleaseeee?

Also, does anyone recommend waterproof underpants for cold weather resembling the TAO pants? Much thanks!

File: 65648562959cde74140a784866707567.jpg (53KB, 736x736px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 736x736px

>>832024
I got these and absolutely love them. Black parts are waterproof plastic-esque meaning I can sit as well as kneel down in wet grass etc. without getting soaked.
They are rather heavy and warm though so wouldn't recommend them for a hot summer day-
Link: http://www.haglofs.com/se/en/Pants/RUGGED-II-MOUNTAIN-PANT-MEN/p/602607.2VW

I personally like the cotton / spandex blend pants meant for people who cycle to work. They look like regular slacks or work pants, but move and breathe very well. If you're in a wet environment, get the nylon variant. I personally prefer the cotton though because it doesn't make a swishing sound.

I dislike anything with cargo pockets or camouflage / tactical styling. Makes you look like a fucking manchild.

The worst offenders are "bushcraft" pants though. Like that Fjallraven shit. Nobody should be trying that hard.

File: pavelimcia.jpg (40KB, 450x253px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 450x253px

>>832375
Looks great for CIA LARPing.

>Condor Stealth Operator Pants
really? are they ironic with the name? I know there was some company that did the tactical ironic name meme. Tactical Edge maybe?
anyway

Found a pair for ~36 bongbucks. Worth picking up?

Need a pair of water resistant pants aswell for rain and canoeing. Anyone knows if Bergans Helium pants are good/durable? Found some for ~70 Eurothaler

>>832058
is that a glock high cap clip?

>>832400
their actual gear is airsoft-tier

File: hmmmmmmmm.jpg (32KB, 475x356px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 475x356px

>>832034
in case this isnt bait...
you are assuming A LOT

>>836453
I love Duluth for work pants, but I don't know about /out/. They're just a bit too heavy.

>>832446
>>832446
ihi
h

>>832276
I can't remember the name but I bought these cheap "hiking" pants from the exercise department of a store. They'd suit your description (despite me not being very helpful in describing them)

>>832060
I LOVE YOU FRUITY RUDY!

>>835041
But it's functional which i'd like to think matters a bit more than how you look. Though i think it looks pretty cool and "operator" like

>>839594
Don't wear waterproof underpants unless you want your balls hard boiled and dick cooked well done.

>>839582
bump, interested in this too

>>832024
I'm sure I'll get flamed for this but .02$, I've a pair of north face convertible water resistant/quick dry pants that I've had for ~5 years and have taken a hell of a beating from jellystone to Moab to N woods of MI to trout fishing/innawoods WI to everyday wear and tear. They're my sole out trousers. Not cheap, but they've done me well. Patagucci makes some good gear too, as well as mountain hardware, as well as OR, again, not cheap, but quality. I've been disappointed w 'gucci in the last several years tho, as well as NF, their gear is becoming more posuer 'urban-out' than out, you've gotta be selective and do the homework; to that end this site is a bretty gud resource: http://outdoorgearlab.com

>>845116
The reason people like to trash on North Face or Fjällraven is because it's expensive and of course we'd like to have everything for dirt cheap regardless of quality, another reason is because hipster rich kids started wearing it which triggers outdoors people for some reason or another

>>844985
>But it's functional which i'd like to think matters a bit more than how you look.

/fa/ has been leaking into /out/ lately

>>845132
Well i mean it is nice for a jacket to look aesthetically pleasing, but it's not a deal breaker for me if it's a fugly jacket

>>845120
this

>>839582
Most likely a softshell or hardshell jacket from some high end tactical brand probably made for the range or for militarized police, so i guess go look at some well known manufacturers of tactical apparel

>>839582
>>845099
It looks a lot like the Rothco Special Ops Tactical Softshell Jacket in coyote, might be wrong but i'm 99% sure it's that model of jacket.

File: 2749793-man-with-noose-around-his-neck.jpg (47KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 800x530px

>>832024
That pic made me angry
Whenever I see skinny little fuckboys out playing operator it makes me angry.
If somebody wants that life, they can train for a few years and OP40 or NSWSO it up. I dont see why they take any enjoyment out of autistically pretending to be soldiers.

As for the actual thread, any milsurp pants you can find at an army surplus work well.Baggy jeans always work for me, just expect them to get torn up.

>>845397
While I hate you for wearing baggy jeans while /out/, I agree with your original sentiment entirely.

>>836627
I live in the tech pants, they're much better cut. They fit me like a dream, and I'm a skeleton.

>>845424
I grew up working for the forest service.
We never used fancy shit, baggy jeans, company T shirts, and windbreakers.

>>845518
Yeah but the forest service's main purpose wasn't to go outside and enjoy nature and be comfortable, it was to clear paths and do foresty shit and get the job done, regardless of comfort.
>>845397
Why do people get so caught up on what others wear? Some guys just like pretending to be operators without the risk of being shot by commies or they're practicing/playing out their fantasy of SHTF. Kinda hypocritical for you to say military gear is stupid yet you're literally recommending milsurp kit, which is often camo, so either you're retarded or you can't make your mind up, but if you actually hated it you wouldn't be recommending people milsurp kit.

>>839076
Don't have to be in Australia to wince at the price.

>>845120
It isn't that North Face or Fjallraven are too expensive, it's that for the same price you can probably find a better piece of gear.

At least that has been my experience with them.

>>832034
>make due

This is why pronunciation matters.

do, rhymes with skidoo. The machine that propels you to certain death

due, rhymes with jew, the race /pol/ is sexually confused about.

>>832024
This guy's a liar.
/k/ doesn't wear pants. Ever.

ridgeline, harkila, swedteam, seeland, deerhunter

File: K+Hermit+7+copy1.jpg (139KB, 800x371px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 800x371px

>>845657
Milsurp kit has a function.
There is nothing wrong with wearing an m65 and camo pants, because they are useful.
There is nothing wrong with taking a rifle out into the woods for hunting.
But If I see a guy wearing an M65, I dont think he is playing soldier, I simply see a guy in an m65
The guy in the OP pic is obviously playing soldier.
And guys like that all follow a certain mindset, they were physically and mentally too weak to ever make something of themselves, so they go and pretend and meanwhile tell any real soldier they are dying for the jews. One could say im projecting, but ive seen hundreds of people that follow the exact same pattern. They start out as a skinny teenager talking about gaining weight and training for BUDS, then they drown proof themselves a few times go to a recruiter, and get denied because the recruiter looks them up and down and tells them to fuck off.
When a candidate looks like he has a chance of making it, the recruiter will help him lie about any medical problem, do a fuckload of paperwork for him, and make sure he gets through, but these guys just get flat out denied because they arent gritty enough.
From here, they either enlist 11b and mop floors for a few years before getting a General Discharge, or just NEET or job it up and buy plate carriers and needlessly expensive guns with their parents money.
Go on /k/ and see for yourself. There is an entire generation of 20 something failures that just play around with guns and gear and act like theyre doing something.
In the DEP ive had to deal with so many fucks like this, and they ALL dropped. 100% of them left the fucking DEP because PTs were too hard for them. And these shits thought they would actually get to the real deal.
Point is, I highly dislike a certain type of person, and when I see a person following a number of signs that would classify them as that type, I dislike them.
What if you saw a fat girl with dyed hair, SJW glasses, and a choker?

>>836622
I bet he doesn't even take his shoes off when he walks in the door.

File: ac0c1106_1_.jpg (1MB, 3840x5760px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x5760px

>>832499
there are quite some ripstop pants that are 50% pollyester 50% cotton (or 67% polyester 33% cotton). I'd say they might be just as good, but where i live you can buy those pants for like 30 us dollars

File: faltuniformer-m90p-pansaruniformsbyxa-31463-c6.jpg (136KB, 759x1229px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 759x1229px

M90
9
0

File: 6171.jpg (119KB, 651x750px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 651x750px

>>845809
K U U S K A KS
U
U
S
K
A
K
S

>>845143
GORKA only looks fugly on lanklets. Eat your porridge to fit the frame or order two sizes smaller.

>>845853
The jacket looks cool, i don't care much for the pants

>>839038
crocs lol

File: 81760-246-633.jpg (16KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 400x400px

>>839045
same here, they fit great, so comfy

great pants and for about $170CAD good value

>>846500

Pants are basically same as M65 Congo to an extent that some websites that sell both M62 and M65 mix them up.

File: 1313654505095.jpg (257KB, 600x474px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 600x474px

>>834592
>>835064
>>835083
cotton once wet is windproof
thats why they usually have synthetic under layers with them

it was their answer to cold/wet at the time

>>832064
>The quirks of /out/ are simple.
everyone is a virgin, /pol/ack fuck. honestly this board is, unfortunately, more cancerous than most other boards. even /b/

File: 4SBch49.jpg (40KB, 567x561px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 567x561px

>>832067

>>834999
Prana is for nu-males that need low rise pants.

>>848078
They're great for sport climbing and bouldering though. The material is super stretchy.

File: captainautismo.jpg (399KB, 929x2457px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 929x2457px

>>848078
Sorry you can't into comfy-ass, moisture-wicking, never-ripping, super-stretching, pantaloons that also show off dat adonis belt

File: 1340595623278.jpg (2MB, 2772x1697px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2772x1697px

>>832067
thanks for your blog anon