Lets be honest

>>1006724
Safer way*

File: sam.jpg (951KB, 2054x2513px) Image search: [Google]

951KB, 2054x2513px

>>1006724
Idiot.

>6kg of ballistic nylon pouches
>so sweaty
>can't sit down anywhere
>can't go any faster than a walk without shit bouncing everywhere
>nowhere to carry bulky items like a sleeping bag
>lets hope you don't overheat and want to take your top off
>autism level 100 achieved

yep don't see anything wrong with it.

>>1006724
you can't easily take it off to carry in the trunk of your Camry

checkmate nerd

someone screen cap this thread, specifically op and >>1006813

>>1006845
>I'm so lazy

Fat fuck.

>>1006845
Shall I make you some coffee while I am at it?

>>1006845
Want a musical wish with that as well, fat ass?

File: ey.jpg (126KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 400x400px

>>1006724
>This is going to be the future of hiking.
why is /k/ always 25 years behind current technology?

File: 2.jpg (21KB, 380x284px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 380x284px

the way things are going in the west this is going to be the future of hiking

>>1006863
>want
>>1006861
>not want

>>1006724
I need a snack, let me take my entire shirt off and spend 20 minutes getting it back on.

Also you'll look like a retard

File: tk.jpg (33KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 550x413px

>>1006724
>Just consider gravity for just a moment.
NO

File: smartest man who ever lived.jpg (100KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 850x400px

>>1006724
>the current year, still believing in the unmeasurable jewish theory

its called density you dense fuck

>>1008649
>doesn't know the difference between special and general relativity

No thanks op, i prefer to MGTOW my own way in my flextrek 37T

>>1006724
I'm faxing dollars to you now

>>1006847
>>1006853
>>1006859
come on lay off guys, hes obviously 14 and doesnt know what prntscrn means

File: IMG_20170509_141702.jpg (205KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 720x1280px

>>1006845
here you go, anon

Didnt we had identical thread a week ago? OP is a homosexual.

this copy pasta is getting kinda stale

in all seriousness though, wouldn't this be better purely from a weight distribution perspective? If you put bulky but light stuff on your back, and smaller but heavier stuff on a chest rig, your weight would be centered instead of all on your back. More and more backpack manufacturers are incorporating pockets into shoulder straps anyway

>>1011550
No. It sucks. In Afghanistan, we would carry very heavy rucksack (up to 90 lbs with ammo and comms gear) with plate carriers and a front load with our essential fighting load. I would want the weight on my back more where it just feels like your meant to bear a load. I was never ed worried about falling back because I'd just bump my butt and my ruck would take the brunt of the impact. If the weight up front caused my to fall it's all knees, hands, and face with a ruck following to sucker punch your face further into the moon-dust covered rocks.

It sounds 100% logical, but it isn't biomechanically advantagous.

Sorry for spelling, on my phone.

>>1011590
>implying fanny packs arent the ultimate weight distribution

People get fat on their bellies and not on their back for a reason. Its easier to carry at that spot.