Am I the only one who thinks ricers should be banned from existence?
>>17887305
Theres no such thing as a ricer, in every automotive clique theres gonna be one asshole who doesnt know what hes doing and modifies his car in a way that isnt accepted by the rest of the clique, just like in EVERY other thing in life. Not everyones gonna have the same opinion, its not really a matter of banning those who dont modify a car to our specific taste but instead ignoring them and going about our days modifying our cars to our specification. Does it make me mad that I can find a crx in a driveable condition that isnt engine swapped or stupidly modified? Yes. But theres plenty of other cars out there...
>>17887339
>t. ricer
Sleeper master race.
>>17887385
I see this thread so often, everyones definition of ricer is different so when a thread like this starts a war starts with it. Its just a battle of people who dont own cars getting upset a the way others pour money into their cars. Whats your definition of ricer though. Is it modifying a car in a way you dont like?
>>17887409
Nigger, a ricer is a faggot that puts gay ass stickers and modifies the car so it LOOKS good, instead of modifying it for actual performance.
It's just a fraud car, really.
>>17887459
So everyone on /o/?
>>17887470
>If I am a faggot ricer, then everyone is.
>>17887513
I still havent gotten a clear definition of what a ricer is or why you are all so upset about them, i own an unmodified truck that i use for daily activities and so far the definition one anon gave me doesn't seem to make me fit the criteria for being a ricer. Give some examples of mods you dislike
>>17887582
>>17887647
This is literally early 2000's the car
>>17887305
Yes, I think you're the only one who gives this much of a shit about what people do with their own property.
>>17887647
That's an example, not a definition.