What do you think /o/? 158hp, 6-speed manual, (slightly) oversquare

coupe looks like shit, get the sedan

>>17870289

why do you think it looks like shit?

>>17870281
Pony up for turbo engine. That 2.0 is turd.

>>17870293
because the proportions are fucked up. the rear wheels are too far away from the doors of the car, so it looks like it belongs on a rwd car (back half) while the rest of the car is fwd. i've never liked any of honda's coupes after 2000

>>17870297
it's the same motor that it's in the type r without the turbo or direct injection

>>17870297

what about it is no good?

>>17870307
New type r does not have duel vtec like older k20, don't buy into hype.
Also it's missing turbo. It's not simple as just put turbo on it.
>>17870309
There is nothing good about this engine. If this was k20a then yea, that is great but at this point 1.5t beats it in power, aftermarket support, mpg.

>>17870326
power only if the engine is free of carbon buildup, and if it doesn't suffer from heat soak

not to mention expensive fuel injectors that a regular port injected engine doesn't have to worry about

>>17870333
From what I see so far, 1.5t are underrated. They put down advertised crank hp to whp. Seen some video of stock 1.5t beating 9th gen si. Seems pretty good to me

>>17870281

clean good looking car, great driving car, reliable. Just don't put a stupid ass wing and rice it out. Keep it clean CAI, and Turbo down the road. Plenty of fun for years.

>>17870281
>buying new
good goyim

>>17870337
This would be only worry.

>>17870350
along with the high pressure fuel pump that can also fail

I test drove an EX T coupe, I will definitely be getting a sedan EX T 1.5T CVT. dont cuck yourself, OP.

>>17870357
>cvt
says the cuck

>>17870358
I ownd mostly manual but I wouldn't call someone cuck for not driving one.
It's just personal choice.

>>17870281
>not getting hondasense
ask how I know you're a cuck

>>17870378
>needing driving aids
>cuck
pick both

>>17870383
>>17870378
>>17870371
>>17870358
>>17870357

you guys have like 10 iq points between you

File: IMG-20170910-WA0005.jpg (87KB, 500x733px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 500x733px

Get 1.5T hatch, don't be a dipshit.

>>17870396

But i don't like turbo motors

>>17870403
just wait until the 2.0 gets a supercharger

File: IMG_0634.jpg (33KB, 640x559px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 640x559px

>>17870391
Oh no! He likes what I don't like

>>17870281
Get the hatch, it comes with more stuff standard and the much better 1.5L turbo engine

>>17870281
>manual

>>17870421

actually it's because you guys can't think of anything more intelligent to say than 'cuck'

>>17870410

people still supercharge engines unironically?

>>17870293
>paying more for a less practical economy car
>goes for the weakest engine

>>17870353
>>17870337
This shit doesn't fail on new cars. Maybe if you were buying something 15-20 years old

>validate my poor choices!
>gets told to make better choices
>NO I SAID VALIDATE MY POOR CHOICES!

>>17870281
it's shit. just get a civic for 3k or fix your current car.

>>17870281
>158hp
>2L

That is SkyActiv bad.

>>17870467
Skyactive actually gets best in class fuel efficiency

Get a V6 Accord coupe from 2008. 270 hp, and like a million times more torque than a VTEC 4 banger gay 4 cylinder.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (293KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1280x720px

>>17870431
>people still supercharge engines unironically
The fastest production car in the world is supercharged.

>>17870724
I didn't know demon can do 0-60 in 2second.

>>17870343

Maybe here's some sort of overboost feature that Honda decided not to include in the official power ratings, different manufacturers do this differently.

Ford actually includes the overboost figure into the officially advertised power of the Fiesta ST IIRC

I was thinking on getting one but some say the reliability is not that good for this 2017 and 2018 years.

>>17870281
there is only one true car and that is a BMW. I'm sorry to say this, but no other car comes close to the driving feel a bmw gives.
you can get one of those focus RS pieces of shit for 300+ hp and a 200hp BMW will still shit all over it in terms of fun, comfort and feel.
only other alternative I see is a porsche, but those are expensive as fuck.

>>17870307
>It's the same thing in the Type R except without the stuff that makes the Type R engine decent.
Ok thanks for agreeing.

>>17872196
>le supreme gentlemen has risen
hide your girlfriends and wives gents

>>17870724
And is absolutely horrid to drive regularly. Your point being?

>>17870281
get the hatchback, lowest trim has the 1.5t

>>17870743
it can hit 60 mph in that time consistently over and over again without needing to recharge it batteries

noobybooby here, whats an oversquare engine and why is it a good or bad thing?

File: 863424350.jpg (59KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x427px

>>17872196
>fun