Anyone on here own a 83-84 Mustang GT Turbo?

File: 1504740424641.gif (3MB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x300px

Hate to break it to you friend but that's not a GT it's an SVO. It looks aftermarket turboed so it probably isnt a true SVO either. Just a plain 4 cylinder, maybe an LX. Anyway, did you have a question or something?

>>17845926
No it's a GT turbo trust me I know

>>17845926
Would you like my vin number so I can prove that

>>17845926
>it's an SVO
You've never even seen a PICTURE of an SVO have you?

>>17847357
Op here that's my car and I'm just curious to see how many are still on the road

>>17847364
hardly any since they sold like shit to begin with
then you have the ones that were swapped
then you have the ones that have been junked

>>17847420
I know they sold like shit, I rather enjoy mine albeit not stock

>>17847430
yeah stock they were shit and cost more than a V8 GT

never been in one but I have been in a Turbobird and they alright with some simple mods

>>17847364
Yours would be the first I've seen in a decade or more. The early 2000's junkyard turbo craze used them all up fast.

>>17847438
Never drove one but I've heard good things about them except the I believe the transmission only being able to handle 18lbs of boost

>>17845372
That's a crustang if I've ever seen one. I bet you look like a felony waiting to happen

>>17847454
Nope, never even been pulled over

>>17845926
You're a fucking idiot, GT turbos were a thing.

OP, I owned an SVO for a little while.