Forced Induction Thread

>>17825642
personal experience here

I had a 92 5.0 Fox back in 2010-2012.
I did a similar setup. Bolt on 5.0 to a kennebelle 2.1 setup I got used.
It was great fun but I was interested in primarily going faster on the dragstrip and went turbo. Lot more options and room to grow on a turbo setup.

The blower will be much more fun on the street though and instant power will be more fun. Probably better longetivity too.

File: 20170905_130032.jpg (4MB, 2614x2323px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2614x2323px

My Saab 9-5. $2k car with $1k in mods and it's making over 300hp. I love these things

>>17825705
The real impressive thing about these is the sheer amount of torque they manage to squeeze out of relatively low displacement engines.

File: IMG_1228.jpg (2MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x2268px

I like when the whistles go WOOOOO

File: 20161104_205146.jpg (961KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

961KB, 2048x1152px

>>17825642
It made a huge difference in my rx7, it added alot of low end bump. Try to find a twin-scroll turbocharger. It gives low and high end power.

>>17825642
dat comp out angle!
You can get Mitsubishi TD05 16G that spin to opposite way, would make a much nicer install.

If I were OP I'd go supercharged. There's just something about a supercharged V8

Fair warning, you will split the block above 450 crank hp.

>>17825915
I have a twin scroll here, used to drive a NA v6, now have a twin scroll turbo 4 cylinder with more HP. Nothing beats NA bois (except maybe a supercharger)

>>17825976
looking for 400-450whp.
I have a 351w that is hot tanked/cleaned. Having a manley rotating assembly for it. Just going to enjoy my 302 til it pops.

File: dClTJMp.jpg (3MB, 2992x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2992x2000px

My '14 GT is my first supercharged car with the exception of a 98 GTP i had that doesn't really count.

I've done a lot with turbo DSM's over the years between 400-500whp.

I'd say that even at 300-400whp the DSM felt faster but mostly because of the way the turbo comes alive and also just because you're in a tin can where you feel everything.

For street manners and just all around fun you can't beat a good blower setup. My TVS setup on my GT is ridiculously fun on the street as it comes alive instantly and torque is there whenever you want it.
Outside of WOT it drives like stock too. Drivability with a decent sized turbo around town can be a bit more tedious but still easily doable.

From what it sounds like you want I'd definitely say go with a blower. For longetivity I'd go with a roots style. Centrigual is still a great setup though and often will do better on the top end.

>>17826192
Is that a Roush?

File: cat2.jpg (75KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 960x540px

>>17825642
5.0 Supercharged with a tune. Putting 503hp to the rears.

File: 1504646293971913347719.jpg (3MB, 1836x3264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1836x3264px

Muh abarth

Tiny engines with high boost threshold is p gay for a DD. I miss an automatic and torque for traffic but this thing is fun as fuck when you are driving moderately aggressively to canyon carving

>>17825642
>Forced Induction
>nitrous

>>17826866
its clearly a saleen you dumbass

File: shot.jpg (164KB, 1022x571px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1022x571px

What do you guys think would be more fun in the long run? A cammed/tuned 2zz swap or a 1zz turbo with forged pistons/rods?
I just love those choo choo noises man

>>17826960
I think I know a Shelby when I see one you misinformed cunt.

tarbo or nuthin fagboy

>>17829012
>turbo lag
nothx

>>17826966
There are nice supercharger kits available for the 2ZZ-GE. But if all you want is a rush of torque and choochoo noises then you can do a 1ZZ-FE turbo for cheaper.

>>17830436
>autism, the post

I'd have more fun with a turbo probably.
I have a 94 Grand Prix SE Coupe with a L67 swap. Intercooled, bolt ons, 3.2" pulley.
Lotta fun but its easy to max out the stock supercharger. Turbo would be more fun on the smaller motor.

I think superchargers are more suited for v8's that supplement the already good torque.

File: 20170602_211630_resized.jpg (497KB, 1383x778px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 1383x778px

Does this even count?

>>17830595
>Pressure Cooker/Crockpot in engine bay
what a time to be alive

this thread will die. FI cars usually make power.
/o/ is trash and drives nothing but shitty na econoboxes and glorifies them to make themselves feel better about not being able to afford anything that isn't bottom of the barrel shit-tier

Question regarding superchargers:

How do they operate in regars to the engine. I understand crankshaft pulleys and RPM, but reading upon a supercharged Mercedes from the 1930s, the supercharger would activate only when the gas pedal was fully depressed. Does/did it have some kind of bypass to allow the engine to run N/A when driven gently, thus better fuel economy, but boost when you wanted or needed it? How is the technological progress?

File: 4pceXFc[1].png (242KB, 1080x929px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1080x929px

>>17830622
How else am I supposed to stay fed on the road?

>>17832193
Might've been some kind of clutched supercharger.

File: IMG_20170904_001811_854.jpg (3MB, 2988x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2988x2988px

The strain they put on the crankshaft is a factor in reliability and the instant hit of power maybe detrimental to the drivetrain.

Gone are the days of unreliable turbo power. A modern single turbo system is dirt simple and with an easily servicable, cheaply rebuildable turbocharger.

Theres probably 2 foot of total vacuum line on my system

>>17832193
well with the throttle plate partially closed the super is pushing against it and not fully boosting the engine, at rpm below like 3000 its not going to boost at all but above that you might see a few psi just from the speed of the compressor

>>17826905
Why would you waste 4chan's server space with an image this bad. You do know this is an image board, right?

File: IMG_2042E.jpg (2MB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1440px

Here's my current setup, GTW 3684R(6262) made 366kw on a stock motor with e85

>>17834295
Because I was sitting on a curb and my car was there

>>17834327
You took a picture of that tubro'd mom ford that happened to have your car in the shot. Next time just post a stock photo of your car.

>>17825680
how do you tune ?

File: IMG_20170725_152315913_HDR.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>17834491
I can post the same picture I always post of my car if it makes you feel better

File: 20170808_145755.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

poopercharged

File: 20170813_154357.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

my dsm has a 20g turbski

>>17826905
thats a nice picture of a fucking street you got there

>>17834319
ausfag?

if so join the aussie /o/ discord
https://discord.gg/UFy68b

>>17835022
I'd charge that pooper

>>17832193

Clutch on the pulley and a vacuum operated bypass plate. Progress wise, still get clutched blowers like SC12,SC14 and SC20 and bypass plates still used like Eaton M45, M90, M112.

>>17834319

Love the puke tank, where did you pick that up?