What was the point of the Prelude when the Accord coupe also existed?

plz respond

>>17821652
Fuck you.

>>17821654

Thank (you)

File: xbhvac1.jpg (77KB, 579x1024px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 579x1024px

I made a thread like this, and it only evoked emotion from JDM loving Prelude faggots that would not accept that the V6 Accord was better in every way except appearance.

the prelude was the basically test car for all of honda's new tricks. hence the name prelude

Accord would be like the Thunderbird. Prelude, the Mustang.

Or having both a Challenger and Charger in coupe forms (and the Dart)

Or GM having several coupes at the same time, Camaro, Chevelle, Malibu, Impala AND the Nova.

You've obviously never driven either. Two entirely different cars. That's like comparing an 83 2 door Impala to an 83 Camaro. Both are 2 door Chevy's. Should be the same thing.

>>17821821
You would be right except an Impala was about 400+lbs heavier than the Camaro, whereas an Accord Coupe and Prelude both were just under that 3,000lbs mark.

What makes me mad is that people act like the Prelude was a light car, but it was seriously big fat in its day of Fox bodies and Thunderbird which did share the same lightweight platform.

>>17821752

What am I looking at? Whats that red goop in the coil?