The strength of rotary engine is not inherently the power it

>>17805048
Rotary cars aren't the only cars to have 50/50 weight distribution

File: misfiringuh shistemu.jpg (95KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 500x375px

>>17805048
>>17805058
no car is really complete without an AWD system and a powerful turbo !

File: 23348549376_b62dddc34e_o-565c25b9a9de7[1].jpg (71KB, 700x467px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 700x467px

*blocks your path*

>>17805067
that thing has 50/50 weight diskhasjdhjasdtion?

>>17805078
Ever so slightly rear-biased, even. 49.x/50.x.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-13 at 1.10.16 AM.png (512KB, 1010x602px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 1010x602px

>>17805084
That's not ideal !

50/50 isnt ideal

>>17805048
LS fags on suicide watch

>>17805048
Does the engine spinning create a gyroscopic effect that stabilizes the car around corners?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-13 at 12.45.18 AM.png (644KB, 776x644px) Image search: [Google]

644KB, 776x644px

>>17805111
ma nigga

File: shingu.png (107KB, 229x229px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 229x229px

[TEPID OSCILLATIONS]

>>17805111
I thought that was athe flywheels job.

>>17805094
50/50 is ideal for handling in a corner. A rear weight bias is ideal for acceleration, such as when coming out of a corner.

>>17805089
>>17805084
That means you ruin your ideal weight distribution as soon as you take a shit.

>inb4 not having small weights in your garage to compensate weight variations throughout the day

>>17805212
no it isnt

45/55 or 40/60 is ideal

even F1 is 45/55

>>17805237
>I can't read: the post

>>17805237
oh and this is assuming rwd

obviously you wouldnt want something like that on a ff

>>17805250
I can read

you are just retarded to think 50/50 is ideal anywhere

but lol muh initial d maymays amirite

>>17805048
>>17805089
>ideal 50-50 weight distribution
This is utter bullshit which sadly way too people believe. BMW's marketing department sure has done a good job with this one.

Anyway the only time 50/50 would be the ideal weight distribution would be when endlessly turning around a corner that stays perfectly constant while also keeping your speed 100% constant. The fact is a car with rear weight bias is better during both acceleration and deacceleration than one with 50/50 one not to mention one with front weight bias. Former is due to having more weight on drive wheels and weight also moving towards rear wheels while accelerating and the latter is due to static rear weight requiring less forward brake bias as load is more evenly distributed among all four wheels under braking.

The ideal weight distribution is somewhere between 46/54 and 40/60 and there is a reason all high end sport-, super- and race cars have their weight distribution on that range.

>>17805259
You just proved you can't read by think I said 50/50 is ideal anywhere, or even overall.

You stupid cunt.

>>17805237
No, that really depends on the specifications of the tires.

>>17805280
>50/50 is ideal for handling in a corner
> by think I said 50/50 is ideal anywhere, or even overall.

lol you really are retarded

fucking Australians lmao

File: Toyota_MR2_(SW20).jpg (34KB, 575x320px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 575x320px

>>17805097
>FR fags on suicide watch

Fixed that for you.

>>17805271
Is that why the Corvette Z06 has a better skidpad rating than some hypercars

>>17805972
Here is something for you to think about the skidpad ratings: many fwd and awd cars usually get better skidpad scores in tests compared to roughly equivalent BMWs but no one in their right mind would say they handle better on track or spirited street driving.