redpill me on the current m3 lads

It's a BMW.

It's overpriced shit.

>>17802228
Its a BMW.
Its an M sport model.
The suspension and handling is top notch for anything with a front mounted engine. They're reasonably fast, and sound alright too. Interior is typical BMW aside from the M sport steering wheel and one or two other things depending on how you option it. They've got tons of leg room which is nice, BMW is one of the only companies with a stock interior that I actually love.

If you like the way they look, and like the interior, there isn't a ton to complain about. The turbo i6 doesn't roar like the V8s though.

>>17802228
F A T
A
T

>>17802228
Pigfat, get a 2003 e46

>>17803593
>this car's too heavy
>get a slower one instead

>>17802228
My problem with it is that there's no reason to get it when the M2 and M4 exist

>>17802271
Yeah, the NA I6's and V8's sound much better. The turbo I6 can be okay too with a muffler delete and possibly new downpipes.

>>17802232
Sour grapes

>>17803762
>"My problem with it is that there's no reason to get it when the M2 and M4 exist"

>implying nobody needs 4 doors

>>17803767
I drive a 4 door bimmer, the thing is instead of an m3 you'd be better off with the m5. It just doesn't have the identity of the previous gen m3's. It's not as comfy as an m5, not as fast as an m4 and heavier than an m2

File: CJq5F17WwAAZhY4.jpg (17KB, 534x379px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 534x379px

>>17802232

>>17803634
just replace the engine then faggit

>>17803634
Handling is important too

>>17803954
>>17803593
even though E46 M3 is one of my dream cars the F80 M3 outhandles the E46 stock for stock and the F80 M3 only is about 50kg heavier than the E46 M3.

>>17803634
better slow than fat

Say what you want but it looks absolutely stunning with the competition pack.

>>17804971
k.