Would you rather have a 2500lbs 300hp car or a 5000lbs 600hp car?

>>17789462
2500lbs 600hp

File: 1488550135279.jpg (4MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5616x3744px

>>17789462
This thread again?

File: 14719186_1316714071696132_3445316464410624000_n.jpg (137KB, 1080x881px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1080x881px

>>17789472

File: _MG_3054.jpg (810KB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 5616x3744px

>>17789478

>>17789462
2500lbs 300 hp

mainly because its close to what my car already is

File: _MG_3012.jpg (848KB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

848KB, 5616x3744px

>>17789485

>>17789467
FPBP

File: IMG_0293.jpg (106KB, 769x769px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 769x769px

>>17789490

File: 1478141519972.jpg (2MB, 1588x2124px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1588x2124px

>>17789494

>>17789485
Ok come on, where's her penis

>>17789507
That's a girl

File: 1503057248730.png (254KB, 560x416px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 560x416px

>>17789512
>girl

>>17789462
>2500lbs 300hp

>>17789462
5000lbs 300hp

I'm not even kidding, just give a car with a comfy interior and Bose suspension and I'm good.

Brotha, that's a bad question. The relation of power/weight is the same, so acceleration will be nearly identical BUT handling wise, the 2500lbs pound car will always be superior, and by a big margin.

A better question would be:
2500lbs/300hp
Or
4500lbs/600hp

>>17789760
umm no sweetie it doesn't work like that ok

>>17789765
Please, educate us on your perspective.

>>17789472
Fugg that's a beautiful Z. Those tires are perfect.

>>17789760
its not directly proportional

>>17789490
your stickers are shit

File: z15682.jpg (68KB, 1280x775px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1280x775px

Light is right.

>>17789462
get both and engine swap them
if that's not allowed 2500lbs300hp all the way

>>17789760
Top speed of the heavier one will be higher unless it's a fucking brick because more power.

>>17791668
It's because momentum

>>17791702
No you fuckwit it's because drag is squared with proportion to speed so you need lots of power to overcome it. Weight has very little to do with top speed, the only real effect weight has is increasing rolling resistance with deformable tires. If the 2500lb 300hp car and 5000lb 600hp car have the same cd and frontal area, the 5000lb car will have a considerably higher top speed despite having similar acceleration.

File: 1499488559004.jpg (88KB, 678x678px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 678x678px

>>17792059
>5000lb car will have a considerably higher top speed despite having similar acceleration

File: 557.jpg (38KB, 680x793px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 680x793px

>shoes on the chassis

ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING

>>17789472
>>17789476
>>17789478
>>17789497
im so disappointed that shes not a trap

>>17792167
The last one isn't the same girl

>>17792180
i wasnt clicking on all the images i was just looking at the thumbnail :/ but still super disappointing

File: 326159487.png (237KB, 377x288px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 377x288px

>>17789462
6000hp 300lbs

>>17789462
>2500lbs 300hp car
This. Mainly because it would actually be possible with the car I currently own

What the hell is a lbs anyway

>>17789745
>bose suspension

i don't think boss makes those

File: seat-suspension-technology.png (457KB, 635x673px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 635x673px

>>17794061
It's a thing.

>>17789485
>>17789494
>>17789497
>butt prints

one of my many regrets from college...
which was well worth it...

>>17789462
2500lbs with 300hp = car
6500lbs with 600hp = suv/truck

I prefer a car.

File: 1274225913567.gif (837KB, 384x269px) Image search: [Google]

837KB, 384x269px

>>17793850
Labels.

>>17794061
>>17794077
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KPYIaks1UY


that fucking leap at the end

>>17794141
>Butt prints
>what did he mean by this desu

>>17794222
Nice trips...

In college a lot of girls liked to sit on my cars front fenders slowly making noticable dents with their butts. it would keep them warm before the doors opened. I'd have to take a picture one day but my fenders are wavy from all of their butts.

The plus side, I got to use a lot of those butts.

>>17789462
A 2,500 lb 300hp car would absolutely fucking dominate a 5klb 600hp car in every single measure.

600lb 5000hp

I'll always take heavy and powerful over light and less powerful.

Love me some high powered cruisers. I drive on straight open roads a he'll of a lot more often than I every get to see twisties.

>>17794663
You realize that the lighter car would be faster right? 5000 lbs is RR territory

Depends on what I'm going to use it for. GT cruiser? I want the fat boy with 600BHP. Track rat? Lightweight.

>>17794669
And I far rather drive a RR or S class for 1000km on a straight road than a 300hp civic.

I've always driven heavy comfortable cars except my echo.

>>17789462
2500lbs 300hp
>cheaper parts
>lower wear rate on components
>dramatically better handling if all else is the same
>dramatically better fuel economy
>Better handling means higher corner speeds means its faster everywhere on the track

File: IMG_0324.jpg (1MB, 2048x1326px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1326px

>>17794410
>fucking fat chicks

Sad!

File: 1491861978781.jpg (70KB, 809x433px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 809x433px

>>17794155
wut?

>>17789462
I dd a 3300lb 60hp car, both of those are for casuals.

Lighter is right-er

2500lbs 300hp. Even if you can get those 5000 lbs moving slightly quicker breaking would be an issue.

>>17795372
Right? Fuck hydraulics
But of course in typical Bose fashion
>too expensive

>>17789462
2500 lbs, 300 hp will get better gas mileage.

>>17794155
>>17795622
Too expensive and too heavy

Modern day airmatic and magnetic dampers are better anyway. Even the new Ford Fusion can tuck a wheel when it detects a pothole

>>17789462

Scales and dyno say I have a 3,280 lb car with 592hp.

Your options suck.