Alfa Romeo

they have plenty of shitboxes that you can buy for like 400 euros lol.
also i think the stelvio will be cheap?

>>17764077
But I live in Amerifat :/

>>17764113
besides the 4c and giulia alfas are just cheap fwd shitboxes, not much better than fiats.
if you want a cheap fwd shitbox rather get a civic. an alfa is not worth the hassle

i want new brera, no matter whatever it will cost

File: 144574698768.png (44KB, 163x129px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 163x129px

You still don't get it.

All those flaws are "character" and"soul". Also, you have "passion" for still caring for it!

Alfa owners love it!

>>17763976
>car that is bellow $80k and doesn't have numerous service bulletins

Friendly reminder that the cars that had problems are only the Quadrifoglio and not the normal models.

The problems were all fixed with ecu updates and according to owners in several forums the very most of them have flawless cars.

>>17764854
according to giuliaforums the giulia is quite unreliable actually.
And it's not just the Q that is having trouble, there have been several standard giulias that have broken down during reviews, can post links if you want.

>>17764878
>according to giuliaforums the giulia is quite unreliable actually.

Top kek

An owners forum is a magnet for people who have problems, just because they all go there to search for infos...especially if it's an exotic car.

I read that forum and the are many people who are satisfied without problems and are aware of the fact that there are trolls and corrupted magazines that have jumped on the bandwagon of the Alfa Romeo = unreliable meme.

I don't know what to say honestly, I heard different owners and they all have perfect cars with minor problems which, like I said, were fixed with ecu updates.

It's pretty normal considered that the Quadrifoglio is a "supercar" with its specific engine and way less beta testers, on the other hand the normal Giulia works as expected, being it petrol or diesel.