Is /o/ prepared for the eclipse?

The only time I ever got pulled over by the cops is driving one of those shitboxes. Fuck those cars and fuck cops.

>>17753430
In my eclipse right now getting ready for the eclipse

>>17753514
well they are a dirtbag teenagers car

File: IMG_0970.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>17753430
Yep. Sitting here waiting for totality

>mfw still kinda want a built gsx

Since we're having this thread I might as well ask, how possible would it be to find a nice GSX and daily it?

>>17756427
impossible, they're all bagged to hell and back.

File: IMG_4494.jpg (92KB, 800x525px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 800x525px

>>17756427
Nearly impossible. RIP

File: IMG_4495.jpg (212KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1024x768px

Is this year biggest /just/ in automotive history?

File: 2012-mitsubishi-eclipse-gs-auto-coupe-angular-front.png (2MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1360px

>>17756477
no this one is

File: eclipse_cross.jpg (52KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x480px

>>17756505
no, this one

>>17753430
I unironically want an eclipse 2nd gen because i like how they look. Dont care if its an heavy ass FWD shitbox i just like how they look.

>>17757075
>not knowing 2.0 turbo AWD version od Mitsubishi Eclipse second generation

>>17756427
>>17756437
https://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/cto/d/1999-mitsubishi-eclipse-gsx/6267282152.html

https://norfolk.craigslist.org/cto/d/1999-mitsubishi-eclipse-gsx/6262023509.html

>>17757082
II know about the GSX you tard. What i meant is that i dont care if i have to get the shitty FWD versions (easy to make AWD anyways, same chassis and suspension i believe) I would still buy one.


First car i REALLY fell in love with when i was a toddler.

>>17757085
>(easy to make AWD anyways, same chassis and suspension i believe)
and u call me a tard? fuck u

>>17757095
Bitch please.

The FWD and AWD share the same fucking engine and chassis.

>>17757097
>The FWD and AWD share the same fucking engine and chassis
nope, not the engine, and what about rear wheels drive? u need something more to swap fwd to awd, your'e so retarded lol
still i think the brakes disk are different most of the times in more powerful versions, there will be much more problems during this 'simple' conversions

File: 1497672604234.jpg (5KB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 245x245px

>>17757118
>u need something more to swap fwd to awd, your'e so retarded lol
>not understanding the concept of AWD vs FWD and how to convert one to another
>calling others retarded for not being able to grasp such a simple concept yourself

Let me get this crystal clear for someone breaking one of the rules of 4chan:


The eclipse 2nd gen (no idea the first one) use the same base chassis across the FWD and AWD variants, they also use THE SAME ENGINE in THE SAME LAYOUT. Which means that up until the engine is placed in the chassis the car can be both an AWD or FWD car.

Its not until the transmission and other parts that work to become AWD go in that it becomes AWD.

If the car already has a tunnerl for a shaft, and has a rear suspension that allows for the easy input of a rear differential and such, the car is VERY easy to conver from the FWD to the AWD model compared to a car SPECIFICALLY made to be FWD.

I dont know how to make it any easier to understand.

>>17757130
>willing to spend more $ 4 conversion than just buy the all wheel drive one
your'e still stupid, but i guess it's not my problem, so fuck off

>>17757143
>if you dare to do something with hard work instead of buying the easy way you are stupid

Ok millenial faggot.

Tell me when the FWD will get cheaper because will AWD become unobtanium.

>>17757146
millenial faggot is ur boyfriend, i'm older than your dads, both of them

>>17757146
i've checked: u need at least new engine , gear transmission, ECU, differential, axle shafts, rear suspension, lol

>>17757186
>new ECU
No shit
>new engine
They literally use the same fucking engine you stupid retard
>differential
No shit.
>axle shafts
No shit
>rear suspension
Light mods, no shit you cant use a stock FWD rear suspension

Do you really think that i meant "stick a shaft in the middle and call it an AWD"? Are you really that dumb?

>>17753430
wait i thought it was already announced