>buy "sports" car >its front wheel drive

A thread died for this vapid shit.

>buy "sports" car
>it can't beat a mini van

File: IMG_20170820_185334665.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>buy hot hatch
>Isn't practical
No ragrets

>>17751798
At least they did a great job with the exhaust

>>17751766
>thinking drive type determines sportiness
>understeer v. oversteer argument
>breaking grip
it's like you don't want to be fast, suspension design is superior to steering with power

>>17751805
Probably my favorite part of having a garage

File: IMG_3939.jpg (309KB, 688x1434px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 688x1434px

>>17751794

>>17751766
Dont be a fucking itsuki. Just because its FWD it doesn't mean you cant enjoy it or have fun with it.

File: GT86_BTFO_again.png (602KB, 661x604px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 661x604px

>>17751842

>>17751821
it doesnt follow, what did you mean by this?

>>17751766
>buy "sports car"
>it has manual transmission
>it isn't front wheel drive
ugh like whats even the point, automatic is faster and fwd doesnt spin out

>>17752433
cold starts sound louder

File: lotus_elan_01hr[1].jpg (795KB, 2000x1335px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 2000x1335px

>>17751766

Problem?

File: GT-86.png (1MB, 912x905px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 912x905px

>>17751842
>RWD is always better than FWD
>but m-muh drifting
>it needs shitty tires in order to "drift"
>mfw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKJ0eNHu5vk

>>17752469
wew lad

File: ra-set-34-_erik_hoffman_1_copy.jpg (188KB, 720x403px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 720x403px

>>17752467
*blocks your path*

>>17753334
*overtake in my faster car*

>>17751766
Next time shit in the toilet instead of 4chan, you boring cunt.

File: IMG_3552.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>17751798
>not practical
Not if I have anything to say about it

>>17753340
*torque steer and lose control in your shitbox, die*
The 90's Elan is like the transgender demiqueer son of the original elan
How dare you stand where he once stood

>>17753356
How is the reliabilty ont his? I have a secret love for the 500 but the general reliability consensus on the Fiat is bad and that stops me from buying one.

>>17751766
If it was manufactured as FWD it was never a "sports car". Just because the marketing Jews think it will sell better with he word "sport" being attached to it, doesn't make it a sports car.

That's like buying a leather dress shoe and making the lining inside bright red and stamping the word sport on the sole. Its still a thick leather dress show useless in every known athletic sport. It was never a sport shoe.

It was never a sports car.

>>17753360
i've driven my mum's elan, it doesn't really have much torque steer (if any), and you have to be a really bad driver to lose control in it, it's like glue on the road.

>>17753368
Ironically the 500 is a pretty damn reliable car. The 1.4 multiair and Tjet engines had their bugs worked out a long time ago and are some of the toughest that Fiat has built. Fit and finish-wise, it's about what you'd expect for a budget Italian car, so don't go in expecting a quiet highway cruise with no rattles. Electronics are good so far, and my clock is still keeping accurate time, so I give it a rating of spicy/meatball. Only problem that seems to come up relatively frequently in forums is front suspension seems to wear quicker than it should, but I haven't noticed any problems on mine. Just keep in mind that it's not a perfect car, just a cheap one that's fun to drive.

File: 1471742878662.png (2MB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2000px

>buy "Smart" car
>it's a piece of shit

>>17751766
The definition of sports car and just sports in general when used for car descriptions are entirely arbitrary

>>17751842
I always find it ironic that someone spent hours to make an image to reply to a line of text