Why doesnt any car maker make sleak, minimally designed cars?

>>17738934
Minimal luxury? Like paying more for less?

File: corolla.jpg (63KB, 717x478px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 717x478px

>>17738934
Consider this: If you fuck up pic related somehow (one little bit of plastic gets scratched, a button comes off, something breaks, carpet tears or something) it isn't going to annoy you that much because you have the rest of the interior to distract you; one small part damaged in a vast sea of other parts. When there are only a few parts you can destroy, you'll feel much worse about damaging something. I feel like these interiors can't withstand wear that well, and they aren't going to age very nicely.

>>17738941
Sounds like Porsche to me.

>>17738934
>I want to control everything with a shitty touchscreen

File: e5189706f57044003c3599df3295ead2--audio-amplifier-hifi-audio.jpg (31KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x480px

>>17738965
You can have buttons

File: model-3-cabin-original[1].jpg (264KB, 2113x1552px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 2113x1552px

>>17738934
Musk wins again

File: -Volvo-.jpg (320KB, 2100x1575px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 2100x1575px

>>17739650
Well, Tesla hired the head of interior design from Volvo. I like most the interiors of Volvo's. Not too busy, just right amount of simple lines and still some buttons in the older ones.