What does /o/ think of this guys reviews?

reviews are fucking stupid and for autists and normals

>>17735235
Yeah, like why would anyone want to know information about a product beforehand? Everyone should just blindly jump into every purchase that make, especially on something as expensive as a car.

>>17735270
Information is listed in the product descriptions on manufacturers websites.

You really need some fag to tell you if it rides bumpy or not. Exactly how the stereo sounds?

Everything about a car that is relevant and objective can be learned by the published figures and your own personal and hopefully extensive experience. You should be able to know how different a 200hp motor in a 3000lb car feels as opposed to a 400hp motor in a 3800lb car.

The rest of it, just how stiff a suspension is, just how much road noise there is, etcetera, are all subjective. If you don't drive it for yourself you are going off of some jack weeds opinion with his own bias and subjective history of experiences that have and should have no bearing on your opinion.

The rest of it, how reliable a brand is, how easy or expensive the maintenance is, the more intangible aspects are universally objective. You may think a BMW is premium luxury and reliable, others may think it is down market and wonky. There is nothing a guy in a video can tell me that I dont know about BMWs in general, and if I want to know exactly how a particular car feels I can go and drive it.

Video reviews are pathetic instruments of self promotion delivering abysmal levels of useful information. They are indeed, as so well put by another poster in other words, for normies and for people who have some kind of obsessive compulsive mental disorder and need to seek opinions to validate thier own opinions.

What some armature dick weed on YouTube has to say, a dickweed who has never manufactured or marketed a car, never sold or resold cars professionally, and has no concept of journalistic professionalism or the realities of the automotive world with decades of experience in some related field of automotive, racing, and journalism, what that fuck wit has to say is of no relevance. You may as well get your opinions from the wall of a men's restroom. They will be as vulgar and useless as YouTube car reviews.

>>17735385
I'm not autistic to bother reading that gigantic wall of text but I'll guess it's garbage and continue reading reviews on products before I buy them like almost every other first worlder.

>>17735385
I find youtube reviews to be somewhat useful if the narrator knows what the fuck they are talking about and isn't spouting their inane opinions about the car every five seconds:
>Hurr Hurr this seat isn't comfortable
>This car can't turn for shit lmao xDDD
>Bumpy ride yikes

Compared to:
>This car sports a 4.6 liter modular V8 naturally aspirated engine
>Car is 212 inches in length, 92 inches in width, etc
>Car has a TH400 Transmission which is 3 speed and has ratios that are X, X, and X

Reading will usually do you loads better though.

nice and qt lad no homo

>>17735182
You mean his gun show?

>>17735182
i want him in my bed