What company mergers according to you could produce a really nice car?
Toyota and Subaru could, but they didn't quite make it.
Mazda and Koenigsegg
nissan and mazda
>>17697608
I think you meant to say Mazda and Pagani
Toyota and Alfa Romeo
>>17697626
Reminds me of the complete disaster that Nissan - Alfa Romeo partnership was
A bland Datsun Cherry with Alfa internals, literally all the things that could be wrong, were wrong.
Volvo and Mitsubishi.
Oh wait.
Honda and Mclaren
>>17697624
Pagani doesn't even make engines
>>17697594
Mosler and Honda.
Mosler provides a very lightweight chassis and Honda styles its and supplies an engine.
>>17697624
Pagani does not have any tech to produce, all they can bring is design expertise, and even then their interiors are subjective IMO.
Koenigsegg brings Freevalve and straight gears to the table, and Mazda brings Skyactive-X and maybe rotaries, although I don't see how those could work with Freevalve, but hey, tech is tech
>>17697684
Engine they could use.
>>17697594
Rolls Royce and Kamaz
>>17697594
buell dodge
>>17697664
>>17697624
>Pagani doesn't even make engines
What'd you think Mazda was in for? Design? I want a Pagani with a rotary beast.
>>17697797
>I want a tackier and overdesigned RX-8 Renesis for $2 000 000
No thanks, I'll stick with Koenigsegg, even though their interiors are still sub-par
Nissan and Chevy, so they can produce the fastest nur lap time vehicle and the shitposting can /spoiler still continue
Lotus and Mazda
>>17697608
>Freevalve HCCI engine
Muh dick
>>17697993
>Rotary
>Cams
>>17697594
AvtoVaz and Toyota
Cars that will last 1000 years.
>>17697997
>rotary
>good
>>17697736
Dodge and Chrysler are officially SHIT at everything now. Their trucks are shit, their are even shittier.
FCA needs to die.
>>17697997
>HCCI
>Exclusive to rotaries
Are you aut
>>17698017
Isn't Mazda's HCCI research primarily under the wing of rotary research?
That's the impression I got, anyways. Or is it just Skyactiv shit.
>>17698026
All the diagrams seem to be piston engines
>>17698132
hmm you might be right then
>Computer controlled valvetrain
>Computer controlled ariable compression
>Computer controlled ignition timing
How long until hackers can grenade your engine?
>>17697797
>Pagani with a rotary
you meme engine is all but dead, deal with it
Hyundai and Subaru
>>17698026
Skyactive-X
>18:1 compression ratio
>60% thermal efficiency
>over 50mpg
>virtually no Nox
>supercharged
Where were you when Mazda saved internal combustion?
Result of the greatest collab ever
>>17698184
my negro
>>17698151
Probably now, just look at tesla
Pagani & Koenigsegg
>>17697594
Another good one imo would be Lotus and Ford
>>17697594
Mitsubishi and Chysler produced some nice cars in the 80s and 90s. But as recent history has shown, these teamups usually are really just meh. Too different cultures meshed together is tough to overcome.
>>17697594
>mazda
>renault
spinning dorito twingo when?
>>17697594
Hmm, let me spin some wheels here.
>Lotus and literally any big makers
Lotus part would die, but it would do wonders for the other carmakers' handling dynamics.
>Mazda and Toyota
Mazda part would make it drivable; Toyota would make it livable.
>Jeep and
Wait never mind, that brand is cursed.
>>17697594
Ferrari and Ford. Just once, just for old time's sake.
Probably wouldn't even be any good. But I still want it
>>17698491
>Infighting and obscene gestures over Ferrari and Ford GT
I'd watch it on the fucking reality show.
The script will write itself.
>>17698498
Kek
Not to mention both teams would think they're superior. Lexus would be able to produce one and a half supercars before FerrFord could agree upon a chassis
>>17698491
I think you can finally then call them "FERD"?
>>17697624
Mazda and Pagani are the shittiest combination I've ever heard.
>>17697594
Toyota and Ferrari?
They could build a dream supercar and when people people finally get to afford them, they don't have to worry much on things breaking down.