Mustang vs Camaro

>>17672935
F-Body is peak performance.

1st gen best Mustang
3rd is worst

1st gen best Camaro
4th is worst

>>17672935
Fox body is always the answer.

File: WM_Mid-Ohio-1970-06-07-016a.jpg (37KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x420px

Always liked the 1st gen mustangs, from there on the mustang kind of went downhill until the 3rd came and sort of revived the market for them. At one point the Ford Probe was going to replace the mustang, imagine a modern day probe.

1st - Mustang looks better, Camaro is better at everything else
2nd - Camaro
3rd - Mustang
4th - Mustang
5th - Mustang looks better, Camaro is better at everything else
6th - Camaro

File: WM_Mid-Ohio-1969-06-08-006.jpg (41KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 800x420px

>>17672950
I guess I can say the same for the Camaro. The first gen is best gen as far as value and well.... everything else. My uncle has one he recently restored and theyre alot of fun

>mustang
3rd gen
>camaro
3rd gen

>>17672935
My opinion based on looks
1: mustang
2: camaro
3: draw
4: Mustang
5: Mustang
6: Mustang

File: download.jpg (7KB, 261x193px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 261x193px

>>17672935
everything after 3rd is bloated safety standard garbage.

File: WM_Spa-1973-07-22-024.jpg (62KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x420px

>>17672962
Dumping pics to brighten up the thread

File: WM_Daytona-1974-12-01-088.jpg (40KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 800x420px

>>17672982

File: WM_Laguna_Seca-1976-05-02-021.jpg (50KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 800x420px

>>17672992

File: WM_Road_Atlanta-1977-04-17-021.jpg (44KB, 800x420px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 800x420px

>>17672998

>>17672935
1st camaro by a little bit but both got good
2nd camaro by a landslide
3rd camaro foxbody is an ls swap donkey making it a cuck to the camaro
4th is close but I have to say mustang because of the irs, dohc 4.6, and the fact it didn't get cancelled
5th mustang camaro was sort of lacking
6th camaro for sure, more power better lap times doesn't have down syndrome and doesn't kill crowds

Theres like a whole styling gen missed in that graphic between 3 and 4. its the only one mustang ever looked better. camaros have always performed better.

The 1993-1996 SN95 Mustang is easily the ugliest fucking mustang ever made.

>>17673083
the sn95 is the worst mustang ever made, it had like 200hp and was ugly as hell

>>17673092
have you never seen a foxbody or a 72-73

>>17672935
Camaro- 4th.

Mustang- 3rd or 5th. I like the 4th tho too.

The new gens are alright looking too but I think Dodge is far superior.

Didn't the camaro die and then transformers makes it cool?

>>17672935
6th gen mustang is best mustang
Early 2nd gen Camaro is best camaro
Just talking aesthetics here
Of all 12 the 6th Gen camaro is fastest but I'd prefer the 2nd gen camaro

File: IMG_0194.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>17672935
That's not a bad looking 2nd gen

Trans Am all years

>>17674187
No Camaro between 2002 and 2010 (the 2010's concept came out in 2006). It did not come back for Transformers. It was just a marketing stunt.

File: 00i0i_6H3sJPb6Pa4_600x450.jpg (14KB, 253x450px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 253x450px

Foxbody is best body but then again I'm biased

>>17674355
>want a 4 eyed t top fox badly but too attached to my current car

>>17674366
It's my first car and I still have it not many gt Turbos still around

Since I don't have experience driving them, going by looks alone:

1st gen Camaro
2-3rd gen burn them all
4th: Mustang but only post facelift
5th: tie
6th Mustang

>>17672935
>make beautiful looking cars
>progressively make each generation uglier and fatter

:/

>>17672935
1st gen: mustang
2nd gen: camaro
3rd gen: camaro
4th gen: mustang
5th gen: mustang
6th gen mustang

1st gen mustang is the best

>>17672935
By looks alone:

>Mustang
1st is best, 5 and 6 are also good.
3rd is worst, 2 and 4 are also bad.

>Camaro
I actually feel it's generally gotten better each generation except the 3rd.

>>17674411
What's wrong with 4th gen Mustangs? They look nice and sleek. Same thing with third gen camaros.

>>17672953
I'm inclined to disagree on the 5th gen. The '13 gt500 is possibly the greatest mustang ever created. No Maro able to compete with that. Otherwise I agree with pretty much everything you said here.

>>17674390
The 2005-09 mustang was pretty great

>>17674414
They both look "cheap" to me. But that's just my taste for looks.

>>17674418
I do like the body but do I absolutely despise the 4.6

>>17674450
>460 will fit right in

File: tumblr_static_filename_640_v2.gif (2MB, 498x278px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 498x278px

>>17674481
Oh god yesssss

File: IMG_0857.jpg (812KB, 2000x1446px) Image search: [Google]

812KB, 2000x1446px

>>17674501
Its one of my dream swaps. Only a handful more years until you can pick up rolling chassis for less than 3 grand

>>17674522
I remember seeing something on a mustang forum about someone wanting to do this but for now I'll have to stick to my GT Turbo

File: IMG_2386.jpg (36KB, 350x258px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 350x258px

>>17672935
>itt: pic related

How can people think Fox body and Fox body derived cars are good? Like I get being a Ford fan and appreciating them but how can you look at those dorky, short, narrow, tall roof, boxy things with faggy little engines and an ancient economy car chassis and go "this is great, this is the ideal performance car"?

>>17674562
Damn

>>17674548
And what does anon drive?

>>17674548
V8
Rwd
Cheap

Boi I dunno you tell me

>>17674600
Prices on foxbodies are going up
Soon everyone will be sucking the dick of the 4th gen F-body but I'm already on that bandwagon

>>17674612
Yep once that pass the 6k dollar range they aren't worth it in my opinion

>>17674600
I understand that's enough, it's just weird to me when you put it beside another car that is also V8, RWD, cheap, and doesn't look like an econobox cosplaying a muscle car that people would still pick it for any reason but brand loyalty.

>There are people in this thread that believe the 302 can be a performance engine in 2017
Foxbody apologists are just the worst

>>17674638
TurboFoxanon here the 2.3 turbo is a damn good performance engine

>>17672935
Camaro
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang
Mustang

>of all 12 which is best
1st gen Camaroc

>>17674638
The only problem with the short deck Windsor is that the block was designed for an engine around 260 cubic inches. Going too far over 500 horsepower can split the block down the lifter valley

File: 1970Camaro_4-1024x683.jpg (161KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1024x683px

>Anyone saying the Mustang II is better than this
I didn't know this board was full of wrong faggots.
Also 4th gen mustangs are fucking trash

>>17674713
IIRC they made what was essentially a giant girtl to hold the block together

Why is 1st gen mustang the 68 or 69 fastback? 64-66 a best mustang

>>17672935
Mustang
Camaro
Mustang
Camaro
Mustang
Both look like ass

>mustang
6>3>1>4NE>5>4>2
>camaro
6>3>2>5>1>4

>>17672945
>3rd gen mustang the worst
kys normalfag

>>17676235
>my shit taste makes me a special snowflake

lol

Foxfags are the worst

>>17672935
1. Tie (leaning mustang)
2. Mustang (wtf Camaro)
3. Draw, leaning towards the Camaro though.
4-6. Mustang
Props to 5-6 Camaro though, finally reeled in the tistic design language, and followed ford's retro bringback.

File: datass.jpg (130KB, 800x425px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 800x425px

>>17674716
>Also 4th gen mustangs are fucking trash

not all of them

File: 1502034976036.jpg (179KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 640x640px

>>17672935

File: 1501523163271.jpg (53KB, 564x428px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 564x428px

>>17672935
1: Stang
2: Camaro
3: Tie
4: Stang
5: Stang
6: Camaro

>>17672935
5th and 6th gen rook same.

>>17676493
will the 7th gen camaro even have windows?

>>17676531
do view ports count as windows? it'll have killer back up and lane watching cameras that display on the new 20" led in dash touch screen infotianment screen with OnStar™

File: 1996-Gen-4-Camaro-SS.jpg (426KB, 1600x1101px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 1600x1101px

why would you post the wrong 4th gen

>>17672935
turd gens a best

File: 1989 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z.jpg (45KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x450px

holy hell, does nobody like the third gen F-body twins? why the hell are they so damn expensive, then?

>>17673057
swap 5&6.

>>17674620
foxes are quite light and are among the easiest cars to turn into 1/4 mile monsters.

File: 2015-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-vs-2016-Ford-Shelby-GT350R-Mustang-front-end-in-motion-03-e1449777757263.jpg (43KB, 660x438px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 660x438px

To me the 1st or 5th.

>>17676235
>kys normalfag
Foxbody is normy as fuck you faggot

File: LScatfish.jpg (45KB, 480x347px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 480x347px

>>17676549
sorry the ls1 mollystomps the lt1

looks:
lt1>ls1

Performance hands down:
ls1>lt1

File: colonial.jpg (66KB, 960x638px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 960x638px

>>17674548
I think the liftbacks look nice once fitted with the right wheels. The 302 is extremely cheap to make 300+ crank with, and once you fall in love with th exhaust note an h-pipe gives you you can replace all of the old suspension geometry to get something that handles. Visibility is also god-tier and they have truckloads of storage space.

>>17676235
Normalfags hate 2nd gen the most tho

>>17677007
Normalfags see the front and think it looks just like the first. Then the fox dares to try and evolve the styling and you get "hurr not not a real mustang".

>>17677013
If the fox had pop-ups, we'd all drown from the fanboy cream

File: My 1973 Mach 1 Neffsville Show.jpg (1MB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x1200px

>>17673105
>72-73 years
>bad

kys

>>17677320

this is my favorite mustang

its a BIG mustang

>>17672946
Yes, if the question is "What is the biggest piece of crap"

>>17676976
>tfw I wanted a foxbody so bad but it was 270$ a month for liability because my veeyate
>tfw I had to settle for a miata and turbocharge it.
>turbo miata makes same hp but costs me 62$/month

Fuck insurance company jews I want a foxbody damnit

>>17677990
Could have you a mustang svo or took one of the base model 2.3s and put a turbo on it

>>17677990
>257 a month for liability
Jesus Christ I pay way less and I just turned 21. For what it's worth the miata is a better platform to start with, you're just gonna have to live without the 302's exhaust note.

4th gen camaro (specifically the z28/SS) is sex

>>17678435
I know and I also really like the styling of the lift backs and all that comfy space. I'll probably get one one day when I make a bit more money.
What's crazy is that I don't have any accidents or tickets on my record i just committed the crime of being 19

>>17672935
i unirionically fucking love 3rd gen even more now

File: 1971-chevrolet-camaro-ss+front.jpg (28KB, 459x345px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 459x345px

>>17672935
Early Second Gen Camaro
Best Gen Camaro

>>17672935
Mustang is better than Camaro in each Gen except 2nd and the Foxbody is the title holder.

>>17672935
1. A close one but I'd say Mustang.
2. Camaro
3. Camaro
4. Mustang
5. Mustang
6. Mustang

>>17672935
damn i didnt know the 3rd gen camaro looked that cool, now i want one. I dont suppose those ever reached europe right?

File: 3[1].jpg (125KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1000x667px

>>17679876
there's plenty of thirdgens in europe, both camaros and birds

They really look a LOT better in real life than on pictures too

>>17677320

Definitely not bad. No one wants them so they're cheap. My only problem with them is the amount of rust that builds up at the firewall and cowl.

>>17677320
pigfat ugly garbage

>>17674417
What about the Z28 which ate it on the course? Or I guess
>MUH PONY CAR AND MUH ZERO TO SIXTY

>tied
>camaro
>camaro
>mustang
>hate both but if i must choose, mustang
>both getting uglier, but I choose camaro

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x640px

>>17672935

There are no winners in the third and fourth generations, how can Americans defend this?

>>17681301
Cheap as fuck on both sides, the camaros are more expensive but actually handle.

3rd gen all day everyday.

>>17676657
because most of them have been wrecked.. i'm sitting on my 89 until it's worth 20k.

>>17672935
>1st - Camaro
>2nd - Camaro
>3rd - Mustang
>4th - Mustang
>5th - Mustang
>6th - Mustang

lol

File: 1502034976036.jpg (205KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 640x640px

the only answer