How safe is your car?

File: greyhound-bus-2.jpg (342KB, 1800x901px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1800x901px

>>17657401
nuthin personnel

File: hqdefault.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

Its not

Don't care to be honest as long as it has seatbelts.

Honda Fit

Bretty gud.

File: api-rating-image.ashx.jpg (130KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 800x675px

seems ok

File: 1ae8c0133c35663ba4917679e1e07c3c.png (992KB, 1245x663px) Image search: [Google]

992KB, 1245x663px

bretty safe for a 1983

Fiesta ST, apparently it's excellent.

No airbags/10
I don't use a seatbelt tho
So in an accident
I should be thrown clear to safety

File: 1501179765189-int.jpg (27KB, 385x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 385x385px

>>17657730
>I don't use a seatbelt

File: hqdefault.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>17657401
Looks fine

>toyota
my outlook is not so good

File: safety.jpg (56KB, 831x730px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 831x730px

Pretty safe it seems.

File: shabaz-cartman-screw-you-guys.jpg (11KB, 251x244px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x244px

>>17657742
>Replying to bait

File: CF10022#04.jpg (126KB, 1508x1508px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1508x1508px

Bad, very bad.

Then again, it was built more than a decade before small overlap sooo...

File: CF10022#17.jpg (197KB, 1508x1508px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1508x1508px

>>17660544
Also rusty ass subframe.

My same model and trim, doesn't look that good. Door is completely fucked. But is pretty hard for a car too look good in a 25% overlap crash.

Overall I feel mostly safe driving my car, my mum has some shitty Chevy Spark that will cut you legs if you have a frontal crash.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (239KB, 1872x1404px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1872x1404px

>>17660575
Forgot pic

>>17660554
>>17660544
Doesn't look that bad imo for a 25% overlap test. The door is still mostly on its place, so it means your left arm won't get ripped off.

>airbags
overall pretty saf-
>airbags by takata
lemme call my insurance agent

File: d3295bc585cc3c147a19f2696c8c8806.jpg (40KB, 568x328px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 568x328px

>front smashed in, windshield intact

Not bad for a car that was largely unchanged from it's introduction in the 70's

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pjDYbIFxJrM

Looks ok, I mean pretty bad by modern standards but in its day it was a tank. I think I would survive without major injury considered the large distance between driver and steering wheel. Yeah I'm a dirty phoneposter

File: api-rating-image.jpg (133KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 800x675px

>>17657401
It got an A on the moderate overlap, so probably less fugged than anything else its age besides a Volvo or Saab, but still pretty fugged

https://youtu.be/x3DkdBugQAY
Could be worse, I guess.

File: 1997-1999_Holden_VT_Commodore_Executive_sedan_(100_kilometres_per_hour_wreckage)_01.jpg (3MB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3072x2304px

https://youtu.be/dr9HSMZ3OIQ

Side impact and Foot space aint that great but frontal and rear do okay

these cars are built like fucking tanks dont let these vids fool you

>>17661061
https://youtu.be/qUoE5YTdWPI

Had dual front and side airbags for a 2001 car pretty advanced

>>17660694
Impressive

File: ch2ta.jpg (60KB, 648x417px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 648x417px

>>17657401
It's alright

>>17657401
Could be worse, I guess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpxyNCrSnNA

File: maxresdefault.jpg (247KB, 1872x1404px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1872x1404px

>>17657401
It was an IIHS top safety pick for 2016

>>17660544
For a 2001 truck, that's actually pretty good.

File: Passengerfrontquarterinyard2.jpg (103KB, 1006x577px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1006x577px

1994 hardbody,
The passengers of this car apparently survived so id say is pretty safe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v947gVIZZdY

>>17661880
But why did you buy a vw?

>>17663610
Because I like it and don't take /o/ memes seriously.

>>17663627
good answer

File: w211.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

Pretty good I'd say,

W211 Mercedes E63. All 4 and 5 star safety ratings from the NHTSA.

File: Screenshot_20170804-132017.png (993KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 2560x1440px

>>17657401
Good enough. Actually have the coupe, couldn't find a test video for it.

>>17663654
German cars in general seem to do very well in crash tests.

File: hqdefault.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>17657401
Not great but fine, starting 98 Twingo structure was reinforced, mine is a 99.

File: 1499994824567.jpg (69KB, 611x548px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 611x548px

>>17661880
>>17663610
>>17663627
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C52kyLzquW0

>volkswagen fans will defend this

An early r32 with no door bars

im fucked m8's

Toyota aygo, like the rest of yurop's wagecucks. Bretty fugged m8

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (266KB, 1872x1404px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1872x1404px

Top safety pick!

>>17660544
I didn't know the IIHS tested cars that old in the small overlap test. That's pretty cool. I want to see more old cars put through that test.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ5PRd_X6-E


Not too great.

File: Screenshot_20170804-175313.png (693KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

693KB, 1920x1080px

> Very Low Risk of Injury
Also side crash test gets a "Good" score with some risk of injury.

File: fhcrash.jpg (24KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x360px

I'll be fine.

File: 2dd.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>my car has no crash test rating

File: 1225586799601.gif (2MB, 216x162px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 216x162px

mine'll buff out

Tfw cas was never crash tested

>>17661880
I've got a Golf from 2010, it was IIHS top pick back then too

>>17663627
Good shit bro me too

File: fiero.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

>>17657401
It'll buff out

File: photo_2017-03-24_15-25-00.jpg (183KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1280x720px

safe as fuck

>>17665744
>korean shitbox
>safe

File: IMG_2582.jpg (138KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 800x675px

>dummy may have suffered a broken leg
>but the institute decided the risk for injury was not high

File: 1406843847474.gif (158KB, 209x193px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 209x193px

>>17665744
>korean desigined
>assembled in gud ol usa by jim bob so u know its gud

its also got fuck tons of airbags and a ridged chassis

File: 1411945902318.png (32KB, 128x128px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 128x128px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0aahh8AOYw
Pretty fucking good, not bad for a Shitsubishi.

File: CF09008#04.jpg (102KB, 1509x1010px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1509x1010px

>>17665025
They only used these during the early development tests for small overlap.

Here's a Kia Rio which got absolutely crushed

File: Challenger-post-crash[1].jpg (142KB, 1100x400px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1100x400px

oh fuck...

>>17666233
Most FCA cars are fucking death traps.

>>17657401
Incredibly safe considering I am not a shit driver

>>17660575
>But is pretty hard for a car too look good in a 25% overlap crash
Check out the 2015 Hyundai Genesis:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGFX1d8dj-U

>my mum has some shitty Chevy Spark that will cut you legs if you have a frontal crash.
The Chevy Spark got the same rating of "acceptable" in the small overlap test, but the Focus might be safer in a head-on crash with the Spark due to its higher weight.

>>17665866
New Korean cars have some of the highest ratings.

I have a rusty NA Miata soft top. probably the least safe car I could buy. I just use it for beach cruising though so it's not a problem

dodge avenger
solid

File: api-rating-image.jpg (117KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 800x675px

Top safety pick +

>retard drives on wrong side of road
>car is designed to protect that retard
to what end

File: 1241149615284.jpg (22KB, 405x444px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 405x444px

>>17666557
>To what end
The infinite mass of your bait and ignorance combined.

1996 chevy 2 door tahoe. Can't find anything

File: 1501265751208.jpg (60KB, 625x582px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 625x582px

http://www.nydailynews.com/autos/nissan-350z-named-deadliest-car-insurance-institute-highway-safety-suvs-high-safety-mark-article-1.132403

Oh well

File: api-rating-image.jpg (133KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 800x675px

I'd probably live albeit insanely fucked up

File: ss+(2017-08-05+at+09.56.33).jpg (46KB, 591x377px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 591x377px

I think i'm okay in most situations, especially considering it's age

File: JUSTFUCKING.png (143KB, 228x227px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 228x227px

>>17666233
>watching them yank off the foot in the video

File: hqdefault.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

Am I ok?

File: saabcrash.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

>saab
am undeadable

File: 1423371707890.jpg (38KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 413x395px

>>17666233
>So deadly it has side curtains so you don't see the mess inside

>>17657401
ZX-6R...

>>17666380
looks kino af

i wanna have a crash in this car

>>17657401
>tfw too terrified to even look up how badly a NA miata did

>>17663696
coupe here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBK7NIHcL6w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddDLuROY-wI

gud enough

File: mazda-mx-5-2002_front_june02.jpg (106KB, 359x239px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 359x239px

>memiata
>Adult(male) occupant: 4/5
>pedestrians: 1/5

Noice

File: 2C9C64E2-FB32-4C3B-A5A4-3B9BCDC61BA5-16297-000005FBD1BB47C0_tmp.png (102KB, 426x210px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 426x210px

It seem like an absolute death trap, but the frunk is actually pretty strong
Front and rear test 3/5
Side 2/5
Lol nvm it's still gonna kill me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci2hyLuRiBc

Probably get some fucked up legs, but otherwise alright. Tbone on driver is death tho

>>17667347
in a similar vein, fiero's had pretty damn good crash test ratings, at least for the 80s. id feel better in one of those than the cooler looking ricebox.

>>17657401
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOqaSTvFrjE

alright i guess

>>17657607
>>17660595
>>17665741
>>17667347
Today cars are crashed on the front corner.

>not testing handling and stability
What's the chance to get in a crash in first place?

File: IIHS Mini Crash 1.jpg (53KB, 1682x990px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1682x990px

Pretty awful actually.

File: VolvoS70.jpg (12KB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x188px

>Volvo 850
>safer than anything you drive

File: Volvo_850-S70.jpg (129KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 800x675px

>>17667645
>>>>>>>>>

>>17657545
I rear ended a honda fit the otherday held up well.

>>17667674
nice photoshoop m8

>>17667510
Extremely high when drunk driver Joe plows into you at a red light going 60.

>>17667683
>100% of crashes are caused by drunks

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-05 at 18.18.54.png (683KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 800x1000px

>when you had enough and you decide to drove off a cliff

>>17667730
>drive

File: saab_9-5_ad-54eb56388291d.jpg (82KB, 1000x1399px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1000x1399px

>>17667645

File: api-rating-image (1).jpg (114KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 800x675px

>>17667936
Pretty decent, got IIHS TSP+. The 16 model was actually less safe.

File: 65 kmh crash on front corner.jpg (99KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1280x720px

>>17667868
lel

>>17667609
Damn good shoop, still had me mindfucked.

>>17668120
kek

>>17667693
I think his point was that no matter how good of a driver you are, you cannot control what other people do, so you should want a car to be as safe as possible.

File: IMG_0619.jpg (17KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x168px

Make way boys, [indestructable] coming throug.

File: CS10002#16.jpg (151KB, 1508x1508px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1508x1508px

>>17668228
the weak should fear the strong

>>17668189
>you should want a car to be as safe as possible
But that's what I meant. Testing car's handling should be a port of a safety test.

>you cannot control what other people do
So you are saying that car's handling won't effect its safety at all? People tend to crash after they lose control because of slippery road, wrong speed or because of sudden obstacles. You might as well crash into somebody else because of the car's poor handling properties and you will be the ''other''.

>>17660694
feels pretty good

>>17657401
VW UP. Something like 9/10 for driver, front/rear passenger, etc, safety. Literally everything but pedestrian safety, which is a 4. The car of choice for people who don't like pedestrians.

File: Screenshot_20170805-190617.png (100KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1080x1920px

>>17668372
The Chad safety result.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (244KB, 1872x1404px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1872x1404px

>>17660694
>us market

Parents drive a 2016 Toyota Corrolla.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIBc2uW9vTU

File: logan_2005_front.jpg (10KB, 280x168px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 280x168px

Seems decent

>>17668403
Renault has one of the best safety ratings.

>>17668242
Did the GEM driver die?

>>17668387
>when you become one with the engine

>NA Miata

I'm a dead man

>>17668778
?

ND miata,


it got a 4 out of 5 in crash test but lol im a realistic . Its a small convertibles If I crash it im a dead man

no regrets though car is fun as hell

>>17667295
Cool, thanks man.

File: FJ crash test.jpg (82KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1280x720px

>>17657917

BoF SUVs always seem to score pretty well, the short frame is so strong that they just bounce up and over anything they hit.

>>17658466

Only in trouble if you drive a 90's Tacoma, then it'll fold in on you.

>>17668813
didn't notice it was a corner test, nvm.

File: paralyzed.jpg (49KB, 301x450px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 301x450px

>>17663452
>The passengers of this car apparently survived
>survived

Yep, here's the driver today: a 2017 softbody.

File: qt13.jpg (135KB, 1080x784px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1080x784px

>>17657917
>>17668869

For reference: they smash whatever they hit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daMfY4Lo3CA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi2vTjpE8Yk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgbSoE0cxrA

>unibody trash BTFO

File: Picture-121[1].png (604KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1200x630px

The safest car ever made

>>17668928
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QlZgqU-tJE

>>17668928
Unless it's RWD that could kill you when the traction control fails while driving on slippery road.

>>17668921
Thic

>>17657401
Apparently pretty good from the front and absolute shit from the side

File: daewoo.jpg (39KB, 443x294px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 443x294px

oh shit

It would fail every safety test these days. It does have seatbelts (for the front seats) though.

>>17667240
Pretty fucking safe here my surviving brother.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QlZgqU-tJE

>>17666811
Thats why my Z insurance is so high compared to my friends significantly newer V6 Stang huh

>>17666233
>using a limited availability color for the crash test car

File: i can't stop laughing...gif (2MB, 230x175px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 230x175px

>>17669958

It appears that FCA ensures it is a death-trap.

Very Italian Mafia Style

>>17669909
Look 6 posts up. lol

File: 4 star.png (121KB, 510x182px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 510x182px

>>17657401
Could be worse i guess.
ive been in a 100km/h crash in one and had no injuries too if that counts toward safety points.

>>17670004
Yeah, saw that after I posted and scrolled down.

Too bad people learned why SAABs were so great after they were gone.

>>17670029
>gone
Mine is still parked outside.

>>17670049
Mine too, but the brand is dead.

File: Screenshot_20170805-203738.jpg (323KB, 1304x1055px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1304x1055px

I'm good

>>17670060
Most of people just crave for cheap stuff and they'll buy every crap that's wrapped nicely. Till it's no good, they'll trow it out and buy the next brand new crap. That isn't the way our environment can be healthy.

>>17670144
Too bad big jews makes it expensive to help the environment.

Here you get money from scrapping your old car even if it's totaled.

But the answer to the problems is what /o/ can't deal with since they haven't matured enough to take it.

Here we pay $8.6/gallon and we don't exclude trucks from strict emissions.

File: bbb885f598d814428ab6c35ed14374c5.jpg (117KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1024x768px

>>17657401
What is safety

>>17670181
The crumple zone is your face

File: 7879042a0999df26391c722d901487f6fb88c610c6b7946597778068b7f8b688.jpg (308KB, 640x632px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 640x632px

>>17670185

>>17670181
>919
I'm pretty sure you would crash yourself for riding something so plebian

>>17670199
t. a nobike

File: Henry-Fords-1941-Car.jpg (950KB, 1200x1650px) Image search: [Google]

950KB, 1200x1650px

>>17670155
Would the governments let us to have a free energy source if there would be one? No, cause even the hemp is illegal.

File: 001.jpg (48KB, 600x467px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 600x467px

>>17670205

>>17670217
Same with the person that made the engine run on water.
greedy jews ruin the world.

>>17670226
This.
Hitler was right about the Jews.
if only he was more successful with his ovens.

>>17670304
And now the jews are fucking up Europe with the immigration program.
Why?
So they can get back on christianity while playing innocent and then reek in more money.

>>17670331
Fairly sure their plan is to try and convert most of europe over to communism, the immigrants will make communism seem more cool.

Thats what jews do, it is why hitler hated them so much.
commie bastards.

>>17670338
communism, capitalism, both are shit.
socialism without ass licking the weak is the real solution.
But the current socialism is run by faggots instead of strong willed people that build the future.

File: 455467576567865.jpg (42KB, 1249x390px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1249x390px

5 stars baby

>>17660585
it doesn't look too safe

>>17668372
How can a car be safe for pedestrians?

>>17666811
>>17669932
Supposedly they have good NHTSA ratings though so maybe that's a statement to the people who tend to drive them

File: ss+(2017-08-06+at+10.50.54).jpg (161KB, 1378x739px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1378x739px

Thought it would be worse. Having an airbag would be better I guess

>>17667609
>Creates a wormhole to a safe destination when threatened
Noice

>>17668412
Yeah, but i'm not expecting much from a car that costed 7500 eurobucks new

File: Screenshot_20170806-112208.png (213KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1080x1920px

>>17657401
Top score for both the IIHS and the EuroNCAP

I suppose that with today's standards it would probably struggle to reach an acceptable score though

>>17670181
Ask honda
https://youtu.be/0kWu8mvXDaE

>>17665938
>literal trash trash so stupid he cant quote the correct post

File: api-rating-image.ashx.jpg (106KB, 800x675px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 800x675px

>>17657401

>>17672436
I'm sure I'll be OK

ez
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxer6QMxbNg

File: audi-embedded-lowestoft-house.jpg (152KB, 942x530px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 942x530px

Babe im home alone

>>17670351
> Socialism is good
> Just no one has done it correctly yet!
Open up a histroy book my man

>>17666233
Eh, niggers drive these so nothing of value is lost