Pick one: http://www.strawpoll.me/13601642
F-40
F-50 is a piece of shit, and everything newer is so over-complicated in their design that they would not make good track competition cars due to the time it'll take to do anything on them
>>17648245
>not picking enzo
The only ferrari car to ever get his actual approval.
For me, it's the F50.
the one in first place.
>>17648245
She's the only one for me
>>17648245
>F40 on top with 48% votes
Never thought I'd witness /o/ having good taste in cars.
>>17648415
F40 a overhyped shit.
Enzo > F40 > F50 > LaF > 288
I'd take the LaF though just because it's most modern.
599 GTB
>288 that low
nice summer
>>17648258
>>17648291
>(incorrectly) regurgitating old Top Gear nonsense
F50 easily
>>17648245
The Ferrari TheFerarri.
i like a pretty face and those are some ugly sisters she got
>>17650038
This.
If you didn't pick the F40, you're objectively wrong
>Try to prove me wrong
>Protip:
>You fucking can't
>>17648291
Enzo Ferrari died 14 years before the Ferrari Enzo came out, how could that be true?
>>17653693
Build quality is go kart shite, you 12 year old.
>>17653727
Well yeah you fucking mongoloid
The F40 is a red, overbuilt go-kart with a wing and turbos strapped to it, what the fuck do you expect?
If you want impeccable build quality go buy a Rolls and shove your head up your ass
>>17653727
And? It's a race car designed for winning races. It's not supposed to be a Rolls Royce. That's what cars like the F12 Berlinetta and 456 are for.
The 288 GTO anyday of the week
>>17653746
>>17653749
>f40 defence force activate
>all these nostalgia-riddled F40 babbies
The F50 is better than the F40 in every metric save looks, and it's almost there as well in that regard
>>17653790
>save looks
I legitimately think it looks better. It's subjective, you can disagree with me, but the F40 does not aesthetically appeal to me, the F50 does.
>>17653782
>>17653795
as much as I love the F50, the 40's mix of boxy and curvy make my penis harden
>>17653796
pic related
>>17653819
not an argument :^)
my argument is that the F40 is completely inferior to the F50 in all performance metrics, because it's older and not as powerful, light or better-handling
>>17653829
And none of that matters because the F50 looks like absolute trash and the F40 is one of the most beautiful cars ever made. The F50 could have 300 more horsepower and be 10 seconds faster on your track of choice and I would still pick the F40 because they let Helen Keller design the F50.
Also, the F50 is heavier by 62 pounds.
>>17653852
>And none of that matters because the F50 looks
Then F40 performance arguments shouldn't matter to me because the F50 looks better to me.
:shrug:
>>17648298
This is like picking the mr2 spyder over the sw20
>>17653871
I own an SW and I prefer the F50 over the F40. Don't know why this bothers anyone. 90s design does more for me than 80s.
>no 512bb
>no 250 GTO
>250 LM
this is my favorite though
>>17648245
Can someone explain why F50 is so low?
no contest
>>17654059
Memes. An opinion gets popular, people start agreeing with it, it snowballs until it's the "accepted point of view."
>>17654064
This, 100%.
I had one of these bad motherfuckers as a kid, so it's the Enzo for me.
>>17654097
Oh shit, I had the same one. I forgot about that.
>>17654097
I had the entire collection of windback ferraris when shell was selling them every time you bought $50 gas
>>17653707
Wow, that's kind of spooky now that I think about it.