Is it worth tuning/modding any kind of civic other than a si?

>>17634091
90s Civics (all trim levels) are a blank canvas. You can do basically anything with them and it will be fairly cheap if you source your parts carefully. New Civics are bloated and overweight, the last "good" one (not including Type R) from an enthusiasts perspective was the 8th gen Si.

Newer civics/accords are a waste of money to mod unless you're adding boost, they're already maxed from the factory for the most part.

There's people that have done the basic intake/header/exhaust and ended up at stock dyno numbers. Just buy a faster car to begin with.

>>17634282
>enthusiast perspective
You mean giant faggots that like their car sounding like an angry lawnmower being pursued by a swarm of bees?
You civic fags should just do an hero, all of you.

>literally no torks
>need to rev to the moon to actually put out any power
>sound like absolute shit

>>17634430
>diesel
>fiat

File: 1497568283105.jpg (103KB, 969x969px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 969x969px

>>17634430
Europoors that are unironically cucked to the point of actually driving a diesel fwd 1.3 cuckbox es are not allowed to have opinions on /o/

Honestly civics should be kept stock, even the Si which is quick enough not to be boring but never actually fast. This gets people tempted to mod them for questionable gains and rarely does anyone dedicate to actually spending hilarious amounts of money on a JDM K20 or a huge turbo setup and never actually gets their honda to go fast.

>>17634552
>800 hp and 9 second passes
>Not fast

Lurk more

>>17634567
I was saying quite specifically that most people don't actually put in the effort to get up to a mere 200 HP with their mods, let alone doing something cool.

>>17634430
Houston, the tripfag is triggered.

>>17634503
>>17634567
>muh simple mods
You're pathetic.
Civics are straight up garbage. Deal with it weeb.