This is the only good Ferrari ever made. Prove me wrong. >ProTip:

>>17604544
I can't, it's literally the only one I like

yet its worse than pretty much every newer supercar tier Ferrari

overrated pleb machine tbqh

File: 1498139779666.gif (1MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x150px

>>17604593

>good
>Ferrari
There's the flaw in your argument.
If you said least shit Ferrari this thread would be given a chance.

>>17604544
Most overrated, overpriced piece of shit ever

>>17604898
I always liked the testarosa more. It looks a bit more charming.

its ugly, uncomfortable and doesnt even go that fast by todays standards

>>17604544
Just because it's the best doesn't mean it's the only good one

File: Ferrari_288_GTO_London.jpg (1MB, 2800x1575px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2800x1575px

Consider yourself disproven.

>>17604995
I swear 70's and 80's super car rear ends were the best.
You got the upswept design with visible exhaust and you usually caught a glimpse of suspension and differential.

File: lewd yellow bird.jpg (544KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1600x1067px

>>17605018

>>17605048
Those light grey exits cant be the fucking exhausts can they??

>>17605060
wastegate. There was lots of turbocharging going on with the CTR

File: ferrari-mythos-02.jpg (71KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x768px

>>17604544
You wrong.

>>17604544
No way, that car has nothing but problems.
It wobbles at higher speeds, the panels rattle and can come unglued.
And you can't see shit out of it, so changing lanes is a great way to get killed.
It was incredibly fast for it's time, but it can't really compete with the cars they put out later.

Ferrari F150

>>17604593
>spotted the millenial middle-eastern

It's like the Cobra: a bare-bones minimalist sports car.

Remember the Italians (and most sports car enthusiasts) don't consider what others call sports cars to be sports cars.

To sports car fans, a sports car is a bare-bones machine made solely for performance.

Everything else is a GTB or GTS.

File: 2ch83y8.jpg (40KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 960x720px

>>17604995
288 GTO > F40

>>17604898
Sex

You're right OP, I can't.

File: IMG_20170604_104558.jpg (3MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4640x2610px

>>17606167
>>17604544
>Bare bones, pure enthusiast pleasure
>Turbo

Pick one

>>17604995
Nice Ford.

File: 1413154631321.jpg (398KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 2048x1536px

>>17605018
they had different ideas about aerodynamics back then
in the 60s lift and drag reduction was the goal
then towards the 70s down-force starts to come into play

File: Ferrari-Tractor-model-85-2.jpg (620KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 1600x1200px

>>17604544
>ProTip: get fucked op

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpht4k_VBhE

File: b74ed6de7323bacccc7a1a36e271b9c2x.jpg (118KB, 1200x849px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1200x849px

Hate me all you want but I like the GTC4Lusso a lot. If I was a millionaire I'd definitively make it my daily driver.

>>17609840
Saw a 612 here last week.
Sweet ride

File: ferrariff.jpg (290KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1920x1080px

>>17609840
unsure if the FF and this are different cars, but fuck yeah shooting brakes

File: 975281289204.jpg (139KB, 1022x651px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1022x651px

>>17604544
>Never won Le Mans

F40fags BTFO!

File: 975281289204.jpg (246KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1024x683px

>>17605340

Nice Diablo.

>>17609889
>shooting brake
Two door station wagon nigga. No one is taking their dogs and rifles to go hunting on the estate in one of those.

>>17609987
Why not? It's not crazy low, it has pretty much the same ground clearance than a normal luxury car

>>17604544
>Ferrari LaFerrari
>Ferrari FXX
>Ferrari FXXK
>Ferrari 599XX Evo.
>Ferrari F12 Berlinetta
>Ferrari GT4C Lusso
>Ferrari 250 GTO
>Ferrari 288GTO
>Ferrari Enzo Ferrari
>Ferrari 458 Speciale
>Ferrari 488GTB

Choose any of the above.

File: ugh.png (198KB, 911x669px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 911x669px

>>17609944
>mfw choosing between Diablo and Mythos in TDIII

File: ferrari-456-venice-station-wagon-2.jpg (80KB, 500x288px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x288px

>>17609889
>>17609840
the only right answers plus mine, anything else sans the tractors is normie tier.

File: IMG_0002.jpg (17KB, 220x128px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x128px

>>17604544
Why no love for the Scuderia?

File: ferrari-enzo-desktop[1].jpg (160KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1280x800px

>>17604544
You wrong

File: 1962-Ferrari-250-GTO-V1-1080.jpg (409KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 1920x1080px

Are you all just being edgy contrarians?

File: Ferrari-250-GTO-Talacrest-10-Autovisie.nl_.jpg (677KB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 2000x1500px

>>17611236
My bad. Since it's a contrarian thread, I'll have a blue one.

>>17609889
They're somewhat different ones

There are two versions of the GTC4; one with the naturally-aspirated 12-cyl and AWD, and another one with two-wheel-drive and the usual V-8 twin turbo ecoboost-clone more and more sports car producers are using.

>>17610924
Dont like the big flat space behind the rear window. It looks like they had no idea as how to finish the car design.

>>17609648
Can you guess why the Ferrari-snobs consider this car so important for Ferrari?

>>17611465
>Can you guess
Nope. Please enlighten.

>Ferrari-snobs
People who own Ferraris?
Have a high opinion of them?
Like them to exclusion, what?

>>17611489
It's the first Ferrari NOT designed by Pininfarina, Scaglietti, or anyone else, and is the first designed in-house by Ferrari itself.

>>17611501
>It's the first Ferrari NOT designed by Pininfarina, Scaglietti, or anyone else
Really?
It shows.
So, Ferrari is of the opinion that those styling houses were dead weight, and they should've been doing all of the design themselves?

Because I can't really say I agree

>>17611513
The 488 was also designed in-house even though it's just a re-tooling of the 458.

That's why it lacks the Pininfarina badging too.

That's not the F50

>>17611523
I wouldn't have fucked with a good thing.
For me, Pininfarina was one of the biggest reasons their cars looked so amazing. I wanted a 328 at one time, and their styling of it was key.

>>17606167
Sports cars are gay

>>17610924
Except it's looks aged like dog shit. Everytime I look at it I like it less.

>>17610340
Scuderia has a very dated design too. The headlights look way too small for the car and it appears to sit very high.

>>17611236
>>17606419
>>17604995
>>17604898
>>17604544
Gorgeous timeless design

>>17609648
I'm interested to see how this design ages. Currently I like it a decent amount, even if it does seem a little overly busy

>>17611756
>Scuderia has a very dated design
Meh, I'd prefer to drive that over a 512 or an F40, although if I was given a choice of car, I'd take the F40, as I could sell it for the most.

>>17611774
As a daily, I'd absolutely agree.

For any other reason than dailying I will be taking an F40 please.

Although, if I was told I would be given an F40 free of charge but I had to daily it, I absolutely would.

>>17611873
Probably location dependent.

It's crowded enough where I live that I have to fight through some of that freeway/traffic bullshit just to get to the good roads. That part is hard enough to do in mine, much less one it's hard as fuck to see out of, like an F40.

If I had great roads at my door, I'd switch though.