Which and why?

Neither

>>17601400
Challenger. I don't care about new (1972+) cars at all and my favorites before that are the 2nd gen Charger and first gen Challenger.

>>17601400
None bevause all bollocks

File: 2005-Ford-Mustang-GT-coupe-silver-in-motion.jpg (548KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 2048x1360px

>>17601400

Challenger because of looks

Or a 2005 mustang

Challenger because it's the only one out of all three that even remotely resembles muscle.

1Le (least pigfat)

>>17601412
>>17601503
>>17601494
my niggas

Same for me, but for different reasons. I absolutely hated driving the camaro and the mustang being the main one.

camaro because it looks like an angry asian

Everyone in these threads always recommend the challenges, but do any of you own one? Mustang and camaros are a dime a dozen.

>>17601584
I borrowed my dad's 392 for a few months and put 20k on it if that helps

>>17601400
Challenger, because I have kids and need the space, and it's nice to cuck the dads driving minivans.

if your looking for a true muscle car you go with the challenger, if your looking for a car that can do it all and looks good get the mustang, camaros are slacking in the looks department in my opinion

I'll take a Demon for the dragstrip, a GT350R for the track and an auto ZL1 for a daily. Please and thank you.

>>17601689
Mustang and Camaro are equally short on looks. Neither does it's progenitors justice.

>>17601584
Its a meme because /o/ is contrarian like every other board.

It goes like this:
Camaro for performance, challenger for looks, mustang for compromise.

Mustang.

I can see why people love the Challenger so much, and honestly if it could keep up with the mustang I'd pick it as it also looks great, but also since 2013/14 I've loved how much they've improved the mustangs aesthetics.

And the camaro... maybe if this was pre-70's and the other two didnt exist lmao, the first gen camaro was a classic but it never stood a chance to the other two, just downhill from there.

>>17601703
If you want to drag race a challenger you can do so much better than a demon for the price.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ujztm5hV1Bs

>>17601400
The 'Maro is the lightest and has the most aftermarket performance.

>>17601737
No doubt. I wouldn't have to worry about smogging the Demon, though.

>>17601703
But a ZL1 1LE rapes the GT350R on the track.

>>17601751
>smog state
Oh, lol.

>>17601763
ding dong your opinion is wrong

File: gt350R_vs_Zl1.jpg (128KB, 839x792px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 839x792px

>>17601763
but MUH DRIVAN FEELS BRO

>>17601781
It was actually a second faster in a previous session.

>>17601763
Maybe. I won't put any effort into defending a Mustang but the GT350R is lighter and sounds great. If I actually had a budget it would be just a ZL1.

File: IMG_20161224_122321.jpg (3MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4640x2610px

>>17601584
I was really close to buying one. But it just didn't have the performance I desired.

>>17601778
It's not his opinion. Research lap times.

>>17601778
Are you fucking stupid? The 'maro beat the gt350r by like 15 seconds around the ring.

File: 1453761345554.jpg (30KB, 570x574px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 570x574px

>>17601871
Was with you until you said "the ring". not that it matters since there was a head to head.

>>17601871
>'maro
>the ring
#yolo360noscope420
we eatin senpai
#vapenation
You finna cop dem yeezys?

Cayman

File: 25542a5e-263b-4a7c-9bfb-607b9c9c4817.jpg (328KB, 1280x1421px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1280x1421px

>>17601894
way to move the goalposts faggot

>>17601887
>>17601894
>I can't refute his statement so I will construct a straw man around his terminology and attack that instead

Mustang. Less fat, less ugly, better engine, better handling.

Dodge or mustang.

Camaros are for faggots and women.

>>17601763
The Stang is down over 100hp and over 200lb-ft. In terms of how it drives, it feels more like a purist sports car.
>>17601781
>muh feels
If you are not racing your car professionally, lap times are *literally* worthless compared to feels.

File: IMG_20170610_000038.jpg (2MB, 4070x2461px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4070x2461px

>>17601584
I do, what would you like to know?

I chose it because it's plenty fast on the take off and in a straight line, there aren't any twisty roads here. I think 2015-current is the best looking of the three. And I know nobody buys a performance car for comfort or practicality but this thing is such a comfy cruiser for road trips and has tons of space both cabin and trunk. My only complaint so far is the placement of some of the buttons on the console, they are too low. I guess to make room for the touchscreen. And you'll bump your wrist if you have bottled drinks in the center cupholder. Minor stuff but I think it's a great car and absolutely do not regret choosing it over a mustang or camaro

>>17601964
>Camaros are for faggots and women
Does a single gay person or female drive a Camaro? Gays and girls buy cars for styling, and the Camaro looks like an angry pissed-off tryhard next to the other two.

>>17602150
idk man. I see more women driving camaros than the others. It's either a latina in a white camaro or a black woman in a black camaro x100

>>17602091
What year did you get? I'm still kind of butthurt that FCA backed out of their promise to give every owner of a 8 uconnect a free upgrade to allow android auto and Apple carplay. 2017 owners got a free update and 2016 owners, like me, got screwed.

>>17601400
probably the camaro straight up or IF i could id get the mustang and turbo the vodoo, they make retarded power and rev to 9k or some shit. Probably the best engine to ever come out of ford imo.

Highest resale value.

File: dhnNIb0i-171447463.jpg (2MB, 1805x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1805x1080px

>>17601400
Is it bad I hope the 18 is ugly in person so I don't want one?

>>17601400
The fwd subcompact hothatch off screen.

File: vehicle.png (289KB, 1920x960px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1920x960px

>>17602240
This car is weird. From some angles, it looks like shit. In others, it looks fantastic. Also the "Orange Fury" color Ford is advertising is hideous compared to every other color available. The yellow Chevy uses to advertise the Camaro is similarly awful.

File: 20170707_122033[1].jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

the best one because its the best

>>17601400
Challenger, it feels looks and sounds like a muscle car, if you want actual performance get a corvette

>>17602202
2017. I have uconnect

File: 32.jpg (41KB, 600x477px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x477px

>>17601513

Challenger because it looks, sounds, and drives like an actual muscle car, if you want performance get a corvette

>>17601400
V6 mustang. Best v6 and the same bolt pattern as the ecoboost 3.5.

>>17602433
All are V8's
Also this thread assumes you aren't an enormous fucking faggot

>>17602202
>>17602388
Or Android auto, whatever it's called. I'm not really a phone person so I could care less about how my phone hooks up to my car. Something I do like though is that when I plug in the phone I get Google maps navigation, which is good. My dad has a 17 ram that came with it's own navigation system and it sucks dick.

File: _storage_emulated_0_DCIM_Camera_20161112_045540.jpg (952KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

952KB, 2048x1152px

I'll take a s197. I really liked mine.

>>17602433
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrs0oa-XIV4
>he thinks the mustang has the best v6
kek

>>17602462
Doesn't have any torque and trusting GM with anything ever.

>>17602466
4 lb-ft more than the v6 mustang :^)

>>17602474
Automatic v6?

>>17602474
10 less torque. Captcha select the buses which is what you will be doing if you buy GM.

>>17602504
google says otherwise

challenger
because i like it

mustang next because i like it almost as much

camaro last because its so fucking ugly and you cant see out of the window

File: 1487312174144.jpg (73KB, 359x525px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 359x525px

>>17601964
>>17602150
>>17602154
imagine being this insecure

Real talk.

Why is the gt350r so expensive? I see it has a msrp around 63k, but dealerships are wanting like 90k for it. At 63k it's a good car but at 90k, fuck that.

>>17603113
Because it's special. It looks, drives, feels, and sounds absolutely phenominal, and the Shelby badge has a lot of history behind it. GM can make faster cars, but they don't know how to make desirable cars.

File: IMG_0864.jpg (218KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1280x720px

>he bought an American mememobile instead of an STI

>>17601494
I got a '14, but the '05's really have a cool face.

>>17601400
Hellcat duh

>>17601584
I drive a charger does that count? Don't like the challenger as much

>>17602150
Yeah I see a lot of broads driving camaros especially the bright colored ones

>>17601400
Challenger for me
It's been my dream car to own a challenger because it's in my words "a modern Chevelle
IE: has the same looks styling and engine power as my 1967 chevelle which is a family heirloom of mine

Inb4: but it's a modern day Challenger
I know that faggot

>>17601737
if you think that is the same price as a demon you're retarded

>>17602433
>he thinks they will still make v6 mustangs by the end of the year

>>17602381
Silver is so boring

I can't take anyone who drives a Challenger seriously since seeing a Challenger parked diagonally in 6 parking spaces so no one will park next to his car.

>>17603644
If you can't build that for less than $85k then you're a fucking idiot.

>>17601400

Challenger, because I've lived with mine for five years and it's become my dream car. I test drove the other ones at the time and have driven the new iterations since and I wouldn't trade my Challenger for the world.

It's the best car in the world to me. I've never smiled wider than I have behind the wheel of that car. Not even when I saw my wife walk down the aisle.

>>17603721
What year is yours?

>>17603727

2012. It's an R/T, since I know that's the next question.

I genuinely love the car and have every intention of making it a lifelong investment. I want to build it and care for it and drive it as much as I can. It's just such an incredible experience to be behind the wheel of.

Even if it's slow and fat, nothing is boring about it. Even body rolling through 30mph turns is a blast.

>>17601400
Charger for the common man, Chevy SS for the patrician.

I don't know why they make muscle cars that large and then make them coupes. Either make the car smaller/lighter or add extra doors so I can actually take advantage of their boat-like sizes.

>>17603766
Oh, I thought you had like a 1970 or something.

>>17603828
Muscle cars have always been big.
Have you ever even seen an A-body? They're pretty big for a "performance" car.
And 5th and 6th gen Camaros really aren't that much larger than my 4th gen, they're just strangely proportioned, with too much emphasis put on styling and not on usability, as evidenced by the tiny windows.

>>17601400
challenger because it's the only one that still looks like the old gens and not like it's pandering to the fucking transformers franchise

File: arctivbluevssilver.png (27KB, 518x507px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 518x507px

>>17603662
nice meme

>>17603853
Yes, but if they're going to be big, why not have 4 doors?

>>17603914
Because 4 doors look ugly and provide no benefit.

>>17603914
Because they're not big.
You can't fit adults in the back of a 4th or 5th Gen Camaro.
If you want to, you have to stretch the cabin out a good four to six inches more and get rid of the nice sloping roofline.
And you know what you did when you did that? You made a Chevy SS.

>>17603925
>No benefit
Eh, getting into the back seats of someone's coupe has never not been a shitty experience for me.

>Ugly
To each their own.

Otherwise, I'd also be okay with them having a fuckton of cargo space by ditching the backseats entirely and turning their cars (particularly the Mustang) into a fastback with a hatch.

>>17601400
thems is beautiful. I'd take the Challenger though just cause I've always wanted one

>>17601400
>no other sizes of this image were found

bitch what

>>17603676
Sounds like a boss to me.

File: Untitled.png (4MB, 2202x1716px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2202x1716px

>>17601400
I dont know which is best but i sure do love mine

File: IMG_1397.jpg (34KB, 500x201px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x201px

>>17601964
Mustangs are objectively for women.
They used to call them secretary specials.

File: IMG_1398.jpg (96KB, 492x648px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 492x648px

>>17604846

File: 1500582551212.jpg (6KB, 228x216px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 228x216px

>>17601871
You sound like a wigger

>>17603164
t. Sougamw Tomagazaki

>>17603925
>what are suicide doors
Proof that the RX8 would be probably the best car ever made if it wasnt for the meme engine

>>17601400
Mustang. Looks good, feels good and tastes great.

File: IMG_9887.png (546KB, 941x734px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 941x734px

>>17601400
The non-ferd

>>17604893
the only time id take a ford is if my only other choice was chevy.

>>17604893
Now this is embarrassing. What the fuck Ford?

File: Challenger.jpg (181KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1280x720px

>>17601400
>Challenger
>wheelies

File: w1.jpg (374KB, 1920x940px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1920x940px

heh

Mustang. Because of all 3 of these, it has the best interior quality. Also Ford is great overall, thats proven by Fiestas and Focuses. Chevy and Dodge on the other hand bunch of cuck pickup manufacturers.

>>17605155
That's a weird looking Chevy SS.

>>17605190
Dodge doesn't even make pickups.

Challenger, because I already own a 2014 Camaro. I would enjoy a nice drag car along with my street destroyer (aka the camaro).

>>17605199
Ram series of pickups? Both gas and diesel are available.

Question to Challenger owners.

How reliable it is? More clearly, how often the parts break?

Is it true that people say FCA builds Challenger, so it's unreliable as fuck.

>>17605199
Then I dont know how they still managed to survive as a company. For me, european, Dodge is nothing. Fords are known worldwide for their great daily cars. And even though Ive never driven a sports car, let alone Mustang, Id still pick it over those two. While looks of mustang are relatively shit compared to camaro and challenger, it fits for daily driving better and is greater all around car.

>>17605214
No doubt that FCA quality is very questionable, but for some reason that doesn't apply to Challengers. I own a 2010 STR8 Challenger with 150k miles on it and I've had zero issues.

File: image.jpg (143KB, 525x809px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 525x809px

>>17605230
>European
Opinion disregarded.

>>17605197
Because its the top spec version only ausfags got

>>17605209
Ram is no longer a series, it is its own marque.

>>17601400
They all look a bit gay.

>>17605273
Compared to what?

>>17605285
Other cars.

>>17605295
Oh, it's bait. I thought you were going to post a faggot ute or bimmer sedan or something equally shitty.

>>17605190
>>17605230
>fiesta/focus
>great daily
getting sued because shit automatic they can't fix

>interior quality
lincoln panel gaps are hilariously bad. Don't even start on the ford rattleboxes

>ecoboost
Gets horrendous real world mpg and worse than cars with similar outputs
ford fusion 2.0, 21-32 (yea na)
audi a4 2.0, 27-37

>mustang
5.slow is not a meme

>>17603164
I don't understand why you're bringing up what is essentially a boosted family sedan into a discussion about sports cars
>305 hp since the early 2000s
Can subaru update their shitty box engine?

>>17605412
Why update it if the market will continue to buy it?

>>17601400
The silver aston

>>17605155
Thought that was a Pontiac at first.
>tfw no 2017 Pontiac G8 GXP
Bring it back GM.

>>17605367
>getting sued because shit automatic they can't fix
Only in US

>lincoln panel gaps are hilariously bad. Don't even start on the ford rattleboxes
I've driven both Fiesta and Focus. It has comfy and nicely layed out interior. Appealing to an eye.

>Gets horrendous real world mpg and worse than cars with similar outputs
1.0l EcoBoost Fiesta no more than 6l/100km petrol. Quick too.

>mustang
What do you mean slow? Its faster than 90% of the cars on the road. And its not like I'm going to take it to the track.

>>17605756
>1L car
>quick

Choose one

>>17603713
they took an SRT8 challenger, took out the motor, bought a brand new crate motor that is almost 30k, put a 5k blower on it, 1200$ injectors, and thousands in gauge/meth stuff.

No, it's not cheaper than a fucking Demon, retard. And you can't even drive it on the street.

>>17605266
stop being a faggot

>>17605884
572 crate is $23k straight from mopar performance. An 09 SRT8 is $18k. Those plus the other shit you quoted comes out to $47,200, leaving plenty of room for "gauge/meth stuff".
And what exactly means you can't drive it on the street?

>>17605910
a 5k new transmission, and easily tens of thousands on other shit. it's on their website. it's not cheaper than a demon in any reasonable sense

and you cant drive it on the street because most likely, your state has a law that prevents driving without a hood, and huge exposed butterflies through a hood cut would count. on top of that it would be fucking dreadful to drive as an experience

>>17605930
A tremec t56 will run you $3500 (but it's already standard equipment) you still have upwards of $35k to spend on "other shit"
My state (GA) has no such laws. Stop making things up.

>>17605829
Quick, not fast, retard. 74kw or whatever for this small hatch is enough for city daily driving.

>>17605214

5 years, no problems with mine. Everything works just like the day I bought it. I do take care of my car, though, and all recommended services have been done on it.

>>17604677
Sounds like a guy asking for someone to key his car to me.

>>17605976
too bad you live in a shit state, and too bad they didn't use a tremec t56 for this? sucks to suck

>>17601400
Challenger
Comfy ride and you can fit actual people in the back seat

>>17606246
>actual people in the back seat
not taking the back seats out of your coupe.

>>17606277
it's not a GTR or some shit. taking the seats out would look really stupid and be basically pointless.

>>17601400
Camaro

Cheapest with the best aftermarket

Own a mustang, like the challenger and it is the fastest in a straight line (hellcat or demon).

But overall the Camaro is the best buy.

>>17604893
>>17605114
Not embarrassing.
Apples to Oranges.

On a road course the v8 carries more weight.
Run a v8 vs v8 and the result is different.
Or
Run the v6 vs the v6 and then look at the price/performance.

Chevy just doesn't have the chops in a true head to head because they cobbled together the camaro and are playing catch up.

File: 15stangvscamaro.png (1MB, 1321x714px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1321x714px

>>17608008
It still loses

>>17601400
Challenger if you want fastest land boat in a straight line speed on an ancient Mercedes body.
Chevy if you want the best track performance, and a standard GM interior.
Stang if you want the slowest of the 3 in a line, good track performance tailing the Camero and the arguably the best interior.

>>17601494
How could you like that, it's all round and feminine. They almost had a masculine grill then fucked it up because lady curves.

>>17602240
That Mustang is fucking disgusting as shit. Way to turn a pony car into a wannabe rice rocket dumb ass.

>>17606238
If they used a t56 on this then it would do fine on that.
http://blog.caranddriver.com/speedkore-performances-tantrum-is-a-70-dodge-charger-turned-1650-hp-supercar/

>>17608008
>Chevy just doesn't have the chops in a true head to head because they cobbled together the camaro and are playing catch up.

are you seriously this delusional? the camaro has been btfoing the mustang since the 6th gen came out 2 years ago across all trim levels. the 2018 refresh to the mustang gt is literally trying to make it compete with the camaro ss thats been out for 3 model years now

>>17602150
I chuckled because the only person I know who owns a camaro is a gay dude. Didn't even know he was gay until he brought his boyfriend to a party. Lol

>>17608397
That's a 5th gen Camaro, which is slower.

>>17609749
Are you dumb or just plain stupid son

>>17608008
Mustang is a girls car. Everyone knows this
>catch up
>5.slow loses to a v6
O i am laffin

File: CAB50FOC051B0101.jpg (37KB, 788x525px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 788x525px

>>17608841

I like the simplicity and the clean design.

More than the face I like the body and the lines

Plus the retro interior on some higher end 05's is top notch

hsv gts

>>17602150
My stepmom owns a bright orange v6 automatic Camaro
And it's terrible
She likes it tho

>>17603872
But it IS silver and it IS boring
It makes the car look less ugly however so good choice

Mustang because I'm a middle class snob and driving a Camaro or Challenger would make me self-conscious about looking like white trash.

>>17608841
Not him but
>Not wanting a car with lady curves
It's like you don't even want to fuck your car

>>17605149
That's one sexy car.

>>17601400
Viper

Challenger is the only one that doesnt pretend to be anything but a 70's muscle car. it doesnt care about european racetracks or cornering. it doesnt try to appeal to anyone but people who like classic muscle.

and they doubled down on that philosophy by making the Demon, which is literally a Drag racer.

File: 3-8Ci6FugsM.jpg (135KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1280x720px

>>17601400
I can buy only picreleited car, Lada Priora Coupe.
Why?
Because Vladimir The Dick do not want russians to have good cars.
Because he is a fucking stupid midget.

>>17605898
He's right dumbass.

>>17612373
I'm sure Russia sells Mustangs and Camaros.

File: 123456789987654321.jpg (86KB, 1600x1065px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1600x1065px

>>17603233
Charger is patrician af, nothing is as sweet as driving a 4500lbs land boat that does 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. How can you get more american than that?

>>17608855
Would you feel better if it just had a bunch of fake scoops and Chip Foose chrome wheels ?

File: scatpack5.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

>>17601584

Yes.

File: not_bad.png (1MB, 962x595px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 962x595px

i drove a scat pack challenger and charger, a mustang GT, and an autotragic 16 ss. i ended up ordering this and i can honestly say that i'm very happy with it. (m6). i wouldn't go with an A8 as i like my transmissions(torque converter specifically in the A8's) lasting more than 3 oil changes.

>>17614403
also drove a used 370z, an even older rx8, a 335xi, and a miata(because you reeeeee's put them on such a pedestal, i had to try it(nice balanced car, but holy fuck underpowered))

>>17602150
>Camaro looks like an angry pissed-off tryhard

That's been car design for the past decade. The Mustang doesn't look any better and the Challenger is a landbarge

>>17613070
Man the Charger is such a sexy looking vehicle. I wish they would trim some of the fat on the Challenger and give it some accent lines like the Charger.

>>17612781
No, it's not.
We have cool old American cars and from other countries on our marker, but their prices a very fucking expencive.
You can look at this here: https://www.avito.ru/rossiya/avtomobili/inomarki?f=188_0b873&i=1&s=2, but you need to know russian language.

>>17603164
sorry he actually likes real power, instead of some phony turbo

>>17604846
every time i see a mustang out on the road, its own by a women who can barley handle the v6 automatic model

>>17601400
>putting a challenger in the same category with those two shitboxes

>>17614438
3rd gen and 4th gen are the best. Transformers era Camaro a shit.

GT350R because exhaust note.

>>17601400
the mustang so i can kill myself for having such shit taste in cars.

>>17614540
>Man the Charger is such a sexy looking vehicle.
I don't think it is. It just looks so disproportionate with the center body line styling. I know it is inspired by the 1970s Charger design but it just doesn't look good on it. Challenger pulled off the design of it's older car in the best way possible. Every car guy I have met only have said good about how the Challenger looks but when it comes to Charger, the majority don't like it.

>>17616247
>https://www.avito.ru/rossiya/avtomobili/inomarki?f=188_0b873&i=1&s=2
Ouch man, you seem like you want muscle cars so much. Sorry about the expenive prices. It's like you can't have what you like because it's too expensive in your country while in other countries it's much more attainable.

>>17617343
I dont have so big amount of cash.
But if I die and reborn in America - that will be great!

>>17601400
>Which
None
>Why
Not an amerifat

>>17601400
All of them.


If you were asking which car looked like shit.

none because i hate cars

Challenger, easily.

Camaro looks retarded.

Mustang looks like female car.

>>17616247
https://m.avito.ru/moskva/avtomobili/dodge_charger_1970_972501123
Can you tell me roughly how much this is in US dollars? Or you could compare it to a car that has a similar price over there, like an advent adore or something.

>>17618361
200K russian rubles = $3000.
Do the math, m8.