post things that trigger liberals

>>17583795
fuck off soviet/alphonse

File: slant-six.jpg (69KB, 770x683px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 770x683px

internal combustion engines

>>17583795
go back to driving your penis transmissions eurofag.

>>17583795
negro

>>17583794
fuck off back to /pol/ you racist bigot redneck

fuck Drumpfterd and fuck white people

>>17583870
Bashing liberals equals racist?
No wonder you get shit on, with your dumbass assumptions.

>>17583916
Can you seriously not tell he was joking? Holy shit

>>17583976
Oh, you guys are buddies?
Or are you just talking out of your ass?
I'm going with the latter.

>>17584580
Different guy.
It's pretty obvious bait, which can be considered a form of joking, but one that makes you shitty.

>>17583794
>>17583805
>>17583972
>>17584930
liberal here. Have fun. I have no issue with any of this so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

Not all liberals are pissy little cunts. more conservatives are special snowflakes than liberals.

>>17584947
I was with you until you said special snowflake.
I also consider myself a liberal, but as soon as you start flinging shit around you become worse than the people you criticize.

>>>/pol/

>>17584967
Agreed, this thread has nothing to do with automobiles, even if op posted a picture of a van.

>>17583794
When you remind them that Teslas run on laptop batteries and that Elon Musk is just another snake oil salesman

>>17584978
What the fuck did you expect them to run on? Do you even know how lithium cells work?

>>17583794
Why exactly is this supposed to trigger me?

Is it because it looks vaguely redneckish and I'm supposed to believe that all rednecks are awful right-wing extremist racists or something? I can infer no information about the political views of the owner of that truck from this image.

>>17584947
kill yourself you liberal faggot

>>17584947
>more conservatives are special snowflakes than liberals
Nah, conservatives favor a much more hands off approach, especially from the government. Which obviously favors privileged and white people, but that's beside the point.
Liberals are all over the government handling more and more.

Your thread is shit.

I love those Econoline / F-150 combos though.

>>17583794
Lol the amount of buttmad in this thread is delicious. So many alt left marxists on this board lmao.

File: 0808dp_54_z+2008_diesel_power_challenge_trucks+2002_ford_f350_smoke_stacks.jpg (38KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x640px

>>17584971
It should! (pic related)

>>17584947
1.) Technically liberals =/= Democrats and since more liberals are becoming Republicans these days, that's even more true. You might not even be a liberal, you might be a progressive. Most Dems today are.
2.) "special snowflakes" is a term reserved for radical progressives with emotional problems. How does that equate to conservativism in your mind?

>>17585150
It's even more hilarious when you consider it requires capitalism to get things like... CARS

>>17585158
>Technically liberals =/= Democrats
no.
liberals = progressive.
progressive = anti-corporatist/anti-money-in-politics

I hate morons confusing liberals with democrats.

What I can't stand are the conservatives CONSTANTLY saying they're against Sharia law in muslim countries, then turn around and support Christian sharia law stateside. Like wtf. This country was founded on FREEDOM OF RELIGION, not as a Christian shithole.

>>17585005
>matte black paint and non original wheels
Kill it with fire.

File: d9e70b90.jpg (67KB, 756x459px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 756x459px

>>17585172
>liberals = progressive
Incorrect, as there are progressives in both ends of the political spectrum (look up the great Teddy Roosevelt). In fact, the two ideologies are becoming more and more incompatible.

Liberals are about freedom, progressives are becoming more and more anti-freedom. They hate America, they want to censor speech, they want to censor religion (except Islam for some fucking reason, I'll never figure that one out).

>I hate morons confusing liberals with democrats.
Me too. Especially since most liberals were Republicans up until the Civil Rights Act.

File: confederate-flag-truck.jpg (146KB, 615x338px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 615x338px

>>17585197
You know what really pisses off liberals?

"Racism."

>>17585197
>Liberals are about freedom, progressives are becoming more and more anti-freedom. They hate America, they want to censor speech, they want to censor religion (except Islam for some fucking reason, I'll never figure that one out).
This is so wrong. You have no idea how stupid you sound right now.

Progressives don't want to censor religion. Believe whatever the fuck you want. Progressives just don't want any LAWS based on religion.
Like when conservatives say gay marriage should be illegal because of the bible. Or that abortion should be illegal because the bible says so. That's religion-based law that can't be allowed.
No, progressives DON'T want to censor free speech. That would be conservatives in general.
Donald Trump has fucking sued people over jokes. He wants to open up the libel laws so that is a reporter writes something about you that you don't like, regardless of how true it is, they can sue you. Hitler did similar.


>>17585123
>Nah, conservatives favor a much more hands off approach, especially from the government.
Bullshit. They say that, then everything they do says the opposite. Actions speak louder than words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYWxVaZaGDI

>>17585234
>regardless of how true it is, they can sue you
you can sure them
I can't into English tonight. ugh.

>>17585239
SUE. motherfucker. I need to go to sleep

>>17583839
>>17583829
>>17583801
what did xe post this time

>>17585248
Probably how much of a gay aids nigger he is

File: b17f7bdaf7f500ba1d92cd3a41554ce0--rebel-flags-american-flag.jpg (55KB, 500x539px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x539px

>>17585234
>This is so wrong. You have no idea how stupid you sound right now
Yessssssssss bring on that anger you snowflakes are so known for! GET TRIGGERED BITCH

All joking aside, marriage has always been a religious institution. In my opinion, the government has no say in who gets married in the first place. Take marriage out of law and be done with it.

>No, progressives DON'T want to censor free speech. That would be conservatives in general.
Say that to any conservative that tried to speak at Berkeley or any other hardcore progressive school in the last 2 years. They literally fucking riot.

And then take a look at all the conservative YouTube channels getting defunded from things like Patreon because of "racism" when they merely say things like "protect our borders."

Or how about conservatives getting banned from Twitter for being open about their political views without being "nice" enough.

Oh, and abortion isn't a cute little procedure you can have whenever you feel like it. It really fucks women up, both physically and mentally. Do some research on a website that doesn't cater to liberal propaganda (for once in your life).

File: KxbxUsb.jpg (11KB, 244x302px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 244x302px

>>17585273
>>>
> Anonymous 07/22/17(Sat)21:29:55 No.17585123▶>>17585

different guy here

yeah but i just want shit like weed and access to abortions senpai. what can the republican party do for me? don't really give a shit about private websites enforcing their TOS tho, seems like their freedom to associate.

File: Ynyenywbwyjfa.jpg (14KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 260x194px

>>17585234
>>17585273
The only reason this whole lib vs con thing exists is to divide the population into two camps and keep them bickering so the govt can do what they want behind closed doors. I've met very few people who identify with one or the other and 100% believe in everything the party stands for. It always becomes lesser-of-two-evils

I mean come on... if you think abortion is wrong but capital punishment is right you're an idiot, both situations involve taking life. And likewise if you are for abortion and against capital punishment you're equally stupid. In any case, the bickering continues and the true evil always gets off unscathed

>>17585234
Yeah, yeah, I'm sure you can cherry pick examples where this isn't the case.
But if you're honest, you'll have to admit that 90% of the time you hear about proposed 'cuts' to whatever, it's the conservatives who want to make them, and the liberals who are protesting them.

>>17585527
If the only issues you are about are weed and abortion, your voting rights should be stripped immediately and you should be sterilized.

>>17585590
>>17585527
>>17585273
>>17585234
>>17585232
>>17585210
>>17585197
>>17585172
>>17585158

how is this remotely car related?

fuck off already, im starting to believe it's actually just 1 guy replying to himself

>>17585640
>im starting to believe it's actually just 1 guy replying to himself

Mod here. It is.

>>17585650
Anon here. You are a shameless faggot acceleration the destruction of this board. Kill yourself.

>>17585650
fuck off retard

File: utfPSs4.png (455KB, 646x680px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 646x680px

>>17585621


nah but this is a car board mate im not here to talk about her emails and tiny hands and all that bullshit

>>17585660
t.Alphonse

File: DDLqASHXYAAelbn.jpg (93KB, 807x582px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 807x582px

>>17585669
back to /pol/ drumpfkin

File: liberal-democrats-hate-when-this-happens-donald-trump-copies-politics-1487541959.jpg (119KB, 640x623px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 640x623px

>>17585527
>yeah but i just want shit like weed and access to abortions senpai

I can understand the weed, but why abortions, kouhai? Just wear a condom. Don't fuck your body/someone else's body up because "it just feels better." Condoms are $0.10 a pop and you can still orgasm. Small price to pay compared to a $500 abortion and possibly ending your/their fertility (not that you care about reproducing as a progressive, since you hate not just America but the white/human race).

>>17585640
To be fair, dear liberal anon, in each of the 5 posts you quoted me in, I posted a pic of something that pisses off liberals. Sorry it hurt your feelings but that's the POINT OF THE THREAD

>>17585674
(pic related)
Politics aren't what you think, teenager. Wait until you see your party flip on its own messages before you start posting political memes.

>>17585682
back to /pol/ drumpfkin

File: 13e78692096745b0b99548716a667019_06fb25d3ba414dee970d40fd4bc65489_1_post.png (187KB, 800x556px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 800x556px

>>17585682

but anon im not white. Fucking white women is the only way for me to contribute to White Genocide.


my body will be fine, I just believe in bodily autonomy, im not one for evangelical moralfagging

File: 129_0207_01_z+2001_ford_f350+water_crossing.jpg (73KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x450px

>>17585688
How to be a socialist progressive on 4Chan or any other platform:

Step 1: Make a statement by calling someone a name.

Step 2: Ignore any attempt at retort by plugging your ears and loudly yelling "LALALALALALA"

Step 3: Claim moral superiority by repeating Step 1 and telling them to leave.

Just watch antifa videos. They do the same thing. It's hilarious how these libtards are so oblivious to their own behavior.

Pic related to original topic, to prevent antifa from reporting.

>>17585682

i like diesels though.
not powerstrokes, cummins.

kindly fuck off with your dumb politics, im not even american

posting a picture while discussing something completely different to the point of the thread is still contributing to a non car related thread.

>>>/pol/

>>17585705
back to /pol/ drumpfkin

>>17585701
>my body will be fine,
>Fucking white women is the only way for me to contribute to White Genocide

You're a male feminist? Hahahahahahahahahahaha

*breathe*

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha!

>>17585707
Samefagging

>>17585708
Spam

God this board has gone to shit. Is anywhere on earth safe from this libtard infection? Can't even talk about cars without cockless cucks showing up to spout their views on women's bodies for some fucking reason.

>>17585705

>>>ferd tuf

File: 3915184-solidus_snake_on_ag.jpg (84KB, 1427x764px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1427x764px

>>17585715
>blah blah blah blah blah
yes, yes. ik

back to >>>/pol/ drumpfkin

>>17585660
fuck off negro

>>17585682
>but why abortions, kouhai? Just wear a condom.
not him but this is something that continually pisses me off about religious conservatives.
>we want less abortions
alright.
>so we're going to make access to contraceptives virtually impossible
you fu-
>and preach abstinence
motherfuckers just went full retard.
You can't have it both ways
abstinence teachings don't work.
What does work is providing access to contraceptives. Every time access to them is restricted, abortion numbers go up.

I'm not anti-abortion or pro abortion. I don't have a vagina, so I shouldn't be making rules on regulating them. If women want an abortion, that's their prerogative. But preaching abstinence and restricting access to contraceptives while defunding anywhere that performs abortions... leads to an increase in abortions. We see it every single time. Hell, it's happening right fucking now in Texas.

File: 13423936_548225448716998_4008205449214938092_n.jpg (13KB, 320x327px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x327px

>>17585715
>Can't even talk about cars without cockless cucks showing up to spout their views on women's bodies for some fucking reason.

you're not even fucking talking about cars

you're just posting pictures while talking politics, when there is a designated board to talk politics.

File: geralt_face_GrownOutBeard_02.jpg (132KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 600x800px

>>17585721
reported for racism

>>17585715

nah I just like fucking white women anon. racemixing feels p nice ngl it's my preffered


since it triggers conservative whitebois that's like, a bonus

File: 6xzty.jpg (79KB, 699x652px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 699x652px

>>17585734
this. feels good to wipe the white race out using my bbc.

love being black desu

>>17585734
Your palms being white doesn't count as racemixing.exe

>>17585728
>you're just posting pictures
>>17583794
>post things that trigger liberals

It's like you can't read. Typical liberal.

>>17585734
>nah I just like fucking white women anon
Lets be honest, you're not fucking anyone.

>>17585724
You're right. Except abstinence is legitimately the best way to be safe with sex. STIs, pregnancy, getting shot to death by nigger-ex-bf/protective father. Not fucking is the best way.

Get married and stop being a degenerate that fucks whores. Studies show women with multiple sex partners prior to marriage are MORE LIKELY to end up divorced and unhappy.

Get with it, anon. Being a whore isn't good. Being a cuck for the Left isn't good. You can change, but you have to be willing to accept that you MAY be wrong.

>>17585730
Announcing a report is against the rules, newfriend ;)
enjoy the vacation, it's all on me.

File: 1456683386952.jpg (32KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x400px

>>17585749
>Republicans this stupid
lol, this is the average trump voter

LOOOOOOOOL
>>17585764
gr3. enjoy your ban. racism is against the rules

>>17585749

>being a cuck for the left
>Auto


wew

>>17585772
>implying trump supporters are intelligent

>>17585741
>love being black desu
How can you love living in section-8 housing in North Las Vegas, Alphonse?

>>17585769
A typical liberal that won't refute the arguments made, simply call the other side a name and laugh hysterically a joke only they're in on. Which is especially funny since you people have zero sense of humor, so that means you're not even laughing. You're just pretending to. Jesus Christ (not that you believe).

>>17585779
Samefagging with still no refute to previous claims and the inability to capitalize proper nouns.

>>17585782
easy. prostitution is legal and plenty of men willing to use his ass as a cum dump.

File: geralt_is_so_dreamy.jpg (340KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1920x1080px

>>17585782
>projecting
>>17585790
>s-samefagging! hmph! ;__;
LOL

back to /pol/ drumpfkin

>tfw fastest /o/ thread is political argument


conservatives ruin everything desu

>>17585806
this

>>17585806
of course. And then when they're up to their noses in the bullshit they created, they turn around and blame other people

>>17585801
Are you an actual autist?

I mean, between the inability to converse and the faggy CG homosexuality I think this anon is an actual autist.

Fuck bro I'm sorry, I didn't mean to bully someone with a mental disability.

>>17585806
>>17585810

>conservatives ruin everything desu
Tell me again why your country isn't Europe?

>>17585815
because I live in a country that voted an orange reality TV clown into the most powerful political position

>>17584947
Wrong. Associating your entire set of beliefs to one party or another makes you a whiney cunt of a person.

Just pick stuff you like and vote politicians that represent those things where they matter. You will confuse the hell out of polls.

See: Republicans liking pro life but voting for death penalty. Makes no sense at all. Why associate completely with that?

>>17585815

possibly because I don't live in europe anon.

>>17585824

>twf democrats won't leave guns (an eventually car culture, they're gonna come for your turbos) alone but republicans wontstop telling me what to do with my dick


fuck.msi

>>17585815
back to /pol/ drumpfkin

File: image.jpg (156KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 736x552px

OP here, why aren't most of you niggers posting trucks. Also liberals are all cucks.

File: chrome_2017-07-22_23-48-03.png (74KB, 665x569px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 665x569px

>>17585820
>>17585826
(pic related)

>>17585801
>>17585741
>>17585730
>>17585720
>>17585708
>>17585688
>>17585674
>>17585839

(pic related)

>>17585826
>possibly because I don't live in europe anon.
Yeah, I know it's hard to understand. Pic related.

File: holden_ute-ve-ss-2007_r9.jpg (832KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

832KB, 2048x1536px

>>17585842
I want an ute. fuck trucks. That's for small dicked Trumptards.

>>17585842

thread got derailed.

on topic though: someone should do a twingo up that way. I believe in my fellow countrymen, now that we can import.

>>17585848
reported for racism

>>17585837
Right? I just want guns, fun cars, privacy, free healthcare, free education, and somebody who acknowledges human impacts in climate change.

It makes everyones head spin.

>>17585848

conservatism isn't a moderate view though.

File: image.jpg (119KB, 727x722px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 727x722px

>>17585852
LOL as if those faggy El Beanerminos aren't only wanted by edgy libcucks who won't buy American.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyNscr3voLg

Where are the conservatives protesting this? If you call yourself conservative, and oppose this, you're a retard and should never breed

File: 11378321_950361341651659_309893969_n.jpg (53KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 480x480px

>>17585852
>fuck trucks. That's for small dicked Trumptards.

>worried about dick-size
>posts purple car no man would ever drive

K.

>>17585858
Ha! Anon I heart you.

>>17585868
It is in today's America, though. That's why conservatives won overall. Hi, welcome to the world.

I know you're brainwashed by "omg the alt-left" from CNN which you apparently watch exclusively, but most people aren't hardcore right or left. Just you.

94.

Just saiyan.

>>17585876

>buying american

what do you suggest for bikes? i just want to go s1000rr fast anon.

>>17585861
THIS. holy shit.

>>17585884
hillary won more votes. retard

>>17585884

but I like guns and capitalism. that makes me part of the centrist master race.

File: Skittles 2007-Holden-VE-SS-V-Ute-Range-1920x1440.jpg (692KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

692KB, 1920x1440px

>>17585884
>bitching about the color of an ute
I'm sorry, did the purple truck somehow emasculate you?
Taste the rainbow bitch

>>17585886
Victory Empulse TT
or an older Buell.
If you can find one, a Fischer MRX may do as well.

Indian probably has something in the works for the future as well. That said, the Scout is a little rocket for what it is.

>>17585892
"California and New York have more libtards than Kansas you fucking moron hahahaha I'm so much smarter than you!"

God bless the Founding Fathers.

Remember when Bill Clinton won the Presidency, fucked up America for 2 years, lost the House for Dems, then proceeded to be a good President for 4 years until he got convicted by Congress for being a sleazebag? Yeah, the Republican Congress carried that rapist and he's seen as a good President.

>>17585900
Purple is the color of royalty. I actually own a purple Mustang, pleb. But no one in America owns a purple wannabe cartruck because that shit is faggy as hell and only women would buy it. Except women don't want a cartruck. That's why the El Camino failed.

Back to Berkeley with you! (94)

>>17585914
>because that shit is faggy as hell
>owns a purple car
spotted the faggot
Come out of the closet anon. It's fabulous out here

>>17585916
Your argument holds no sway. I feel like Julius Caesar in my purple Mustang.

Try again, buddy. Don't worry, I see the IP count hasn't gone up. Samefag 'til you're blue in the lips.

>>17585911

Honestly was gonna shitpost about pigfat harleys and import supers but have you ever known someone that owned a Buell?


I would love an xb12 but im afraid id have a hell of a time if anything on it went.

File: Holden_Ute.jpg (191KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1024x768px

>>17585921
I like the utility of a truck
I love the handling of a car.
I love the capability of an LS V8 attached to a 6 speed manual
Purple is my favorite color
I'm a gay bottom who takes it up the ass.
Problem?

>>17585930
Buell was literally a division of Harley Davidson. Any Harley dealer will be able to service it.

>>17585936

their shop rates are fucking ridiculous though.

File: image.jpg (82KB, 600x365px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 600x365px

>>17585936
"Utility of a truck"

Maybe if you're a faggot who carries gay shit around town.

>>17585936
>I like the utility of a truck
Yet you don't have it.

>I love the handling of a car.
Yet you don't have it.

>I love the capability of an LS V8 attached to a 6 speed manual
Which you can get in many CARS or TRUCKS for as this anon says >>17585946 much fucking less.

>I'm a gay bottom who takes it up the ass.
>Problem?
My only problem is that you're driving a faggy purple wanna-truck and pretending its fashionable. As with most faglords your sense of style is only endearing to yourself.

File: SADGURL.jpg (158KB, 800x1460px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 800x1460px

>tfw liberal
>tfw have to vote republican because I don't want to give up my guns/cars/gender
>tfw both parties are full retard at this point

Ayyy smoke weed everyday familam

>>17585946
That's what happens when the biggest name in motorcycles concentrates on aging boomers.... and nothing else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXDL-492-mk

>>17585951
you didn't read the whole post, did you?

>>17585954
Welcome to the Republican party.

I'm hoping more liberals join so we can get weed legalized and keep our guns and cars.

The progressives want us to ban gasoline and drive around in electric cars.

Join the party, tell your representatives you want weed but also want guns, etc. Change the party from the inside.

>>17585959
You're right, anon. Harley-Davidson is going to die because it refuses to admit no one wants to ride it's ugly, big, unweilldly bikes.

>you didn't read the whole post, did you?
Are you mad when others can't read but okay with it when you can't?

File: American-Flag (4).jpg (48KB, 520x423px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 520x423px

>>17583794

>>17583794
As a rightist, I've never understood why most rightists are against abortion. Its like they want millions of more leftist voters a year. If I could, I would make sure there was an abortion clinic in every CVS in every major metro area, especially in blue states.

File: image.jpg (194KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 640x640px

>>17586030
You need to raise the standards for society to follow if you want society to improve.

>>17586030
I chuckled.
That's one idea.
We must stop the future! Every man must get a vasectomy now!

>>17585824
>children shouldn't be aborted because their parents find them inconvenient
>dangerous criminals should be permanently made a non threat

If you can't see the difference you're a moron

>>17586038
Sure, but the numbers don't lie. Abortion has been a god send in keeping us from becoming Brazil-tier. We should encourage it.
>>17586039
Absolutely. As long as its not reversible.

>>17585824
>See: Republicans liking pro life but voting for death penalty. Makes no sense at all. Why associate completely with that?
Aborting a child who had no chance at all is different than killing a criminal who already had a chance and fucked up bigly. Stop being a retard.
>the cuck wouldn't want someone put to death who killed his wife and his wife's kids

>>17586057
>>17586048
Maybe if all you see is black and white.
See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful_execution

But it's easy for these type of voters to make judgements early on.

>>17585245
kek lefties are retarded. You already said SUE in the original post, failed to 'correct' yourself, then failed it a second time, then 'corrected' yourself a third time.

File: 1495011422893.jpg (179KB, 619x1221px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 619x1221px

>This thread

Proof americans should be rangebanned, They are so fucking DUMB and FAT

>>17586096
>wahh a few cunts get executed wrongly so we should never execute anyone ever

What's the rate of wrongful execution? One in a thousand? Ten thousand? A million? It it really worth letting mass murderers have a chance at escape because one retard was in the wrong place at the wrong time? Why should we punish any criminals if sometimes we get it wrong?

Fuck you phoneposter

>>17586096
Its about percentages and ratios. How many wrongful executions to correct judgements? Its also inhumane to keep somebody locked in a cage for the next 60 years. If I was faced with being locked in a box for the next five decades or getting killed, I would choose getting killed. Killing is easier on the system and more humane overall.

>>17586115
It's 1 in 25 in the US. Maybe one day you'll get wrongly executed. Maybe the you'll feel empathy.

>>17586123
>It's 1 in 25 in the US.

top kek, provide proof that 1 in 25 people are wrongfully executed you colossal faggot

File: 69e37f3c50a7df868834a5c1ca05a8da.jpg (70KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 736x552px

>>17583794
that is fucking awesome

>>17586117
plus it would make people believe that there are actual consequences to murder besides sitting in a cell, getting 3 meals a day, showers, toilets, clean water, free medical care, etc.

>>17585745
my sides

>>17586130
First link on Google, my dude.
http://m.pnas.org/content/111/20/7230

>>17586123
If I get executed I won't feel empathy. I'll be dead.

>>17586123
I found the study that was referenced from the article you presumably read (the first result in google, repeated down the page)
>>17586166
There is NO evidence in that study. It is all estimations and guesswork. Their assertion is based upon the rate of exonerations in death row, then extrapolated across EVERY EXECUTION EVER in the USA

This is a worthless study, and it only exists to create clickbait articles for you to fawn over in your ridiculous crusade to defend criminals from the consequences of their actions

>>17586166
>>17586177
The discussion at the bottom of the full text also states that they do not believe that the study is accurate, and they cannot prove anything stated above.

TL;DR - it's shit

>>17586158
I know a guy who was in solitary confinment for a long time while serving his 25 year sentence. He went in relatively sane and came out a mental patient who frequently has hallucinations and mental problems. He was essentially locked in a box for a decade and his mind deteriorated to the point to where he can no longer function as a human being. And that was only for 15 years. Imagine 50 or 60 years living like that. Its pure sadism. Anti-death penalty activists know about the effects long term isolation has on people yet they still advocate for life sentencing. These same people would scream "torture!" if it was done at gitmo, but its fine to do here in our prisons. So long as nobody dies of course.

>>17585273
>Say that to any conservative that tried to speak at Berkeley or any other hardcore progressive school in the last 2 years. They literally fucking riot.
I see that you don't understand the first amendment, it protects us from government censorship, private platforms can censor you all they want and you can't do shit about it.

>And then take a look at all the conservative YouTube channels getting defunded from things like Patreon because of "racism" when they merely say things like "protect our borders."
Boo hoo, private companies don't like funding things they disagree with.

>Or how about conservatives getting banned from Twitter for being open about their political views without being "nice" enough.
Twitter is a private company, they don't have to let you use it.

>Oh, and abortion isn't a cute little procedure you can have whenever you feel like it. It really fucks women up, both physically and mentally. Do some research on a website that doesn't cater to liberal propaganda (for once in your life).
And that means they should be illegal? It doesn't affect you at all, let people make their own choice. If you don't like abortion then start pushing contraceptive use and abortions will plummet. The idea that people just won't have sex is completely and totally wrong, yet conservatives are anti-contraceptive and anti-abortion.

>>17586214
Cal Berkley is a public university, you retarded faggot.

>>17586214
>private platforms can censor you all they want and you can't do shit about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California,_Berkeley
The University of California, Berkeley, (also referred to as UC Berkeley, Berkeley, Cal, Cal Berkeley, and California)[7] is a public research university located in Berkeley, California
>PUBLIC
>PUBLIC

First amendment rights apply, ergo free speech is being denied

>>17586214
>Boo hoo, private companies don't like funding things they disagree with.
That's a two way street. Like Christian companies not wanting to provide birth control for their employees.

>>17586214
>I see that you don't understand the first amendment, it protects us from government censorship, private platforms can censor you all they want and you can't do shit about it.
Berkley is a public uni, it's owned by the state, as is subject to all restrictions applied to the state, including maintaining freedom of speech.
>Boo hoo, private companies don't like funding things they disagree with.
However burning bakeries that refuse to bake dick cakes is A-Okay

>>17586226
they chose not to let it happen because they were afraid their overzealous liberal student faggots would go ape shit and start destroying things

I don't agree with the dipshits like that cocksucker milo, but they should be allowed to speak and heard

>>17586185
Really? Care to point it out?

God forbid statistics is actually a real field.

File: aaaliphotos-73.jpg (43KB, 450x327px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 450x327px

>>17586262
>God forbid statistics is actually a real field.
Yeah cause statisticians are so reliable and never make bullshit reports for attention

>>17586262
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/20/7230.full

Scroll down right to the bottom
>estimates
>assumptions
>The most charged question in this area is different: How many innocent defendants have been put to death (6)? We cannot estimate that number directly but we believe it is comparatively low.

Without expecting you to read the entire study (heaven forbid!) I can summarize for you, most of the convicted that are sentenced to execution, but are innocent, are saved by the checks and balances put in place for that very reason. It's highly unlikely that many have been wrongfully executed in the USA, and the few that were, were long before the established checks and balances were put into place.

>>17586273
She won the fucking popular vote you retard. I didn't vote for her or the orange orangutan, but she still won.

I mean some of those trucks look retarded, but GNX? Utes?I'm a liberal and no way in hell I'd hate something that cool.

Also saddened that France and a couple of other countries are doing away with ICE. They better at least have exceptions for sports cars.

>>17586423
there's a chance for ICE cars in their countries in the future. Just convert everything to run on ethanol.
>more environmentally friendly
>more power
It's a win win. I honestly with it was available stateside. The closest we get is E85 and it isn't even available in my state.

>>17586398
in counting there is strength
unfortunately the electoral college doesn't count the same way you do

File: EhBcELk.jpg (64KB, 800x455px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 800x455px

Liberal here. Not trigger; just ashamed of you guys

>>17586461
The electoral college fucks up everything. I say we do away with it and just let the popular vote decide. The people who vote in the electoral college aren't normal citizens. They're rich oligarchs and retired politicians. The fact that twice in my lifetime the electoral college and the popular vote have been at odds, and what the people literally want is ignored just shows how broken our political system is.

>>17586441
It's not exactly friendly for the environment either. You still have to grow a LOT of plants to sustain it. Plus it has a terrible AFR as well as energy density.

Brazil only does it because they can grow sugarcane and at least they get sugar out of it. Literally feeding cars just doesn't make too much sense everywhere else.

I'd say natgas is a better option state side. Better AFR, very plentiful, and burns pretty cleanly. Biggest problem is delivery emissions (very bad) and consistency.

File: image.jpg (92KB, 599x428px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 599x428px

>>17586465
"Not trigger"

lel

>>17586475
what do you think about converting long haul semi trucks to run on cooking oil? We can literally recycle that shit. Have a company that collects used cooking oils from the plentiful restaurants and fast food trashcans, filter it, and deliver it to fueling stations to replace diesel fuel.
Better for the environment, and sustainable.

>>17586472
Except the electoral college is working exactly how it was meant to.
The problem is states rights aren't working how they were meant to.

It really shouldn't have a huge impact on your life who wins the presidency. It should be far more important who wins your governors race and who occupy your state houses.

>>17583976
Knowing how dumb liberals are, sadly there is all possibility that this was genuine.

>>17585701
>Hentia

???

>>17585701
>im not white
suuure you're not
even better, you're probably like spf 50 white

>>17586248
>Berkley is a public uni, it's owned by the state, as is subject to all restrictions applied to the state, including maintaining freedom of speech.
Berkeley students are not employees of the university dipshit.

>However burning bakeries that refuse to bake dick cakes is A-Okay
I never claimed to be against it, try again.

>tell conservatives how stupid they are and they sperg out and pidgeon-hole me into some weird idea of liberalism without knowing anything about me, therefore confirming that they are indeed stupid.

>>17584947
>more conservatives are special snowflakes than liberals.
The_Donald to confirm this

Conservative posters on forums love to use the board rules as a weapon to shut down debates that don't go their way.

>>17585590
Retard, abortion is killing a baby that didn't even have time to do something wrong. Capital punishment is for killing dangerous criminals.

File: heres-the-final-2016-electoral-college-map[1].png (165KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1200x900px

>>17586398
>She won the fucking popular vote you retard.
Since when that does matter?

USA was ser up as and Constitutional Representative Republic and not a Direct Democracy in order to prevent the tyrrany of majority.

System working as intended, just get over it, try harder next time. I bet donating more money to democrats will help.

File: 1469180847515.png (2MB, 1011x917px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1011x917px

I live in California, I'm libertarian because the GOP here has died out and I'm sick of all the fucking liberals here. Go away assholes, you fucked up everything with your bullshit no-funs laws. Then you voted to raise taxes on everything so everything is expensive as fuck.

>>17585861
Literally all I want

And not even the free stuff because I want it, because the government mismanages money criminally.

>>17585969
>be me
>be center-left, and a reasonable guy
>realize I have more of a chance of making the Republican Party work for me if my endgame is to keep guns than the Democrats

I think the car shit is BS though. Nobody is gonna make you throw away your gas guzzler, chances around 2040 when "the switch" reaches it's peak people will do that on their own.

>>17587057
>the tyrrany of majority
As opposed to what, the tyranny of the minority? AKA actual tyranny?

File: one google away.jpg (34KB, 634x150px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 634x150px

>>17587073
You could have just googled
instead you chose to be retarded

>>17585123
Meh. Liberals want to use the government to give more freedom to people. Conservatives want to give freedom to people by giving the people less government.

The problem is that there are hypocritical actions on both sides. Conservatives want to use the government to restrict who you could marry, to restrict what you can do to your body, restrict access to drugs that are by and large much less harmful than done legal ones, and so on.

Liberals restrict things too but it seems to me the regulations they put into place are actually an attempt to make things better for the average citizen. Be it higher higher taxes for the super well off, background checks for guns, financial and environmental regulations to prevent them taking advantage of things for their own gain at the cost of harm to others.

Regulations can be a good thing. It's not an evil word. It helps keep our rivers clean. It helps keep our financial markets stable. They keep the internet open They help so many things. That's not to say there aren't bad regulations in place though. I'm just saying that they can be a good thing for everybody.

>>17585197
>no tiedown towards the front
Should've put it at the rear of the bed.

>>17586051
>Sure, but the numbers don't lie. Abortion has been a god send in keeping us from becoming Brazil-tier. We should encourage it.
Which is funny because the left is always screaming racism, yet they adhere to racist things. If you point it out, they call you racist.

>>17586214
>I see that you don't understand the first amendment, it protects us from government censorship, private platforms can censor you all they want and you can't do shit about it.
Except those "private platforms" get millions of dollars a year in federal money.

>Boo hoo, private companies don't like funding things they disagree with.
>Twitter is a private company, they don't have to let you use it.
Can't wait for net neutrality to end. We'll see how those "private companies" fare when a conservative ISP decides they don't like the direction Twitter is going in.

> If you don't like abortion then start pushing contraceptive use and abortions will plummet.
You mean like they've been doing for decades in schools and yet the abortion rates remain higher in those areas than in areas where they preach abstinence?

>>17586237
>That's a two way street. Like Christian companies not wanting to provide birth control for their employees.
Or cakes for faggots.

>>17587084
>Liberals restrict things too but it seems to me the regulations they put into place are actually an attempt to make things better for the average citizen.
Too bad it doesn't work out.

Look at any 100% liberal-controlled city vs cities that occasionally vote in conservatives. For example Detroit vs. New York City.

I mean literally just go to fucking Detroit.

The left is retarded. They're all about GIVING to people so they don't have to struggle. But that's what being an American is. Life, liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness, not the guarantee in the form of a monthly check courtesy the evil rich people that exploited them.

>>17587476
Giant corporations outsourcing to foreign countries destroyed opportunity here. If we don't bring back our blue collar and even some white collar jobs, we're fucked as a nation.

>>17585674
>implying the uninsured don't just use hospitals as their primary care
>implying a majority of that 23 million aren't illegal immigrants

t. ED employee

File: 494335140.jpg (531KB, 1024x630px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1024x630px

>>17587476
>I mean literally just go to fucking Detroit.
Detroit was destroyed by decades of conservative rule and corporations outsourcing, which completely ruined the local economy. The companies were only able to screw over the local economy because conservatives gave tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations.
The liberals in charge now were handed a literal dumpster fire and are now expected to make to make a utopia. It takes decades to fix what the conservatives ruined there. It's working, but slowly.
Pic related. The factory in Detroit that builds the Alpha chassis cars. One of the few left in the city.

>>17589475
>Detroit was destroyed by decades of conservative rule
>Detroit
>conservative
[citation needed]

>>17589518
He's talking about shit like trade agreements. In reality, libs are partially responsible for them as well since they constantly promote globalism. NAFTA was a Bush/Clinton policy, as was TPP. In reality, nationalism could solve the majority of these problems, but white libs hate themselves, so they'll never push for it. Also, on the subject of regulations. Regulations on cars is one of the reasons why new cars are hideously expensive. All those safety features cost shitloads of money and make new car purchases almost exclusively the domain of the top 10%.

Sage because /o/ is not /pol/.

>>17584947
>Not all liberals are pissy little cunts. more conservatives are special snowflakes than liberals.
The ones that anonymously vandalize property such as your car's bumper sticker are troggered liberals though. That statistical anomaly might be due more to certain minorities being liberals instead of being conservative.

>>17589558
>clinton is now a liberal somehow
no. the man was a centrist with right wing leanings.
If he were a liberal, "Don't ask, Don't tell" never would've been a thing.
Just because he's a democrat doesn't mean he wasn't conservative. Same thing with Bush being a Republican. Every since 1979 when Democrats started taking corporate money, their politic started moving left.
Nowadays, current democrats are the old Republicans. Current republicans are extremist lunatics in an effort to differentiate themselves from democrats, and the only people abiding by what the democrats originally stood for are progressives like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

>>17589657
>their politic started moving left.
*right.

File: ElectoralCollege.jpg (35KB, 371x395px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 371x395px

>>17587057
That state map is less accurate. Breaking things down by county shows how the tyranny of the special interest majority is unbalanced. The purpose of the electoral college was to provide a check against special interest majority effects. The next test will come after 2042 (or so) when the two minorities (hispanic and blacks) become the physical majority. It will be some time after that before they are the voting majority though.

You see that the concentrated social welfare users could dominate the voting and cause the whole country to walk down the path of Detroit if they voted to decrease police spending, decrease local jail sizes, release more convicted minority prisoners and felons, and increase social welfare spending. Detroit had that tyranny of the special interest majority.

>>17584947
>more conservatives are special snowflakes than liberals.

baby boomers dont count as they aren't human

>>17589657
>Nowadays, current democrats are the old Republicans.
I don't recall old republicans calling for open borders and pushing for transgenderism and other social cancer. The culture as whole has been going left socially for over 50 years now. The mainstream left never advocated for that shit prior to the 60s either. As far as Sanders or Warren are concerned, they are playing by the left's old "economic oppression" playbook in a world where identity politics is becoming more and more important.

>>17589697
The anon you're replying to knows that the cities will dominate everything if the electoral college goes away. That's why he is advocating for it's dissolution.

>>17589857
>I don't recall old republicans calling for open borders
Saint Reagan literally did that.
learn your history

>>17589857
>The mainstream left never advocated for that shit prior to the 60s either.
Actually, there were attempts to implement medicare for all-like health plans as far back as the 1920's. This isn't anything new. Every time, the AMA opposed it heavily deriding it as socialist medicine. FDR attempted it a few times.
learn your history

>>17589697
Land doesn't vote in elections, people do.

>>17589857
>The anon you're replying to knows that the cities will dominate everything if the electoral college goes away. That's why he is advocating for it's dissolution.
Yep, he wants black voters and mexican voters in the cities to dominate the states enough to turn the whole country into another welfare Detroit. The people who work will be the actual slaves due to paying taxes to take care of those who don't work. And they'll vote for porous borders so all the old people from other countries can emigrate in for free retirement and health care because their countries have none. Or if they didn't plan for retirement.

Reagan did advocate for open borders. Open to all legal immigrants. He did not advocate removing the border patrol or checkpoints. Open borders supports legal immigration.

>>17589475
Two things you seem to be blissfully unawares about:

1. outsourcing is possible because of shitty trade deals, namely the one signed into law by Bill Clinton making it cheaper to manufacture in Mexico

2. taxes in the big cities, which are required for all those fancy things city-dwellers love (like public transportation and new football stadiums), cause businesses to take their production outside the city.

I live near a small city, and the taxes there are so high for businesses they choose instead to go right outside the city limits in the township next door and set up shop. The city's residents benefit from the jobs, but the city doesn't benefit from the taxes. So instead, they simply raise the taxes on them to compensate.

Which of course causes even the residents to move out of the city. Then you're left with the people too poor or too stupid to leave. And they inevitably vote Democrat. Which is why cities suck dicks.

>>17589657
You're mistaken, anon.

Today's Democrats are indeed yesteryear's Republicans, however there's more to it than that. Progressivism has gotten so bad, there's been a major nationwide backlash against it, which is why Trump is our Emperor now. You don't have to look far to know how stupid the Left is. They're still blaming Russia when half the people who voted for Trump said they'd still prefer Trump over Clinton even if it were true. Why? Because they're stupid? No, because they just can't stand the advance of Progressives.

>Current republicans are extremist lunatics in an effort to differentiate themselves from democrats, and the only people abiding by what the democrats originally stood for are progressives like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

This is simply wrong, in fact it's backwards.

Democrats today are doing everything in their power to distance themselves from Republicans, not the other way around. There are extremists on both sides, of course, but there aren't any rioting Republicans in the streets.

And Democrats "originally" stood for racism, slavery, and making money on cotton plantations.

....so yeah I guess they are 2/3 still doing what they've been doing. Huh.

>>17590827
Again. Clinton is not a proper democrat. The a conservative. Republican lite if you will. Just because there's a D next to his name doesn't mean he's liberal or progressive.
2: That's why you tax imported shit at a higher level.

>>17590892
No, anon. Clinton most certainly WAS a Democrat, at least at the time. This is why a lot of today's Democrat voters are switching to Republican (like I did). 20 years ago Clinton could say "protect our borders" and everyone would nod and agree, on BOTH sides.

In fact, Clinton was so much a Democrat that his initial 2 years in office was hated so much by the American people they voted an all-Republican Congress into power in '94. He still won the popular vote in '96, which parallels Obama.

>2: That's why you tax imported shit at a higher level.

Do you know what trade deals are, anon? You CAN'T.

>>17590861
Again. You morons assume that democrats = progressives
No it fucking doesn't. Do you know WHY the democrats focus on Russia so much? Because it allows them to stand against Trump without stating policy substance which would piss off their corporate donors.
Democrats are NOT progressives. get that through your fucking head.
REAL progressives like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have been bitching there's too much Russia coverage and that the democrats have no message people can get behind.
Progressives are just as pissed at democrats as they are with republicans. Progressives are not democrats.

>>17590915
holy shit. it's like talking to a WALL. You do not get it.
Progressives are NOT democrats and THAT is WHY people are pissed. Trump got elected because he ran on a somewhat progressive, populist platform that resonated with people. People want progressivism. They chose Trump because he seemed more populist than Hilary. he's not because he's a fucking lier, but that is why he got elected.

>>17590938
Woah! Calm down, scooter. Don't melt on me, bruh.

I know exactly what the difference is between a progressive and non-progressive, and I know not all Democrats are progressives.

In fact, re-reading what I wrote (I wrote both of the things you're responding to) I never once said they're the same thing. So chill out before you thaw.

And no, people do NOT want progressivism. Maybe YOUR people want it, but mine don't. We've had enough "progress" with the butch bull dykes throwing period blood on people and the rabid muslim women screaming in our faces that they hate America while they bitch about being deported.

Progress.

We chose Trump simply because he's not Hillary. Sure, he said some nice things about jobs and shit, which is why his hardcore fan base likes him, but centrists like me don't give a fuck about Trump's promises. We know he won't keep them. It's the promises Hillary made that scare us.

How you can call half your country deplorable, racist, sexist, etc. and then be confused when you lose their vote is a lesson in stupidity and arrogance.

Which is why we say we have a smug liberal problem in the US. "Coz I went tuh collage! I hate raceism!"

>>17590966
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMlUJrdCCuc
>that moment when you find out you're a minority

>>17591019
Now ask those same people if they're willing to pay twice as much in taxes and see how that goes.

If medical coverage really wants to reign-in all those loose un-covered people, you can simply change tort laws.

Make it harder for people to sue doctors because they missed something and you'll free up billions of dollars a year in useless tests.

Seriously, go to an ER and say "I have this weird pain in my chest" and enjoy the next 14 hours of expensive tests.

>>17589895
Regan didn't want to import the entirety of Mexico, Africa, and the middle east into the west and force natives to acclimate to their views like the modern left does. Don't conflate legal immigration with opening the floodgates to everyone who can walk across.

>>17590054
I didn't deny that. I was talking about open borders and transgenderism. Learn to read.

>>17591041
>Now ask those same people if they're willing to pay twice as much in taxes and see how that goes.
well no shit. That's why you tax the wealthy to fund it.

>>17591063
Who is the "wealthy" and what's stopping them from leaving? And why should I try to get wealthy if its just going to go pay for services I never use? Why can't I just do the bare minimum to get by while your policies pay for my problems?

Post Trump/GOP the US is going to swing hard left. Doubly so once the Millennials start seriously getting involved in politics.

>>17591063
The problem with using other people's money is you eventually run out.

Lets first define "wealthy." I'm assuming the top 1%, since that's what you nutjobs always go for.

The wealthy in America already pay almost half the taxes in the country. At what point does your socialist greed end?

>>17591076
It'll undoubtedly swing left, as it has been for the last... since the country began. I highly doubt it'll swing "hard left." There's no way in hell all the people voting for Trump suddenly want to go right back into Obama-style national suicide. That's just wishful thinking, lefty-kun.

>>17591087
>At what point does your socialist greed end?
When a small handful of people don't own as much wealth as everyone else put together and then some.

>>17591161
So you're a socialist. Okay, explaining why that's a bad idea is an entire thread in itself.

Lets just point to every socialist country that has ever existed: USSR, PRC (China), DPRK (North Korea), Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Cuba.

Of those, the USSR and Cambodia failed. PRC and Vietnam have adopted Capitalism and continue to exist as a one-party state ruled by so-called socialists (which just means they like to get their palms greased since they can't legally make more money). Laos, Cuba, and the DPRK continue to exist with the worst poverty in their respective regions.

In every instance of socialism, hundreds of thousands to millions of people died. Not always through firing squads and death camps, though many tens of millions did. In China, for example, Mao went into exile after his incompetence led to several tens of millions of people starving to death and the country ended up with dickloads of useless steel its workers had been forced to make after they were kicked off farms their families owned for generations since the government owns all property.

And you may be thinking "well that can't happen here, we're better than that!"

It's already "okay" to punch a Nazi. Just imagine what it'll be like once the progressives win and it's okay to "kill a Nazi." Death camps? Good! Get rid of those Nazi fuckers! And who's a Nazi? I dunno, anyone I don't like!

>>17591228
Woops, I meant to say "major" Communist countries when I said "every socialist country that has ever existed."

There are a bunch that have existed in the past, for varying lengths of time, and all of them have failed. Every single one.

The only remaining socialist countries are China, North Korea, Vietnam, Laos, and Cuba.

All of them are a shithole except China, which is reaping the benefits of capitalism and expertly crafted trade deals that take advantage of the West.

>>17591228
>>17591259
>conveniently leaves out countries with socialist programs like single-payer healthcare kike Canada, Poland, Finland, and Sweden

Here's a brainwave for ya. Socialist does NOT mean communist. They're separate things.
woah.

>>17591327
Anon, you're being deceived.

Canada, Poland, Findland, and Sweden all have 2 things in common.

1. They're second-rate, backwater nations with a few dozen million inhabitants at best.
2. They're all capitalist countries.

You have no idea what real socialism is, do you? I know the difference between socialism and communism. I can promise you there has never been a communist country. If you support socialism, you supported the USSR, you supported China and Vietnam before they adopted capitalism, you support North Korea and Cuba. They're socialist countries.

I'm not trying to argue with you anon, do some research.

Like I said earlier, we can make an entire thread about this.

So stop the snarky "I'm smarter than you, nerd!" comments because you look like a dumbass. You seriously don't know what you're getting yourself into. I hate, absolutely HATE when people say "wake up, sheeple" but it really does apply here. Socialism is for lazy people that don't want to work. It's basically an infomercial promising you will lose 50 pounds instantly by taking this magic pill!!

Here's a "brainwave"(?) for you: Hitler was a socialist.

>>17591366
>wanting some socialist programs automatically means you're a communist
it doesn't work like that anon. good ideas can come from anywhere. In fact, single payer healthcare is an idea that predates communism.

>>17591398
Socialism predates communism. Communism, Marxism in particular, was written in defiance of socialism. Marx thought socialism didn't go far enough. True Communism is an absolute nightmare without the right conditions. **

You're right, good ideas do come from anywhere. Single-payer healthcare is not one of them. I can't speak on the other countries, but I can on Canada.

Canadians pay FAR more taxes than we Americans do. Sure, the top 1% of Americans pay 'only' 42% of the income taxes in the country, but the bottom 40% pay almost nothing. That's already almost socialist (but the greed continues). In Canada, your average person working can expect to pay 35-45% of their wages. It's estimated Canadians, on average, pay $10k a year for their healthcare. Think about that, if you never go to the doctor you're paying $10k a year so someone else can.

Canadians also benefit greatly from the US in another way: the US is making all the new medicines.

Canadians pay almost nothing for pills simply because they don't have any companies that develop them. There's no research and development costs. They just wait for a generic version to become available or for companies to try to soak up profits as much as possible and reduce the price in foreign countries.

Then, when they wait over 2 months to see a foot specialist for their heel spur, they don't complain. 'Cuz it's "free!"

>>17591450
>True Communism is an absolute nightmare without the right conditions. **

Now to clarify what I meant here.

I'm not against Communism. Not at all, really. One day the entire world will be communist.

When we have robots that literally do EVERYTHING for us.

Until then, keep working and earning money while benefiting from Capitalism. Everything that you have that makes your life easier/safer/more rewarding is a result of capitalism. Don't throw it off because you're stupid and lazy.

One day, when robots are our slaves, we humans will be free to sit around and lounge in the glory of God's creations without fear or worry in any way.

Until then (hundreds of years in the future, anon), get a fucking job you lazy asshole.

>>17588508
>If we don't bring back our blue collar and even some white collar jobs, we're fucked as a nation.
It was your liberal Clinton that signed the treaty to make give Most Favored Nation trading status to China. That is what opened up the economic boom for China, allowed foreign companies to move their manufacturing divisions to China, and allowed China to open up USA branches of companies that claim "Made in USA" despite all the parts being from China. Among other thing those chinese companies also put the usa companies with living wages out of business.

>>17591585
>liberal Clinton
Clinton isn't liberal you fucktard. How many times does it have to be repeated? He's a conservative.

>>17585884
>Jap truck
>dem flags

>>17587063
$14,000 to paint the crosswalk gay?.....wow

>>17591596
Stop it.

Or prove it.

You're just saying things. They're not even true. Just stop.

I mean, if Clinton was a conservative then every Democrat before him was too.

But you'll ignore this post and just keep saying "Clinton was a conservative you fucktard" without proof.

Typical leftist. Blind to facts, ignorant to reason.

>>17591694
Welcome to socialist America, where libtards can't count or use money.

>>17591702
>I mean, if Clinton was a conservative then every Democrat before him was too.
they have been. ever since 1979

>Stop it
>Or prove it.
>You're just saying this. They're not even true. Just stop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States
learn to read faggot. it's true.

>>17591694
Yep. My city spends that much on fucking shit like that too. Don't fix the potholes or anything, I love replacing my control arms every year.

>>17591747
All major cities do that. Mine has these artsy statues that look sorta like ebola and can't be seen when it floods because they're in a ravine.

>>17584947
>More conservatives are special snowflakes than liberals
>Libcucks actually believe this
Shouldn't you be prepping the bull, faggot?

>>17591779
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BV41WsIa290&t=0s

File: chrome_2017-07-24_00-05-25.png (21KB, 815x132px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 815x132px

>>17591728
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States

>learn to read faggot. it's true.
What does this have to do with Clinton supposedly not being a Democrat?

Jesus Christ can you read?

>they have been. ever since 1979
So your argument is that, in America, which is becoming more and more liberal with every passing second, the liberals have become conservative and the conservatives are simply Nazis waiting in the wings and true European-style liberalism (i.e. communism) will never take root in America.

God I hope that's true. God bless the Dimocrats if that's true. (though it's blatantly not and is obviously propaganda)

>>17591758
Best part is, those faggy nondescript "art" statutes are actually a part of real-life communist agendas.

Just google "agenda 45"

http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm

>>17591819
>What does this have to do with Clinton supposedly not being a Democrat?
Being a democrat has NOTHING to do with being liberal
>Jesus Christ can you read?
Can you, it was stated earlier. In 1979, Democrats started taking corporate money. This means they were accountable to their donors. Their donors wanted conservative policies. As a result, the average democrat has been moving farther right ever since. Current democrats are essentially old republicans. Current republicans are the religious bigots and nutcases we used to write off as crazy and not worth paying attention to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppSd0-qxdiA

Being conservative doesn't mean you're automatically Republican, and being liberal doesn't automatically mean you're Democrat

>>17591852
So you're saying no one is liberal or conservative anymore? It's all just a jumble!

The Democrats, united solely by their namesake, are uniting against Trump because they're old Republicans and people like Paul Ryan are simply religious bigots and nutcases.

Btw, your kind keeps saying "impeach Trump" but that will end up with an ACTUAL conservative in the White House. I wonder if your dipshit newscorps even realize that. Probably not, since they're retarded.

>Being conservative doesn't mean you're automatically Republican, and being liberal doesn't automatically mean you're Democrat.

Ralph Nader is a fucking has-been. Fuck that washed-up scrub.

Dems started taking corporate money... from other Dems. You think Warren Buffet isn't a socialist? That dumb fuck is advocating for blacks conquering whites and rich people paying for the poor. He's a literal cuck, same as you.

This is true. Since most Democrats are actually conservatives. I just find myself disagreeing with the Republican side of things. We're all racist, afterall, deplorables and sexists, etc.

>>17591879
>So you're saying no one is liberal or conservative anymore?
No. I'm saying it varies person to person.
>It's all just a jumble!
pretty much. This is why you have to look at the POLICIES your politicians support and weigh how it would affect your life. You don't vote based on a messages. Messages can be twisted.

>Btw, your kind keeps saying "impeach Trump"
I never saidi to impeach him. I'm actually against it if only because Mike Pence is SO MUCH WORSE.
>your dipshit newscorps
wat? I get my news online from independent media.

>Ralph Nader is a fucking has-been
agreed. That doesn't make what he said any less true. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Dems took corporate money from corporations with an agenda to push. COrporations don't care which party is which, just which one will push their agenda.
Example: most of the corporate donors for Hilary Clinton's 2016 campaign are now openly supporting Donald Trump. Because he's in office and has a higher chance of pushing their agenda through.

>We're all racist, afterall, deplorables and sexists, etc.
to some degree yes. I grew up in a primarily black neighborhood. Did I know ome decent blacks? Yes, but they were few and far between. Most blacks are ghetto trash. There's a difference, in my mind, between blacks and niggers. I haven't had enough experience with other minorities to form an opinion but stereotypes come from somewhere, and there's always an element of truth.
But I realized society is ALWAYS going to have undesirable types like that. It's a guarantee. And almost any policy that helps you ill also help them. it's a double edges sword.

I would prefer Trump stay in office for entertainment value and because he's safer than Pence. Hopefully non-corporate politicians (those who refuse to take corporate money) will win in 2018 and helping push proper policies like higher wages, single-payer healthcare and government funded college education.
Look into Brand New Congress, and Justice Democrats

>>17585158
liberal is literally amerilard for progressive, it has nothing to do with classic liberalism which they call libertarianism

>>17591934
I respect you, anon.

You're wrong on a lot of things and your views are very clearly skewed towards stupidity but at least you're not a typical rightist/leftist.

You're wrong about the parties being jumbled. The left is the left, they generally push the blue button on ballots and don't give a fuck about results, and the same of the right.

"Independent media" is subjective as fuck. I mean, The Young Turks might as well be CNN. The Daily Wire might as well be Fox News with some jabs at Trump thrown in for "objectivity."

As a final note, since I'm drunk as fuck and I'm going to bed now, I agree with a bipartisan non-corporate Congress. I think today's Republican-controlled Congress is just a way for those with deep pockets to make the impact they want.

Personally, I think tort-reform is a great way to make health care cheaper. But the people who oppose that will have a hand on their dick. And that hand belongs to tort lawyers.

>>17591963
Classic liberals are more and more becoming Republicans. Just watch Dave Rubin on YouTube. Progressives are hated by almost everyone outside of college and dipshits on welfare.

>>17585234
>Like when conservatives say gay marriage should be illegal because of the bible. Or that abortion should be illegal because the bible says so. That's religion-based law that can't be allowed.
Nah, we want that stuff banned because it leads to societal decay. You don't have to believe in the old man from the sky to see how fucked up they are.

File: you can't.png (261KB, 3840x2158px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 3840x2158px

>>17591974
>Nah, we want that stuff banned because it leads to societal decay
post proof.
>pro tip: You can't

>>17591971
>Classic liberals are more and more becoming Republicans
classic liberals always voted republican when they voted one of the two big parties lol
classic liberalism and conservatism align because fiscal conservatism is liberal

>>17591934
>Look into Brand New Congress
Holy shit. Some of their candidates are running on the Republican ticket!

>>17591983
>classic liberals always voted republican when they voted one of the two big parties lol
That's because Republicans WERE the liberals.

>classic liberalism and conservatism align because fiscal conservatism is liberal

Only in today's terms. 100 years ago, almost all liberals were Republicans, almost all conservatives were Democrats.

Progressivism is where people get screwed up. People think FDR was a liberal progressive, but his policies were so close to Hitler's Time Magazine had a hard time deciding which leader would be on the cover of their magazine. (it ended up being Hitler, a socialist progressive)

But Teddy Roosevelt was also a progressive. And he was a conservative. And a Republican (which then, was liberal). It's all screwy.

But here's a breakdown:
1900: progressives = bad unless you belong to a union.
1950: progressives = bad unless you're black.
2000: progressives = bad unless you're not white.

>>17592006
Communism creeps into everything, slowly, non-descript.

Must be nice, being able to influence everything based on stupidity and ignorance rather than facts and logic.

I wish capitalism had that mystical force. Too bad the desire to go out and make money is hampered entirely by food stamps.

>>17592018
Your point is moot because you're arguing semantics. Progressive/liberal just means cultural marxist nowadays

>>17592023
I mean if you take it that way.

Progressives have ALWAYS fought for socialism (not Marxism, you Commie fuck). Liberals have always fought for freedom, which socialism (and w/e form of socialism you practice) inhibit.

Progressives are not liberals. They're on the same side now, in public and in general, but they're not the same thing. There have been many progressive conservatives that were legit conservatives.

Today's insane hardcore Left is a product of people not beating their children. Spoiled fucking cunts are going to destroy the world and people like you are explaining away their actions as reasonable.

Keep supporting Europe. They're going to be extinct as a race in 100 years. But with the new Islamic Europe we'll surely be allies.

Right?

I mean, right? Surely they can't be that stup-

God bless Poland.

File: 45e8a8403ebc8a4ba04abd564f08a671f4600f66744bf0409f4d780c7c725bc5.jpg (84KB, 941x794px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 941x794px

>this whole thread

just rangeban americans, please

>>17592049
"liberals" today don't fight for freedom

>>17591981
Just a token of what comes with faggotry
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/drug-use-seven-times-higher-among-gays-8165971.html

>>17592127
this proves nothing except that strict regulations have to be placed on dance clubs in general

>>17592145
>this proves nothing
lel stay in denial
faggots are worthless hedonists selected by nature to stay out of the genetic pool because they're defective

>>17592151
>asked for proof
>shows circumstantial evidence easily laid at the feet of the clubbing scene
>gets called out on it
>lel stay in denial
wew. Found the conservative snowflake

File: IMG_20170719_193112.jpg (1MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3120x4160px

>>17589697
>half US pop. lives in these countries

>>17592160
it's like you haven't met any faggots IRL
get GRIDS, faggot
https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm

File: i__m_just_here_to_gay_up_by_danichanxd-d4e5pdl.png (51KB, 550x400px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 550x400px

>>17592175
>it's like you haven't met any faggots IRL
Looks like you haven't either.
I AM a faggot.

>>17584930
Sauce on this chick?

File: 1500775612502.jpg (151KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 960x960px

>>17592191
no

>>17592181
Then you should know better, faggot

File: gjbcilv3Aqx2wMK9W676Gb9OSg.jpg (579KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 1000x1500px

>>17592200
hnnnnnnngggggg high test

File: lamson_6_2_562916.jpg (115KB, 555x780px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 555x780px

>>17583794

File: 1mpg.jpg (56KB, 550x342px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 550x342px

>>17583794

>>17584947

>he doesn't know about how comedians exclusively make fun of conservatives because they're the only ones who can take a joke and laugh at themselves

>>17585824

>killing an unborn child
>equivalent to killing an adult criminal

Liberal spotted.

File: Drags01.jpg (571KB, 900x598px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 900x598px

>your coal is carcinogenic!
>munches on a charbroiled burger

>>17592364
>because they're the only ones who can take a joke and laugh at themselves
I call bullshit
Trump literally sued someone for calling him an orangatan
Ann Coulter has been bitching non-stop because Delta airlines fucked up on seating arrangements...

>>17586096
Just make the death penalty only for repeat offenders of the worst crimes.

>>17586472
The popular vote is bullshit because of winner takes it all states. If it didn't exist republicans would bother voting in Commiefornia

File: 1448251387339.jpg (30KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x480px

>>17584947
Then how about this?
>literally damages people

>>17592447
we need more pop ups
fuck pedestrian safety standards. Just punish the drive with years in jail for manslaughter. If it's a Miata, they'll enjoy prison. Plenty of quality time with Bubba

File: 1400823886392.jpg (336KB, 818x539px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 818x539px

>>17592375
>so much torks that the entire thing twist like a dying snake
Thats some display of powa.

>>17592382
Trump wasn't a conservative until like yesterday and I highly doubt he is one now. You keep bringing up this shit about Trump suing like it matters or means anything.

Ann Coulter was wronged by an airline. That has nothing to do with comedic value.

>>17592160
>Found the conservative snowflake

No matter how much you push this, it won't be a thing. Snowflakes are sensitive emotional crybabies that need the world to bend to their psychological problems.

>>17592181
>I AM a faggot.

No you're not. You've never met a gay person. They're legit the most annoying people in the world. There's a reason they've been hated throughout history. No one cares who you fuck, but when you do it by annoying everyone around you people are going to get pissed.

>>17585861
This exactly. Free education over anything. Id pay higher taxes for just the opportunity for younger adults to get what should be a benchmark of education in our day and age without owing 40k to a bank for 15 years. The same I'd say for healthcare. Medical and pharmaceutical bills are the biggest rape in the country to affect all citizens.

/pol/ has the biggest victim complex my fuck.

>Liberal here, I don't give a fuck
>WOW HOLY SHIT LIBERALS ARE SNOWFLAKES

sage and report /pol/ threads

>>17593368
>No you're not. You've never met a gay person. They're legit the most annoying people in the world. There's a reason they've been hated throughout history. No one cares who you fuck, but when you do it by annoying everyone around you people are going to get pissed.
anon, you're talking to alphonse
he takes it up the ass, he's met other faggots
what he's doing is just fag taqqiya

>>17593419
60% of people don't need college though, anon.

Why should I pay for the elite to go to school? You want to be educated so you can get a job making $50k a year, invest $50k. Why is this hard for commies?

File: 7055.jpg (144KB, 800x489px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 800x489px

Am I doing it right?

>>17584947
>all these replies
cuckservatives confirmed to be snowflakes

>>17593538
No, that abomination triggers anyone with functioning eyes

>>17592191
Shamone Jardim

File: IMG_1607.jpg (136KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1280x720px

2 stroke dirtbikes and dirtbikes in general. As the years go on public areas get more and more restrictive. It's mostly for wildlife conservation because when I see a tortoise my first instinct is to run it the fuck over

>>17594313
>As the years go on public areas get more and more restrictive.
And for good reason. Their riders throw trash all over the place like in my area. My neighborhood borders a public area and those riders sometimes ride across someone's private yard to get to the public road. Because the bikes are loud, the homeowner comes out and the bikers taunted the homeowner on his own property and then rode off.

Sure, it takes a certain type of personality to own a dirt bike and ride it around. And that type of personality may even be the type to taunt homeowners. But it is certainly bad public relations to go through private property.

>>17593368
>They're legit the most annoying people in the world.
When they have a chip on their shoulder and then hide behind anti-discrimination laws, that's when they are quite annoying.

File: chess.png (54KB, 1077x539px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1077x539px

>>17586398

File: DotaSS2.png (670KB, 736x728px) Image search: [Google]

670KB, 736x728px

>>17583794
not all of us liberals say "triggered" you fucking fascist pig

leave it to this alt-right NAZI site to post shit like this in unrelated boards

going back to 2ch antifa where people actually use SENSE and LOGIC

>mfw facsits post on unrealted boards

>>17584947
gross

>>17584930
cum*

File: 1362564685449.jpg (74KB, 686x582px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 686x582px

>>17596794
You're not a progressive, anon. You made a few mistakes.

1. you spelled well. Progressives, college education and all, can't spell for shit.

2. you used the words "sense" and "logic." They don't exist to Progressives so why would they use them?

3. no one in antifa would post a face reaction without covering it for fear of being doxxed by the fascist pigs in blue.

>>17596822
>3. no one in antifa would post a face reaction without covering it for fear of being doxxed by the fascist pigs in blue.
anon, that's fucking brad pitt

File: 001f20758bc525752c09a8fcc9deeb28.jpg (391KB, 964x768px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 964x768px

>>17583794

>>17596868
>brad Pitt.
Hey. dumbass. No it isn't. That's an EDM music artist by the stage name of BassHunter. Not the guy who posted the image, but I've been listening to his music for years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTsaS1Tm-Ic

>>17597131
Cunningham's Law
>"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer."

>>17597131
>>17597231
You know I was trolling >>17596794 this guy with this post >>17596822 and this anon >>17596868 was (what I assume) continuing the joke.

If not, fuck it. I blame Obama.

File: thanks trump.png (224KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 500x375px

>>17597260
Thanks Trump

File: 1390092388364.png (249KB, 555x828px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 555x828px

>>17597231
>i'm not a sperg with face blindness i swear guise!

>>17597260
I'm both >>17597231 and >>17596868 and yes I was aware you were trolling :^)

>>17597271
Weak, bro.

I was reading something just the other day about how the Left can't meme. And it's true, they (you) seriously suck at it.

This, anon. This is how you fucking meme.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikryErBt4Z8

File: trump card.png (432KB, 610x457px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 610x457px

>>17597306

>>17589475
>Detroit was destroyed by decades of conservative rule
FALSE. You boldly lie in the face of huge amounts of documentation as well as media stories. Minority voters placed their candidates onto the city council. Eventually, the black votes dominated all the council voting for city policies.

One of the changes was to reduce prosecution of blacks due to statistics showing a highly disproportionate number of blacks were caught committing crimes. Various other tax laws were changed along with social services due to the blacks controlling the political votes.

The years of "crime waves", social unrest, and arson sprees where the perpetrators were black and not caught created a lot of bad publicity. The city council tried to get the news to hush up about it citing racism. That only made the part of the populatio that paid taxes more irate and they left crime ridden Detroit and moved far away to HOA suburb cities. So, the prosperity is still there but moved out to the suburbs. The Detroit city proper remains almost 80% black and generates much of its revenue from social welfare income from both the state and federal government.

One prior dashcam thread showed how casual the current blacks are about crime. A black lady parks to go shopping. But on her way in from the parking lot, she checks car doors to see which ones are open so she can loot those cars. I wonder if she is shoplifting in the store because she showed on camera that she has a larcenous nature.

>>17585892
no she didnt illegal votes didnt count trump won it all

>>17586398
no she didnt

File: billboardx-large.jpg (35KB, 640x434px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x434px

>>17598122
>>17598114

>>17589475
>Detroit was destroyed by decades of conservative rule

some one listens to msm to much, I suggest you go learn what really happened in detroit,

File: 1499338356248.png (221KB, 1202x1033px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1202x1033px

>>17596794
no arguing with fucking liberals they just are to stupid, just be prepared to kill em all when day of the rope comes.

File: zimbabwe_BLM_result.jpg (197KB, 937x552px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 937x552px

>>17589475
If Detroit was a country, it would have been like Zimbabwe.

What sucked was how crass the black politicians were about endowments and donations. The city possessed many donations which were made with conditions that they would not be sold off. If the city didn't want them they can return them. The black politicians wanted to just ignore the terms and sell off the artworks and properties to generate funds for the city. And then ignore the cries of injustice from the donors since the property or assets are now gone and sold off. If the donors want it, they can go buy it back from the new owners. That is so crass. And what is expected of those black politicians during the Detroit bankruptcy hearings.

They're just like Zimbabwe for honor and integrity.

File: comparisonZimbabwe.jpg (281KB, 2465x795px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 2465x795px

When blacks implemented equality in zimbabwe, they sure went whole hog.

>>17598291
niggers btfo

File: GTA5-weed-smoking-grand-theft-auto-5-gta-5.jpg (52KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x500px

>>17598304
reported for racism

File: 1486446326803.jpg (23KB, 333x333px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 333x333px

>>17597110

>>17586472
Yes, please let seattle make the law for spokane. Please let san francisco make the law for arcata. Please let the big apple lord over jamestown. The majority of people should control the entire country even though they're all concentrated in a few parts of it instead of equally distributed.

>>17597110
>highways trigger libtards
how? I've never tried triggering them with that

Just remember guys, the world is shit and it's your fault because you're white.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-bader-resegregation-los-angeles-20160401-story.html

>>17599152
>the world is shit and it's your fault because you're white.
That's one of the problems about anti-discrimination laws. Many people are mentally weak, and such laws allow them to lean on it as a substitute for actual effort. It's easy for those types of personalities to regress into feeling sorry for themselves when they can depend on such a law like a drug.

As a result, they do use that law like a drug. Whenever there is a setback in their lives, they don't blame poor decision making, slacking off, education, bad luck, a lack of effort, or market evolutionary forces. They use the anti-racism law as their hammer. Every problem looks like a nail when the only tool they will use is a hammer. Because there is almost no penalty for treating every problem as a nail to be hammered down, vast numbers of people have learned to only use a hammer to deal with problems.

File: 1988_240_wagon_445_w.jpg (140KB, 445x297px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 445x297px

>>17583794
Liberal here, I don't care.

I actually think it's pretty funny when people do shit like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYPMbLO4pAY

>>17601236
choo choo bitch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yN21hW42kzc

>>17585852
>>17585936

I bought a 77' El Camino to haul shit when i need and otherwise daily during summer, pretty nice once you change suspension a bit.

>>17584930
god fucking dammit

>>17598114
Hillary won the popular vote. No amount of mental gymnastics will change this fact.

>>17602602
>Hillary won the popular vote.
Hillary's constituency has the great majority of the social welfare cases. She also has votes from the non felon criminals. If that is what you call popular, then so be it.

>>17602677
still more votes.
stay mad Trumpcuck

>>17602677
>non felon criminals
okay? you can get arrested and charged for smoking fucking plants in this country. so fucking what?

File: 1313191799921.jpg (142KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 500x333px

>>17585210
>>17585884

I've never understood this. That's not the actual confederate flag, it's one of several battle standards they used. It's also not a sign of freedom or a proud nation, it's the icon of traitors and mutineers.

Also this image tends to trigger liberals a bunch.

>>17603032
>it's the icon of traitors and mutineers.
spoken like a true redcoat

>>17603032
for fucks sake all the cyclists in my neighborhood never stop at stop signs
speed limit I could care less about, because cars go over it all the time as well, but they fly through stop signs like complete retards

>>17603072
anon, I'm pretty sure he's complaining that they're 2slow4u

>>17603072
>for fucks sake all the cyclists in my neighborhood never stop at stop signs
I almost hit a bicyclist last week and of course it would be my fault since I assume he'd lie like fuck since he is black and I'm white. The light was green and I was making a right turn. It is "Don't Walk" and there are no bicycles on the roadway in my mirror. I am turning right and I see a flashy blur and I instinctively jam my brakes. The biker rode fast on the sidewalk and zoomed off the sidewalk through the pedestrian crossing without stopping or slowing. Pretty unexpected.

What is with these people and their thought process?