It was terrible. maybe 20% driving at most and only 5 minutes of WRX and it want event a real WRX most of the time
>>17580674
what did you expect fool! you can always judge a movie by it's trailer
>>17580674
OP here, ok looked into a bit more and i guess they were actually STI's and one was converted to rwd for filming the interior shots. still wish there was more after the first 5 mins
>>17580692
the trailer was pretty much all of the driving content
>>17580700
it still looked like a shitty movie
>>17580708
It's actually really good. The film managed 100% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Drive was mostly action and fight scenes.
>>17580737
>rotten jewmatoes
>>17580737
yeah, rotten tomatoes used to be quite accurate for movie ratings but i feel like its fallen off
>>17580739
Is there a movie called "Fight" thats 80% driving?
>>17580674
>It was terrible because the getaway driver had a variety of inconspicuous vehicles instead of using the same bright red performance rally car for every job.
If you want retarded shit with car porn why don't you just watch Fast 5?
>>17580674
Why did you waste your money on that shit? It only encourages them to make more crap like that.
>>17580739
I tried watching that. It was 90% autism, then I got bored and never went back to it.
>>17580674
Story was bland. Sound design was the best part. Cinematography was good.
>>17581313
You don't belong here my man
>>17580674
The movie itself was quite good, though I wouldn't consider it an /o/ movie.
Here's the full intro scene. For your convenience ;-)
https://youtu.be/6XMuUVw7TOM
>>17580855
>>17581727
Thanks. I don't have to watch this garbage now.
>>17581602
This, if anyway more of a music movie than car movie, entertaining
>>17580674
It's a great film. If you're that much of a slut for a particular model of car just watch fucking adverts.
>>17581727
Is this literally the only time he drives a WRX?
>>17580855
almost
>>17584494
Yes, it's kinda an action musical in a way. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Best movie I've seen in theater for AGES. Not a car movie though, sorry if you thought it was OP.
>>17580756
Well that's honestly just your confirmation bias. You agree with it less that means it must be less accurate
>>17580737
>The film managed 100% on Rotten Tomatoes
Doesn't that simply mean that every critic gave it favorable reviews? It's not like they all individually gave it 10/10. Their rating system is kind of misleading.
>>17580674
>and it want event a real WRX most of the time
What?
>>17580674
>Impreza
>all of the engine foleys are from a Skyline
>said foleys are just generic revving when the car is clearly under acceleration
It was very cringy. Edgar Wright is a good director, but he doesn't know how cars work.